Simple Explanation. Pelosi Shield All Radicals. interesting Articles. Lighten Up. Israel Gives Up And Leaves USS Biden.

 

+++++++++++++++++++++

Political Differences Explained

If someone asks you the main difference between most Biden supporters and most Trump supporters, instead of stammering and looking for the best answer, just tell them that most Trump supporters sign their checks on the front, and most Biden supporters sign their checks on the back.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Nothing will be done. Radical Pelosi will shield her as she did Swalwell.  As lynn says: "so what, who cares, nothing will happen."

Maxine Waters Just Set Off a Nuke With Chauvin Remarks...And A LOT of

 Democrats Are Furious By Matt Vespa

And:

Power to the people but only if they are rioting:

Dems have abandoned all principle by telegraphing approval of some rioting

 By Jonathan S. Tobin

 

Are some riots good and others unacceptable? Surely not. Those who destroy property and commit assaults, whether against law enforcers or civilians, ought to be punished, no matter the cause they claim to support.

But today’s liberals reject this fair, universal standard. Some riots deserve legal protection, they insist, while others must be harshly repressed. It all depends on the politics of the rioters.

Some, such as the excitable Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), are cheering the prospect of another round of Black Lives Matter riots, er, “peaceful protests,” if the Derek Chauvin trial doesn’t go their way. They’re also up in arms about a new Florida law that strengthens punishment for those who take to the streets to commit violence.

Yet some of the same progressives are also demanding that authorities throw the book at Trump supporters who participated in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. They’re also on board with the DC authorities stonewalling demands for more information on the officer who shot and killed one of those entering the US Capitol.

The double standard is overt and infuriating: One group of demonstrators, the left says, should be permitted to commit mayhem. Another group deserves to be locked up as seditious insurrectionists, and the police-involved killing of one of them can and must be brushed aside.

It’s the clearest indication that the modern left subordinates all principles to the distinction between political friend and enemy: The Democratic Party sees itself allied with one group of violent demonstrators. That group’s excesses must be tolerated as an understandable reaction to racial injustice; the enemy must be punished.

Innocent Americans will pay the price for this cynicism and irresponsibility. As the Chauvin trial comes to a close, the situation in Minneapolis is especially febrile. Yet encouraging more explosive rioting of the kind we saw last year seems to be a priority for some Democrats. Waters was just in Minnesota protesting the police shooting of Daunte Wright, which set off violent protests around the country.

Waters told demonstrators to “get more confrontational” with law enforcement if the Chauvin jurors decide wrongly (by her political lights). Not long after she uttered those words, some “mostly peaceful” protesters committed a drive-by shooting of National Guardsmen, there to protect against riots.

The Florida bill, then, is necessary. The law makes it easier for authorities to prosecute rioters while still preserving the right to protest peacefully. It’s a smart response to the fact that when rioters burned businesses, attacked public buildings and generally created mayhem last summer, the police were often ordered to stand down.

Even when arrests were made, the rioters were often quickly released, reinforcing the impression that those committing violence on behalf of a fashionable cause like BLM shouldn’t be held to account. Some were quickly bailed out by funds promoted by then-Sen. Kamala Harris, now vice president of the United States.

It’s nonsense to claim that the Florida measure will have a chilling effect on the exercise of the First Amendment. So, too, is the American Civil Liberties Union’s claim that anti-rioting laws are “racist.”

But somehow the harsh treatment meted out to the Capitol rioters — who are no less deserving of punishment than BLM and antifa hooligans where they broke the law — doesn’t bother anyone on the left. Indeed, Waters and some of her Democratic colleagues in the House are suing ex-President Donald Trump for allegedly inciting a riot — even as they seem to encourage the very same activity in Minnesota.

They can’t have it both ways. Florida is right to crack down on politically inspired violence, and the rest of the country would do well to do the same. Those who grant immunity to one group of rioters while harshly prosecuting another aren’t just hypocrites. They’re doing exactly what they accused Trump of doing in January: trashing the rule of law.

Once political and cultural elites wink at rioting, illegal behavior once universally condemned, the rioting won’t stay limited to their preferred causes. Telegraphing approval to one group may well inspire other groups to do the same. The peril to the civic fabric is incalculable.

Jonathan S. Tobin is editor in chief of JNS.org. Twitter: @JonathanS_Tobin

Jonathan S. Tobin is editor in chief of JNS.org and a senior contributor for The Federalist, a columnist for the New York Post, Newsweek and Haaretz. He can be reached via e-mail at: jtobin@jns.org. Follow him on Twitter at @jonathans_tobin and on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/JonathanSTobincolumnist/. 

AND:

What Joe Biden and Obama Have in Common When It Comes to Handling Crises By Matt Vespa

The Lies Liberals Need to Tell Themselves By Derek Hunter ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++  If Soros has his way there will eventually be no Republican Attorney Generals: How Republican Attorney Generals Plan to Fight Court-Packing Get ready >> Read it Here >> AND: Jerry Nadler’s 7 Words About Court Packing Is ALL You Need To Know About The Radical Bill   Read This Alert >>> +++++++++++++++++++++  Lighten up jerks! Life can be a bowl of cherries if you don't brake your teeth on the pits. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Israel has left the Biden Boat: Israel Has Given up on Biden! After Biden Caved to Iran’s Terror Regime Israel Took Matters Into Their Own Hands  The attack on Iran’s Natanz nuclear enrichment site has already been discussed and there are a number of claims being tossed around at the moment. The Iranians are placing the blame on the Mossad and the United States is claiming that they did not play any role in the attack. The Jerusalem Post is offering more background on the explosion, which has taken out the underground electrical system responsible for powering centrifuges that enrich uranium. Let’s take a closer look at their report: “Fereydoon Abbasi-Davani, former head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, told Iranian media on Monday that the attack hit an electrical substation located deep underground and managed to damage both the power distribution system and the cable leading to the centrifuges in order to cut power to them. The Iranian official stressed that such an operation takes years, saying “the design of the enemy was very beautiful.”… The Jerusalem Post has learned that the attack was carried out through an explosive device that was smuggled into the facility and detonated remotely… Alireza Zakani, head of Iran’s Parliament Research Center, announced in a television interview on Tuesday that “thousands of centrifuges” had been destroyed, damaging “most of the enrichment facilities.” As for the New York Times, their reports are also easy enough to understand. Iran is furious and they are vowing revenge against the parties that are responsible. “Mr. Zarif, in a statement broadcast by Iranian state television, said that Israel wanted “to take revenge because of our progress in the way to lift sanctions.” “But we will take our revenge on the Zionists,” he continued,” the Times shared. This attack is going to do nothing to stop the Iranians from continuing to enrich uranium. Their most recent announcement is a fascinating one for those who are wondering what comes next. The Washington Post reports that they are going to be enriching uranium at a higher level than before: “Iran’s state-run Press TV quoted Iran’s lead nuclear negotiator, Abbas Araghchi, as saying the country informed the International Atomic Energy Agency of plans to start 60 percent uranium enrichment. The announcement puts Iran closer to weapons-grade levels of more than 90 percent enrichment and exceeds its current top level of 20 percent. The move adds another major hurdle to negotiations to revive a 2015 nuclear deal negotiated between Iran and six world powers,” their report warns. The only solace that the rest of the world can take is that it will take a few months before Iran is able to become operational again. If they are going to be enriching uranium any time soon, it is not going to be happening at Natanz. The U.S. revival of our involvement in the JCPOA was slated to be discussed once again this weekend but now no one knows if Iran is even going to show up. The worst part of all is that we still have no idea who is responsible for the attack to begin with. There are a number of countries who could have had a motive. Israel may have decided that they are looking to put a stop to the nuclear ambitions that Iran seems to clearly possess. They may have also wanted to set back their talks with the United States. They have never supported the JCPOA. If they had their druthers, they would probably prefer that the United States keep the sanctions in place. If you check out the quote from Zarif, that seems to be his take on the situation at the moment. The New York Times has their own theory: Israel is handling the United States’ dirty work on their behalf. Iran had massive leverage in the negotiations as long as those centrifuges kept spinning. Now that they are not, things have changed a bit and they are going to have to adjust their position. They functioned as an implied threat. If the United States comes to the table now, the terms are certainly going to be less favorable for the Iranians. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++