Cancel culture is eroding America as we know it. It’s up to every person, especially those in the media and Hollywood, to stand up against it. Comedian and podcast host Adam Carolla explains why it’s time to be courageous on this episode of Stories of Us. Click here to watch.
| Biden Must Reverse Course On Iran -- Before It's Too Late |
| by Bill Hagerty, H. R. McMaster via Real Clear Politics Media outlets around the world recently reported on leaked audio comments in which Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif admitted that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps controls all of Iran’s foreign policy decisions. Although President Joe Biden was careful to mention neither Zarif nor Iran in his speech before Congress last month, Zarif’s embarrassingly candid revelations have direct implications for Biden’s entire Iran policy: namely, it underscores that reducing economic sanctions in order to moderate the Iranian regime cannot work. |
ILLEGAL POEM
By Illegal Immigrants
I cross river,
Poor and broke,
Take bus,
See employment folk.
Nice man
Treat me good in there,
Say I need
Go see Welfare.
Welfare say,
'You come no more,
We send cash
Right to your door.'
Welfare checks,
They make you wealthy,
Medicaid
It keep you healthy!
By and by,
Got plenty money,
Thanks to you, TAXPAYER dummy.
Write to friends
In motherland,
Tell them
'come, fast as you can'
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Stacey Abrams said what?
In an interview with CBS News, Stacey admitted that she has every intention of running for president. When asked about it, she responded, “DO I hold it as an ambition? Absolutely.”
This is right on the heels of President Biden practically endorsing her when he visited Georgia just a couple of weeks ago. He sang Stacey’s praises, and said, “Stacey Abrams can be anything she wants to be, from whatever she chooses to president.”
It may sound ridiculous, but we absolutely cannot afford to underestimate Stacey Abrams again.
After losing the gubernatorial election in 2018, she went on to become a kingmaker in Georgia and throughout the country. Abrams “flipped” the Peach State blue for Biden, and handed Chuck Schumer the Senate Majority by helping win our two Senate seats.
If Stacey Abrams says she is running for president someday, WE NEED TO STOP HER NOW.
Our grassroots team is working hard to mobilize conservatives and ultimately expose Stacey and her shady, dark money political network, and we need your help, Fellow Conservative,
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Robert
Mueller’s Revenge
A judge’s ludicrous tirade targets former Attorney General William
Barr.
Federal Judge Amy Berman Jackson has an answer for all those hoping to heal and move
on
from the Trump years: Nothing doing.
Her answer comes by way of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by the left-
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. In her ruling, Judge Jackson orders
the Justice Department to make public an internal March 2019 memo to then-Attorney
General Bill Barr about whether to prosecute
President Trump.
The pretense is that this is about Mr. Barr, whom the judge accuses of being
“disingenuous” about his handling of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russian
interference in the 2016 presidential election. In reality, her tirade is but the latest
expression of Mueller Madness: the great liberal frustration that, in the end, there was no
“there” there in the Mueller
report.
We know this not from Mr. Trump or Mr. Barr but from their fiercest foes. When
Democrats finally did get around to impeaching Mr. Trump, they made a conscious
decision to ignore the Mueller report. Instead, their (first) impeachment was over a phone
call Mr. Trump made to Ukrainian President
Volodymyr Zelensky.
On Dec. 10, 2019, the New York Times reported that, after consulting with her caucus,
Speaker Nancy Pelosi decided the House would move ahead with two articles of
impeachment. Each would focus narrowly on Ukraine. A third impeachment charge, tied
to Mr. Mueller’s report, was “too much of a
reach.”
In short, Mr. Mueller’s first shot at Mr. Trump was collusion with the Russians, for which
he found no evidence. His second shot was obstruction of justice, but he punted on a
decision about whether what he found was a crime. This shot didn’t hit its mark either
when Congress declined to act
on it.
Plainly the judge is hoping the third time’s the charm. If she can’t get Mr. Trump, maybe
she can at least tarnish his attorney general.
One of the judge’s complaints is that in reducing the 448-page Mueller report to a four-
page summary of its principal conclusions and releasing it to the public, Mr. Barr was
trying to “hide the ball.” The idea is ludicrous, given that Mr. Barr made public almost
the full report—complete with its hundreds of pages detailing Mr. Trump’s bad behavior
—only three weeks later. In his letter Mr. Barr duly noted Mr. Mueller’s point that the
report didn’t
“exonerate” the president.
Now, two years later, Judge Jackson revives the special counsel’s complaint that the
attorney general’s letter didn’t fully capture “the context, nature, and substance” of his
report. What the judge doesn’t point out is that Mr. Barr then called Mr. Mueller to ask
what he’d got wrong and, according to a Justice spokesman, Mr. Mueller conceded there
was nothing inaccurate but felt the media coverage was misinterpreting it and wanted
more released. Weeks later, when Mr. Mueller testified before the House Judiciary
Committee—the perfect opportunity to tell the world about the ball Mr. Barr had hidden
—he again retreated into vague generalities.
We are left with a federal judge reaching into internal Justice Department communications
in a way that, if allowed to stand, would jeopardize the ability of any attorney general to
get candid advice from his staff. In an argument that sounds less like the words of a
dispassionate judge than the fantasies of a naked partisan such as Democratic Rep. Adam
Schiff, Judge Jackson claims to know—without proof and apparently without appreciation
for how the Justice Department functions—that Mr. Barr had already made his decision
before the memo. Her opinion is a reminder of how egregious prosecution could be if left
to judges.
After her ruling, gleeful headlines reported that a judge had all but called Mr. Barr a liar.
Some who should know better—e.g., Neal Katyal, acting U.S. solicitor general during the
Obama administration—have piled on by
talking up possible criminal charges.
This is a test for Merrick Garland. As attorney general he surely has an interest in keeping
confidential his own department’s internal deliberations on controversial issues. Whether
the Justice Department appeals Judge Jackson’s outrageous decision will tell us whether
Mr. Garland really is
a square shooter, as he has been sold.
Meanwhile, there have been almost no public defenses of Mr. Barr. Partly this is because
he is loathed by Democrats for launching an investigation into the Federal Bureau of
Investigation’s 2016 Trump-Russia probe. Partly it’s because some Republicans are also
sore at him for not backing Mr. Trump’s claims that Mr. Biden won the 2020 election
because of
widespread election fraud.
None of this changes the reality of Mr. Mueller and his report: He found no underlying
crime, his investigation was not obstructed, and he was never able to cite a single case
involving the obstruction statute in which a government official—much less a president
—was prosecuted for exercising his legitimate authority. In ruling as she has, Judge
Jackson has shown herself to be another bitter partisan who cannot bring herself to face
these facts.
++++++++++++++++++++++++
I would not have entitled the heading in this manner because the disaster was the loss of
life but I despise J Street and what they stand for. They are the Jewish equivalent of a
disgraceful organization loaded with Jane Fonda's.
A disaster for J Street?
It’s as if certain media outlets form a kind of protective cordon around Jewish critics of Israel in order to ensure that they are not asked difficult or embarrassing questions.
By Stephen M. Flatow
(May 10, 2021 / JNS) Everything about the murder of Israeli teenager Yehuda Guetta shatters the myths and lies that are used by groups like J Street to promote the Palestinian cause. In a fair world, the killing and its aftermath would be an utter public-relations disaster for the Jewish left. But in the real world, things likely will turn out rather differently.
Let’s start with the ironic timing. Last week, J Street announced its support for legislation by Rep. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) to penalize Israel for arresting teenage Palestinian terrorists. But just a few days later, it’s three Israeli—not Palestinian—teenagers who are the victims.
Nevertheless, neither J Street nor its allies on the left, such as Americans for Peace Now and Partners for Progressive Israel, issued even one press release to condemn the attack on the three Israeli teens. Oh, they have had plenty to say in recent days—like condemning the Jewish community for criticizing the Human Rights Watch “apartheid” smear against Israel. But not a single press release about the gunning down of Israeli teenagers.
Still, not a single journalist seems to have asked them about their silence, or about the contrast between their deep interest in the fate of teenage Palestinian terrorists and their utter indifference to the fate of teenage victims of Palestinian terror.
When feasible, many on the Jewish left try to minimize or rationalize Palestinian terror by emphasizing that the Israeli victims were “settlers.” That line won’t work this time. Guetta, the murder victim, was a resident of Jerusalem. The two other teens who were shot are residents of Beit She’an and Tzfat. Meaning they all come from cities within the pre-1967 armistice lines. They weren’t “occupying” any Palestinians.
The shooting took place at a bus stop in an area which, according to the Oslo accords, is within Israeli-administered territory. It wasn’t in the area governed by the Palestinian Authority. The teenagers were not intruding on somebody else’s turf. They were waiting for a bus in exactly the area where the P.A. agreed they could wait when the P.A. signed the Oslo agreement.
Now let’s talk about what happened when Israeli forces pursued the shooter. Israeli soldiers tracked the shooter’s car into the Palestinian Arab village of Aqraba. That’s a P.A.-controlled town. It’s been under exclusive P.A. rule for the past 26 years. It’s not “occupied.” There are no soldiers, no settlers.
J Street and company have been telling us for decades that as soon as the Israelis withdrew from Palestinian Arab areas like Aqraba, peace would follow. The whole problem, they said, is that Palestinians resent having to see Israeli “occupiers” every day. Well, the Israelis left Aqraba in 1995. So presumably the residents are now peaceful and opposed to terrorism. They should have welcomed and assisted the Israeli soldiers who pursued the shooter into their town.
Instead, local Arab mobs tried to stone the soldiers to death. Then they tried to destroy evidence linking the shooter to the shooting by burning the car in which he had escaped. In short, the behavior of the Aqraba residents shatters all the myths that J Street has been spreading. But not a single journalist has asked them about that.
The Israelis captured the shooter anyway. And once again, everything about him confounds what the J Streeters have been telling us for years. The terrorist, Muntasir Shalabi, comes from the town of Turmus Ayya—again, a town under P.A. control. There are no soldiers or occupiers or settlers bothering Shalabi or his neighbors. He wasn’t responding to “oppression.” He left his P.A.-run town to go hunt for Jews in the areas that the P.A. itself agreed should be administered by Israel.
Not only that, but Shalabi’s demographic profile is all wrong. The Jewish left always portrays Palestinian terrorists as young people who are unemployed or come from broken families. They want it to seem as if Palestinian terrorism is caused by socioeconomic problems, not Jew-hating ideology.
Well, guess what? Shalabi is 44 years old. He’s married. He’s a family man. The problem is just that he hates Jews. I wonder if that could have anything to do with the anti-Jewish hatred pumped 24 hours a day throughout the P.A.’s newspapers, radio broadcasts, television stations, movie theaters and schools. It’s in their air. It’s in their water.
Apologists for the Palestinians are already spreading rumors that Shalabi recently lost some money while gambling in the United States. If gambling were the cause of terrorism, America would be in pretty bad shape; before the pandemic, an average of 42 million Americans visited Las Vegas each year. Yet for some reason, people who lose in the Nevada casinos don’t respond by carrying out drive-by shooting attacks on Jewish teenagers. I wonder why.
I have referred here several times to the fact that journalists never seem to ask J Street or Peace Now spokesmen about these issues. It’s as if certain media outlets form a kind of protective cordon around Jewish critics of Israel in order to ensure that they are not asked difficult or embarrassing questions.
In a fair world, the latest developments would have become an utter public-relations disaster for the Jewish left-wing hecklers of Israel. But in the real world, they will probably be able to quietly ride this one out until the current news cycle is over and everyone else starts paying attention to something else.
Stephen M. Flatow is a vice president of the Religious Zionists of America, an attorney in New Jersey and the father of Alisa Flatow, who was murdered in an Iranian-sponsored Palestinian terrorist attack in 1995. He is the author of “A Father’s Story: My Fight for Justice Against Iranian Terror.”
AG
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Don't turn into a statistic stay a turnip!
Don't get carried with statistics. Stay safe.
STATISTICS TO AMAZE YOU ...
The number of deaths in the world in the last 3 months of 2020
3,14,687 : Corona virus
3,40,584 : Malaria
3,53,696 : suicide
3,93,479 : road accidents
2,40,950 : HIV
5,58,471 : alcohol
8,16,498 : smoking
11,67,714: Cancer
Then do you think Corona is dangerous?
Or
is the purpose of the media campaign to settle the trade war between China and
America
or
to reduce financial markets to prepare the stage of financial markets for
mergers and acquisitions
or
to sell US Treasury bonds to cover the fiscal deficit in them
Or
Is it a Panic created by Pharma companies to sell their products like
sanitizer, masks, medicine etc.
Do not Panic & don't kill yourself with unnecessary fear. This posting is to
balance your newsfeed from posts that caused fear and panic.
33,38,724 People are sick with Coronavirus at the moment, of which 32,00,000
are abroad. This means that if you are not in or haven't recently visited any
foreign country, this should eliminate 95% of your concern.
If you do contact Coronavirus, this still is not a cause for panic because:
81% of the Cases are MILD
14% of the Cases are MODERATE
Only 5% of the Cases are CRITICAL
Which means that even if you do get the virus, you are most likely to recover
from it.
Some have said, “but this is worse than SARS and SWINEFLU!” SARS had a
fatality rate of 10%, Swine flu 28% while COVID-19 has a fatality rate of 2%
Moreover, looking at the ages of those who are dying of this virus, the death
rate for the people UNDER 55 years of age is only 0.4%
This means that: if you are under 55 years of age and don't live out of India -
you are more likely to win the lottery (which has a 1 in 45,000,000 chance)
Let's take one day ie 1 May as an example when Covid 19 took lives of 6406 in
the world.
On the same day:
26,283 people died of Cancer
24,641 people died of Heart Disease
4,300 people died of Diabetes
Suicide took 28 times more lives than the virus did.
Mosquitoes kill 2,740 people every day, HUMANS kill 1,300 fellow humans every
day, and Snakes kill 137 people every day. (Sharks kill 2 people a year)
SO DO THE DAILY THINGS TO SUPPORT YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM , PROPER HYGIENE AND DO
NOT LIVE IN FEAR.
Join to Spread *Hope* instead of Fear.
The Biggest Virus is not Corona Virus but Fear!
Omar Goes FULL Radical Mode With Her Latest DemandFrom Fellow Democrats | |
Read More >> |
No comments:
Post a Comment