++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This is what can happen when you work for a buffoon and you are also incompetent:
Jen Psaki is an unfortunate one that has to field questions for a man that is slowly going crazy. Biden is unpredictable and makes statements without thinking things through.
It is next to impossible for Psaki to provide any intelligent answers to people asking the questions.
Kayleigh McEnany Weighs in to Explain Why Psaki is Stuck!
Fighting for Freedom,
Chuck Little
Joe Biden is proving to be a significant pain as the president of the United States. He has removed every protective barrier that Donald Trump put in place during his first four-year term. And now that things are going wild, people are asking questions about why he is doing whatever it is he is doing.
Jen Psaki is an unfortunate one that has to field questions for a man that is slowly going crazy. Biden is unpredictable and makes statements without thinking things through. It is next to impossible for Psaki to provide any intelligent answers to people asking the questions.
One would think that the way Biden’s staff shields him from taking questions would help Psaki, but it really does no good for her. In fact, the way she handles the situation is absolutely terrible. She uses a “circle back” approach to giving answers, which is not the best way to respond to people. But it would be an effective way to cover up for bumbling Biden.
Kayleigh McEnany was the former White House, press secretary. She did a fantastic job handling the pushing reporters and giving top-notch answers to any question that was thrown her way. She was always prepared and did her research into the various jobs that certain people did around the White House.
Jen Psaki has already shown her ignorance by not knowing what every department handles in the White House. There was a time when Psaki and others did not know anything about the military’s Space Force part. To cover that ignorant moment, they all joked about that something happens there.
But McEnany didn’t dig too much into Psaki. She went after Biden more than anything else. Biden provides zero details about what his policies and regulations are about.
McEnany stated that Donald Trump was very open about what was happening. She always had the information she needed to provide answers and give details about specific topics.
She noted that “I always knew where my boss stood. Unlike other press secretaries who maybe didn’t have walk-in privileges, I could walk in at any time … I always knew where his head was at, so I didn’t have to a ton of circling back because President Trump gave a lot of access to me.”
Which is more than what Psaki can say about Joe Biden. He cannot remember what day of the week it is, let alone what details he needs to provide for Psaki to do her job.
The great thing about the Trump Administration is, as McEnany states, that they would do “hours and hours of research beforehand, days sometimes.” Trump worked with his team to make sure they were well-prepared.
Jen Psaki’s faults come to the surface at this moment because she is a person that lacks the ability to research things out well. Her idea of a briefing is to shoot from the hip and hope that she can answer that will keep the reporters off her back.
Joe Biden loves to stay in his Oval Office and hide from the press and from the rest of America. Donald Trump took the microphone and spoke to the press to keep the country informed of what was really happening in America.
McEnany points out that Biden “Hide in the basement, don’t talk to the American people … That’s what President Trump offered. He gave transparency. He was always willing to take questions, always willing to go to the podium, always willing to stop on his way to the helicopter. Transparency is what he offered, and Joe Biden vowed transparency. Now he’s set a 100-year record for not going to the podium.”
Psaki is forced to take to the podium, never prepared for the task she was hired to do. Biden is a lousy human being for treating her the way he does. At some point, Psaki will have to declare that she does not know the answers because Biden will not give them to her.
The reporters hated the way Trump spoke to them, but at least he gave them something to write about. Biden, on the other hand, fails to show his face to the public. There is not a person alive that knows what he is doing and why he is doing it. All because he does not communicate.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A truly solid investigative reporter, John Solomon, updates Durham's investigation:
Breaking: Here’s What You NEED To Know About The Durham Investigation – John Solomon Gives Stunning Update
++++++++++++++++++++
How to determine who your friend is, politically speaking, what they think and why:
Is Your Friend a Liberal or a Leftist? Ask These Questions to Find Out
The great tragedy of our time is that liberals vote left.
Virtually every value liberals have held for a century is now held by conservatives and scorned by leftists. Therefore, America, in serious jeopardy of being lost, will be saved when people convince the liberals in their life that the left, not the conservative, is their enemy.
This process begins by establishing whether a friend or relative is a liberal or a leftist. If it turns out that he or she is a liberal, it is worth engaging in respectful dialogue on the issues of the day. If the friend or relative is a leftist, you can probably only talk about innocuous subjects such as the weather (though not about global warming) or sports (though not about players taking a knee during the national anthem). If you talk about the great issues of the day with a left-wing friend or relative, that could be the last time you talk to each other. He or she is likely to unfriend you not only on social media but also in life. Leftists generally do not dialogue; they dismiss.
Here are questions you might want to pose to friends and relatives to determine—as much for them as for you—whether they are liberal or left.
On Race
1) Many universities now have all-black dormitories, and some have all-black graduation exercises. Do you support these developments?
2) The University of California has declared this statement racist: “There is only one race—the human race.” Do you agree with the University of California, or do you agree with the statement?
3) Is the goal of being “colorblind”—doing one’s best to ignore a person’s color and concentrating only on the person’s character and personality—a noble goal or a racist one?
4) Do you believe the color of a person’s skin tells you anything of importance about that person?
5) Do you agree that all white Americans are racist?
6) If your answer is yes, would you tell the millions of blacks in Africa and the Caribbean who wish to emigrate to America that they would be making a poor decision? If not, why not?
7) Is it possible for a black person to be a racist?
8) Is it racist to claim that Johann Sebastian Bach, Ludwig van Beethoven and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart composed the greatest music ever composed?
9) Is the national anthem racist?
10) If your answer is yes, what would you like to put in its place?
11) The English department at the University of Pennsylvania removed its painting of William Shakespeare because he was a white European male. Do you agree with that decision?
On America
12) Do you agree with the New York Times‘ “1619 Project” that America was not founded in 1776 but in 1619 with the first arrival of black slaves in North America, and that the Revolutionary War was fought in order to preserve slavery?
13) Should statues of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln be taken down?
14) Has the United States, overall, made the world a better place?
15) Would America be better, worse, or the same as now if all Americans dropped their religion and became secular?
16) Has capitalism been a net-plus for America and the world?
17) Everyone would like to improve America. Some would like to, in their words, “fundamentally transform” it. Would you?
18) Could a good person have voted for Donald Trump in 2020?
19) Do you believe that CNN, the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the rest of the mainstream media are biased toward the left or try to present the news as accurately as possible?
20) Should America have full control over its borders to prevent illegal immigration?
21) There are between 11 and 30 million people in America who entered the country illegally. Should they all be put on a path to citizenship?
22) Should those who enter America illegally be called “undocumented immigrants” or “illegal immigrants”?
23) Do you believe police departments should be defunded, or at least have their budgets severely cut?
24) Should the government provide vouchers to enable parents to choose what school their child attends?
25) Which school do you believe is more likely to be attacked by a gunman: one that has a sign in front that reads, “Gun-Free Zone” or one that reads, “This School Has Armed Personnel”?
On Men and Women
26) Should it be legal for a teenage girl to have her breasts surgically removed because she identifies as a male—or should there be a minimum age of 18 or 21?
27) Schoolteachers have been told to stop calling students “boys and girls” because a student might not identify as either male or female. Do you agree with this policy?
28) Should biological males who identify as females be allowed to compete against biological females in sports?
29) Is the statement, “Men give birth” science-based?
30) Do you agree with the practice of inviting a drag queen into public libraries and elementary school classrooms to conduct a “Drag Queen Story Hour”?
On Freedom of Speech
31) Do you believe that free speech allows for hate speech, or should hate speech be banned?
32) If you believe hate speech should be banned, who do you believe should determine what is hate speech?
You might want to send these questions to the people in your life whose views are to the left of your own. At best, you (and they) will realize that you have more in common than either of you previously thought. At the very least, their answers will bring you both clarity. And at worst, they will explain why there is a rift between you—and why you might want to restrict communication to weather, sports, recipes, and warm memories.
COPYRIGHT 2021 CREATORS.COM
About Dennis Prager
Dennis Prager is a nationally syndicated radio talk-show host and columnist. His latest book, published by Regnery in May 2019, is The Rational Bible, a commentary on the book of Genesis. His film, "No Safe Spaces," is now available on DVD and BluRay. He is the founder of Prager University and may be contacted at dennisprager.com.
And:
Obama has now been president longer than FDR:
Barack Obama Has Now Been President Longer than FDR Ayad Rahim
On March 3, 2021, Barack Obama passed Franklin Roosevelt for the longest presidential tenure in American history.
What’s that you say? — president, for longer than FDR? But FDR was elected president four times; Obama was elected president two times.
Yes, all of that is true. That’s why this record has an asterisk next to it.
For anyone with eyes to see, the current presidency is being run by Barack Obama.
Even before this presidency began, its roots were laid in Obama’s home in Washington. Over the past couple of years, Obama-House was the royal court for receiving, selecting, and anointing the party’s standard-bearer for 2020. Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris were Obama’s favored candidates, and Obama-House functioned as the campaign war-room. But Harris gained no traction, and dropped out of the race on December 3, 2019, exactly two months before the Iowa caucuses.
That left Warren — to face off against Bernie Sanders in the left-wing bracket of the sweepstakes. The party had already determined, four years earlier, that Sanders was unsuitable as its standard-bearer because he wielded an abrasive, in-your-face style of Marxism. Obama himself expressed such sentiments more than once. So, the party scuppered his campaign in 2016. But in 2020, Sanders was bettering Warren in the early primaries.
So, the Obama camp had to go to plan B — find somebody who was “presentable” to the public.
In the first two contests of the nominating process, Joe Biden fared very badly — maybe even worse than Harris would have done had she stayed in. He finished a distant fourth in Iowa and a much-weaker fifth in New Hampshire. He was bumbling along on stage and on the hustings and going nowhere fast. And Obama didn’t even like Biden, but Biden would have to do — there weren’t really many other options on hand.
So, all the other candidates immediately dropped out; the Black vote in South Carolina and across the South was delivered to Biden; and he was anointed the nominee.
We know the rest of the story — Biden was banished to the basement; the media carried the water for him and continued demonizing Trump; Big Swamp exploited and manipulated a virus; and Big Cities stopped counting the votes late on election night, to figure out how many “votes” they needed to get their man over the finish line.
Which leads us to the inauguration of Joe Biden as president. On his first day in the White House, Biden expelled the bust of Winston Churchill from the Oval Office, as Obama had done on his first day in office (because Churchill was an imperialist and led the suppression of the Mau Mau Rebellion in Kenya, during which, Obama said, his grandfather was tortured; Trump brought the Churchill bust back on his first day in office).
Then there are Biden’s appointments — they say that personnel is policy. Well, the old Obama gang is back, and at the center of the action is Susan Rice. A foreign-policy specialist (ambassador to the United Nations and then-National Security Adviser under Obama), Rice was one of Biden’s first appointments — as director of the White House Domestic Policy Council. That’s her official title, but her actual job is to be Obama’s “messenger boy” in the White House and to cover any remaining tracks to past criminal activities.
Heading the White House press room is Jen Psaki; she was Obama’s communications director. Anthony Blinken moves up a notch: from being Obama’s deputy secretary of state to the top job at Foggy Bottom. Obama’s chairman of the federal reserve, Janet Yellen, is now secretary of the Treasury.
Anita Dunn, who had to resign from her top post in Obama’s Department of Education because she’d praised Chairman Mao, is back. Merrick Garland, whom Obama was unable to get into the Supreme Court in 2016, gets the consolation prize of Attorney General — a “take-that” from Obama. Those are the most glaring of a slew of Obama retreads. It wouldn’t be surprising if Van Jones and Samantha Power get appointments soon, and David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, Rahm Emanuel, and other members of the Chicago mafia are major behind-the-scenes players.
Then there are the rewards to the people who tried to sabotage the Trump campaign in 2016 and who took part in the “resistance” to his presidency. Peter Strock, his wife, and all others who made “sacrifices” in the effort are being compensated for their pain and suffering.
On the policy front, the White House has rapidly undone almost all of Trump’s reversals of Obama policies, while ratcheting up the Obama agenda with even more-radical steps than Obama took in his first eight years of “fundamentally transforming” the country. The border is open again. The Keystone Pipeline is canceled. Coal mining and energy independence are “out.” Subsidies to “green energy” and Big Tech are back. So is Big Pork and the great party slush fund.
China is no longer an enemy. Climate change is an existential threat again, and the Paris Accords take center-stage. The Iran nuclear deal is back on — actually, John Kerry never stopped negotiating with Iran. And to curry favor with Iran, the administration is lifting sanctions against the country and has halted the sale of weapons to those of Iran’s Arab enemies that recently made peace with Israel. As for Israel, the White House is stiffing the country, big time — especially as it has the wrong leaders.
Okay — so that makes three terms for Obama, but FDR was elected president four times.
To complete the set, we have to rewind the tape to 2016. Obama was finishing his second term and handing off leadership of the Marxist revolution to Hillary Clinton. On the Republican side, three candidates for president — Trump, Cruz, and Carson — were vehemently opposed to Obama, his policies, and the direction of the country. So Obama spied on their campaigns. Trump still won.
But not only did Trump trump the Swamp, he then actually tried to put the brakes on the Marxist revolution. He took steps to reverse the regulatory state and he allowed the economy to boom. But worst of all, Trump bruised the Swamp’s ego — he exposed it as arrogant, corrupt, and incompetent, and as the entrenched D.C. front of the Marxist revolution.
After he arrived in Washington, Trump quickly learned that Obama was running the “resistance” to his presidency — the government’s opposition from within (in the summer of ‘16, Trump had informed the world that his campaign was being spied on).
During Trump’s four years in Washington, Obama ran the shadow government out of his DC home, probably exerting more influence over the wheels of government than the man in the Oval Office did. Obama lined up whistleblowers, leaks to the press, and resistance to the president from within the government, including in the White House and the president’s cabinet. He advised “the gang of four” and other radicals on policy and presentation.
The ultimate goal of the efforts was to impede and hobble the duly elected president, to subvert, sabotage, and undermine his agenda, and to ultimately expel him from office — by any means necessary — in the bowels of government, in the media and entertainment, in academia and education, in Big Tech, Big Finance, and Big Business.
So, we ought to face reality — as of today, Obama has been running the show in Washington for 4,424 days — and counting — and he’s not shy about letting us know it.
Ayad Rahim, a former journalist, is a bookseller and tutor in the Midwest.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
As I wrote in a previous memo, Cuomo will not voluntarily resign nor is it likely Democrats will force him to do so. Democrats are better at forcing everyone else to resign. It is called the Swalwell Resignation Plan.
The following story is brought to you courtesy of The Next News Network. Click the link to visit their page and see more stories.
Emily Zanotti from The Daily Wire reports, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo told the media, Sunday, that he will not resign from his position amid allegations that he sexually harassed five women and called critics demanding he step down “anti-democratic” and at odds with the voters of New York.
+++++++++++++++++++
Is this education or indoctrination and, ironically, are liberals calling themselves racists?
You Wont Believe What Liberals Say is Being Taught in Schools
Horrific >>
++++++
The more Muslims the merrier?
If you are interested in knowing where the $1.9 trillion funded in the “relief” bill will go, click on the link to the ‘more extensive summary’ and you’ll see all the unrelated programs to which the money will be directed.
Consider this: U.S. population 330,483,530
That’s the equivalent of $5750 per person…..but instead $1,200 will go to every adult who makes under a certain income… Where’s all the rest going?
It should be evident this costly bill is predominantly used to fund underfunded and or/mismanaged pensions, and states and cities who overspent, basically were run by Democrats and to use tax payer "honey" dispensed by Democrats in the hope it buys them votes which, when connected with HR1, will ensure America has a unitary party governing for as long as voters are willing to tolerate such.
Below is a summary from Rep. Scalise’s office. And Here is a more extensive summary from the House Budget Committee.
Senate Amendment to the American Rescue Plan Act:
The Senate amended version of this package remains largely the same, a progressive wishlist of provisions unrelated to COVID that will keep schools closed, bail out blue states and pay people not to work. Rather than waiting for the remaining $1 trillion from past bipartisan COVID legislation to be spent, Democrats are recklessly spending another $1.9 trillion, bringing the total price tag for all Coronavirus legislation to almost $6 trillion—more than the GDP of all countries except the U.S. and China. Democrats rejected all efforts to advance bipartisan solutions that are targeted, temporary, and tied to COVID relief and are instead using reconciliation as a vehicle to pass the most progressive domestic legislation in generations.
- Authorizes approximately $130 billion to schools without any guarantee that schools provide the option of in-person instruction for America’s school children.
- According to CBO, 95% of the money for schools won’t be spent until after 2021 - slowing down getting kids back in school.
- Nearly all of the $68 billion obligated to K-12 schools remains available from previous relief packages to support reopening schools and could be utilized immediately.
- Includes the establishment and funding of the “Emergency Federal Employee Leave Fund” which allows certain federal bureaucrats up to 15 weeks of paid leave, up to $1,400 a week, for various reasons including if their child has the option or is required to participate in virtual learning.
- Less than 9% of the $1.9 trillion plan goes to combatting COVID-19 through public health spending such as national vaccination program, tracking, and more testing.
- Provides $350 billion to bail out blue states, despite the fact that most states collected about the same amount of revenue during the pandemic, with some collecting even more.
- Creates a bonus for bureaucrats by authorizing funds to be used to provide up to $25,000 in premium pay to eligible state and local government workers.
- Multiple pro-life concerns in the package:
- Fails to include Hyde protections to prevent taxpayer dollars from paying for abortions.
- Requires taxpayers to subsidize health plans that potentially cover elective abortions.
- Changes PPP affiliation rules for non-profits to allow Planned Parenthood to receive funding.
- Codifies numerous partisan priorities, including duplicative rental assistance to funnel money toward non-COVID purposes and restarts the ineffective Obama-era State Small Business Credit Initiative.
- Includes $300 a week federal unemployment through September.
- Despite projections for 3.7% economic growth, the legislation provides a third round of stimulus checks costing approximately $400 billion and will include households that have experienced little or no financial loss during the pandemic.
- Illegal immigrants would be eligible for some benefits included in the package.
- Expands expensive and ineffective health coverage policies that further disincentivize work.
- Worsens the already flawed structure of the ACA’s subsidies by dramatically increasing government spending and creating new inequities by ignoring the actual income of certain enrollees and giving them free coverage.
- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
No comments:
Post a Comment