Wednesday, October 21, 2020

Hate Trump More Than You Love America, Then Live With Your Decision. Soros Arranged For His Wealth and Son To Speak Long After He Has Gone. Much More.


 
























: FBI investigation into Hunter Biden’s laptop ongoing since December

And:

Stilton's Place

 

Dear H R,

 

Tomorrow evening will be the last of the President debates, and to ensure that voters aren't overwhelmed by too much truth, an "off" switch has been installed on President Trump's microphone to keep him from responding to lies in real time. No, really.

 

Frankly, this is why "journalism" now has much lower credibility than we enjoy at Stilton's Place!

 

Stilton Jarlsberg


Finally:

 Last week I e-mailed The White House and messaged Trump, that with all due respect, he was not a good debater in his  own defense.  I laid out a succinct rebuttal of what he should be saying and how to say it  and even  posted it in a previous memo.


Considering his many positive achievements it remains his to lose but early voting is a neat way Democrats have chosen to lock in votes so if anything comes up that is newsworthy and negative it is too late to change votes. 


 Second, Trump has to widen his appeal and seems he has failed to do that, Perhaps the undecided are too small a number and too difficult to persuade but you would think Trump has an advantage if he focuses on what he accomplished, economically speaking, before COVID hit.


Three, it is obvious Democrats, assisted by the mass media, made persona the issue when playing  substance cards should have been Trump's strategy. Yes, he made some Pandemic mistakes but who would not have and he did listen to the medical experts and even they were  wrong at times. Overall Trump did a lot of good things and he has mentioned them but, in my opinion, he was not effective. I believe you need to tick each one off in a brief and punchy manner, ie. 1, 2, 3 etc.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Meanwhile, Democrats wanted everyone to believe Trump was engaged in collusion when, in fact,  it was renegade Democrats who were engaged in spying and  setting him up using false documents and illegal warrants.   However, when it comes to Hunter and "Pop" these same renegade Democrats tell you not to believe the material obtained from Hunter's own hard drive.

You have to hand it to the Democrats they are shameless, they are the epitome of chutzpah and the definition of hypocrisy.

"Pop" is hiding in his basement, hiding behind the mass media shills and big technology is busy suppressing any story about allegedly aligning him to questionable activities.

Go ahead and elect their flawed candidate, allow the mass media to protect "Pop" who will not last 78 days as president and spend the next four years ruing the day you ever heard of  "Pop Biden" and Kamala's names. 

Yes, hate Trump  more than you love America and live with your decision .

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-bidens-and-china-business-11603236651?mod=opinion_lead_pos1

And:

In my opinion, a vote for Biden is just what Soros wants so you can join his fraternity and hop in bed with those who want to destroy America. It is your call. Soros has tentacles that reach all over the world and he has arranged for his money and  his son to speak/influence long after he has gone.

       If you have ever wondered exactly who is George Soros .....................well, here it is!

 

Subject: THE MOST EVIL HUMAN ON EARTH! 
This is an oldie but it needs to be read over and over. Present day organizations such as ANTIFA and BLM are also Soros funded. A MUST READ by all who care about this country. 
 
 
THE MOST EVIL HUMAN ON EARTH!
Steve Kroft (born August 22, 1945) is an American journalist and a longtime correspondent for "60 Minutes".  His investigative reporting has garnered him much acclaim, including three Peabody Awards and nine Emmy awards, one of which was an Emmy for Lifetime Achievement.
****************************** ****
One Evil Human..... by STEVE KROFT ("60 Minutes”)

Glen Beck has been developing material to show all the ties that Soros has through the nation and world along with his goals.  This article is written by Steve Kroft from "60 Minutes".  It begins to piece together the rise of Obama and his behavior in leading the nation along with many members of Congress, (in particular the Liberal Democrats, such as the election of Pelosi as the minority leader in Congress).

If you have wondered where Obama came from, and just how he quickly moved from obscurity to President, or why the media is "selective" in what we are told about him, here is the man who most probably put him there, and is responsible.  He controlled President Obama's every move...

Think this is absurd?  Invest a few minutes and read this.  You won't regret it.

Who is Obama?  Obama is a puppet, and here is the explanation of the man, or demon that pulls his strings.  It's not by chance that Obama can manipulate the world.  After reading this, and Obama's reluctance to accept help on the oil spill you wonder if the spill is part of the plan to destroy the US?

"In history, nothing happens by accident.  If it happened, you can bet someone planned it." ~ Franklin Delano Roosevelt~

Who Is George Soros?  He brought the market down in 2 days.  Here is what CBS' Mr. Steve Kroft's research has turned up.  It's a bit of a read, and it took 4 months to put it together.

"The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States of America."
~ George Soros~

George Soros is an evil man.....He's anti-God, anti-family, anti-American, and anti-good."  He killed and robbed his own Jewish people.  What we have in Soros, is a multi-billionaire atheist, with skewed moral values, and a sociopath's lack of conscience.  He considers himself to be an elitist world class philosopher, despises the American way, and just loves to do social engineering, and change cultures.

Garry Schwartz, better known to the world as George Soros, was born August 12, 1930 in Hungary.  Soros' father, Tivadar, was a fervent practitioner of the Esperanto language invented in 1887, and designed to be the first global language, free of any national identity.  The Schwartz's, who were non-practicing Jews, changed the family name to Soros, in order to facilitate assimilation into the Gentile population, as the Nazis spread into Hungary during the 1930s.

When Hitler's henchman, Adolf Eichmann arrived in Hungary, to oversee the murder of that country's Jews, George Soros ended up with a man whose job was confiscating property from the Jewish population.  Soros went with him on his rounds.

Soros has repeatedly called 1944 "the best year of his life."  70% of Mr. Soros's fellow Jews in Hungary, nearly a half-million human beings, were annihilated in that year , yet he gives no sign that this put any damper on his elation, either at the time, or indeed in retrospect".  During an interview with "Sixty Minute's" with Steve Kroft, Soros was asked about his "best year.”

KROFT:  My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.

SOROS:  Yes.  Yes.
KROFT:  Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from your fellow Jews, friends, and neighbors.

SOROS:  Yes.  That's right.  Yes.

KROFT:  I mean, that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many, years.  Was it difficult?

SOROS:  No, not at all.  Not at all, I rather enjoyed it.

KROFT:  No feelings of guilt?

SOROS:  No, only feelings of absolute power!

In his article, Muravchik describes how Soros has admitted to having carried some rather "potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control, otherwise they might get me in trouble." 

Be that as it may.  After WWII, Soros attended the London School of Economics, where he fell under the thrall of fellow atheist and Hungarian, Karl Popper, one of his professors.  Popper was a mentor to Soros until Popper's death in 1994.  Two of Popper's most influential teachings concerned "the open society," and Fallibilism.

Fallibilism is the philosophical doctrine that all claims of knowledge could, in principle, be mistaken.  (Then again, I could be wrong about that.)  The "open society" basically refers to a "test and evaluate" approach to social engineering.  Regarding "open society," Roy Childs writes, "Since the Second World War, most of the Western democracies have followed Popper's advice about piecemeal social engineering and democratic social reform, and it has gotten them into a grand mess.”

In 1956 Soros moved to New York City, where he worked on Wall Street, and started amassing his fortune.  He specialized in hedge funds and currency speculation.  Soros is absolutely ruthless, amoral, and clever in his business dealings, and quickly made his fortune.  By the 1980s he was well on his way to becoming the global powerhouse  he is today.

In an article Kyle-Anne Shiver wrote for "The American Thinker" she says, "Soros made his first billion in 1992 by shorting the British pound with leveraged billions in financial bets, and became known as the man who broke the Bank of England.  He broke it on the backs of hard-working British citizens who immediately saw their homes severely devalued and their life savings cut drastically, almost overnight.”

In 1994 Soros crowed in "The New Republic," that "the former Soviet Empire is now called the Soros Empire."  The Russia-gate scandal in 1999, which almost collapsed the Russian economy, was labeled by Rep. Jim Leach, then head of the House Banking Committee, to be "one of the greatest social robberies in human history.  The "Soros Empire" indeed.

In 1997 Soros almost destroyed the economies of Thailand and Malaysia.  At the time, Malaysia's Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohammad, called Soros "a villain, and a moron."  Thai activist Weng Tojirakarn said, "We regard George Soros as a kind of Dracula.  He sucks the blood from the people.”

The website Greek National Pride reports, "Soros was part of the full court press that dismantled Yugoslavia and caused trouble in Georgia, Ukraine, and Myanmar [Burma].  Calling himself a philanthropist, Soros' role is to tighten the ideological stranglehold of globalization and the New World Order while promoting his own financial gain.  He is without conscience; a capitalist who functions with absolute amorality.”

France has upheld an earlier conviction against Soros, for felony insider trading.  Soros was fined 2.9 million dollars.  Recently, his native Hungary fined Soros 2.2 million dollars for "illegal market manipulation."  Elizabeth Crum writes that the Hungarian economy has been in a state of transition as the country seeks to become more financially stable and westernized.  Soros deliberately driving down the share price of its largest bank put Hungary's economy into a wicked tailspin, one from which it is still trying to recover.
My point here is that Soros is aplanetary parasite.  His grasp, greed, and gluttony have a global reach.  But what about America?  Soros told Australia's national newspaper "The Australian."  "America, as the center of the globalized financial markets, was sucking up the savings of the world.  This is now over.  "The game is out," he said, adding that the time has come for "a very serious adjustment" in American's consumption habits.  He implied that he was the one with the power to bring this about.”

SOROS:  "World financial crisis was "stimulating, and in a way, the culmination of my life's work."
Obama has recently promised 10 billion of our tax dollars to Brazil, in order to give them a leg-up in expanding their offshore oil fields.  Obama's largesse towards Brazil came shortly after his political financial backer, George Soros, invested heavily in Brazilian oil, (Petrobras).

Tait Trussel writes, "The Petrobras loan may be a windfall for Soros and Brazil, but it is a bad deal for the U.S.  The American Petroleum Institute estimates that oil exploration in the U S could create 160,000 new, well-paying jobs, as well as $1.7 trillion in revenues to federal, state, and local governments, all while fostering greater energy security and independence.”

A blog you might want to keep an eye on is SorosWatch.com.  Their mission:  "This blog is dedicated to all who have suffered due to the ruthless financial pursuits of George Soros.  Their stories are many and varied, but the theme is the same:  the destructive power of greed without conscience.  We pledge to tirelessly watch Soros wherever he goes, and to print the truth in the hope that he will one day be made to stop preying upon the world's poor, that justice will be served.”

Back to America.  Soros has been actively working to destroy America from the inside out for some years now.  People have been warning us.  Two years ago, news sources reported,"Soros is an extremist who wants open borders, a one-world foreign policy, legalized drugs, euthanasia, and on and on.  This is off-the-chart dangerous.  In 1997 Rachel Ehrenfeld wrote, "Soros uses his philanthropy to change, or more accurately deconstruct the moral values and attitudes of the Western world, and particularly of the American people."  His "open society" is not about freedom; it is about license.  His vision rejects the notion of ordered liberty, in favor of a PROGRESSIVE ideology of rights and entitlements.

Perhaps the most important of these "whistle blowers" are David Horowitz and Richard Poe.  Their book, "The Shadow Party", outlines in detail how Soros hijacked the Democratic Party, and now owns it lock, stock, and barrel.  Soros has been packing the Democratic Party with radicals, and ousting moderate Democrats for years.  The Shadow Party became the Shadow Government, which recently became the Obama Administration, and life's work since he left office…

Discover The Networks.org(another good source) writes, "By his [Soros'] own admission, he helped engineer coups in Slovakia, Croatia, Georgia, and Yugoslavia.  When Soros targets a country for "regime change," he begins by creating a shadow government, a fully formed government-in-exile, ready to assume power when the opportunity arises.  The Shadow Party he has built in America greatly resembles those he has created in other countries prior to instigating a coup.”

November 2008 edition of the German magazine, "Der Spiegel," in which Soros gives his opinion on what the next POTUS (President of the U. S.) should do after taking office.  "I think we need a large stimulus package."  Soros thought that around 600 billion would be about right.  Soros also said that "I think Obama presents us a great opportunity to finally deal with global warming, and energy dependence.
The U.S. needs a cap & trade system  with auctioning of licenses for emissions rights." Although Soros doesn't (yet) own the Republican Party, like he does the Democrats, make no mistake, his tentacles are spread throughout the Republican Party as well.

Soros is a partner in the Carlyle Group where he has invested more than 100 million dollars.  According to an article by "The Baltimore Chronicle's" Alice Cherbonnier, the Carlyle Group is run by "a veritable who's who of former Republican leaders," from CIA man, Frank Carlucci, to CIA head, and ex-President George Bush, Sr.
In late 2006, Soros bought about 2 million shares of Halliburton, Dick Cheney's old stomping grounds.  When the Democrats and Republicans held their conventions in 2000, Soros held Shadow Party conventions in the same cities, at the same time.

In 2008, Soros donated $5,000,000,000 (that's Five Billion) to the Democratic National Committee, DNC, to insure Obama's win and wins for many other Alinsky trained Radical Rules Anti-American Socialist.  George has been contributing a billion plus to the DNC since Clinton came on the scene.

Soros has dirtied both sides of the aisle, trust me.  And if that weren't bad enough, he has long held connections with the CIA.  And I mustn't forget to mention Soros' involvement with the MSM (Main Stream Media), the entertainment industry (e.g. he owns 2.6 million shares of Time Warner), and the various political advertising organizations he funnels millions to.  In short, George Soros controls or influences most of the MSM.  Little wonder they ignore the TEA PARTY, - Soros' NEMESIS.

As Matthew Vadum writes, "The liberal billionaire-turned-philanthropist has been buying up media properties for years in order to drive home his message to the American public that they are too materialistic, too wasteful, too selfish, and too stupid to decide for themselves how to run their own lives.”

Richard Poe writes, "Soros' private philanthropy, totaling nearly $5 billion, continues undermining America's traditional Western values.  His giving has provided funding of abortion rights, atheism, drug legalization, sex education, euthanasia, feminism, gun control, globalization, mass immigration, gay marriage, and other radical experiments in social engineering.”

Some of the many NGOs (Non-Government Organizations) that Soros funds with his billions are: MoveOn.org, the Apollo Alliance, Media Matters for America, the Tides Foundation, the ACLU, ACORN, PDIA (Project on Death In America), La Raza, and many more.  For a more complete list, with brief descriptions of the NGOs, go to DiscoverTheNetworks.org.                        

Poe continues, "Through his global web of Open Society Institutes and Open Society Foundations, Soros has spent 25 years recruiting, training, indoctrinating and installing a network of loyal operatives in 50 countries, placing them in positions of influence and power in media, government, finance and academia.”

Without Soros' money, would the Saul Alinsky's Chicago machine still be rolling?  Would SEIU, ACORN, and La Raza still be pursuing their nefarious activities?  Would big money and lobbyists still be corrupting government?  Would our college campuses still be retirement homes for 1960s radicals?

America stands at the brink of an abyss, and that fact is directly attributable to Soros.  Soros has vigorously, cleverly, and insidiously planned the ruination of America, and his puppet, Barack Obama lead the way.

The words of Patrick Henry are apropos:  "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?  Forbid it, Almighty God!  I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!”

Above information researched by CBS Steve Kroft.....

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work, and give to those who would not."Thomas Jefferson

If you have read this to the end, and you are a true patriotic American, then you will not have a problem forwarding it.



And:


 FARRAKHAN, HITLER, AND 

THE N.Y. TIMES: HERE WE GO AGAIN
 
by Rafael Medoff
 
               (Dr. Medoff is director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies, in Washington DC, and author of more than 20 books about the Holocaust and Jewish history. )
 
 
   The New York Times is under fire for publishing an article about one of the world’s most notorious anti-Semites, without any mention of his anti-Semitism. Sadly, it’s not the first time; the Times did something similar with Adolf Hitler.
 
   In an October 17 essay in the Times, Professor Natalie Hopkinson of Howard University portrayed Rev. Louis Farrakhan as an admirable leader, who planned his 1995 “Million Man March” on Washington as a men-only event but then recognized the need to bring African-American women into the organizing process. “Amid critiques that the [march] was exclusionary and sexist, he took the advice of the women,” Hopkinson wrote. As a result, women played an important behind the scenes role in Farrakhan’s “great feat.”
 
   Hopkinson made no mention of the fact that anti-Semitism is one of the central themes of Farrakhan’s ideology. Nor did Hopkinson acknowledge that Farrakhan has called Jews “termites,” “bloodsuckers,” and “Satanic.” She did not even note the impact of anti-Semitism on the march itself—that is, the refusal of African-American civil rights leaders such as Congressman John Lewis to attend because of what Lewis called Farrakhan’s “divisive and bigoted” statements.
 
   Challenged on Twitter about these omissions, Hopkinson responded that “Ppl who have become white” — seemingly a euphemism for Jews — “should not be lecturing Black ppl about oppression.” She urged her critics to focus their ire on President Trump, since after all, “Hitler never had more than 38% of popular vote.”
 
   Funny she should mention Hitler. In 1933, he, too, was the beneficiary of a puff piece in the New York Times.
 
   During Hitler’s first months in power, there was extensive coverage in the American press of his anti-Jewish policies, such as the mass firing of Jews from their jobs, public burnings of books by Jewish authors, and sporadic anti-Semitic mob violence. To counter this negative attention, Hitler in July 1933 granted Anne O’Hare McCormick of the New York Times his first exclusive interview with an American reporter since becoming chancellor of Germany. 
 
   McCormick was a Pulitzer Prize recipient (the first woman to win the prize in a major journalism category) with a reputation for landing big-name interviewees. But snagging an interview is not the same as making the best use of it.
 
   There is no evidence that McCormick harbored any sympathy for the Nazi leader’s views. But her choice of questions, non-confrontational manner, and flattering description of his appearance and demeanor contributed to a generally positive portrayal of Hitler. 
 
   “Hitler Seeks Jobs for All Germans” was the headline of McCormick’s page one, top-of-the fold interview. Here’s how she introduced Times readers to the Fuehrer: “At first sight the dictator of Germany seems a rather shy and simple man, younger than one expects, more robust, taller. His sun-browned face is full and is the mobile face of an orator.”
 
   She continued: “His eyes are almost the color the blue larkspur in a vase behind him, curiously childlike and candid. He appears untired and unworried. His voice is as quiet as his black tie and his double-breasted black suit….Herr Hitler has the sensitive hand of the artist.”
 
   It got worse from there, as McCormick lobbed soft ball question after soft ball question, giving Hitler a platform from which to expound his views in a reasonable-sounding tone without any serious challenges.
 
   Just as Natalie Hopkinson portrayed the role of women in Farrakhan’s march in glowing terms, Anne O’Hare McCormick gave Hitler several paragraphs to explain the positive role of women in the Third Reich. “Women have always been among my most sta[u]nchest supporters,” he boasted. “While our aims encourage women to marry and stay home, unmarried women are in free competition with men. Only military service, service on the bench and certain political posts are closed to women.” No follow-up on that from McCormick.
 
   Unlike Hopkinson, McCormick did not completely ignore the question of the Jews, although she badly mishandled it. In her 29th paragraph (out of 41 total), she asked: “How about the Jews? At this stage how do you measure the gains and losses of your anti-Semitic policies?”
 
   She then gave the Nazi leader four uninterrupted paragraphs in which to explain—in what she called “his extraordinary fluency” — that the reports of his anti-Jewish persecution were all exaggerated, that many other people were enduring hardships, and that the Jews’ suffering was all their own fault anyway.
 
   From there, McCormick pivoted to what she evidently felt was a more pressing question: “What character in history do you admire most, Caesar, Napoleon, or Frederick the Great?”
 
   Although McCormick did not set out to soften the Nazi leader’s image, her interview may have had that effect. Improving Hitler’s reputation in the United States was important to the Nazis. Germany sought to postpone repaying of its World War I wartime debts to the U.S. and its allies. Hitler also hoped to dissuade American companies from joining the growing boycott of German goods. And he was anxious to keep the United States from interfering as he rebuilt the German military. That’s also why Hitler authorized an American publisher, Houghton Mifflin, to omit the most extreme and violent passages from his autobiography, Mein Kampf, when it published English-language editions of the book in the 1930s.
 
   Farrakhan is not another Hitler, although he might like to be. He has praised the Nazi dictator as “a very great man” and asserted that “there’s a similarity” between the two of them in that “he raised Germany up from nothing [and] we are raising our people up from nothing.”
 
   Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam has, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, “earned a prominent position in the ranks of organized hate,” and its leader is, in the words of the Anti-Defamation League, “the leading anti-Semite in America.” Tens of thousands have attended his rallies in recent years; he has more than one million Facebook followers, and nearly half a million followers on Twitter. That makes him a dangerous figure, whose anti-Semitism should be taken seriously by the most influential newspaper in the world. Natalie Hopkinson was wrong to omit it, and the editors of the New York Times were wrong to let that omission stand.

Finally:

Before the Democratic Party’s lurch to the Left and his selection by Barack Obama, Joe Biden saw himself as a quasi-Dixiecrat. In his first try for the Democratic Presidential he bragged that he had received an award from George Wallace and boasted that “Delawareans were on the side of the South in the Civil War.”

In 1982, as he was probably beginning to plan that campaign, Biden thought he could appeal to the perceived nativism of the Dixiecrats by publicly threatening to cut off aid to the Jewish state. In July of that year, he used an appearance of Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin before the Senate Finance Committee to threaten to cut off aid to Israel. After enduring Biden’s fist-pounding tirade, Begin responded with the eloquence that was his trademark. Looking directly at Biden, he said

“Don’t threaten us with cutting off aid to Israel. It will not work. I am not a Jew with trembling knees. I am a proud Jew with 3,700 years of civilized history. Nobody came to our aid when we were dying in the gas chambers and ovens. Nobody came to our aid we were striving to create our country. We paid for it. We fought for it. We died for it. We will stand by our principles. We will defend them. And, when necessary, we will die for them again, with or without your aid.”

The always proper and dignified Begin then lectured Biden on his manners. Looking directly at him he said, “This desk is designed for writing, not for fists.” Biden’s behavior was so out of line that immediately after Senator Moynihan approached the Jewish Prime Minister and praised him for his cutting reply.

Unfortunately, much of the American Jewish Community is composed of Jews with trembling knees. Although Donald Trump has been the most pro-Israel President in history and will receive a record Jewish vote, he may receive fewer Jewish votes than Joe Biden, despite the latter’s checkered record on Israel and his support for reinstating Obama’s deal with Iran.

It has now been established beyond any reasonable doubt that the Ayatollah’s nuclear program has no peaceful purpose and is designed to fulfill Iran's stated goal of destroying the Jewish state. And there is no doubt that a Democratic victory will encourage the most belligerent elements in the Arab world to step up their terrorism and viciously target Jews for murder. Yet Democratic operatives who are afraid of their political futures and Jewish Wall Street financiers afraid of missing out on deals are working overtime to defame Trump.

There is no longer any credible dispute that the leadership of the American Jewish community behaved abysmally during World War II. The record is now clear that Stephen Wise, the President of the American Jewish Congress, who proclaimed himself the leader of the then-smaller and less influential community, was more concerned about his personal relationship with Roosevelt, who used to refer to him as “the Chief,” than the millions of Jews who were dying at the hands of the Nazis. He not only hid what he knew was happening in the concentration camps, but also attacked and tried to deport Jews who were trying to expose the truth, and get the Roosevelt administration to making saving Jewish lives a priority, instead of allowing the State Department to discriminate against Jews in their administration of the immigration laws.

Equally reprehensible and consistent with the attitude of much of liberal Jewish community was the behavior of Sam Rosenman, a senior aide to Roosevelt. It was Rosenman who advised Roosevelt not to meet with the 400 Orthodox Jewish rabbis, who came to Washington in 1943, three days before Yom Kippur, to plead for action to save what was left of their European brethren. Rosenman told Roosevelt that the rabbis were not representative of American Jewry and that he had tried to stop the “horde from storming Washington.” Rosenman knew of, and hid, Roosevelt’s anti-Semitism. He confided to Nachum Goldman, the then-head of the World Jewish Congress that Roosevelt reacted to an ad in the Washington Post charging that the Allies were doing nothing to stop the slaughter of Jews “with language that would have pleased Hitler himself.”

While the actions of Wise and Rosenman were cowardly and despicable, they pale in comparison to today’s Democrats. Roosevelt was indifferent to the plight of European Jewry. However, he fought Hitler and did not fund him. Barack Obama gave the Ayatollahs of Iran, who are dedicated to annihilating the 6.8 million Jews who live in Israel, one hundred and fifty billion dollars. The transfer of these funds was carried out by then-Secretary of the Treasury Jack Lew. The Jewish Jack Lew, whom I once considered a friend, and who signed my ketubah and served as a witness at my wedding, not only disbursed the money from a Treasury Department account, but had $1.8 billion given in untraceable cash.

Inevitably, the money transferred to Iran funded their terrorist activities in the Middle East and elsewhere. Following the receipt of the money Iran stepped up its activities in Syria, Yemen and Iraq. It also funded Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza, which fired, and continues to fire, rockets into Israel. Is there any doubt that American money sent to Iran, which was facilitated by a Jewish U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, paid for the murder and maiming of Jews hit by Hamas and Islamic Jihad rockets? Stephen Wise may have acted cowardly, but he never did anything to enable the murder of Jews. Jack Lew could have resigned in protest, but then he would not be a partner in hedge fund with other Obama supporters.

Almost as pernicious is the work of Mark Mellman, the Jewish Democrat who has formed “Democratic Majority for Israel,” a group that raises money for Democratic candidates whom it claims are supportive of Israel. However, a visit to the group's web page reveals Mellman’s true purpose. If you click on the group’s website, its purpose becomes clear. There is no argument for the importance of Israel or its many positive attributes. There is no criticism of Palestinian intransigence or terrorism. It merely states that the group is for Israel and has a few perfunctory words about the Jewish state.

However, if you click on the site's “who we are” section you will see a big picture of Mark Mellman, the candidates he has worked for, and testimonials to his success as a political consultant. Included among his clients are some favorites of the anti-Israel J Street organization. One standout on the list is Brian Schatz, the Senator from Hawaii. Schatz's position on Israel can be discerned from his vocal support of the Iranian deal, his boycott of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Congressional address, and his vigorous opposition to the appointment of David Friedman to the position of Ambassador to Israel. Schatz was one of the leaders on the Senate floor fight against Friedman whom he accused of not being “objective” about whether Islamic terrorists want to destroy Israel. Mark Mellman has made millions working for Democratic candidates and the “Democratic Majority for Israel,” is nothing but a vehicle to make sure that he can continue to keep up his plush Georgetown lifestyle.

Mark Mellman and Jack Lew are hoping that if they support Biden and go along with some criticism of Israel they can still flourish in Democrat political and financial circles. But they may soon realize that is not assured in today’s woke Democratic party.

If they want to see their future, they should look at what has happened to Elliot Engel, the about-to-be former member of Congress. Engel was a loyal Democrat Congressman from the Bronx and parts of Westchester County. Although he fundraised aggressively among pro-Israel Jews, he trimmed his sails when he was being challenged in the primary by a Bernie Sanders “Socialist.” Although he was Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs, he did not go to the opening of the American Embassy in Jerusalem. He used his Chairmanship to actively and vociferously support the impeachment of Donald Trump. He even spoke at a rally protesting police “brutality.” Despite all his kowtowing to the extreme Left, he was defeated in a Democratic primary.

Bernie Sanders leftists will not be appeased. Sanders may claim that he is a democratic socialist, but he was an admirer of the Soviet Union and still supports communist countries such as Cuba. He was so blinded by his hatred of the United States that he honeymooned in the Soviet Union in 1988. He came back from the USSR singing its praises the year before it collapsed. If you research his organization, Democratic Socialists of America, you will find vicious, hate-filled attacks on the United States and individuals proclaiming themselves to be Communists. They are totalitarians who seek total power the way Lenin did. They see Biden as a vehicle to gaining that power -- the way Hitler saw being part of Hindenburg’s government as a way to total power.

There is no room for Israel or any people who identify as Jews in the totalitarian world that Sanders and his followers crave to impose.

Stephen Silbiger was the chief legislative aide to Congressman Stephen J. Solarz of Brooklyn. He also was the lobbyist for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) and was the Washington Representative for the American Jewish Congress. He currently is practicing law in Washington, D.C. More importantly, he is the son of Holocaust survivors and was born in a refugee camp.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ DAILYCHATTER is interesting and informative if you should choose to subscribe:


 

Good morning, today is October 21st, 2020, and this is your “World In 2 Minutes” from DailyChatter.

NEED TO KNOW

THAILAND

The King and Them

In May 1992, Thai King Bhumibol Adulyadej summoned a military leader who had just become prime minister through a coup and a pro-democracy opposition figure who opposed the junta to his palace. Loyalty to the king compelled them both to go, defusing a potential civil war, the BBC wrote.

Protesters have been on the streets again in the southeast Asian nation in recent months. The current monarch, King Maha Vajiralongkorn, might not be able to help this time, however. That’s because protestors have been protesting the royal family, too.

Protesters are angry over the Thai military’s influence on politics, LGBTQ and women’s rights, social welfare and the economy in the wake of the coronavirus, the New York Times explained. Most shockingly to mainstream Thais, the protesters also are critical of the monarchy, which is culturally taboo to criticize as well as illegal.

“Thailand’s unprecedented revolt pits the people against the king,” wrote CNN.

The protesters, who were initially students before the movement broadened, want new parliamentary elections, the end of security forces harassing citizens, a halt to the crackdown on social media, a stop to the abuse of human rights and a new constitution, Foreign Policy reported. Some protesters also want to reform the monarchy and its patriarchal practices.

Attacks on the revered sovereign indicate how the mood in Thailand has shifted as the coronavirus has caused the country’s economy to suffer its biggest contraction in 22 years,  Reuters reported. The country is cutting taxes and increasing spending to boost domestic consumption, a strategy that could entail other problems years down the road.

Tensions are high. Queen Suthida Vajiralongkorn Na Ayudhya recently passed by angry demonstrators in her cream-colored stretch Rolls-Royce limousine. They heckled and yelled, “My taxes” to complain about their personal contributions to the royal treasury.

The reassessment of Thai life has been sweeping. Protesters, for example, are researching the government’s oppressive behavior in the past, including a 1976 university massacre that the monarchy and others have been happy to sweep under the table.

“To dig into what happened in 1976, a lot of people are afraid that it will involve the ruling elite and its associates,” Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn University Political Scientists Puangthong Pawakapan told the Associated Press. “They don’t want people to know about it. They want people to forget about it.”

Officials recently declared a state of emergency, banning gatherings of five or more people and prohibiting the publishing of anything that might “harm national security,” Al Jazeera reported. Police also arrested activists and movement leaders. And yet the streets are still full.

The crackdown might work in the short term. But the king won’t be king if the people turn their backs on him.

WANT TO KNOW

SUDAN

In Good Graces

Sudan paid more than $300 million Tuesday to American victims of terrorist attacks and their families, part of a deal to remove the African nation from the United States’ list of state sponsors of terrorism, Reuters reported.

A day earlier, US President Donald Trump said he would remove Sudan from the list, which has isolated the country from the international banking system since the 1990s.

Sudan’s transitional government has tried to improve relations with the West, since the ouster of autocrat Omar al-Bashir last year, the Wall Street Journal reported. The country is currently facing an economic crisis and is hoping to receive humanitarian aid following the removal of sanctions.

Analysts said the move is also an attempt by the Trump administration to urge Sudan – a predominantly Muslim nation – to normalize relations with Israel, following the example of the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain.

They added that by normalizing ties with Israel, Sudan would have higher chances of accessing international aid without encountering obstacles from the US and its allies

RUSSIA

Back to the Future

Russia offered to freeze the total number of its nuclear warheads for one year if the United States agrees to do the same, an offer that is part of an attempt by Washington to push the two nuclear powers to extend a key arms reduction deal before the US presidential elections, the Washington Post reported.

The warhead freeze comes less than a week after the US rejected Moscow’s offer to extend the New START treaty by one year.

Russian officials said that extending the treaty would allow the two powers to conduct “comprehensive bilateral negotiations on future control over nuclear missile weapons.”

Following the announcement, the US State Department welcomed the offer and requested an immediate meeting of negotiators.

The 10-year treaty, which restricts the number of deployed nuclear warheads, expires in February. If it’s not extended, the US and Russia will return to the arms race that existed during the Cold War.

The new proposal could offer a foreign policy victory for US President Donald Trump, who is running against his Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden. Biden has proposed a five-year extension of the treaty, which was supported by Russia.

Trump has previously insisted that any replacement treaties should include China, as well as encompass all of Russia’s nuclear arsenal, which includes smaller, “tactical” nuclear weapons that fall outside the New START.

However, Russia rejected those demands and China has refused to join the talks.

PHILIPPINES

I Did It My Way

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte accepted responsibility for the thousands of people killed by police during his violent crackdown on drugs, adding that he would “gladly” face jail time for it, the Associated Press reported Tuesday.

“If there’s killing there, I’m saying I’m the one … you can hold me responsible for anything, any death that has occurred in the execution of the drug war,” the strongman president said during a televised speech Monday.

After taking office in 2016, Duterte began a tough crackdown on drugs: Police data reports that more than 256,000 people have been arrested and nearly 6,000 have died in police operations. Human rights activists and Western nations, however, say that the death toll is much higher and accuse Philippine authorities of conducting extrajudicial killings during operations.

Duterte’s war on drugs has resulted in at least two criminal complaints for crimes against humanity and mass murder: These are currently being investigated by the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

He withdrew the Philippines from the court in 2018 following the complaints but ICC prosecutors say the investigation into the killings will continue.

DISCOVERIES

Nature’s Tinkering

Australian scientists say humanity is going through a “micro-evolution,” as more babies today are being born with an extra artery in their arms and without wisdom teeth, BBC Science Focus reported.

Researchers discovered this after reviewing anatomical literature dating back hundreds of years, including records with details on dissected individuals born in the 20th century. They realized that humans began showing a “significant increase” in the prevalence of the additional artery since the late 19th century, according to a recent study.

The blood vessel – known as the median artery – forms while a baby is in the womb and it is usually replaced by the radial and ulnar arteries during gestation. However, some people today have all three.

Meanwhile, human faces are becoming shorter and jaws are also downsizing because many newborns lack wisdom teeth. The human jaw is the fastest-evolving part of the body, say scientists: It has been steadily shrinking over the past 10,000 years as the invention of agriculture and cooking resulted in softer foods that need less chewing.

“This is happening…as we have learned to use fire and (eat) process foods more,” said lead author Teghan Lucas.

Also, some people are being born with additional bones in their arms and legs or with abnormal connections of two or more bones in their feet, the research showed.

Researchers suggest that changes in natural selection could be the major reason for this micro-evolution: Natural selection is constantly tinkering. Meanwhile, Lucas said that the changes show that humans are evolving at a faster rate than at any point in time over the past 250 years.

COVID-19 GLOBAL UPDATE

More than 180 nations worldwide have confirmed cases of the coronavirus. The following have the highest numbers worldwide as of 4 a.m. ET*:

  1. US: 8,274,797 (+0.73%)
  2. India: 7,651,107 (+0.71%)
  3. Brazil: 5,273,954 (+0.44%)
  4. Russia: 1,438,219 (+2.24%)
  5. Argentina: 1,018,999 (+1.63%)
  6. Spain: 988,322 (+1.42%)
  7. Colombia: 974,139 (+0.85%)
  8. France: 973,275 (+2.17%)
  9. Peru: 870,876 (+0.25%)
  10. Mexico: 860,714 (+0.68%)

Source: Johns Hopkins University

*Numbers change over 24 hours

ForwardForward
ShareShare
TweetTweet
ShareShare

Thank you for reading!

Your comments are always welcomed and appreciated. Write to us at editors@dailychatter.com.

Copyright © 2020 Daily Chatter, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to the DailyChatter newsletter at DailyChatter.com.

WHERE WE'RE LOCATED
Daily Chatter
32 Atlantic Ave
Pilot House-Lewis Wharf
Boston, MA 02110

Add us to your address book


CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

PAID SUBSCRIBERS
Contact Support | Customer Portal
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

No comments: