At very least puzzling: https://spectator.us/reasons-w
Evidence and testimony are starting to spill out and they are compelling but it is doubtful it will bring about any changes because the fix is in and the powers that want Biden to win are going to have their way. There are not enough Republicans with clout willing to stick their necks out for Trump or run the risk of having the bad mouth put on them.
And:
America the glorious but will it/can it survive the vicious radical and divisive political landscape?
|
Biden
announcements show the left’s devotion to identity politics |
|
As the first wave of announcements naming the people that
perceived President-elect Joe Biden will be nominated for top positions in
his cabinet, the devotion to identity politics is in full view. I am not
speaking of the individuals themselves, their qualifications, or the lack
thereof. That will be dealt with in later commentaries. I am referring
to... Read More ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The stumbling begins even before he takes office: Biden suffers two hairline fractures after fall while playing with his dogAnd: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ |
Legitimacy of Biden Win Buried by Objective Data
Emerging information from the states render his victory less and less
plausible.
by DAVID CATRON <https://spectator.org/author/
Joe Biden reading his Thanksgiving message on Nov. 25 (YouTube screenshot)
Listen to this article
During the weeks following November 3rd, innumerable election experts and
statistical analysts have pored over the voting data upon which former Vice
President Joe Biden's purported campaign victory ostensibly stands. A
growing body of evidence ranging from straightforward ballot audits to
complex quantitative analyses suggests that the tabulation of the votes was
characterized by enough chicanery to alter the outcome of the election.
Consequently, a consensus has gradually developed among the auditors of
publicly available information released by the states, and it contradicts
the narrative promulgated by the Democrats and the media. The more data
experts see, the less convinced they are that Biden won.
Among the analysts who question the legitimacy of Biden's victory is Dr.
Navid Keshavarz-Nia, a cybersecurity expert whose technical expertise was
touted
<https://www.nytimes.com/2020/
ontracts.html> by the New York Times last September and who has been
described as a hero
<https://washingtonmonthly.com
Washington Monthly. It's unlikely that either publication will be singing
his praises for his work pursuant to the recent election. His damning
analysis of the electronic manipulation of votes that occurred in the early
hours of November 4th appears in a sworn affidavit included with C.J.
Pearson v. Kemp, a lawsuit
<https://defendingtherepublic.
ARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf> filed by Attorney Sidney Powell in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. His nine-page affidavit
<https://www.courtlistener.com
ied.350905.1.19.pdf> (Exhibit 26) describes how it is possible to
manipulate votes, where this occurred, and sums up his findings as follows:
I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in
all battleground states resulting in hundreds of thousands of votes that
were cast for President Trump to be transferred to Vice President Biden.
These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable
vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that
enabled operators to achieve the desired results. In my view, the evidence
is overwhelming and incontrovertible.
Dr. Keshavarz-Nia is by no means the only expert to reach the conclusion
that widespread vote-tampering occurred. This examination
<https://votepatternanalysis.s
election results, for example, uses quantitative analysis to identify some
very odd anomalies in the 2020 vote patterns. But it isn't necessary to be a
sophisticated statistician or cybersecurity expert possessed of arcane
knowledge of how voting machines operate to see that enough ballot fraud
occurred to change the election results in several states. That
Keshavarz-Nia provides his findings in a sworn affidavit, under penalty of
perjury, renders him highly credible. Still, his conclusions are rather
opaque to anyone without an enormous amount of training and experience in
his field. This requires many of us to take what he says on faith.
Bearing this in mind, Matt Braynard of the Voter Integrity Project (VIP)
approached the 2020 results in a far less arcane fashion. His team analyzed
publicly available data on absentee ballots and he explained
<https://www.youtube.com/watch
findings in a way that any intelligent voter can understand. VIP looked at
suspicious ballot activity in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada,
Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Among the most significant VIP findings
involved people who changed their state of residence, yet voted absentee
using their prior address. In Arizona, which Biden "won" by 10,457 votes,
there were 19,997 questionable votes. In Georgia, which Biden "won" by
12,670 votes, VIP found 138,221 such votes. In Wisconsin, which Biden "won"
by 20,608 votes, there were 26,673 such votes. As Braynard told
<https://www.theepochtimes.com
tes-data-analyst-concludes_359
Times:
This election, it appears to me, has been decided by ballots that are highly
questionable.... I can give you the list of the people who voted in this
election, who filed National Change of Address cards in Georgia, moving
themselves to another state.... I can also show you the subsequent state
voter registrations of these individuals in other states, who then cast
absentee ballots back in Georgia.... I have no confidence that Joe Biden is
the deserved winner of this election.
Braynard has been asked to present the findings of the Voter Integrity
Project to Monday's hearing
<https://www.fox10phoenix.com/
with-arizona-lawmakers-on-elec
legislature. Moreover, as Braynard tweeted
<https://twitter.com/MattBrayn
VIP findings have also been included in court filings in PA, GA, MI, WI, and
AZ, including declarations we collected." Sunday, another tweet
<https://twitter.com/MattBrayn
revealed that the FBI has proactively requested VIP findings that may
indicate illegal ballots. Meanwhile, no discussion of 2020 election
skulduggery is complete without a discussion of the Democrat precincts that
record more votes than registered voters. Rep. Bill Posey (R-Fla.) tweeted
<https://twitter.com/congbillp
following on that perennial topic: "According to an affidavit in the MI
lawsuit, one Michigan precinct/twnship had 781.91% turnout. How does this
happen?"
Good question. No fewer than six precincts listed by Rep. Posey experienced
turnout exceeding 120%. Another 10 allegedly enjoyed 100% turnout. This is
an insult to the electorate's intelligence, and it happened in Democrat
precincts all across the nation. From WWII through 2016 average turnout in a
presidential election was about 56%. Yet we are expected to believe that, in
2020, the national turnout <http://www.electproject.org/2
simply does not pass the laugh test. This is obviously the result of
widespread Democrat chicanery facilitated by high-handed flouting of
federal, state and county election laws. Joe Biden's victory is no more
legitimate than his plagiarized rhetoric or working class credentials. His
Potemkin presidency would be no more authentic than the man himself.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
What's Wrong With the 1619 Project?Presented by Wilfred ReillyIn August of 2019, the New York Times published the 1619 Project. Its goal is to redefine the American experiment as rooted not in liberty, but in slavery. In this video, Wilfred Reilly, associate professor of political science at Kentucky State University, responds to the 1619 Project’s major claims. Watch now. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ |
No comments:
Post a Comment