Men Are Happy People And Thus Mostly Not Liberals. Something Else To Think About. You Can Never Win.

And:

MEN ARE JUST HAPPY PEOPLE and THAT IS WHY MOST ARE CONSERVATIVE AND NOT LIBERALS. THEY ALSO ARE ROM MARS WHILE WOMEN ARE FROM VENUS.
 
Men Are Just Happier People!   What do you expect from such simple creatures? Your last name stays put. The garage is all yours. Wedding plans take care of themselves. Chocolate is just another snack. You can never be pregnant. You can wear a white T-shirt to a water park. You can wear NO shirt to a water park.
 
Car mechanics tell you the truth. The world is your urinal. You never have to drive to another gas station restroom because this one is just too icky. You don't have to stop and think of which way to turn a nut on a bolt. Wrinkles add character. Wedding dress - $5,000. Tux rental - $100. People never stare at your chest when you're talking to them.
 
New shoes don't cut, blister, or mangle your feet. One mood all the time. Phone conversations are over in 30 seconds flat. You know stuff about tanks. A five-day vacation requires only one suitcase. You can open all your own jars.
 
You get extra credit for the slightest act of thoughtfulness. If someone forgets to invite you, he or she can still be your friend. Your underwear is $8.95 for a three-pack. Two pairs of shoes are more than enough. You almost never have strap problems in public. You are unable to see wrinkles in your clothes.
 
Everything on your face stays its original color. The same hairstyle lasts for years, maybe decades. You only have to shave your face and neck. You can play with toys all your life. One wallet and one pair of shoes - one color for all seasons. You can wear shorts no matter how your legs look.
 
You can 'do' your nails with a pocket knife. You have freedom of choice concerning growing a mustache.. You can do Christmas shopping for 25 relatives on December 24 in 25 minutes. No wonder men are happier.
 
NICKNAME -   If Laura, Kate, and Sarah go out for lunch, they will call each other Laura, Kate and Sarah.               If Mike, Dave and John go out, they will affectionately refer to each other as Fat Boy, Bubba, and Wild man.
 
EATING OUT -   When the bill arrives, Mike, Dave and John will each throw in $20, even though it's only for $32.50. None of them will have anything smaller and none will actually admit they want change back. When the girls get their bill, outcomes the pocket calculators.
 
MONEY -   A man will pay $2 for a $1 item he needs  A woman will pay $1 for a $2 item that she doesn't need but it's on sale.
 
BATHROOMS -  A man has six items in his bathroom: toothbrush and toothpaste, shaving cream, razor, a bar of soap, and a towel.     The average number of items in the typical woman's bathroom is 337. A man would not be able to identify more than 20 of these items.
 
ARGUMENTS - A woman has the last word in any argument.  Anything a man says after that is the beginning of a new argument.
 
FUTURE -  A woman worries about the future until she gets a husband  A man never worries about the future until he gets a wife.
 
MARRIAGE -  A woman marries a man expecting he will change, but he doesn't.   A man marries a woman expecting that she won't change, but she does.
 
DRESSING UP - A woman will dress up to go shopping, water the plants, empty the trash, answer the phone, read a book, and get the mail.   A man will dress up for weddings and funerals.
 
NATURAL - Men wake up as good-looking as they went to bed   Women somehow deteriorate during the night.
 
OFFSPRING - Ah, children. A woman knows all about her children. She knows about dentist appointments and romances, best friends, favorite foods, secret fears, and hopes and dreams.  A man is vaguely aware of some short people living in the house.
 
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY   A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing! 

And:

Something else to think about:

Interesting Take on Electric Cars

As an engineer I love the electric vehicle technology However, I have been troubled for a longtime by the fact that the electrical energy to keep the batteries charged has to come from the grid and that means more power generation and a huge increase in the distribution infrastructure Whether generated from coal, gas, oil, wind or sun, installed generation capacity is limited A friend sent me the following that says it very well. You should all take a look at this short article.


IF ELECTRIC CARS DO NOT USE GASOLINE, THEY WILL NOT PARTICIPATE IN PAYING A GASOLINE TAX ON EVERY GALLON THAT IS SOLD FOR AUTOMOBILES, WHICH WAS ENACTED SOME YEARS AGO TO HELP TO MAINTAIN OUR ROADS AND BRIDGES. THEY WILL USE THE ROADS, BUT WILL NOT PAY FOR THEIRMAINTENANCE!

In case you were thinking of buying hybrid or an electric car:
Ever since the advent of electric cars, the REAL cost per mile of those things has never been discussed. All you ever heard was the mpg in terms of gasoline, with nary a mention of the cost of electricity to run it. This is the first article I've ever seen and tells the story pretty much as I expected it to.

Electricity has to be one of the least efficient ways to power things yet they're being shoved down our throats. Glad somebody finally put engineering and math to paper.

At a neighborhood BBQ I was talking to a neighbor, a BC Hydro Executive. I asked him how that renewable thing was doing. He laughed, then got serious.

If you really intend to adopt electric vehicles, he pointed out, you had to face certain realities. For example, a home charging system for a Tesla requires 75 amp service. The average house is equipped with 100 amp service. On our small street (approximately 25 homes), the electrical infrastructure would be unable to carry more than three houses with a single Tesla, each. For even half the homes to have electric vehicles, the system would be wildly over-loaded.

This is the elephant in the room with electric vehicles. Our residential infrastructure cannot bear the load. So as our genius elected officials promote this nonsense, not only are we being urged to buy these things and replace our reliable, cheap generating systems with expensive, new windmills and solar cells, but we will also have to renovate our entire delivery system! This latter "investment" will not be revealed until we're so far down this dead end road that it will be presented with an 'OOPS...!' and a shrug.

If you want to argue with a green person over cars that are eco-friendly, just read the following. Note: If you ARE a green person, read it anyway. It's enlightening.

Eric test drove the Chevy Volt at the invitation of General Motors and he writes, "For four days in a row, the fully charged battery lasted only 25 miles before the Volt switched to the reserve gasoline engine.
"Eric calculated the car got 30 mpg including the 25 miles it ran on the battery. So, the range including the 9-gallon gas tank and the 16 kwh battery is approximately 270 miles.

It will take you 4.5 hours to drive 270 miles at 60 mph. Then add 10 hours to charge the battery and you have a total trip time of 14.5 hours. In a typical road trip your average speed (including charging time) would be 20 mph.

 

According to General Motors, the Volt battery holds 16 kwh of electricity. It takes a full 10 hours to charge a drained battery. The cost for the electricity to charge the Volt is never mentioned, so I looked up what I pay for electricity.

I pay approximately (it varies with amount used and the seasons) $1.16 per kwh. 16 kwh x $1.16 per kwh = $18.56 to charge the battery.
$18.56 per charge divided by 25 miles = $0.74 per mile to operate the Volt using the battery. Compare this to a similar size car with a gasoline engine that gets only 32 mpg. $3.19 per gallon divided by 32 Mpg = $0.10 per mile.

The gasoline powered car costs about $25,000 while the Volt costs $46,000 plus. So the Canadian Government wants loyal Canadians not to do the math, but simply pay twice as much for a car, that costs more than seven times as much to run, and takes three times longer to drive across the country.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I have memos written, posted and ready to be sent through 5:15 AM, March 1.

I am trying this so they will be shorter but I run the risk they might appear less timely. 

You can never win.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

What a real creep: https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/02/16/biden-former-military-police-fueling-growth-of-white-supremacy-groups/

And:

Brandon Smith poses a valid question:

A question for leftists: Why are all the evil people on your side?

By Brandon Smith

The media these days is saturated with tales of "evil conservatives" and our heinous plans for world domination through "insurrection." In fact, most mainstream articles that cover recent events including the election and the protests at the capitol make a point to always mention "white supremacy" and "terrorism" in the same breath as the word "conservative." This is an entirely deliberate propaganda tactic called "word association" or "word redefinition;" change the subtext of a word or group label in the minds of the masses and you can often change the perception from positive to negative. In other words, conservative = racist/terrorist. It doesn't matter if it's not true, it just matters that people are conditioned to subconsciously make the connection. For example, I've had numerous criticisms of Trump and his administration over the years, but none of that criticism had anything to do with what leftists were regurgitating since 2016. To them, Trump's "racism" was a verified fact, yet when I ask any social justice warrior to produce an actual quote of Trump saying something racist, they can't seem to dig anything up. By extension, leftists have a bizarre obsession with Russia and the theory that Russia is an ever-present hand of god in U.S. politics, yet none of them can produce concrete proof that Russia has meaningful influence at all in American affairs. The political left deeply believes in things that never happened because their movement is populated by people that are easily manipulated by word redefinitions and false associations. Are they victims of propaganda? Sure. Are they innocent? No. Refusal to question the actions and motives of your chosen movement is willful ignorance, and leftists are accountable for that. Leftists are the only group of people that has consistently supported mass surveillance, mass censorship, mass violence, property destruction and looting as well as violations of individual rights through medical mandates and lockdowns. They call conservatives "insurrectionists" while they are the only people openly trying to dismantle constitutional protections and the Bill of Rights. So, who are the real villains of this story? One of the core characteristics of conservatives is that we tend to argue with each other... a lot. It's one of the main reasons why we find it difficult to organize on the same scale that leftists often do. We might all agree on the source of the problems our country faces, but we rarely all agree on the details or solutions. This is a weakness, but it is also a strength. I would much rather be a part of a movement that self reflects. I would much rather be a part of a movement that doesn't operate as a hive mind. There needs to be dissenting voices in everything so that ideas are challenged. If the ideas are found wanting by reason and logic, then they need to be addressed or abandoned. The political left has no concept of this, though. Leftists are afraid to question anything within their own circles. To dissent on the smallest detail is to be a heretic, a traitor to the cause. They use the word "diversity" all the time, like a battle cry, but when confronted with true diversity (diversity of thought), they panic and react violently. You cannot be black and also be a conservative, according to leftists. If you are, then you must be an "Uncle Tom" and a traitor. You can't be gay and be anti-social justice. If you are, then you must be a secret bigot that is confused about your place in the world. You can't be a woman and argue against feminism. If you do then you are actually a self-hating woman that has been "enslaved by the patriarchy." You can't be a Democrat and also support gun rights. If you are, then you support school shootings and must be excommunicated from the cult. Leftists don't actually care about diversity; they only care that you have blind allegiance to the collective. Stray but a little, and the mob will come for your head. They love plantations, they love slavery… as long as they own the plantations, and they control the slaves. A natural consequence of this Animal Farm mentality is that irony and hypocrisy are lost on the followers of such movements. They project all their shortcomings and crimes on others; the devils they see in conservatives are actually the devils they see in the mirror every day. That said, the higher up you get in the leftist pyramid, the less it becomes hypocritical and the more it becomes malicious intent. The gaslighting, the word association propaganda, the selective memory hole they use to erase historical facts that contradict their ideology, the people at the top and their lackeys know exactly what they are doing. They don't care that their claims are hypocritical or outright fraudulent. They know they are lying; they know they are gaslighting. They're not interested in being right, they are only interested in winning. There is much more going on here than meets the eye. There is a great deal of power and money behind the rise of hard-left ideology and there are certain people that benefit from its expansion. Leftists like to view themselves as the "underdogs" or revolutionaries fighting against "the man." However, every resource of global power brokers has been offered in support of the political left. The "Man" is the ally of the leftists; in some ways, he is even the creator of the leftist movement. They aren't revolutionaries at all; they are the jackboots of the new world order. All the evil people are on their side. It was globalist institutions like the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation that funded different elements of the feminist movement and "gender studies" movements from the late 1960s onward. This included the Rockefeller Foundation's large donations to The Feminist Press's and the Ford Foundation's programs to indoctrinate teachers into injecting social justice talking points into their curriculum. This is openly admitted in Alison R. Bernstein's book Funding The Future: Philanthropy's Influence On America's Higher Education. Bernstein is the vice president of Education at the Ford Foundation and the former Associate Dean of Faculty at Princeton. That's right folks, social justice activism was paid for and encouraged by the so-called "patriarchy." This is the reality, and it never stopped. Even today SJW groups are funded by globalists. For example, as the mainstream media often tries to dismiss or ignore, Black Lives Matter was initially funded by the Ford Foundation and George Soros and his Open Society Foundation. BLM coffers were flooded with over $100 million from uber-rich white elites. Again, this is a fact that even the dishonest spin doctors at Snopes are not able to deny. Instead, they attempt to use strawman arguments and sophistry to distract from the implication of extreme-left mobs receiving seed money from elitist billionaires. But let's follow this path even further: Who gets the support of the mainstream media behemoths? Conservatives or leftists? The answer is obvious. What about Big Tech platforms? Do they enforce leftist ideological standards? Do they censor conservative viewpoints predominantly or leftist viewpoints predominantly? The reality is that conservatives are deplatformed from Twitter, YouTube and Facebook far more than leftists, this is a verifiable fact. When alternative platforms like Parler are built, are they allowed to simply exist? Of course not! The leftists rampage in an effort to destroy them, but the leftists would have no power without the backing of corporate monopolies like Apple, Google and Amazon. Not only does Big Tech aid the leftists in their jihad against conservatives, but the government does as well. They don't just go after alternative platforms; they try to go after server providers. And when alternative platforms move to more freedom-oriented server providers like Epik, the leftists get government support in order to intimidate them also. The collusion between government, corporations and political-ideological movements is the classical definition of fascism. And, just as the Third Reich enjoyed immense funding, investment and industrial support from the globalists in the decade leading up to WWII, the political left is enjoying immense support from the global corporate oligarchy today. So, again, I ask leftists: If you are the rebels... if you are the freedom fighters... then why are all the elites you are supposedly fighting against on your side? Why are the evil people your most avid allies? To truth and knowledge, Brandon Smith

 

++++++++++++++++++++++