Monday, August 27, 2018

Input From Various Memo Readers. Now Is The Time For The Zany Left To Attack Pence For Being A Religious Christian.

Subject: POWERFUL VIDEO

Watch this video... absorb with what you know, have seen and heard. Then you be the judge.
https://www.youtube.com/embed / _VpFNgfbebY
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
And so it goes and will continue to go. Even China will eventually fall in line.  Not cave but they will bend.  They just need to save face.

The mass media will portray, in the most negative manner, by focusing on how much any agreements fall short etc.(See 1 below.)

The time for hating our V.P is building in the event Trump is thrown out of office by the haters.

The weapon of choice and angle against Pence is attack his Christianity.  Liberals and progressives have been on a crusade against crusading Christians for decades and now it is time to direct their knives at Pence.

Religion teaches us right from wrong.  Religion provides a moral compass for mortals to follow. This is particularly relevant for a people who profess to believe in and adhere to the rule of law. In other words, Americans.

If we weaken the foundation on which such adherence is based we broaden the range of options for those who embrace relativism. Once everything is relative there is no place for right and wrong and then chaos can rule and that is the goal of the radical left, the haters, the wild eyed marchers and assorted fascists and most particularly the hypocritical Hollywood trend setters whose lifestyles are off most normal charts - whatever goes for normalcy these days..  (See 1a below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From time to time I receive e mails from friends and fellow memo readers that have no particular relevance to anything I am writing or posting but are interesting and/or humorous. Here are a few. (See 2, 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e and 2f below.)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dick
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1)
The United States and Mexico have reached a preliminary agreement on 

NAFTA. The new negotiations have not included Canada, another partner to the deal, but specifically focused on the auto industry. 

President Trump has called the existing NAFTA deal one of the worst in history
and a new agreement could be a big win for the president in his ongoing trade
war with Canada, Mexico, the E.U., and China.

According to the New York TimesWASHINGTON

The United States and Mexico have reached agreement to revise key portions of 
the 24-year-old North American Free Trade Agreement and a preliminary deal 
could be announced on Monday, a crucial step toward revamping a trade pact 
that has appeared on the brink of collapse during the past year of negotiations.

Reaching an agreement on how to revise some of the most contentious portions 
of what President Trump has long called the worst trade pact in history would 
give Mr. Trump a significant win in a trade war he has started with countries 
around the globe, including Mexico, Canada, the European Union and China.

Still, a preliminary agreement between the United States and Mexico would fall 
far short of actually revising Nafta. The preliminary agreement still excludes 
Canada, which is also a party to Nafta but has been absent from talks held in 
Washington in recent weeks. It centers on the rules governing the automobile
industry and leaves aside other contentious issues that affect all three countries.

To qualify for zero tariffs under Nafta, car companies would be required to 
manufacture a greater proportion of an automobile’s value in North America 
under the new rules. They will also be required to use more local steel, aluminum
and auto parts, and have a certain proportion of the car made by workers 
earning at least $16 an hour, a boon to both the United States and Canada.

The absence of Canada will make for a contentious road ahead, as the U.S. 
and Mexico will have to work to get Canada on board. Congress will also have 
to ratify the deal once one is fully reached. But the agreement in principle 
between the U.S. and Mexico is an encouraging sign and another win for the 
Trump administration.

Read more at http://trumptrainnews.com/articles/preliminary-nafta-deal-
reached-between-mexico-and-u-s#2swpFwM8bZCRxUQI.99
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1a) Maybe the Best Ben Shapiro 
Answer Ever?

by Peter Heck

Ben Shapiro’s quick-tongued intellectualism is perfect for a culture that now exists 
completely in the digital age. His isn’t an entertainer that incorporates information. He is all 
information, all the time, and for the intellectually curious in our culture, left or right, that 
in itself is entertaining.

While the internet is full of classic Shapiro debate moments, speeches, and sound bites, I 
don’t know that I’ve ever seen him better than his recent conversation with Shannon Bream 
about the left’s hatred, not of Donald Trump, but of Vice President Mike Pence. 

Shapiro started off by confronting the painfully unhinged New York Times writer Frank Bruni’s 
assessment that impeaching Trump would only bring about a “bigot,” “liar,” and “self-infatuated 
holy terror” in Pence. Exposing the boy-who-cried-extremist credibility problem the left has when
it comes to this sort of thing, Shapiro pointed out how McCain was once portrayed as 
radically unstable, then Romney was a crazy extremist, now Trump is a deranged madman, 
but there’s always someone worse according to the left…whoever the next person is that the 
right supports. It gets tiresome and ineffective politically.

But where Shapiro earned a standing ovation was when he articulated, perhaps better than 
ever heard done before on television, how and why it is Pence’s Christianity that makes him such 
a hated figure to progressives in America – from media to politics to entertainment:

            “[T]here’s a baseline level of hatred, really, for Christians, on the cultural Left; it’s most 
evident in New York and Los Angeles, places where I’ve spent a lot of time. There’s this belief that 
everybody who deeply believes their faith is actually, secretly a bigot, that the reason they are 
acting out their religion in public is not because they believe their religion, but because they 
are using the religion as a cover for bigotry. It’s the same sort of thing that they’ve used with 
regard to Jack Phillips over at Masterpiece Cakeshop; really, he hates gay people; it’s not that 
he’s a Christian who believes he has to abide by his religious standards; it’s that he secretly hates
 gay people and trans people and he’s just using religion as a cover. They say the same sort of 
thing about Mike Pence; truly there’s a tyrannical tendency among religious people, and then 
they just use Jesus or the Bible as an excuse.”

One of the biggest reasons progressives oppose Christian rights to conscience in the public 
square is because they don’t truly believe that the conscience is real. They see it, largely, as a 
cover for bigotry rather than legitimate, personal faith convictions. While there are many 
progressives who happily wear the label Christian, they don’t subscribe to a Biblical worldview, 
and thus divorce Christian teaching on, say, sexual ethics from their public character. It is 
unreasonable to them that anyone else would fail to do the same. 

In short, they confuse a deep, abiding love and obedience to God for a deep, abiding hatred of the
 “other.”

I would have been satisfied with that Shapiro truth bomb, but the next thing I knew, he had 
reloaded and was dropping another on the left’s panicked fears of Pence and other 
Christians desiring theocracy in America:
            “I find it absolutely bewildering that the same folks who are claiming that Mike Pence is 
going to run a theocracy also want federal gun control to seize all the guns. It’s truly amazing. It’s
 also amazing that the folks who are saying that Mike Pence wants to run a theocracy ignore 
the fact that Mike Pence is a constitutional conservative who wants to limit the size and scope 
of government. The only theocrats, the only people who actually want to rule from above by 
instituting their moral preferences on society from the top down, are the folks on the Left, who 
actually want to invade rights on a regular basis and force people to do things that they don’t 
want to do. It’s a lot more common on the Left than it is on the Right, so they’re actually using 
their own theocratic tendencies toward government, which a lot of folks on the radical Left see 
as a quasi God-like figure; they’re using that own theocratic tendency and then projecting it 
onto people like Mike Pence.”

Think about it: liberals actually believe that Christians like Pence would compel every woman in 
America to wear bonnets and red dresses. They fear it and believe it no matter how ludicrous it is.
 Perhaps the origin of that fear comes from the fact that when they themselves have the 
opportunity to harness the power of government, they are happily compelling non-progressives to 
participate in activities against their will and conscience.

To people who force nuns to pay for abortion drugs, or Christian bakers to celebrate sexual i
mmorality, it probably isn’t that far out of the realm of their imagination to believe that someone 
might force feminists to wear bonnets.

This is why the left hates Ben Shapiro. He’s on to them and exposes them in a way few 
others can.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

2) THE MEANING OF LAUS DEO




LAUS DEO

One detail that is seldom mentioned is that in Washington, D.C. there can never be a building of greater height than the Washington Monument.

With all the uproar about removing the Ten Commandments, etc., this is worth a moment or two of your time. I was not aware of this amazing historical information.

On the aluminum cap, atop the Washington Monument in Washington, D.C., are displayed two words: Laus Deo.  No one can see these words. In fact, most visitors to the monument are totally unaware they are even there and for that matter, probably couldn't care less.

Once you know Laus Deo's history, you will want to share this with everyone you know.

These words have been there for many years; they are 555 feet, 5.125 inches high, perched atop the monument, facing skyward to the Father of our nation, overlooking the 69 square miles which comprise the District of Columbia, capital of the United States of America.

Laus Deo! Two seemingly insignificant, unnoticed words.

Out of sight and, one might think, out of mind, but very meaningfully placed at the highest point over what is the most powerful city in the most successful nation in the world.

So, what do those two words, in Latin, composed of just four syllables and only seven letters, possibly mean? Very simply, they say 'Praise be to God!'

Though construction of this giant obelisk began in1848, when James Polk was President of the United States, it was not until 1888 that the monument was inaugurated and opened to the public.

It took twenty-five years to finally cap the memorial with a tribute to the Father of our nation, Laus Deo, 'Praise be to God!'

From atop this magnificent granite and marble structure, visitors may take in the beautiful panoramic view of the city with its division into four major segments.

From that vantage point, one can also easily see the original plan of the designer, Pierre Charles L'Enfant ..... a perfect cross imposed upon the landscape, with the White House to the north, The Jefferson Memorial is to the south, the Capitol to the east and the Lincoln Memorial to the west.

A cross you ask? Why a cross? What about separation of church and state? Yes, a cross; separation of church and state was NOT, is NOT, in the Constitution.

So, read on.

How interesting and, no doubt, intended to carry a profound meaning for those who bother to notice.

When the cornerstone of the Washington Monument was laid on July 4th, 1848 deposited within it were many items including the Holy Bible presented by the Bible Society. Praise be to God! Such was the discipline, the moral direction, and the spiritual mood given by the founder and first President of our unique democracy 'One Nation, Under God.'

I am awed by George Washington's prayer for America .... Have you ever read it? Well, now is your unique opportunity, so read on!

"Almighty God; We make our earnest prayer that Thou wilt keep the United States in Thy holy protection; that Thou wilt incline the hearts of the citizens to cultivate a spirit of subordination and obedience to government; and entertain a brotherly affection and love for one another and for their fellow citizens of the United States at large.

And finally that Thou wilt most graciously be pleased to dispose us all to do justice, to love MERCY, and to demean ourselves with that charity, humility, and pacific temper of mind which were the characteristics of the Divine Author of our blessed religion, and without a humble imitation of whose example in these things we can never hope to be a happy nation.

Grant our supplication, we beseech Thee, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen."

Laus Deo!
2a) SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT FOR SOME OF US.


A woman dies at age 65 before collecting one 
benefit check.  She and her employer paid into the 
system for almost 50 years and she collected 
NOTHING.  

Keep in mind all the working people that die every 
year who were paying into the system and got 
nothing! 

And these governmental morons mismanaged the 
money and stole from the system, so that it's now 
going broke. 

BEAUTIFUL!  And they have the audacity to call 
today's seniors "vultures" in an attempt to cover 
their ineptitude.    DISGRACEFUL! 
  
The real reason for renaming our Social Security 
payments is so the government can claim that all 
those social security recipients are receiving 
entitlements thus putting them in the same 
category    as welfare, and food stamp recipients. 

THIS IS WORTH THE FEW MINUTES IT TAKES 
TO READ AND DIGEST! 

F.Y.I.  By changing the name of SS contributions, it
gives them a means to refute this program in the 
future.    It's free money for the government to 
spend under this guise. 

The Social Security check is now (or soon will be) 
referred to as a   *Federal Benefit Payment* ? 

  The government is now referring to our Social 
Security checks as a  "Federal Benefit Payment." 

This is    NOT  a benefit. It is  OUR money ,  paid 
out of our earned income!  Not only did we all 
contribute to Social Security but our employers did
too !  It totaled 15% of our income before taxes.

If you averaged $30K per year over your working 
life, that's close to $180,000 invested in Social 
Security. 

If you calculate the future value of your monthly 
investment in social security ($375/month, 
including both you and your employers 
contributions) at a meager 1% interest rate 
compounded monthly, after 40 years of working 
you'd have more than $1.3+ million dollars saved. 
  
This is your personal investment. Upon retirement, if you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive $39,318 per 
year,   or $3,277 per month.  
  
That's almost three times more than today's 
average Social Security benefit of $1,230 per 
month, according to the Social Security 
Administration. (Google it – it's a fact).   And your 
retirement fund would last more than 33 years 
(until you're 98 if you retire at age 65)! I can only 
imagine how much better most average-income 
people could live in retirement if our government 
had just invested our money in low-risk interest-
earning accounts. 

Instead, the folks in Washington pulled off a bigger
*Ponzi scheme* than Bernie Madoff ever did (or 
Lyndon Johnson). 

They took our money and used it elsewhere. 
They "forgot"(oh yes, they knew) that it was OUR 
money they were taking.  They didn't have a 
referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the 
money to them   ... and they didn't pay interest on 
the debt they assumed.    And recently they've told 
us that the money won't support us for very much 
longer.    (Isn't it funny that they NEVER say this 
about welfare payments?) 

But is it our fault they misused our investments?  
And now, to add insult to injury, they're calling it a 
*benefit*, as if we never worked to earn every 
penny of it.   This is stealing! 

Just because they borrowed the money, doesn't 
mean that our investments were for charity! 

Let's take a stand. We have earned our right to 
Social Security and Medicare. Demand that our 
legislators bring some sense into our government. 

Find a way to keep Social Security and Medicare 
going for the sake of the 92% of our population 
who need it. 


2b)New breathalyzer can flag early onset 
Parkinson’s, Israeli researchers say

Technion team also identifies breath signatures of 17 other 

ailments that could be detected by the handheld breath 

analysis device, including Alzheimer's and gastric cancer


A team of researchers at Israel’s Technion Institute of Technology has developed a device 
they say can detect the early onset of Parkinson’s disease by analyzing the breath of users.

Since antiquity physicians have been evaluating their patients by the odor of their bodily fluids: the 
stools and urine of noblemen’s children were often sniffed daily by their physicians. Of these,
exhaled breath is the most accessible and useful source for monitoring health and disorders,
the researchers said in a paper, one of several they published on the subject.

Armed with this knowledge, the researchers, led by Prof. Hossam Haick of the Department of 
Chemical Engineering and Russell Berrie Nanotechnology Institute of the Technion, set out
on a quest to find out if a breathalyzer could help identify patients who are at the very early
stages of Parkinson’s disease.
Parkinson’s disease is a degenerative condition that affects dopamine-producing neurons in
an area of the brain. Dopamine, a chemical, is responsible for coordinating movement.
Symptoms of the disease develop gradually over the years, causing patients to experience
hand tremors, limb rigidity and gait and balance problems. And although there is no cure, the
affliction is treated by dealing with the symptoms by using dopaminergic medications,
according to the Parkinson’s Foundation.

Because people with Parkinson’s start experiencing symptoms only later in
the course of the disease, when a substantial number of neurons have 
already been damaged, scientists are trying to find ways to identify bio-
markers that can lead to an earlier diagnosis and hopefully more tailor-made 
treatments to help slow down its progression.

More than 10 million people worldwide live with Parkinson’s, with some 60,000
 Americans diagnosed each year and nearly 1 million forecast to 
have the disease in the United States by 2020. The direct and 
indirect costs of Parkinson’s — which include treatment, social security
payments and lost income — is estimated at nearly $25 billion per 
year in the US alone, the Parkinson’s Foundation says on its 

The breath analyzer developed by the Technion multidisciplinary team, which
included electrical and chemical engineers and medical researchers,
consists of miniaturized sensors that can help detect the early 
onset of the disease and help with follow-up treatment, Haick 
said in a phone interview with The Times of Israel.

The 10x5x5-centimeter (4x2x2-inch) handheld device holds a set of 40
chemical sensors that have been trained via algorithms to detect 
specific markers in the breath that could flag the onset of the 
disease.

The researchers collected breath samples of Parkinson’s patients and loaded
it onto the sensors, which have chemicals that react to molecules in 
the breath. These reactions are transformed into electrical 
signals, with the breath of Parkinson’s patients marked by the 
algorithms with their own kind of electrical signal. The sensors in 
the breathalyzer were then trained to identify those specific 
breath compositions that indicate Parkinson’s, said Haick. So 
when people are tested with the device, the sensors are able to 
distinguish the breath of those who have the disease from the 
breath of those who don’t.

Over 80% accuracy

The researchers conducted their studies with the breathalyzer over a number
of years on a sample population of up to 500 people, Haick said. In 
their most recent study, published in ACS Chemical 
Neuroscience last month, Haick and his team set out to find out 
if their device could detect differences in the breath of patients 
with early-stage, not-yet-treated Parkinson’s disease.

The researchers tested the device on the exhaled breath of 29 newly
diagnosed patients who had not yet begun taking medication for their 
illness. When comparing the sensor output to that of 19 control 
subjects of similar age, they found that the breathalyzer managed to detect
early Parkinson’s disease  with over 80 percent accuracy, almost as 
good an outcome as an ultrasound scan of the brain.

“Just as a dog can be trained to memorize a smell,” said Haick, “so we have
trained our sensors in the  breathalyzer to identify those that are 
specific to Parkinson’s.”

Although the device still needs to be improved and validated with larger
studies, the researchers say that it has potential as a small, portable 
system to screen at-risk individuals without the need for big 
and expensive analytical tools or highly trained specialists.

To commercialize the device, the baton now must be picked up by either
pharma companies or startups, Haick said. The Technion has 
already reached licensing agreements for the technology with 
seven entities, some of them big international firms and some startups, in the
US, Israel, Asia, Germany and Toronto, he said.

“I think it could be a point of care device,” Haick said, where doctors can
screen patients in their clinics. “The development of the disease can 
be slowed down, if detected and treated at an early stage.”

The researchers have also identified the breath characteristics of 17 diseases.
 “We have proven that each of these diseases has a signature in
breath,” he said, so they could use the same technology for 
those diseases, including multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s, lung cancer and
gastric cancer, he said.

2c Phyllis Diller was the

Female equivalent of Will 

Rogers.... 


Whatever you may look like, marry a man 
your own age. As your beauty fades, so 
will his eyesight. 
-Phyllis Diller  
  
Housework can't kill you, but why take a 
chance? 
-Phyllis Diller 
  
Cleaning your house while your kids are 
still growing up is like shoveling the 
sidewalk before it stops snowing. 
-Phyllis Diller 


The reason women don't play football is 
because 11 of them would never wear 
the same outfit in public.
-Phyllis Diller 
  
Best way to get rid of kitchen odors: 
Eat out. 
-Phyllis Diller 


A bachelor is a guy who never made the 
same mistake once. 
-Phyllis Diller 
  
I want my children to have all the things I 
couldn't afford. Then I want to move in 
with them. 
-Phyllis Diller  
  

Most children threaten at times to run 
away from home. This is the only thing 
that keeps some parents going. 
-Phyllis Diller 
  
Any time three New Yorkers get into a cab 
without an argument, a bank has just 
been robbed. 
-Phyllis Diller 


We spend the first twelve months of our 
children's lives teaching them to walk 
and talk and the next twelve years telling
                    them to sit down and shut up. 
-Phyllis Diller 
  
Burt Reynolds once asked me out. 
I was in his room. 
-Phyllis Diller  
  
What I don't like about office Christmas 
parties is looking for a job the next day. 
-Phyllis Diller 
  
  His finest hour lasted a minute and a half. 
-Phyllis Diller 
  
Old age is when the liver spots show 
through your gloves. 
-Phyllis Diller 


My photographs don't do me justice -
they just look like me. 
-Phyllis Diller 
   
  
Tranquillizers work only if you follow the 
advice on the bottle -  keep away from 
children. 
-Phyllis Diller 
  
I asked the waiter, 'Is this milk fresh?' 
He said, 'Lady, three hours ago it was 
grass.' 
-Phyllis Diller 


The reason the golf pro tells you to keep 
your head down is so you can't see him 
laughing. 
-Phyllis Diller
  
You know you're old if they have 
discontinued your blood type.
-Phyllis Diller

2d)
Ocasio-Cortez Visits Former Employer. 






They Just Went Out Of Business 

Because Of Policies She Supports.

Mario Tama/Getty Images
Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez visited a restaurant that she used 
to work at in New York City on Monday on its final day in 
business, closing largely because of policies supported 
by the 28-year-old bartender-turned-politician.
Ocasio-Cortez's former employer, The Coffee Shop in Union Square, 
has shut down after a 28-year run due to high rent and an ever-
increasing minimum wage — a policy that Ocasio-Cortez strongly 
supports.
"The restaurant I used to work at is closing its doors," Ocasio-Cortez 
wrote on Twitter. "I swung by today to say hi one last time, and kid 
around with friends like old times."

2e) Kemp begins his ads and message.
Kemp GA Digital FLT14 EH1

Friends,

Tonight, our first ad of the General Election will air on prime time 

television.

"Ahead" highlights my strong commitment to continued job growth 
in Georgia and support of early learning initiatives that prepare our 
children for bright and promising futures.
As governor, I will streamline government and slash regulations 
that make it difficult for the private sector to create jobs.
We will encourage local control, reduce mandates in the classroom,
empower our teachers, and dramatically improve our 3rd grade 
literacy rates.
Finally, I will work to protect those that are the most vulnerable and 
urge able-bodied folks in our state to work. We will celebrate those 
that follow the law, and always put hardworking Georgians first.
I believe in Georgia and know that with bold, trusted leadership at 
the State Capitol, we can continue moving in the right direction.
If you share my vision and support my plan for Georgia's future, 
please share our new ad with your friends, family, and neighbors.
Together, we can earn victory on November 6. With your help, we 
can ensure that our best days are always ahead.
Sincerely,
Kemp sig bk1

Brian P. Kemp
Conservative Businessman
Republican Nominee for Governor



2f)
Revolutionary Future Ahead
By John Mauldin 
Change Happens Fast
The Mathematical Reason for Accelerated Change
Turning Back the Clock
New Space Race
Financial Revolution
It Is Happening Everywhere
Summer Winding Down

Back in 1936, in Esquire magazine of all places, F. Scott Fitzgerald 
wrote something profound“The test of a first-rate intelligence is the
ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and
still retain the ability to function.”


As someone privileged to have met some of the world’s greatest
thinkers, I know what first-rate intelligence looks like. I am not in their
league, but I think I’m pretty good at holding opposing ideas. It’s why
I’m often called the “muddle-through guy.” When I consider
contradictory scenarios, I figure reality will be somewhere in between.
That’s right more often than you might suspect.
So, let’s consider two seemingly conflicting ideas.

  1. Major economic pain is coming.
  1. We have a bright, prosperous economic future.
Can both of those be right? I think so.
I explained last week in 
The Good News Economy how the current
recovery should continue for a couple more years. Beyond that lies
the Great Reset, featuring the “major economic pain” part. But beyond
 that is something much better… a time unprecedented in human
history, when life will improve in ways we can barely imagine right
now.

We’ll have a better chance to get through the Great Reset with assets
and sanity intact if we remember the good things waiting for us on the
other side and take advantage of them as soon as possible. Today
we’ll talk about some of the technology and biotechnology
developments that I believe will drive economic growth in the next
decade or two. Full disclosure: This is a very short version of my
forthcoming book, The Age of Transformation.

Change Happens Fast

Our various gadgets become so integral to daily life that we can
forget what life was like without them. I’ve said this before, but it
bears repeating: No one on Earth had a smartphone until 2007. That
first iPhone, revolutionary at the time, was primitive compared to even
 today’s low-end models.

Now, can you imagine living without your iPhone or Galaxy or
whatever you have? The answer for most of us is probably not. Some
Luddites don’t like being online, and to each his own. I like my tech.
But that just illustrates how fast the world can change. One invention,
in one decade, radically altered both daily life and the global
economy. Not without some downside, but I think mostly for the better.

Think about it from the other direction. In 2007, could you have
imagined those little devices would have the staggering impact we
now see as perfectly normal? Again, probably not. Many imagined the
opposite: “Why do I want the internet in my pocket?” Guess what:
Almost everyone who said that now has the internet in their pocket
and would not dream of living without it. Certainly not if you are a
Millennial.

In the next decade, we’ll see multiple inventions bring similar and, I
believe, even greater changes. The details won’t be immediately
obvious, but the changes will come. By 2030, they will be as ho-hum
to us as smartphones are today.

It may not even take that long. The pace of technological change is
accelerating, as is the speed at which new inventions propagate
around the world. Intangible software and information can spread at
lightspeed, while 3-D printing will let manufacturing capacity grow
faster and more widely than we’ve ever seen before.

In sum, the kind of change, magnitude of change, and rate of change
will all likely speed up considerably in the coming years. It will be a
roller-coaster ride. Now let’s look at some of the twists and turns it
will bring us.

The Mathematical Reason for Accelerated
Change


Back in the late 1700s, maybe a dozen people understood the steam
engine, mostly dilettantes doing it for fun. James Watt understood the
business implications and eventually built a steam engine that could
do the work of four horses pumping water out of a coal mine.

John Wilkinson—who developed a machine to make a true bore so
cannons could shoot longer and further—decided to use steam
engines to power his fires. He took the engine apart, saw that the
“bore” of the engine was not true and redid it. Voilà, a 16-horsepower
engine. Then dozens and eventually hundreds of engineers and
tinkerers improved performance further.

Fast forward to today. Today we routinely throw hundreds of scientists
and engineers at much simpler problems. But it is going to accelerate
even more.

Google and Facebook are in a race to make wireless internet available
to every part of the earth. Google will use what is known as high
balloons and Facebook is working on solar drones. Google is already
supposedly circumnavigated the globe at one meridian in the
southern hemisphere. Both technologies are viable, it will simply be a
matter of which is the less expensive and more workable.

In the not-too-distant future, and certainly by 2025, wireless voice and
data networks will be available to every human on the earth.

By the middle of the next decade, Wi-Fi will be essentially free or at
negligible cost. Seriously. That means three billion more people will
be connected to the internet. If 0.0001 percent of those three billion
people (or merely 30,000) create a major new technology or business
idea, that will accelerate the pace of change and make life better for all
of us. Give them access to the internet and artificial intelligence
expert systems, and stand back and watch what happens as
individual humans try to improve their own lives.

Turning Back the Clock

Demographic challenges lie behind many of our economic problems,
and the #1 demographic challenge is aging. Specifically, too many of
us aging at the same time and not doing it very well. The resulting
health problems both cost money to treat and may remove us from the
workforce when we could otherwise stay happily productive.

This is going to change for the better. I don’t mean simply longer
lifespans, though I think that will happen, too. Adding more years is
not necessarily a blessing if they simply extend your pain and make
you a burden to others. Much better to have a long, healthy life, and
then decline quickly when it naturally ends.

That is exactly where biotechnology is taking us. My friend Patrick
Cox 
writes about this extensively. He believes, as do many top
scientists we both know, that we are only a few years away from
treatments that can not only slow the aging process to a crawl, but in
some quite profound ways, actually reverse it. We already see it in
animal studies. Elderly mice exposed to these new treatments regrow
their hair, gain muscle mass, see and hear better, and even regain their
sexual vigor. Maybe not the mythical fountain of youth, but at least a
fountain of middle-age. And let me tell you from where I stand, about
one month shy of 69, middle-age sounds really good right now.

Obviously, humans are not mice and the research is ongoing. In fact,
it is accelerating because the Japanese government (which not
coincidentally faces major demographic headaches) is removing many
 of the bureaucratic hurdles that slow down progress. Some
treatments could be available there as soon as two or three years
from now.

If it works in Japan, other countries will follow quickly because it will
be in their own financial self-interest. Taking care of an aging,
unhealthy population is expensive. Think of all the time, money, and
attention that goes to health care. In the US, it’s about 18% of GDP—
the majority of which is spent on elderly people. If we can not only get
them healthier but actually make them younger, some of that money
can find better uses.

Then there is the astonishing progress being made against our most
challenging medical foes: cancer, heart disease, diabetes, and
assorted other killers. Big data and AI systems are quickly decoding
the genetics behind some of them, leading to better detection and
treatment. I truly believe we will have eliminated most cancers by 2030,
or at least turned them into minor, easily treated conditions. Imagine
the productivity boost from having all those patients stay alive and
working. (Again, full disclosure: I’m invested in a company that is in
phase 2 of a “silver bullet” cancer cure. If we are successful, and it is
still if, the treatment will not require hospitalization and seems to have
minimal side effects. I now think the biggest risk to my investment is
not that our drug does not work, but that other drugs will be cheaper,
better, and faster.) You can’t believe how much progress there is being
 made in this area.

As with HIV, cancer may soon become a chronic condition treated
with a cocktail of drugs rather than just one therapy. There are so
many possible scenarios, it’s almost impossible to describe what the
path will look like over the next 10 to 15 years. But barring stupid
governments, by 2030, cancer will be a nuisance and not a death
sentence, and certainly not something that will take massive national
expenditures.

New Space Race


At 
the end of last week’s letter, I mentioned the billionaires’ space
race. Paul Allen, Jeff Bezos, Richard Branson, and Elon Musk all want
to send satellites and/or people into orbit and eventually beyond.
Unlike the 1960’s US-Soviet space race, this one has unashamedly
commercial motives.

These men are so wealthy, in part because they can recognize
opportunities and what it takes to seize them. Reaching space at a
reasonable cost is the first step, so that’s the first order of business.
They have different ideas on how to do it. Time will tell what works
best… and competition between them will probably work better and
faster than waiting for the government to do it.

The first goal is to put more satellites in orbit. We forget that our
 smartphone location features depend on the satellite-based Global
Positioning System. And of course, satellites take the pictures you
see on your phone’s mapping app. All that works well, but more
satellites will make it even better.

My friend Peter Diamandis wrote an interesting blog post on this last
month.

As of August 2017, there were nearly 1,800 operational satellites in
orbit. Of these, 742 are communications satellites, 596 are used for
Earth observation, and 108 are used for navigation.

We’re seeing a massive increase in the number of operational
satellites as satellites become smaller and launch costs plummet.

Private companies all over the world are building out satellite
technology. For example, China plans to place 60 commercial (i.e.
private) high-resolution Jilin 1 imaging satellites in orbit by 2020.
Planet Labs is a disruptive company using milk-carton sized imaging
satellites to help entire industries obtain game-changing data. Planet
Labs showcases 175+ satellites in orbit, enabling them to image
anywhere on the globe with up to 3.72-meter resolution.

Alternatively, Planet Labs offers a specialized, targeted satellite option
 called SkySats. Thirteen of these satellites can achieve up to 72-
centimeter resolution. SkySats can also capture video, which can be
used to extrapolate 3D models. These satellites are built on the same
technology that Google deployed to capture crisp 3D image views for
Google Maps.
Imagine Google Maps satellite imagery that is live, not months or
years old. What could you do with that capability? Farmers, mapping
software, construction, maintaining operational control of your
logistics supply line, and a thousand other things we haven’t even
thought about today. We’re going to find out, on top of many other
benefits from easy, low-cost access to space.

Beyond that, a wealth of minerals are just waiting to be collected out
there, both in asteroids and on the Moon. Bringing them to Earth in
greater quantities than we have now could enable untold miracles.

Financial Revolution

Recently I heard someone say banks are now essentially technology
companies. So much lending now happens in the capital markets and
“shadow banks” that the legacy banks are mostly service providers.
They process payments, hold assets in custody, and provide the
financial system’s necessary plumbing. Old-style “banking” is on the
way out.

That may be a stretch, but it is true that the financial services
business is changing fast, due largely to technology. Stock trading
commissions are one obvious example. Remember when it used to
cost $50 to buy 100 shares of a stock? It wasn’t that long ago. Now
the fee is pennies or even zero. That’s partly because brokers have
found new ways to make revenue from order flow, and partly because
their costs are mostly fixed. Once you have the systems in place, the
incremental cost of processing one more trade is negligible.
Competition does the rest and customers win.

More competition is coming. You know what Amazon has done to the
retailing industry? Banks may be next. Here’s an amazing graphic
from CB Insights.


Source: CB Insights

In short, Amazon has ways to deliver many of the services we 
presently get from banks. So where exactly is that line between 
technology and banking? It’s hard to say and getting harder.

Blockchain-based cryptocurrencies are slowly finding their place in 
the financial system, too. I’ve been a Bitcoin skeptic—and it may yet 
give way to some other currency—but this isn’t fool’s gold. The 
technology has real advantages that will change the industry.

When I see people like John Burbank and Mark Yusko essentially go 
“all-in” on blockchain investments, staking their careers and 
reputations and hundreds of millions of dollars on something so 
ephemeral to most of us, I sit up and take notice. Something is 
happening here.

Finally—and you wouldn’t know this from all the tariff talk—capital is 
flowing around the world like never before. Investors who once 
thought they should stick “close to home” have branched out 
internationally. They do this in part because technology makes it 
possible to monitor assets you own, even on the other side of the 
world. This is good because it means capital will flow more easily to 
the entrepreneurs with the best ideas, wherever they may be 
geographically. Ultimately, that’s good for everyone.

It Is Happening Everywhere

Cambridge and Oxford could have been Silicon Valley. They had the 
Turing machine, but the bureaucrats were so afraid Russia would 
steal it they literally tore it down. They drove the greatest 
mathematical mind of the time, Alan Turing, to suicide simply 
because he was homosexual.

Over in the United States, ENIAC was formally dedicated at the 
University of Pennsylvania on February 15, 1946, and was heralded as 
a "Giant Brain" by the press. It had a speed on the order of one 
thousand times faster than electro-mechanical machines; this 
computational power, coupled with general-purpose programmability, 
excited scientists and industrialists alike. (Wikipedia)

What did the US do? The University of Pennsylvania threw a 
conference and three dozen schools came. Shown every design 
detail, they all went back and created computer schools and courses 
at their universities. Truly open source development.

From a human perspective, it really doesn’t make any difference 
where an invention comes from, as long as it improves our lives. 35% 
of artificial intelligence research funding will come from China in the 
next three years. PricewaterhouseCoopers recently projected AI’s 
deployment will add $15.7 trillion to global GDP by 2030, with China 
taking home $7 trillion of that total, dwarfing North America’s $3.7 
trillion share.

You think engineers and scientists in India are going to sit back? Or 
Thailand? No. Ricardo was right, different countries will specialize in 
their strengths. Yes, we would all like our home team to be the one 
that benefits the most, but the reality is the world is going to benefit, 
and we are all part of the world.

One day I will do a letter on China’s rising companies. Yes, many are 
state-sponsored, and we can grouse about it all we want, but then a 
lot of US research has been state-funded, too. That’s just what 
countries do. You think Airbus doesn’t get a lot of subsidies? But 
they make good planes. I like them. Just like I like Boeing planes. It 
makes no difference to me which plane I get on if it gets me there 
safely.

In India, you can get all the music you want streamed to your phone 
or device for literally pennies a month, not the $10 a month we pay to 
Spotify, which still seems incredibly low. I could go on with examples 
for pages, and probably will in my book.

But understand, all of these remarkable changes and improvements 
in our lives are going to happen even as we figure out how to deal 
with global debt. And those changes and improvements are going to 
be extraordinarily powerful investments if we get there at the right 
time and place.

Summer Winding Down

None of this means we are entering Nirvana next week. We’re going to 
have another recession eventually. The Great Reset is still coming. I 
expect to be talking about recessions in the next century. But the 
Great Reset and recessions won’t be the end of the world. Good 
things will keep happening, and we’ll get to the other side.

In the Vietnam War, “light at the end of the tunnel” became kind of a 
joke because the war seemed endless. Finally it did end, and some 
bad years followed. But now Vietnam is at peace and its economy 
growing fast.

One of my favorite frontier market investors told me at Camp Kotok 
that Vietnam is his favorite opportunity right now. There really was
light ahead in their long, dark tunnel. Getting to it just took time. We 
will get there, too.

I don’t have any trips or personal news to report this week. We’re in 
August, it’s hot and summer is winding down. I’m looking forward to 
cooler weather and even cooler new technology.
  
Your really optimistic about the future analyst,


John Mauldin
Chairman, Mauldin Economics
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

No comments: