https://townhall.com/tipsheet/
And:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I cannot contribute to everyone who asks but he seems worthy:
Richard -
My life story is proof that America is the greatest country in
the world, but if
Congress passes their #defund the police bill this coming week,
it will literally create an injustice for the majority of law-abiding citizens
in our nation.
I’m an Army veteran, a Dallas Police Officer for 22 years,
earned a PhD in Education, and now a candidate for Congress in my home state of
Texas.
Yet, because of the color of my skin, DEMOCRATS are confused as
to why I WILL NEVER stand with the Marxist front of Black Lives Matter. They
refuse to understand why BLM doesn’t represent Black America.
I have seen the true face of Black Lives Matter – I saw it when
they prodded a madman into killing 5 of my fellow police officers here in
Dallas. They were happy to watch those cops die if it advanced their political
agenda. I took them
to court to hold them accountable, and I haven’t stopped fighting them
since.
Now, Democrats in Washington
are happy to sweep it all under the rug if it will help them repay a debt to
Black Lives Matter for delivering them control of our federal government. Nancy
Pelosi, AOC and even Joe Biden are supporting a sweeping set of police reforms
– reforms that will cripple law enforcement in this nation and make your family
less safe from the liberal mobs – MAYBE
THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT!!
Where was the bill to honor the fallen officers when Black Lives
Matter killed five cops in Dallas?
Where was the legislative Action when Black Lives Matter was
burning black neighborhoods last summer?
The Democrats didn’t care because those bills wouldn’t help them
secure control of Washington.
I’m running for Congress to stand up to Black Lives Matter and
ANTIFA in this fight for freedom. If you want to be a part of the team doing just that,
then I need you to join the team as soon as possible with a donation of $50,
$100, $500 or even $1,000.
I’m living proof that hard work
and determination means anyone can achieve the American Dream if we can stop
the failed progressive policies that seek to enslave generations of Americans.
Black Americans should not fall prey to these harmful policies, but unless I
win my race, they will only be looking to Democrat politicians who will dupe
them into believing that justice can be served by defunding the police.
That lie will cause more harm to poor Americans who are already
more susceptible to crime in their communities. That’s the big lie we need to
overcome.
As a 22-year veteran of the Dallas Police Department and a
survivor of a rough inner-city neighborhood, I can tell you that defunding the
police in America will hurt our nation more than it will help us heal.
Americans should be more concerned about the Politicians who use
cops as a convenient political punching bag to help them get elected. They know it is a lie every time –
they don’t care, they only want to hold onto power, and they will tell any lie
to get there.
Remember when Joe Biden said black Democrats who don’t vote for
him “ain’t black”? He was just being honest, that’s how the leftist politicians
think. They think the same old thing will keep black votes coming back.
I say not this time. Not here, not in my backyard.
I need your help to send a message to the left: their race
baiting intolerance and elite toleration for lawlessness have no place in this
country. Donate Today and help me put an end to BLM and the defund
movement.
For our future,
Tre Pennie
American for Congress
++++++++
I never believed what was said about Kavanaugh but I did think to myself his expressions conveyed a certain weakness. Now, according to this op ed author, it appears Kavanaugh can be intimidated and may turn out to be a disappointment pushover along with Barrett.
Kavanaugh
Proved Once and for All He Isn’t Trump’s Puppet With Deciding Vote
Turmoil,
strife, and general unrest surrounded the confirmation of the last three
Supreme Court justices, but none more than Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
When
the time came for former President Donald Trump to nominate someone to replace
the retiring Anthony Kennedy, to say that tensions were high would have been an
understatement.
Liberals
were irate that the “orange man” was going to have a second nomination and
conservatives were apprehensive that there would be anyone as wonderful as
their recently beloved Justice Neil Gorsuch. But all of those emotions came to
a head, and Kavanaugh had what is likely the most high-profile and hotly
debated Supreme Court nomination any of us will see in our lifetime.
I won’t
bore you going over the details again: basically, Kavanaugh wowed everyone,
people came forward accusing him of a kind of-rape from more than three decades
ago, liberals all gathered claiming all women must be believed (boy did that
age badly) and there was general screaming and mayhem in the highways and
byways of Congress.
However,
as so often happens when liberals lose some push for injustice, they also had a
backup plan, which began in earnest when Trump nominated his third Supreme
Court Justice, Amy Coney Barett. The backup plan was to get under the skin of
these dedicated jurists and claim that since Trump was allowed to nominate
them, they must be his puppets.
Whether
those cries of outrage have affected any of the decisions made by justices
today, we might never know (seeing as we can’t go back and change time).
According to a report in The Hill, Kavanaugh “dismayed conservatives … hen he
cast what appears to be the deciding vote preventing the Supreme Court from
taking up pro-Trump election lawsuits.”
The
second-to-most-recent Supreme Court Justice pulled away from the high court’s
most conservative jurists, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch, all
three of whom responded as if they might have taken the decisions personally.
In
Thomas’ dissent, he said he was “befuddled” by the court’s lack of desire to
take up the disputes, thanks to their late October decision that gave reason to
believe they would hear the case:
“One
wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the
election, and thus provide clear rules,” Thomas wrote in what some analysts saw
as a thinly veiled swipe at Kavanaugh. “Now we again fail to provide clear
rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a
shroud of doubt is baffling.”
Not
only did Kavanaugh get to feel the wrath of Thomas’s scathing dissent, but
despite making it clear that they agreed with Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch also
wrote their own dissents on Monday.
Libertarian
litigation firm, Institute for Justice’s Anthony Sanders said he believed the
conservative justices’ dissents were pointedly aimed at Kavanaugh.
“Thomas,
Alito, & Gorsuch seem pretty ‘befuddled’ & ‘baffled’ at Justice
Kavanaugh today,” Sanders wrote on Twitter. “He voted with them to take a case
on the scope of the ‘legislature clause’ last fall, but strangely is absent in
granting cert in the Pennsylvania case.”
Julie
Kelly, a fierce Trump defender had harsher words for the Supreme Court Justice,
calling his move cowardice in the face of pressure from Democrats and the news
media.
“One
can only assume since Kavanaugh changed his pre-election position on
Pennsylvania, threats of promoting a ‘Big Lie’ about election fraud got to
him,” Kelly wrote in American Greatness.
Was
Kavanaugh’s decision the right one? Well, that depends on a few things, not the
least of which is whether or not you believe in moral absolutism, that people
are basically bad and must be prevented from doing bad things, (and a little
more recently) whether you think the constitution should be followed down to
the letter.
Regardless
of any of those concerns, Kavanaugh proved one very crucial thing: he’s not in
Trump’s pocket and probably never will be.
++++++++++++
FAIR Posts News
https://www.wsj.com/articles/dividing-by-race-comes-to-grade-school-11615144898
and:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbJWi6KkcHs
And:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/beyond-black-history-month-11614355101
And:
https://open.spotify.com/episode/0yA586XjDwo2eKSYj01zi
++++++++++
Will Biden obey and betray?
The Chinese Communist Party Reveals a New Demand for Biden
By Beth Baumann
The Chinese Communist Party is demanding President Joe Biden roll back former President Donald Trump's policy of supporting Taiwan, a democratic island China claims as their own. According to Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, Trump's support of Taiwan is a "dangerous practice" that the United States must move away from.
The fight between Taiwan and China goes back to the 1940s. Taiwan broke from mainland China in 1949 and established a democratic society. The Chinese Communist Party, however, still attempts to impose rules and regulations on the island.
During a press conference on Sunday, Wang said China's claim
on Taiwan is an "insurmountable red line" that the Chinese government
refuses to back away from, the Associated Press reported.
“The Chinese government has no room for compromise,” Wang
said. “We urge the new U.S. administration to fully understand the high
sensitivity of the Taiwan issue” and “completely change the previous
administration’s dangerous practices of ‘crossing the line’ and ‘playing with
fire.”
China is continuing to assert its dominance over other
territories. Their fight to keep Taiwan under their thumb comes after Hong
Kongers demanded their autonomy and civil liberties be respected.
“No one cares more about the development of democracy in
Hong Kong than the central government,” Wang said, claiming Hong Kongers'
"rights" would be protected.
It's unclear what action the CCP will take if Biden refuses
to roll back the informal policy of supporting Taiwan, although the party has
threatened to invade the island if Taiwan attempts to declare formal
independence.
Tensions between China and Taiwan have heightened over the last year-and-a-half because of the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic. Taiwanese health officials alerted the WHO about the Wuhan coronavirus' transmission between humans back in Dec. 2019, but the organization failed to alert countries around the world.
+++
Kurt Schlichter asks the same question I have been posing.
https://townhall.com/columnist
+++++++++++++++++
No comments:
Post a Comment