Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Trump Validates Obama's Social Mores Trends! America's Perversion By Progressives. Response To Comey.

Trump proves, once again, he is ahead of the times and Obama's social mores.  We now have learned, as a result of a New York Time's scoop, Donald exercised Obama's interpretation of one's constitutional right to  walk into the opposite sex's locker room without knocking. Rather than be criticized, Hillary should be praising Donald because his actions validate Obama's focus on encouraging the LGBT crowd free access to barge in whenever it suits their "gotta go" desires.

A 'let us' wedge issue has gained political credibility!

While the campaign has reached the gutter/sewer level, as I predicted it would, Putin continues to expand a trading relationship with Turkey, The Saudis kill hundreds in Yemen by mistake and our borders remain porous but then sex 'trumps' rational behaviour as the mass media continues to work on behalf of Hillary, sheltering her from her misdeeds.

Meanwhile, Assange's WikiLeaks has proven the Clinton's and Democrats are racists in private and bleeding hearts in public.

Their attacks on Trump's deplorable supporters, Red Necks, Catholics and their snide comments about blacks, Hispanics, Asians and yes, even Muslims, revealed in the flood of newly re-leased e mails, rips the masks off their two faces!  Will it amount to anything?  I doubt it. Why? Because it is much more fun talking about Trump barging into the locker rooms of beauty contestants.

If only there was an accompanying  video so all us "dirty old conservative men" could enjoy Donald's privileged status.

The last and only thing going for Trump, now that elite Republicans have deserted him, as if they ever were aboard, is showing he is willing to fight, is tough and, in doing so, clearly reveals the bias he is up against.  The Clinton's, liberals and mass media campaign by wounding their opponents early employing character assassination.  It might work again but we already know Trump is a character, even has questionable character and, therefore, might be able to slough it off to his advantage.

When Obama blitzed Romney, he did not know what hit him and did not show any 'moxie.' Perhaps Mormons do not have any?

Time will tell whether Trump's feisty way will win out because the issue is drawn and simple - a self-dealing liar protected by the mass media versus a loose cannon with the right ideas and willingness to say what is on our minds but have been restrained by PC'ism..
The perversion of America by progressives. (See 1 below.)


Finally, whether this is real or not, it does not make a whiff of difference, because it says what is needed to be said.

My friend, who was head of the local FBI office, was promoted and moved to Los Angeles and we never go a chance to have lunch before he left.  (See 1a below.)
We are leaving tomorrow to go to Pittsburgh, returning on Monday.  Have a great weekend.

Book Review: We Have Seen the Future and It Looks Like Baltimore, By Craig Smith & Lowell Ponte

By Jay Lehr
Smith and Ponte have co-authored a number of books on economics, all dealing with serious problems as they see them. While they are very insightful and this is a revealing book it is poorly titled as Baltimore is but a single case study in a cautionary tale of matters going on in our government that are not transparent to most of the population. They tell of Baltimore's history as a beautiful town on the sea welcoming immigrants and onto the birthplace of corrupt politicians including Nancy Pelosi's family and the Freddy Gray riots. They soon get into the crux of the book which is clearly a treatise of how progressives are successfully perverting all that our founding fathers hoped for our nation. 

In the new Progressive Dream individuality is sacrificed to the group interests of the collective which in practice means the state. In Europe the progressive philosophy became communism, nazism, fascism and today's socialist welfare states. The authors go back to President Woodrow Wilson. as the table setter for Progressivism in America. Ironically Princeton University where he served as President has recently downgraded his esteem on campus having uncovered evidence of racism, not for his Progressive philosophy which has largely been adopted by the school. 

The authors make a detailed case for Obama's successful Progressive Social Engineering and showing how his control of banking caused the housing bubble., His student loan program has been a way to advance his ideology and increase dependence on government by redistributing wealth from taxpayers to America's colleges and universities. It has resulted in huge unpaid federal debt and a devalued college degree for many institutions. Perhaps worse yet is the near total leftist bent of faculty members where diversity means only the type of Marxism and sexual orientation practiced.
If you wonder why there are about 90 million working age Americans out of the work force voluntarily, wonder no more as the authors document how 35 states pay more for welfare programs than any minimum wage job while the stigma once connected to not working has been removed by programs such as food stamps where there are no longer actual stamps but rather a credit card that appears like any other credit card. 

Leading the way in the Why Work hit parade are New York State which will pay you $43,700 for not working followed by Connecticut $44,370, Washington DC $50,820 and the best place of all to drop out is Hawaii where annual welfare income reaches $60,590. Hey it is expensive to live in Hawaii.
At times the authors lean toward a bit of conspiracy theory such as their chapter on the War on Cash which aims to have greater control over all financial transactions, but of course they may be correct. After all the book is darkly honest with some bits of optimism such as its belief that Texas economic leadership could bring the nation back to fiscal responsibility . 

The authors have nothing good to say about the The Federal Reserve and spend many pages documenting the insanity of the Zero Interest Rate Policy we have lived with these many years.
One of the most instructive portions of the book is the manner in which they slay the idea that the combination of socialism and capitalism in the Nordic countries such as Sweden, Denmark and Norway is as good as some believe or at all exportable to our nation, and regardless they are dramatically declining as a result of Moslem immigration. 

I was delighted to see them skewer the European Union for all its untenable positions and the countries which have declined at its hands from Greece at the bottom to Germany at the top. 

If it was Smith and Ponte's goal to uncover every inequity in the management of our government, I think they have succeeded. When you hear President Obama attempting to take control of America's health care system, energy sector, auto industry, television, banking and higher education in his effort to turn us into a feudal monarchy which the founding fathers fought a revolution to escape, the authors tell us to "remember who the Progressives really are and the total control over the rest of us that they really want".
Jay Lehr is a Senior Fellow and Science Director of the Heartland Institute.  

1a) September 2, 2016 
Mr. James Comey, Director Federal Bureau of Investigation 
J. Edgar Hoover Building 
935 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W 
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001 
Sir, I am writing regarding your public statement in July, 2016 informing the American people that the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton was being closed without referring it to a Federal Grand Jury or the Attorney General of the U. S. for a decision whether or not to indict her. Strangely, you eloquently laid out enough of the evidence deduced from the investigation to strongly indicate there was abundant evidence uncovered during the investigation and interview of her to not only indict but to convict her in Federal Court. However, you personally re-worded and soft-pedaled the actions she took as Secretary of State describing her actions as "extremely careless” in using a personal email and un-secured server for her communications while Secretary of State. You rewrote the statute, which is not your job. 
As a retired Special Agent of the FBI, I have standing to write this letter. My thirty years in law enforcement, including 22 years as a Special Agent with the FBI have given me the knowledge, expertise and experience to question and confront you for your perplexing actions, which (as you well know) were outside the normal standard operating procedure of the FBI and Federal judicial procedures. Some of the finest people in the world proudly carry the credentials of FBI Agent and you have soiled them and not allowed them to speak. But I will not be silent. 
Sorry, but NO SIR, MS Clinton was not merely careless or extremely careless. She was not even negligent or grossly negligent (as the statute requires). Hillary Clinton was knowingly purposeful in her decisions and actions to set up a server under her exclusive control and possession in order to control what information was available to the American public and Congress regarding her actions as Secretary of State. Furthermore, she took those government owned communications into her personal possession after leaving her position and knowingly and willingly attempted to destroy them so her nefarious actions could never be known or used as evidence of her corrupt moral character against her. Sir, what possessed you? Did you cave in to political pressure to unilaterally come to this decision? I fear that is the case, and Rule of Law be damned. I am embarrassed for and ashamed of you. You have set a precedent that can never be rectified and certainly not justified. Shame on you, Sir. You ought to resign right now in disgrace for what you have done to tarnish the reputation of the finest Law Enforcement Agency in the world. for entirely political reasons. 
Normally, an investigation will be assigned to an agent, or team of agents with one being the Case agent, or the lead investigator. When the investigation is complete, an investigative report will be presented to the U.S. Attorney for the Federal District involved. It would be the U.S. Attorney who decides whether to decline prosecution for that investigation. NOT the FBI agent. But in the Clinton investigation, YOU 
(unilaterally) decided not to forward the investigation to the U.S. Attorney or the Attorney General of the U.S. but, instead, personally made the decision not to prosecute her or even provide the information to a Federal Grand Jury. You were wrong to take this upon yourself. Sir, in order to indict a subject, only a preponderance of evidence , or 51% is needed for probable cause to exist. You did not think even that level of probability existed? Who do you think you are fooling? What judicial proceeding did you think you were following? 
Throughout my years with the FBI, I (along with my fellow agents) took great pride in conducting each investigation in an unbiased manner regardless of the subject’s position or standing in the community. All were treated equally under the law. But you, Sir, decided to allow this corrupt, evil and nasty human being to go free and unchallenged for her treasonous actions (yes, treasonous, in my opinion) which threatened the security of this nation. Furthermore, you stopped short of investigating the Clinton Foundation as a RICO case (Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization. This is a RICO case if there ever was one. Even an untrained person can tell from the communications which were recovered that Hillary Clinton spent more time working for the Clinton Foundation while Secretary of State than on State Business. It may be argued that Hillary did not do any State business UNLESS the Clinton Foundation benefitted. You decided to just let this uncomfortable truth alone without addressing it. 
I will conclude with this: Following my retirement from the FBI, I volunteered for a 12 month tour of duty in Afghanistan as a Law Enforcement Professional, embedded with U.S. forces as a subject matter expert in counter-terrorism investigations. For most of that year I operated outside the wire patrolling with the troops, interviewing witnesses to IED incidents and gathering evidence on the bad guys. The results of my work would then be reported through secure channels to the Commanding Officer. All reports and communications were required to be transmitted via secure and encrypted devices. Occasionally my remote location in the mountains of Afghanistan made transmission impossible and I would have to fly back to Bagram Air Base in order to securely report to the Commander of the battle space. It would have been convenient if I could have just called the Commander on my personal cell phone or written him an email on my personal laptop. But, had I done so I would have been reporting classified information via an unsecured device and it could have been compromised. These were, relative to Secretary of State communications, low level classifications of Secret. Had I ever sent even one in such a manner I would have been prosecuted and sent to Federal Prison for 20 years or so. That is how serious this violation is considered. 
Now, because of you, Hillary Clinton is allowed to continue her RICO activities and is running for President of the United States, the most powerful position in the world. You have trampled on the Rule of Law and destroyed the trust of the American people in the FBI and in unbiased enforcement of the law. How do you sleep at night? It is time for you to go and work for the Clinton Foundation. 
Hugh W. Galyean 
(FBI Agent, Retired)

No comments: