Biden's Foreign Policy. Mauldin Worth A Read. Is Abrams In Trouble? Unity The Road To Disunity. Strike While The Iron Is Hot.

This is mind-boggling.

This is sad, sad, sad, bad enough to see it with sports,

but now it is in schools and even our U.S. Congress ... SICK!
 
If they won't stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance,

they have no place in our Congress.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Just in case you thought otherwise:

Biden’s Foreign Policy Is Dangerous

By Larry Horist

While President Biden is myopically focused on domestic policy - mainly how to grow the federal government into an authoritarian behemoth - the foreign scene is going to Hell. Biden has basically canceled all of... Read More +++++++++++++++++++++ What Mauldin says is often worth reading: Read Online  |  View as PDF +++++++++++++++++++++++++ She will eventually learn the world is unfair. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ If so, would not surprise me: Stacey Abrams Under Criminal Investigation For Fraud (PresidentialWire.com)- Georgia voting advocate Stacey Abrams is not out of the woods yet. An ethics committee in Georgia said recently that it would be continuing its probe of “potential illegal campaign activities” by a group run by Abrams. The former Democratic gubernatorial nominee from 2018 runs the voter mobilization group. The group, known as the New Georgia Project, was required to “comply with previously issued subpoenas” that were issued by the Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission. The group appealed that decision from the Gwinnett County Superior Court, according to David Emadi, the group’s executive director. The commission has accused the New Georgia Project of advocating for the election of Abrams in 2018 in her bid to unseat Republican Governor Brian Kemp “without registering as a campaign committee or filing disclosures showing how much it raised or spent.” Emadi responded by writing to Just the News: “The case remains in appeal at this time pending its next hearing on the matter.” Because the litigation is still ongoing, Emadi said he couldn’t share any results of “any investigation thus far.” In making his ruling, Judge Warren Davis cited various evidence the commission provided against the New Georgia Project as well as the Action Fund. The evidence showed the two sibling groups made expenditures and solicited contributions in order to promote not only Abrams but other candidates as well. Some of the expenses included “canvassing activities, literature expressly advocating for the election of candidates, and operating field offices where these electioneering activities were coordinated.” This whole time, officials at the New Georgia Project have tried to dismiss the claims. The CEO of the group, Nse Ufot, for example, said the investigation is “another continuation of a baseless partisan attack on a grassroots organization.” The group made it a point to note that Emadi ended up donating $600 to Kemp’s campaign back in 2018. That despite the fact that he may face off against Kemp in the state’s gubernatorial election in 2022. As Ufot tried to explain: “There is nothing ethical about this partisan inquiry, and they should be ashamed.” At a hearing in 2020, the New Georgia Project and officials from the commission sparred. The voter group said it turned over 4,000 documents so far “showing checks, wire transfers, bank records and campaign transactions.” The group accused the commission of fishing for unrelated documents and personal emails that they would use in other ways. On the flip side, a lawyer for the state argued that the New Georgia Project as well as its action fund didn’t left out certain information from spending disclosures. This includes the fact that it sought donations, hired canvassers and also sent mass emails that supported Abrams in her run for governor. The retort from Abrams’ side was those emails and activities don’t show “direct communications” that would suggest any illegal coordination. Further, they claim the commission has to show “reasonable grounds to believe” that the group violated campaign finance laws if it wants to dig deeper beyond the preliminary investigation. ++++++++++++++++++++ As I edge closer to 90 and reflect this is what I have learned about Radical Democrats : Every goal Radical Democrats have is meant to heighten anxiety,  make it large, bigger than life so only an expanded government can solve the problem. What do radical Democrats employ to accomplish this?  Weaponize words and phrases. Intimidate and play race cards. Spend money and when that does not work spend more because money is the liberal's solution to everything.  Support or ignore disorder, ie. riots. Couch everything in terms of caring, compassion so they appear as selfless do gooders. Always be on the side of the under dog because numerically that justifies more spending. Always stick together because in unity there is strength and that is the best way to create disunity. What's the end game?  Power, continuation in office and eventually personal enrichment.  How did Pelosi and Waters get filthy rich off congressional salaries? You talk about "wokeness" when will "turkey citizens" awake?  Democrats  already told you" never allow a crisis go to waste." If there is no crisis create one and if there is take advantage of the associated fear.  It is better known as: "strike while the iron is hot." ++++++++++++ Kamala Harris Says Black Women Are Dying In Hospitals Because Of Racism   Read This Alert >>> And: Critical Race Theory: What It Is and How to Fight It Christopher F. Rufo  Founder and Director, Battlefront Christopher F. Rufo is founder and director of Battlefront, a public policy research center. He is a graduate of Georgetown University and a former Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy. As executive director at the Documentary Foundation, he has directed four films for PBS, including most recently America Lost, which explores life in Youngstown, Ohio, Memphis, Tennessee, and Stockton, California. He is also a contributing editor of City Journal, where he covers topics including critical race theory, homelessness, addiction, and crime. The following is adapted from a lecture delivered at Hillsdale College on March 30, 2021.   Critical race theory is fast becoming America’s new institutional orthodoxy. Yet most Americans have never heard of it—and of those who have, many don’t understand it. It’s time for this to change. We need to know what it is so we can know how to fight it. In explaining critical race theory, it helps to begin with a brief history of Marxism. Originally, the Marxist Left built its political program on the theory of class conflict. Marx believed that the primary characteristic of industrial societies was the imbalance of power between capitalists and workers. The solution to that imbalance, according to Marx, was revolution: the workers would eventually gain consciousness of their plight, seize the means of production, overthrow the capitalist class, and usher in a new socialist society. . . . continue reading ++++++++++++++++++++++++++