Tuesday, October 31, 2017

Buddy Carter, True Prospective Meeting. Move The U.N. and Possibly Leave It OOPS -Shame on Me.


















Many times I post cartoons etc. that may not pertain to what the attached memo references.  However, virtually everything I post, by way of cartoons, does relate to, supports and expresses  my thinking which I may well have discussed in previous memos.  Such is the case with this memo.

I would rather watch this over and over than a NFL game:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                                          Skidaway Island Republican Club
                                                  Presents:
True Perspectives 
Washington Insider
The Honorable Buddy Carter

Monday,  December 18, 2017
Plantation Club
Cocktails : 5:00 PM
Presentation : 5:30 – 6:30 PM
Sustaining members – Free
Regular members - $5
Non-Members - $10

All Welcome
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Talk about finding a needle in the haystack. 

However,we have not defeated ISIS and/or Islamic Terrorism.  We have dealt them serious blows and now they are dispersed and conduct their activities through/over social media technology. This makes detection more difficult.  

News reports state the FBI has 1000 ongoing  investigations . There is no way they can eliminate terrorist attacks and particularly the Lone Wolf type.


Unlike Obama, Trump is committed to protecting our nation in a more fervent manner and is willing to allow the various agencies involved a freer hand and that is about all we can do beyond hunting them down. (See 1 below.)

+++++++++++++++++++++++
Mia Culpa

When I posted the Larry Williams Link, in the previous memo, I had not listened to the entire Video.  I was under the mistaken assumption it was limited to his direction babble but when I listened to the full video it ended in a display of language I was unaware.  Shame on me.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I have said for years we should ship the U.N. out of New York and send it to some less relevant site.  It would save New York's Police Department a great sum of money and open more parking spaces for more ticket revenue.

Once the U.N's agencies became radicalized it was time for our president to pull the rip  cord. (See 2 below.
+++++++++++++++++++++
Dick

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1)




Trump vows justice as US captures key Benghazi militant

By Maggie Michael and Sadie Gurman


WASHINGTON — U.S. special operations forces captured a militant in Libya accused of playing an instrumental role in the Benghazi attacks, officials said Monday, in a high-stakes operation designed to bring the perpetrators to justice five years after the deadly violence.
President Donald Trump identified the militant as Mustafa al-Imam and said his capture signified that the four Americans who died “will never be forgotten.” Justice Department officials were escorting al-Imam by military plane to the United States, where he's expected to be tried in federal court.
“Our memory is deep and our reach is long, and we will not rest in our efforts to find and bring the perpetrators of the heinous attacks in Benghazi to justice,” Trump said.
The Navy SEAL-led raid marked the first publicly known operation since Trump took office to target those accused of involvement in Benghazi, which mushroomed into a multiyear political fracas centered on Republican allegations of a bungled Obama administration response. Those critiques shadowed Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of state at the time of the attacks, through her presidential campaign.
U.S. forces captured al-Imam just before midnight local time Sunday in Misrata, on Libya's north coast, U.S. officials said. He was taken to a U.S. Navy ship at the Misrata port for transport by military plane to Washington, where he's expected to arrive within the next two days, one of the officials said.
Once on American soil, al-Imam will face trial in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia as the FBI continues to investigate, the Justice Department said. He faces three criminal charges that were filed in May 2015 but only recently unsealed: killing or conspiring to kill someone during an attack on a federal facility, providing support for terrorists, and using a firearm in connection with a violent crime.
It wasn't immediately clear how al-Imam was involved in the Sept. 11, 2012, violence. The U.S. attorney's office said he is a Libyan national and about 46 years old.
Trump said he'd ordered the raid, and thanked the U.S. military, intelligence agencies and prosecutors for tracking al-Imam and enabling his capture. The U.S. officials said the operation was coordinated with Libya's internationally recognized government. They weren't authorized to speak publicly on the matter and demanded anonymity.
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said he'd spoken with the relatives of some of the Americans who died in Benghazi: U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, State Department information management officer Sean Patrick Smith, and contract security officers Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. Tillerson said the U.S. would “spare no effort” to ensure al-Imam is held accountable.
Al-Imam will face court proceedings in U.S. District Court, officials said, in an apparent departure from Trump's previously expressed desire to send militants to the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
In an interview last March with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt, Attorney General Jeff Sessions called Guantanamo “a very fine place for holding these kind of dangerous criminals.”
The commando raid also came amid an ongoing debate about the use of U.S. forces to pursue insurgents in Africa and other locations outside of warzones like Iraq and Afghanistan. Four U.S. soldiers were killed in an ambush in Niger earlier this month under circumstances that have remained hazy and prompted Democrats and Republicans in Congress to express concerns.
Earlier this month, another man accused in the Benghazi attack, Abu Khattala, went on trial in federal court in Washington. Khattala, captured during President Barack Obama's tenure, has pleaded not guilty to the 18 charges against him, including murder of an internationally protected person, providing material support to terrorists and destroying U.S. property while causing death.
The Benghazi assault started in the evening when armed attackers scaled the wall of the diplomatic post and moved through the front gate. Stevens was rushed to a fortified “safe room” along with Smith, but were then siphoned off from security officers when attackers set the building and its furniture on fire. Libyan civilians found Stevens hours later in the wreckage, and he died of smoke inhalation in a hospital, becoming the first U.S. ambassador killed in the line of duty in more than three decades.
A nearby CIA annex was attacked by mortar fire hours after the diplomatic complex, killing Woods and Doherty, who were defending the rooftop.
The attack became fodder for multiple congressional investigations to determine what happened and whether the Obama administration misled the public on the details of the bloody assault. Initial accounts provided by administration officials, notably Obama's U.N. ambassador, Susan Rice, said the attack grew out of a protest against an anti-Muslim internet film. Later, the administration said it was a planned terrorist attack.
A two-year investigation by a House Benghazi committee focused heavily on Clinton's role and whether security at the compounds and the response to the attack was sufficient. It was the Benghazi probe that revealed Clinton used a private email server for government work, prompting an FBI investigation that proved to be an albatross for her presidential campaign.
Associated Press writers Maggie Michael and Sadie Gurman contributed to this report.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2)

UN Launches ‘Unprecedented’ $1.3 Billion Legal Campaign Against Israel

By Adam Abrams

The United Nations has earmarked some $1.3 billion to fund Palestinian legal campaigns against Israel and to support the creation of an independent Palestinian state, in what experts are calling an unprecedented act singling out the Jewish state at the world body.
document that was recently signed between the U.N. and the Palestinians outlines a “strategic programming framework” in the disputed territories from 2018-2022, and states that the U.N. will work to advise the Palestinian Authority on how to exploit “international accountability mechanisms” in order to hold Israel accountable for alleged violations of international law. The document is set to come into effect Jan. 1, 2018.
The document makes no references to Palestinian violations of international law and human rights, nor does it specify that the $1.3 billion in funding should be applied to humanitarian assistance. Rather, the U.N. document states that the money should be used for developing programs that support “Palestine’s path to independence.”
“The funding of this unprecedented and prejudicial aggression against a member state by the U.N. is clear evidence that the international body’s goal and solution is for a single Palestinian state to replace Israel,” Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, president of the Tel Aviv-based civil rights organization Shurat HaDin - Israel Law Center, told JNS.org.
“It’s a new form of anti-Semitic aggression and terror by other means, and it plainly violates the U.N.’s own charter,” she said.
Sixteen U.N. agencies appear as signatories in the document, including the OHCHR human rights office, the UNESCO cultural body and the UNRWA refugee agency. In signing the document, the agencies pledged to hold Israel accountable for its alleged violations and to document the purported abuses while simultaneously strengthening Palestinian groups’ “ability to advocate effectively for rights to be respected.”
In the document, the U.N. also pledged to monitor “the impact of Israeli violations” as well as how purported Israeli “breaches of international law” hinder the development of “Palestine.”
“There is no other example or precedent of the U.N. funding, training and advising one side of a conflict to pursue legal advocacy against another side,” said Hillel Neuer, executive director of Geneva-based UN Watch, a group whose stated mission is to “monitor the performance of the United Nations by the yardstick of its own charter.”
“For some reason, however, when it comes to Israel, the U.N. development agencies cross the bright red line from humanitarian assistance to political advocacy,” he said.
Although the amount of funding allocated by the U.N. towards overtly anti-Israel initiatives is unprecedented, Shurat Hadin’s Darshan-Leitner said the world body’s singling out of Israel and misuse of funds were “no big surprise.”
“The U.N. is misappropriating, once again, its donors’ funds and directing them into projects that help the PLO target and attack the Jewish state, instead of for humanitarian causes,” said Darshan-Leitner.
“After all, it’s the U.N.’s raison d'etre at this point,” she added. “We have seen a massive increase in these baseless lawfare suits being filed without any merit in the American federal courts in the past few years. The unilateral encouragement of these frivolous harassment suits against Israelis and Jewish individuals, which are obviously being funded and fanned on by foreign bodies, is a new Palestinian strategy to try to bedevil and deter support for Israel.”
Darshan-Leitner underscored that the U.N. “does not care one iota about justice for the so-called ‘victims’ it’s pretending to assist,” and that it uses Palestinian initiatives as a vehicle for turning Israel into an international pariah.
“It’s policies like this that display so clearly why the United States was moved to quit UNESCO, and is considering resigning [from] and defunding other U.N. agencies,” she said.
Prof. Avi Bell, a member of the faculty of law at Israel’s Bar-Ilan University and a senior fellow at the Kohelet Policy Forum think tank, voiced similar sentiments, telling JNS.org that the U.N.’s newly revealed strategic document “highlights the degree to which many organs of the United Nations are actively involved in diplomatic, legal and financial warfare against the state of Israel.”
“We often fail to appreciate the degree to which the U.N, supports, or even directs, anti-Israel propaganda and political activity,” said Bell. “This kind of activity obviously violates the U.N. Charter by infringing upon Israeli sovereignty and denying Israel the right of sovereign equality.”
Bell added that these actions “undermine international institutions by subordinating their legal roles to a political agenda [and] corrupting them in the name of anti-Zionist ideology….Unfortunately, the U.N.’s decades-long war on Israel is nowhere near ending.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

        1. This from my dear friend, a fellow memo reader and Headmaster of SCA who wants to write a book entitled: "Demoralizing Education.
        2. The news will not be fake but conclusions those who oppose Charter Schools could be premature because this is actually old news.  (See 1 below.)

        3. Meanwhile, when a church pulls down plaques in order to be inclusive this is similar to Affirmative Action, in that you deprive one group to enhance another.  Perhaps the better approach is to know history and not repeat the mistakes but then I am a raving conservative and not a raving liberal (See 1 below.)
          +++++++++++++++++++++
          Dick
          ++++++++++++++++++++
          1)1)Good morning SCA family,

          Last year's CCRPI scores will be released this week. I want to remind everyone that the scores that will be in the paper have been expected and are from last year, and do not consider all the changes we've made to teach the Georgia Standards of Excellence this year.  

          Despite the scores, it should be noted that:
          • Our ELA and math scores improved in 4 of the 6 grades tested.
          • Our ELA Developing & Above scores for Black and Economically Disadvantaged students outpaced the district's.
          • Last year's 7th grade outpaced the district in ELA and math.
          • And, with every 9th grade student taking the 9th grade Literature state EOCT, SCA scores were 4th among district high schools behind two specialty schools and Islands High (30% ED).
          What we definitely know now is that the the students' performance on the state assessments has not been an accurate assessment of the high quality of education at SCA, and that our scores must improve immediately.

          Many of you have already noticed the change in our curriculum and instruction this year to better prepare our students for the Milestones assessments this spring. Much of it is quite a departure from the classical and Core Knowledge material from the last 4 years. However, in order to best prepare students for proficiency on the Milestones assessments and to ensure the future of the school, most of our time and energy must go toward explicit instruction of GSE, frameworks, vocabulary, and instruction in all assessed courses.

          To improve our CCRPI scores, we have:
          1. Realigned curriculum and instruction to address the GSE and assessed content, with a focus on 3rd-8th grades ELA and math, 5th grade and 8th grade social studies and science.
            1. For example: Last year, our social studies for 8th grade covered 20th century US and world history, yet those 8th grade students were assessed on their knowledge regarding Georgia Studies on the Milestones assessment. This year, our 8th grade students are studying Georgia.lt;/

      1. Our math and ELA curriculum were revamped to address explicit vocabulary and frameworks of the GSE and used on the Milestones assessment.
      2. We hired an experienced Guidance Counselor and Director of Curriculum & Instruction to assist in maximizing CCRPI performance. 
      3. We are developing more consistent planning and accountability practices focused on student outcomes on benchmark and GSE-based assessments.
      4. We are offering substantially more math and ELA remediation this year to support struggling students, specifically regarding targets based on GSE performance.
      Through these measures and many more, we are confident that our students will make significant improvements on this spring's Milestones assessments and the school's CCRPI score will rise accordingly. Our faculty is quite able and hard-working, and our students are engaged and motivated to succeed this spring.

      We are thankful for all your support through this transition and are excited for the months and years ahead. We look forward to this time next year, when we will be celebrating our outstanding CCRPI scores from 2017-18!

      Benjamin Couch Payne
      Director, Savannah Classical Academy
      ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Monday, October 30, 2017

We Need Larry Williams To Give Directions to Illegal Immigrants Before They Enter America. Sanctuary Colleges? Bret Stephens and Potatos.



In the Second Word War, Germans changed sign directions in France etc.. We need this guy if we are ever invaded. Maybe the Israelis could use him.

If we sent Larry Williams to Mexico it would reduce illegal immigration and most of the Muslims who flooded into Europe, like Moses and the Israelis,  would still be wandering in the desert..

simply left click this  link below.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hCXE9ZJb-RI
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Stop and think.  Had Hillary won and become president would any of this about The Trump Dossier, Uranium One, the un-gagging of an FBI informant, the stench coming from The Obama White House etc, have been allowed to surface.  Would the corruption of the IRS, The Attorney General's Office  and other agencies and piercing of our borders continued?

I submit we would never know because, as with Kennedy and Camelot, the mass media would have ignored and failed to report  potential corruption  etc,
.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

While I am on the subject of education, it seems if the government can withhold money from sanctuary cities and states they can do the same regarding government funding of colleges and universities that do not allow free speech and controversial speaker with unpopular views to appear on their campuses. (See 1 below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Bret Stephens on Communism. (See  below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This man needs to speak to the kneelingNFL player , owners and  commissioner:
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=the+wisdom+of+a+third+grader&view=detail&mid=58C68C740F71B749895158C68C740F71B7498951&FORM=VIRE&PC=APPL
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
One potato, two potato three potato etc. .  (See 3  below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dick
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1)

Colleges Should Protect Speech—or Lose Funds

Withhold federal research dollars from institutions that practice viewpoint discrimination.

By Frederick M. Hess and Grant Addison

Almost every week brings a new campus controversy: a college speech code that goes too far, an invited speaker shouted down by students, a professor investigated for wrongthink. While lamentations abound for the state of free inquiry at American universities, few have suggested substantive proposals for redress.
Here’s a straightforward idea that would be easy to put into practice: Require schools to assure free speech and inquiry as a condition of accepting federal research funding. In addition to subsidizing tuition and providing student loans, Washington disburses billions of dollars to colleges and universities for research—nearly $38 billion in fiscal 2015 alone.

Those funds constitute about 60% of all support for university-based research, according to the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Because universities build in usurious rates of overhead on this money—in some instances, upward of 50% goes to underwrite salaries and facilities—these are some of the most prized funds in academia. It would be easy for Washington to require schools to protect free speech before the cash can be disbursed.

Massive federal investment in higher education dates to World War II, when the U.S. purposely made universities a pillar of the nation’s approach to research and development. In a 1945 report, Vannevar Bush, director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, insisted that “freedom of inquiry must be preserved under any plan for Government support of science.”

At the time this meant measures to protect university research from governmental interference. Today the threat to free inquiry on campus comes from within. In a study last December, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education reviewed 449 higher-education institutions—345 public and 104 private—and found that 92% had policies prohibiting certain categories of constitutionally protected speech.

Cross-referencing FIRE’s data with figures from the National Science Foundation illustrates a disheartening reality: Of the 30 higher-education institutions that collected the most federal research funds in fiscal 2015, 26 maintain formal policies restricting constitutionally protected speech. Six of them—Johns Hopkins, the University of Michigan, Harvard, Penn State, the University of Texas at Austin, and New York University—maintain policies FIRE categorizes as “substantially restricting freedom of speech.” These 26 colleges and universities took more than $14 billion in federal research funding in fiscal 2015, or nearly 40% of the total disbursed.

Academics used to understand that policies to stymie speech and expression are anathema to free inquiry. Consider the “General Declaration of Principles” issued in 1915 by the American Association of University Professors. The group asserted that the university should be “an inviolable refuge” from the tyranny of public opinion: “It is precisely this function of the university which is most injured by any restriction upon academic freedom.”

Prohibitions on what can be said or written inevitably favor certain questions, points of view, and lines of inquiry while discouraging or barring others. Speech codes, trigger warnings, bias-response teams and the like lead students and professors to self-censor. In a national survey this year by FIRE and YouGov, 54% of students said they “have stopped themselves from sharing an idea or opinion in class at some point since beginning college.” All to the detriment of a good education.

Leveraging federal money is one way to discourage campus speech restrictions. Federal research funds should come with contractual provisions that obligate the recipient schools to guarantee open discourse. Colleges should be required to offer assurances that their policies do not restrict constitutionally protected speech or expression and that they will commit to safeguarding open inquiry to the best of their ability. Violating such assurances would be grounds for loss of funds and render the school ineligible for future research dollars.

Further, colleges that receive research grants should be required to establish formal processes for investigating and appealing allegations of speech suppression or intellectual intimidation. Such machinery already exists to address other forms of research misconduct.

These provisions could be implemented by Congress, by presidential directive, or by individual grant-making agencies. Whatever the case, the move is entirely appropriate and wholly within the purview of the federal government. Taxpayer funds should not subsidize research at institutions where free inquiry is compromised.
Tying research funding to free speech would give a stake to serious scientists in fields like engineering and biology. These scholars traditionally have left the campus culture wars to their more politicized colleagues in the humanities and social sciences. Under this plan, they would suddenly have an incentive to help push higher education back to its intellectual roots. The same goes for college presidents, many of whom have found it easier to placate the radical fringe than to defend free inquiry. With federal research funds on the line, they would suddenly face a new financial and political calculus.

Mr. Hess is director of education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, where Mr. Addison is program manager for education policy. They are the authors of a new AEI report, “Free Inquiry and Federally Funded Research.”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2) Communism Through Rose-Colored 
Glasses
By Bret Stephens

“In the spring of 1932 desperate officials, anxious for their jobs and even their lives, aware that a new famine might be on its way, began to collect grain wherever and however they could. Mass confiscations occurred all across the U.S.S.R. In Ukraine they took on an almost fanatical intensity.”

I am quoting a few lines from “Red Famine,” Anne Applebaum’s brilliant new history of the deliberate policy of mass starvation inflicted on Ukraine by Joseph Stalin in the early 1930s. An estimated five million or more people perished in just a few years. Walter Duranty, The Times’s correspondent in the Soviet Union, insisted the stories of famine were false. He won a Pulitzer Prize in 1932 for reportage the paper later called “completely misleading.”

How many readers, I wonder, are familiar with this history of atrocity and denial, except in a vague way? How many know the name of Lazar Kaganovich, one of Stalin’s principal henchmen in the famine? What about other chapters large and small in the history of Communist horror, from the deportation of the Crimean Tatars to the depredations of Peru’s Shining Path to the Brezhnev-era psychiatric wards that were used to torture and imprison political dissidents?

Why is it that people who know all about the infamous prison on Robben Island in South Africa have never heard of the prison on Cuba’s Isle of Pines? Why is Marxism still taken seriously on college campuses and in the progressive press? Do the same people who rightly demand the removal of Confederate statues ever feel even a shiver of inner revulsion at hipsters in Lenin or Mao T-shirts?

These aren’t original questions. But they’re worth asking because so many of today’s progressives remain in a permanent and dangerous state of semi-denial about the legacy of Communism a century after its birth in Russia.

No, they are not true-believing Communists. No, they are not unaware of the toll of the Great Leap Forward or the Killing Fields. No, they are not plotting to undermine democracy.

But they will insist that there is an essential difference between Nazism and Communism — between race-hatred and class-hatred; Buchenwald and the gulag — that morally favors the latter. They will attempt to dissociate Communist theory from practice in an effort to acquit the former. They will balance acknowledgment of the repression and mass murder of Communism with references to its “real advances and achievements.” They will say that true communism has never been tried. They will write about Stalinist playwright Lillian Hellman in tones of sympathy and understanding they never extend to film director Elia Kazan.

Progressive intelligentsia “is moralist against one half of the world, but accords to the revolutionary movement an indulgence that is realist in the extreme,” the French scholar Raymond Aron wrote in “The Opium of the Intellectuals” in 1955. “How many intellectuals have come to the revolutionary party via the path of moral indignation, only to connive ultimately at terror and autocracy?”

On Thursday, I noted that intellectuals have a long history of making fools of themselves with their political commitments, and that the phenomenon is fully bipartisan.

But the consequences of the left’s fellow-traveling and excuse-making are more dangerous. Venezuela is today in the throes of socialist dictatorship and humanitarian ruin, having been cheered along its predictable and unmerry course by the usual progressive suspects.
One of those suspects, Jeremy Corbyn, may be Britain’s next prime minister, in part because a generation of Britons has come of age not knowing that the line running from “progressive social commitments” to catastrophic economic results is short and straight.

Bernie Sanders captured the heart, if not yet the brain, of the Democratic Party last year by portraying “democratic socialism” as nothing more than an extension of New Deal liberalism. But the Vermont senator also insists that “the business model of Wall Street is fraud.” Efforts to criminalize capitalism and financial services also have predictable results.

It’s a bitter fact that the most astonishing strategic victory by the West in the last century turns out to be the one whose lessons we’ve never seriously bothered to teach, much less to learn. An ideology that at one point enslaved and immiserated roughly a third of the world collapsed without a fight and was exposed for all to see. Yet we still have trouble condemning it as we do equivalent evils. And we treat its sympathizers as romantics and idealists, rather than as the fools, fanatics or cynics they really were and are.

Winston Churchill wrote that when the Germans allowed the leader of the Bolsheviks to travel from Switzerland to St. Petersburg in 1917, “they turned upon Russia the most grisly of all weapons. They transported Lenin in a sealed truck like a plague bacillus.”
A century on, the bacillus isn’t eradicated, and our immunity to it is still in doubt.
++++++++++++++++++++++
3)Well, A Girl Potato and Boy Potato had eyes for each other,
And finally they got married, and had a little sweet Potato, which they Called 'Yam.'
Of course, they wanted the best for Yam
When it was time, they told her about the facts Of life.
They warned her about going Out and getting Half-baked, so she wouldn't get accidentally mashed, and Get a bad name for herself like 'Hot Potato,' and end up with a bunch of tater tots.
Yam said not to worry, no Spud would get Her into the sack and make a rotten potato out of her!
But on the other hand she wouldn't stay home and become a Couch Potato either.
She would get plenty of exercise so as not to be skinny like her shoestring cousins.
When she went off to Europe, Mr. And Mrs. Potato told Yam To watch out For the hard-boiled guys from Ireland and the greasy guys from France called the French fries. And when she went out West, to watch out for the Indians so she wouldn't get scalloped..
Yam said she would stay on the straight and Narrow and wouldn't associate with those high class Yukon Golds, or the ones from the other side of the tracks who advertise their trade on all The trucks that say, 'Frito Lay.'
Mr. And Mrs. Potato sent Yam to Idaho PU. (that's Potato University) so that when she graduated she'd really be in the Chips.
But in spite of all they did for Her, one-day Yam came home and announced she was Going to marry Tom Brokaw.
Tom Brokaw!
Mr. And Mrs. Potato were very upset.
They told Yam she couldn't possibly marry Tom Brokaw because he's just.......
Are you Ready for this?
Are You sure?
*
*
OK! Here it is!
*
*
*
*
A COMMON TATER