++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Well so far Biden has insulted Japan, ticked off Guatemala and has not endured himself to Israel or Putin. "C'mon Jap boy!"
Breaking: Guatemala President SLAMS Biden on Live TV amid Border Crisis
And:
+
And:
Our "Woke" president
Joe Biden is hardly the sharpest tool in the shed. Most people would say he’s a few fries short of a Happy Meal. But I have no doubt that he’s been...
Finally:
How Wokery Dominates Society By Michael CurtisThe present obsession with race and sex is taking over, everywhere. More++++++++++++++Democrat Fundraising Emails Get More Desperate 
++++++++++++++++++
Trump's thin skin and narcissistic ways hurt him and probably cost him a re-election. When it comes to his distaste for McConnell, Trump is foolish:
WHY DOES TRUMP HATE MITCH MCCONNELL?
Posted by Larry Horist
One of former President Trump’s least admirable traits is his habit of turning on friends and allies out of personal pique. It has not served the Republican Party well … or the conservative cause … or even Trump, himself.
There is no person in politics to whom I pledge fealty – not even Trump. I am driven by the issues and the skill with which those on my side pursue them. I may not agree with every position or action taken by such people as Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, etc., but I do not consider them enemies. They are all important in the strategic alliance known as the conservative movement.
Even such outliers as Mitt Romney and Lisa
Murkowski will vote right most of the time. In politics, one never gets
one hundred percent. A political coalition – at least a successful one –
must embrace those of common interest and belief – even if they occasionally
take actions inconsistent with my personal belief. The only person I know
who agrees with me all the time is … me.
WHEN
I LOOK AT SENATE MINORITY LEADER MITCH MCCONNELL – IN TERMS OF HIS RECORD – I
SEE A LOT TO ADMIRE AND VERY LITTLE OF WHICH TO DISAPPROVE.
Trump can call him a “cold stone loser,”
but I am put off by that sophomoric and gratuitous insult. It reflects more
negatively on the accuser than the accused.
Trump may feel that Mitch McConnell has
not been as politically sycophantic as he would like. But McConnell has been a
pretty good leader in terms of conservative issues. And that is my primary
consideration.
Without McConnell’s strong conservative
leadership, Trump would have had only one appointment to the Supreme Court –
Justice Brett Kavanaugh. McConnell endured the full wrath of the left
when he held open the seat on the high court made available with the sudden
death of Justice Antonin Scalia on the eve of the Trump presidency. That
enabled Trump to nominate Justice Neil Gorsuch.
McConnell stood strong against the same
left-wing maelstrom when he expedited the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney
Barrett in the last days of the Trump presidency.
Those two appointments, alone, would put
McConnell in the ranks of political heroes in my book. However, he has
also been responsible for the confirmation of hundreds of judges to the lower
federal courts. These are judges devoted to the text and meaning of the
Constitution.
But McConnell has done a lot more by
advancing the conservative agenda in the Senate. He used his power – both
as Minority and Majority leader – to block the most egregious proposal emitting
from the Obama White House.
Against all odds, McConnell has kept his
members united against the flurry of radical left-wing legislations flowing
from the Democrat-controlled House. These include such so-called “moderates” as
Alaskan Senator Lisa Murkowski and Utah Senator Mitt Romney. I call that
leadership.
McConnell successfully defended Trump
from two impeachments by the House. He even delayed the second impeachment in
order to create a “legitimacy” argument over a post presidency
impeachment. It was the argument most used by those voting
acquittal. A smart strategy that was enormously beneficial to Trump and
the Republican Party.
IT
SEEMS A LOT OF REPUBLICANS AND TRUMP HATE MITCH MCCONNELL. BUT WHY?
I cannot find that reason in any analysis
of the issues. On those, McConnell has been a rock.
The only cause of the animus toward McConnell
is because Trump an irrational, albeit temporary dislike for the man – except
when he IS liking him. Beyond a personality clash, the only real
foundation for Trump to hate Mitch McConnell is that he did not SOMEHOW stop
the inauguration of President Biden. That is the same reason Trump
flipped on his long-loyal Vice President Pence. That is another guy I have long
liked and admired. And still do. There is no way that either of
them could have stopped the certification of Biden. No matter what they believed
about the legitimacy of the vote.
There is always room for criticism. But I
see McConnell as a guy that has been quite loyal to conservative Republican
principles. Perfect? No. But pretty damn good.
Perhaps the best way to judge Mitch
McConnell is not based on the Trump’s irrational bitterness but on the
animosity heaped on the Minority Leader by those on the left – Democrats and
the media. I would take their uncompromised and unbridled hatred for
McConnell as sufficient evidence that he is doing a good job for the Republican
Party and the conservative values that I embrace – despite Trump’s current
opinion.
So, there ‘tis.
And:
Will Pelosi allow Waters to get off scott free as with Swalwell?
Maxine Waters once again caught trying to foment unrest | |
Headline: Maxine Waters Caught Trying to Foment Unrest and Now People are Calling on Pelosi to Punish Her The First take: A California congresswoman travels across state lines to address protesters and instruct them to be "more confrontational" if they don't get a guilty verdict in the Chauvin trial. Hours later, members of the National Guard are injured in a drive-by shooting not far from where Maxine Waters was speaking. If it is not criminal, it is at least shameful. Now a list of people are calling on Pelosi to do something about the harmful rhetoric. Think she will? | |
| |
Bonus: McCarthy vows to take action against Maxine Waters if Pelosi does nothing+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Israel and Biden maintain their differences regarding Iran: And: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Kick her out: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The tale of two shootings and what they reveal: A Tale of Two Shootings By Jeff Crouere On January 6, decorated U.S. Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt
was killed by a U.S. Capitol Police officer. She was among the crowd of
protesters who entered the U.S. Capitol and was shot as she attempted to climb
through a broken door outside the Speaker’s lobby, an area that leads to the
House Chamber. Babbitt was unarmed and should not have been considered a
threat by police officers. She was not a convicted criminal, in fact, she was a
military hero. Babbitt served in the U.S. Air Force for over 12 years in
various capacities. She deployed to both Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as to
the United Arab Emirates twice. Babbitt received medals for her service in the
Iraq Campaign and the Global War on Terrorism. Last week, the Department of Justice announced that the
officer who killed Babbitt would not be charged in her death. While this
officer was being exonerated, Kim Potter, a 26-year veteran of the Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota police force, was charged after she mistakenly shot and
killed Daunte Wright, a 20-year-old with a criminal record. Potter, along with two other officers, pulled over Wright’s car because of an expired license plate. Once the officers determined that Wright was also wanted on an outstanding warrant, they attempted to arrest him. At that point, Wright resisted arrest, reentered the vehicle, and attempted to leave the scene. Attempting to stop Wright, Potter yelled “Taser,” and shot him. Sadly, she used her weapon by mistake, tragically killing him. Wright’s troubles with the law started in December of 2019
when he was arrested for an aggravated armed robbery attempt. At that time,
Wright reportedly pulled a gun on a woman and demanded $820 in cash. When she
resisted, he allegedly choked her and tried to take her money. She started
screaming as Wright choked her again. Eventually, Wright and an accomplice left
without taking the money. After being identified by the victim, Wright was arrested
and released on $100,000 bail. It was revoked in July of 2020 when he violated
the terms by possessing a fireman and losing contact with his probation
officer. Clearly, when Wright was pulled over by the officers, he knew he
would be going to prison, so he tried to flee the scene. Potter was charged with second-degree manslaughter and
resigned from the police force after being put on administrative leave. In her
letter of resignation, she said that “loved every minute of being a police
officer and serving this community to the best of my ability.” The death of Wright was considered an accident by former
Brooklyn Center Police Chief Tim Gannon. He was forced to resign last week
after claiming that Potter “had the intention to deploy” her Taser but
mistakenly “shot Mr. Wright with a single bullet.” According to Gannon, the
fatal shooting appeared to be “an accidental discharge,” After being arrested, Potter was released after posting a
$100,000 bond. If convicted, she faces a maximum sentence of ten years in
prison. Her life will never be the same and her 26-year record as a police
officer will be completely disregarded. The mistaken shooting has led to
protests throughout the country and calls for Potter to be convicted. In their reporting on the tragedy, the media focused on the
fact that Potter is white while Daunte Wright was an African American. Of
course, there was no media coverage of the fact that the officer who killed
Babbitt, a white victim, is African American. The issue of race is often considered when the victim is
African American, and the officer is white. When the roles are reversed, it
seems to receive almost no attention from the media. The officer who killed Babbitt has not been identified. He
is being protected by the Department of Justice, which decided not to charge
him in Babbitt’s death. According to federal prosecutors there was
“insufficient evidence” to prove that Babbitt’s “civil rights were violated.”
Prosecutors also stated that the unidentified officer’s actions were
“reasonable.” However, was it “reasonable” to shoot Babbitt, a small woman,
could have easily been stopped with a Taser? Why did the officer use his weapon
to shoot an unarmed woman? While Potter has been charged and is no longer a police
officer, the U.S. Capitol Police officer has returned to his job after being
placed on administrative leave. He has been totally cleared of wrongdoing and
has faced limited backlash for his questionable actions.
Why the difference in how these two cases were handled? Some
believe it is another example of the double standard of justice that exists in
our country today. While Republicans and conservatives, such as Roger Stone,
former Lt. General Michael Flynn, and many other associates of former President
Donald Trump have faced severe consequences for their actions, Democrats are
often unpunished. The list of Democrats
who have received lenient treatment from the Department of Justice include
Hillary Clinton and all of those involved in the Russian collusion hoax. The
lackluster “Durham” investigation into this matter has been ongoing for years
and has produced almost nothing of value. Recently, it was
discovered that the FBI took possession of Hunter Biden’s laptop in December of
2019. In the last 16 months, despite the scandalous material on the laptop and
the sordid allegations against him, there have been no charges filed against Biden
and no update on the status of that investigation. While the FBI has
vigorously pursued those involved in the breach of security of the U.S. Capitol
on January 6, there has been little enthusiasm to prosecute those left-wing
agitators involved in the 275 riots last summer or the ones participating in
the ongoing riots in Portland, Minneapolis, and many other cities. The FBI Director
claimed he is investigating Antifa, but the organizers and main benefactors of
that terrorist organization have not been brought to justice. This leads many to
conclude that American justice is no longer blind. It can see, but only
conservatives.
Jeff Crouere is a
native New Orleanian and his award winning program, “Ringside Politics,” airs
nationally on Real America's Voice Network,AmericasVoice.News weekdays at 7 a.m. CT and
from 7-11 a.m. weekdays on WGSO 990-AM & Wgso.com. He is a political columnist, the author
ofAmerica's Last Chanceand provides regular
commentaries on the Jeff Crouere YouTube channel and on Crouere.net.
For more information, email him at jeff@ringsidepolitics.com +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Russia versus America military training. Yes, a bit over done but believe you will get the message: https://rumble.com/embed/ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Sent to me by a dear friend, fellow memo reader and someone who knows how to shoot a rifle:
In 1865 , a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States
In 1881, a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States - who later died from the wound.
In 1963, a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.
In 1975, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.
In 1983, a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States.
In 1984, James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.
In 1986, Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat , shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.
In 1990, James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.
In 1991, George Hennard, a disgruntled Democra t, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria in Killeen, TX.
In 1995, James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat , shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
In 1999, Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat , shot and killed 8 people at a church service.
In 2001, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.
In 2003, Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat , shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.
In 2007, a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.
In 2010, a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
In 2011, a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.
In 2012, Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.
In 2013 , a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school in Newtown ,CT.
As recently as September 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy shipyard.
Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.
Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was involved in any of these shootings and murders.
SOLUTION:
It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns.
We don’t need gun control, we need Democrat control.
Guns don’t kill people, DEMOCRATS do! +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ | |
No comments:
Post a Comment