Wednesday, November 14, 2018

More Gaza Commentary. Peter Morici and GDP Growth. Kavanaugh's Position Filled By Female Nominee.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
More Gaza commentary. (See 1, 1a, 1b  and 1c below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Is Amazon whorish?  Certainly Bezos wants to curry favor with politicians and he showed us how it is done. (See 2 below.)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Peter Morici is a friend and fellow memo reader and this is what he thinks regarding growth:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/13/innovations-in-robotics-artificial-intelligence-in/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Trump nominates women to fill Kavanaugh's position. (See 3 below.)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dick
++++++++++++++++++++++++
1)IDF threatens to step up Gaza attacks, but won’t call up reservists for now
Army says Hamas and Islamic Jihad have fired over 400 rockets, mortar shells at Israel, with some 20,000 more in their arsenals; military bombs ‘key assets’ in Strip

A man stands inside a house that was hit by a rocket fired from the Gaza Strip in the southern Israeli city of Ashkelon, on November 13, 2018 (Nati Shohat/Flash90)
A man stands inside a house that was hit by a rocket fired from the Gaza Strip in the southern
Israeli city of Ashkelon, on November 13, 2018 (Nati Shohat/Flash90)

The Israeli military threatened on Tuesday to escalate its bombing raids in Gaza, which the army said have already destroyed more than 150 military targets in the coastal enclave, after Palestinian terrorists in the Strip fired some 400 rockets and mortar shells at Israeli cities and towns along the border since Monday afternoon, killing at least one person and wounding dozens more.
“There is ample room for additional targets,” said Lt. Col. Jonathan Conricus, an Israel Defense Forces spokesperson. “We have signaled to Hamas over the course of this night that we have the intelligence and ability to strike a variety of military targets that belong to Hamas.”
Spokespeople for the armed wing of Hamas, the terror group that rules the Strip, threatened to start shooting rockets deeper into Israeli territory if fighting continued, calling recent barrages on the city of Ashkelon a “warning.”
“Approximately one million Zionists will be within the range of our missiles if the Zionist enemy’s decision is to continue its aggression,” a Hamas spokesman said.
Another spokesman said Tuesday morning that if Israel continues its bombardments of Gaza, the cities of “Ashdod and Beersheba are next in line,” while a spokesperson for the Palestinian Islamic Jihad terror group threatened to attack Tel Aviv.
On Tuesday, Israel also stopped cooperating with the Egyptian intelligence officials and United Nations Special Envoy to the Middle East Peace Process Nickolay Mladenov, who have been working to broker a ceasefire between the two sides, in a clear signal that Jerusalem was prepared to continue pummeling the Strip if the rocket and mortar attacks persisted.
Israel’s security cabinet convened in the morning at the Defense Ministry’s Tel Aviv headquarters. The discussion was expected to last several hours, at the end of which the ministers would decide how to proceed.
The IDF’s threats to Hamas came as rocket and mortar attacks from the Gaza Strip entered their second day, forcing tens of thousands of Israelis in the south to stay close to bomb shelters and while most schools, businesses and government offices remained closed.
The massive barrage of rocket and mortar shells, which began Monday afternoon and persisted throughout the night and into Tuesday morning, appeared to be the largest-ever attack in a 24-hour period from the Gaza Strip, with more than twice the number of projectiles fired than on any single day of the bloody 2014 war.
In response to the “relentless rocket fire” from Gaza, the Israeli military launched a series of ground, air and naval strikes at over 150 targets in the Strip connected to Hamas and Islamic Jihad, including “key strategic assets,” according to Conricus.
Among those assets were the Hamas-controlled Al-Aqsa television station, which Israel says was used to direct and encourage terrorist activities, and Hamas’s internal security headquarters.
As rocket attacks continued throughout the day on Monday night and Tuesday, the Israeli army sent reinforcements to the south in the form of additional infantry troops, tanks and Iron Dome batteries.
The military had yet to call up significant numbers of reservists as of Tuesday morning, but IDF Spokesman Brig. Gen. Ronen Manelis told the Radio Darom station that it may yet do so if the need arises. Small numbers of reserve personnel, mostly from aerial defense units, have been brought into army service, Conricus told reporters by phone.
According to the IDF, more than 400 rockets and mortars have been lobbed at southern Israel since Monday afternoon, which began shortly after 4:30 p.m. when Palestinian terrorists fired a Kornet anti-tank guided missile at a bus near the border, severely injuring an Israeli soldier.
The anti-tank missile attack occurred less than a day after an IDF special operations officer was killed in an operation in Gaza gone awry that also killed seven Palestinian gunmen. Following the clashes, Hamas said “the blood of our righteous martyrs will not be wasted.”
Most of the projectiles launched from the Strip have been targeting the “Gaza envelope,” the Israeli communities located within a few kilometers of the coastal enclave, the army said.
Conricus warned that Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad — the two largest terror groups in Gaza — have “in excess of 20,000 rockets and mortar shells of different calibers and ranges” in their arsenals in Gaza, almost twice the number that Israel assessed they had in the 2014 war, known in Israel as Operation Protective Edge.
“Unfortunately they are not near the end of their capabilities,” he said.
According to the military, over 100 of the incoming projectiles were intercepted by the Iron Dome air defense system. Most of the rest landed in open fields outside of Israeli communities. Dozens exploded inside cities and towns throughout southern Israel, several of them directly hitting homes and apartment buildings in Ashkelon, Netivot and Sderot.
One man was killed in one of those direct hits in Ashkelon. He was later identified as a 48-year-old Palestinian man from Hebron, Mahmoud Abu Asbah, who was living in Israel with a legal work permit.
According to medical officials, 27 other people in were injured in attacks, including the soldier hit in the anti-tank missile attack and two women wounded in direct hits on apartment buildings in Ashkelon. A man in his 40s was also moderately wounded by shrapnel, medics said.
“The Iron Dome so far has been phenomenal, but even the Iron Dome is not hermetic and we cannot expect it to intercept everything, especially when it’s dealing with this amount of rockets,” Conricus said.
In Gaza, six Palestinians — at least three of them later claimed by terrorist groups as members — were reportedly killed in the IDF’s raids on Monday and Tuesday, apparently in airstrikes on rocket-launching cells.
“It is unfortunate that of the dozens of rockets fired at Ashhkelon one was able to get through our defenses and hit a building in a populated area,” he added, when asked about the rocket attack that killed the Palestinian man.
No Hamas members have yet to be identified among the dead in Gaza.
According to Conricus, that is because Hamas leadership and fighters have mostly stayed underground throughout the fighting, launching their rockets with timers and other remote-controlled devices in order to avoid being hit by Israeli airstrikes.
“It’s not a secret — they’re in hiding,” he said. “They fire rockets from within the Gaza civilian population at our civilian population, and they do so while hiding beneath their civilian population.”
Conricus said the IDF was using a variety of measures to avoid Palestinian civilian casualties, including phone calls to buildings about to be destroyed and the so-called “knock on the roof” technique in which non-explosive ordnance is dropped on a building as a warning before an actual missile strike takes place.
“Hamas is forcing its violence and bringing its destruction on the Gaza Strip with its actions,” Conricus said. “This is in spite of long term efforts that Israel and the IDF have done to stabilize and improve the situation [in Gaza].”
In recent weeks, Egyptian and UN mediators had appeared to be making progress in brokering informal understandings aimed at quieting the situation.
Last week, Israel allowed Qatar to deliver $15 million to Gaza to allow cash-strapped Hamas to pay the salaries of thousands of government workers. At the same time, Hamas has lowered the intensity of the border protests in recent weeks.
The fighting on Monday and Tuesday cast doubt over understandings previously brokered by Egypt and UN officials to reduce tensions. Just a day earlier, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had defended those understandings, saying he was doing everything possible to avoid another “unnecessary war.”
The United Nations on Monday said it was working with Egypt to broker a halt in the violence. “Rockets must STOP, restraint must be shown by all!” the UN Mideast envoy’s office tweeted.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, meanwhile, urged Israel and the Palestinians “to exercise maximum restraint,” according to a statement.
In light of the barrage from the Gaza Strip, the Israeli military ordered residents of communities near the Gaza Strip to remain near bomb shelters until further notice. That included residents of the towns of Netivot and Ofakim, which are not typically as affected by Gaza rockets as communities closer to the border.
Residents of the cities of Beersheba, Ashkelon and Ashdod were also told to stay within close proximity of bomb shelters and protected spaces.
A run-off election scheduled for Tuesday in the Hof Ashkelon region was postponed.
The military also canceled school for Tuesday in the Gaza border region and in the central Negev and Lachish regions, including in Israel’s fourth largest city Beersheba.
In addition, businesses were ordered closed in the Gaza region, along with government offices, unless they are considered essential or had close access to bomb shelters, the army said. No large gatherings were allowed in southern Israel on Monday night and Tuesday, it said.
In Gaza, Hamas set up multiple checkpoints in a show of force. It also restricted movement through crossings with Israel, preventing foreign journalists, local businessmen and some aid workers from leaving the territory.
Hamas also canceled a weekly beach protest in northwestern Gaza along the border with Israel. The organizers cited “the ongoing security situation.”

1a)
https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/static/thumbnails/cf51f1223a59948501ff4e78407b666e.png

Analysis: Hamas’s emboldened risk-taking is fueling this escalation
Written by Yaakov Lappin

https://cdn.i24news.tv/upload/image/afp-242886b01a7a47be63245c9c883622d1c87181bb.jpg?width=716
The flare-up came after a deadly Israeli special forces operation in the Gaza Strip on
Sunday that led Hamas to vow revenge MAHMUD HAMS (AFP)

If Israel fails to restore deterrence in Gaza, it could embolden its more powerful adversaries in the north
An increasingly emboldened appetite for risk-taking and a belief that Israel is too busy elsewhere to want to seize their territorial base has led Hamas and other terror organizations in the Gaza Strip to initiate a mass rocket assault on southern Israel.
Gaza's armed factions feel they can tolerate Israel’s counter-strikes, and that the benefits they can achieve by initiating this escalation outweigh the costs. Israel has set out to disavow Hamas of this concept, and this is the purpose of the current Israeli air campaign in Gaza.
The first stage of Israel’s response involves the demolition of a growing number of strategic Hamas assets. These targets are high-value assets for Hamas, and are also symbolic of its rule in Gaza.
They include the central Hamas military intelligence headquarters, the Al-Aqsa television station building, and other high-profile targets being struck alongside standard Hamas infrastructure, like weapons factories, tunnels, and command centers.
Although such targets may seem unimpressive to many, they represent areas of heavy investment and planning by Hamas, and it will take the organization’s military wing a long time to rebuild them.
Still, this level of attack may not be sufficient to influence Hamas’s cost-benefit analysis.
AP Photo/Tsafrir Abayov
Israeli firefighters work at the scene where a rocket fired from the Gaza Strip hit in
Sderot, Israel, Monday, Nov. 12, 2018. AP Photo/Tsafrir Abayov

Hamas and its shrewd new leader, Yahya Sinwar, learned in recent months that Israel is reluctant to commit itself to an irreversible, large-scale military conflict in Gaza and that the Israeli leadership and defense establishment would prefer to focus on, and prioritize, the far more threatening northern arenas.
They have also learned that when they back up with violence their demand for "protection money" – funds to prevent the collapse of Gaza’s economy and civilian government – regional actors and the international community scurry to meet their demands driven by fear of a disastrous meltdown of the Islamist-ruled enclave.
The main question going forward is whether Hamas’s calculations thus far have rested on the wrong assumptions.
Israel’s other enemies, Hezbollah, Iran, and allied terrorist forces, are closely watching Gazan factions terrorize a regional power and will be looking to see what costs Hamas pays for these actions.
If Israel fails to restore a basic level of deterrence in Gaza, the lessons drawn by Israel’s more powerful adversaries could, in turn, embolden their own appetite to take risks against Israel.
Hamas senior commanders are hiding in, or under, heavily populated residential areas, where they fled to as soon as the security situation escalated. It is a familiar pattern, and one that enables Hamas’s senior military command level to feel that it can bombard southern Israeli civilians with relative impunity, using Gaza’s own long-suffering civilians as human shields.
But the IAF is operating on a low flame at this time, and could step up its strikes in a major way if directed to do so by the government. The deployment of back-up ground forces to the Gaza border is a clear Israeli threat to move beyond air power, and launch a land offensive, should the escalation continue. This is a threat that Hamas has yet to decide if it wishes to try and test.
Ultimately, this flare up is still at the stage of signal sending.
Hamas is not only striking a new aggressive pose against Israel, it is also banking on a boost to its credibility in the Palestinian arena, through its willingness to clash head on with Israel, while it accuses the Palestinian Authority (PA), its hated domestic foe, of collaborating with Israel.
Such messaging may not interest ordinary Gazans, however, many of whom are looking at the safer, more stable, and more financially secure lives of their fellow Palestinians in the West Bank with envy.
The combined rocket and mortar arsenal of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) exceeds 20,000 projectiles, and these factions are prepared on the ground to engage in persistent asymmetrical urban warfare if Israel enters the Strip with ground forces.
This means the Gazan factions feel their aggressive posturing is sufficient to deter Israel, fueling their willingness to revenge tactical incidents, like Sunday night’s deadly fire exchange between Israeli special forces and Hamas, by taking it out on Israel’s southern civilians.
Israel, for its part, has dramatically improved the readiness and capabilities of its ground forces. But Israel has advertised its lack of appetite to engage in a full-scale war in Gaza, and its fear of finding itself in control of two million Gazans. Hamas has assessed that it can therefore get away with these actions.
Now, it is up to Israel to drive home the message that the longer this continues, the more Hamas will lose. The IDF’s actions so far amount to just an initial attempt to influence Hamas’s decision-making, before Israel feels the need to escalate further.
These events represent a collapse of the concept that it is possible to stabilize Gaza with money, fuel, electricity, and basic goods.
The escalation comes only days after initial signs suggested that Gaza and Israel were heading for calmer days. Israel permitted Qatar to inject Gaza with $15 million – money for Hamas’s civilian government officials – and Egypt was working intensively to try and bridge gaps between Hamas and its bitter internal foe, the PA.
The PA views Gaza as a breakaway rebel province that was hijacked by Hamas. The PA has been seeking to choke Gaza until Hamas submits to its demands to allow it to retake the territory.
In the past, Hamas had signaled that it would prefer to avoid a new war, but if faced with economic collapse, it would launch one anyway. Now, it is signaling that it is willing to risk war even if Gaza receives injections of cash.
Caught in in this complex web are southern Israeli civilians and Gazan civilians, who are bearing the brunt of Hamas’s cynical, violent, and dangerous calculations. Israel’s first goal will be to change Hamas’s logic for a long time to come.
Yaakov Lappin is an associate researcher at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, and a correspondent for Jane’s Defense Weekly and the Jewish News Service.

1b)
By George Friedman

Israel’s Strategic Reality

The current fighting in Gaza is part of years of sporadic conflict, but there’s more to it than that.

Israel and Gaza are involved in an escalating firefight that began with the exposure of undercover Israeli soldiers at a militant checkpoint in Gaza over the weekend. The Israeli probe there is part of an ongoing operation to limit Hamas’ ability to wage war. It may seem that this attempt failed, given that several hundred rockets have been fired into Israel. But the strategic situation goes far beyond this exchange.
Palestinian Divides
For the Palestinians, one of their main challenges has been the profound divide between Palestinian groups. The West Bank is controlled by the Palestinian Authority, a descendant of the Palestine Liberation Organization. The PLO is an umbrella organization for various Palestinian factions that all descended from the secular Arab movements that emerged in the 1950s and 1960s. Gaza, on the other hand, is dominated by Hamas, a different strand of the Palestinian movement that took its bearings from the rise of Islamists. Ideologically, Hamas and the Palestinian Authority diverge profoundly. Strategically, they have different interests in Gaza. The PA had some possibility of creating a viable entity there and made formal and informal arrangements with the Israelis to achieve that end. But ultimately, Gaza wasn’t viable. Given its size and population, it was sustainable only through outside support. Any settlement with Israel would leave Gaza permanently unmanageable. But the divergent interests of the PA and Hamas benefited the Israelis. Internal division had been a feature of the Palestinian movement from the beginning, but this sharp ideological and geographical split made it easier for the Israelis to manage the situation.
Gaza was contained not only by the Israelis but also by the Egyptians, who saw Hamas’ links to the Muslim Brotherhood as a threat to their interests. The Saudis, on the other hand, saw an opportunity. Saudi Arabia sees itself as the center of Sunni Islam and, therefore, responsible for the religiously oriented Palestinian movements, providing them with military support.
Another factor was Iran, which also offered Hamas support. The foundation of Iran’s power in the Levant was Hezbollah. It was a Shiite political and military movement that confronted the Israelis during Israel’s invasions of Lebanon and in Israel itself. There was tension between Shiite Iran and Sunni Palestinian groups, but Hamas needed military aid, and Hezbollah and the Iranians were ready and willing to supply it. They provided the rockets that Hamas fired at Israel and the technology Hamas needed to construct rockets of its own. Israel was thus militarily diverted in two directions: to the north in Lebanon and to the south in Gaza. Neither posed an existential threat to Israel, but together they were a significant force drawing Israeli attention in multiple directions.
Iranian Expansion
After the U.S. withdrawal from the region, the spread of Iranian power created a new
strategic dynamic. Saudi Arabia and Israel had a common interest in containing Iran, and
Iran’s connection to Hamas concerned both. The Saudis seemed to support Israel’s efforts
to shift Hamas away from confrontation. As the main supplier of non-lethal aid, the Saudis
had massive influence over Hamas, and in recent weeks, the group indicated it was
interested in some settlement with Israel and displacing PA as the main representative of
Palestinians.
The shift in Hamas’ posture had to alarm the Iranians. Gaza was not an existential threat
to them, but its ability to divert Israel’s focus and shift logistical support would be an asset
in any potential conflict with Israel. I speculate now that the Saudi pressure to
accommodate Israel may have resulted in Iranian counter-pressure, and the increasing
Israeli probes were in some way connected to this. Gaza would be permanently crippled if
it accepted the Saudi status quo and, therefore, continued working with Iran, as covertly
as possible.
For Israel, the real strategic problem is that Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and Haifa are the heart of
the country and where its population is concentrated. If they were to come under massive
rocket and missile fire, the losses would likely be unacceptable. Israel, therefore, must pre-
empt any possible attack from Iran. U.S. economic pressure on Tehran has weakened the
regime, but that has not changed the strategic problem Israel faces.
Gaza is therefore not the real problem. The real problem is the peripheral threat from the
north, east and south. The Israeli military has no way to instantaneously destroy all the
rockets that can be launched from these positions. Any Israeli attack, therefore, would take
an extended period of time and might require ground forces. And once the Israelis begin
such an operation, the Iranians would be able to launch a large number of missiles toward
the main population hubs. Israel would thus have to engage its entire periphery
simultaneously. It’s unlikely Israel would use nuclear weapons given the proximity and high
probability of nuclear fallout reaching Israel. An Israeli assault must be conventional and
very quickly effective. A difficult task, to say the least.
It would also have to be pre-emptive. If Iran were to initiate war, Israel would be in the
worst position possible. It can’t assume Iran won’t act, nor can it assume that a pre-
emptive strike would even work.
Russian Interests
As odd as it seems, the matter may come down to the Russians. If they block Israeli
aircraft attacking Syria, then Israel has the choice of backing down or attacking Russian
facilities, making the situation even more unmanageable. What Israel needs is for the
Russians to force Iran to withdraw its missiles from Syria. Gaza is manageable, and with
the Syrian problem eliminated, Israel would face only one remaining threat: Hezbollah in
Lebanon. Indeed, without Gaza and Syria involved, Hezbollah might not be willing to begin
an exchange.
The Russians don’t want to see Israel attacked, and they don’t want to face an Israeli
assault either. Russia would be at a disadvantage, and it has little desire to deploy more
forces to the region. And while it has no love for Iran, it doesn’t want to force the Syrians
have to choose between Russia and Iran. The Syrian army is far larger than the Russian
force in place, and superior training and weapons don’t always compensate for numbers.
Russia’s presence in Syria is getting more complicated by the day, but it can’t withdraw
 without giving up the one thing it sought in Syria in the first place: credibility. It can act
quietly against Iranian missiles but can’t guarantee their withdrawal.
It’s for this reason that the U.S. abandoned the nuclear agreement with the Iranians and
demanded they halt the construction of missiles. Long-range missiles in Iran would turn
Israel’s problem insoluble without rapid, aggressive action, which the U.S. doesn’t want at
a time when the situation throughout the region is volatile.
The Least Dangerous Force
The current fighting in Gaza is part of years of sporadic conflict, but there’s more to it. The
spread of Iranian power has threatened Sunni Arabs in the region, particularly the Saudis.
Now it has reached the point of forcing Israel to consider pre-emptive action, and Gaza is
the least dangerous force with which it can deal. The Israelis clearly didn’t take Hamas’
offers for an agreement seriously, likely due to its rocket production capabilities.
The Israelis have warned the Lebanese about Hezbollah’s rockets. They have insisted that
the Russians permit continued airstrikes against Iranian positions in Syria without warning.
And they are taking rocket fire from Gaza. All these events are in some way connected to
the massive growth in Iranian power. The Iranians, though, are facing severe economic
pressure and may see confrontation with Israel as the kind of national security event that
could boost patriotism and allow citizens to forget their economic hardships.
Meanwhile, intense talks are undoubtedly underway. The Americans are using their new
favorite weapon – economic warfare – against Iran and avoiding military involvement. The
Russians are getting the old sinking feeling of foreigners intervening in the Middle East.
The Israelis are contemplating full peripheral warfare. It comes down to how badly the
Iranians want to hold their current position, and the extent to which they are willing to back
down. The possibility of a defeat might be enough to force them to choose another day.

1c)

Israel's warning to Hamas of impending 

destruction of Al-Aqsa TV building caught on 

camera


Israel’s warning to Hamas of impending destruction
of Al-Aqsa TV building caught on camera

 by Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik

While Hamas has launched hundreds of missiles at Israeli civilian targets in the last 24 
hours, Israel continues to warn Palestinian civilians before attacking strategic targets, to 
minimize civilian casualties.
One remarkable example can be seen and heard in the video of the last minutes of broadcasts from 
Hamas’ Al-Aqsa TV station. Al-Aqsa TV has been inciting to murder of Israelis and Jews for years, and 
yesterday, Israel decided to destroy its main broadcast building. However, as can be seen and heard, the 
station received ample warning from the Israeli army and air force to get all their staff out of the building 
before it was destroyed. In the video, the faint sounds of the three warning missiles that hit the building, as 
well as shouting of the TV staff can be heard in the background:
  
  
WAFA, the official PA news agency, and official PA TV described Israel’s warning and the 
building’s destruction as follows:
WAFA, the official PA news agency:
“Israeli planes fired three missile alerts, before F16 planes targeted with at least three
 missiles the al-Quds TV headquarters, destroying it completely… No injuries were 
reported.” 

Official PA TV host: 
“Three warning rockets [by Israel], and after them three rockets completely destroyed 
the building of [Hamas’] Al-Aqsa satellite channel. Thank God there are no wounded 
among our colleagues and the journalists there. The [Palestine] Broadcasting 
Corporation has condemned this attack.”


The following is the text of the final moments as Hamas TV is interviewing an “expert on 
security affairs” and then receives Israel’s warning to evacuate before the building is 
destroyed. After hearing the faint sounds of the explosions of the warning missiles and the 
shouting, the TV host then states that a “Zionist” attack is impending. Finally, the screen 
freezes and then goes black for seven minutes.
Transcript of the video:
Rafiq Abu Hani, Hamas expert on security affairs is talking:
(Boom of Israel's first warning strike is faintly heard)
Abu Hani continues: “The Palestinian resistance’s capability is clear in the Gaza 
Strip…”(Two more booms are heard)
Abu Hani: “In other words, this provides us with the difference between the 
Palestinian resistance in the Gaza Strip…”
Al-Aqsa TV host: “Apparently there are certain events, developments on the ground. 
Apparently there is a new Zionist attack against the Gaza Strip.”
(Shouting is heard in background)
Al-Aqsa TV host: “I don't know – I’m waiting for a signal from the editing room and 
from the control room – if there are any developments, they should notify us right now.”
(More shouting heard in background)
Al-Aqsa TV host: “In general, I thank my guests here. And also one last word: The 
last word is always the word of the Palestinian resistance. Many greetings to these 
young people who always cared to defend our people…”
(The screen freezes for a minute before going black. Screen stayed black for seven 
minutes)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2)


The Amazon Deal is Shameful.

I opposed Georgia trying to woo Amazon and I am delighted Amazon went elsewhere. Last night, Georgia's officials released their deal and it would have been a $2 billion monstrosity of taxpayer largess and way too cute ideas like renaming a street after Alexa.
New York and Virginia were, instead, the losers who will burden their taxpayers with Amazon. The incentives include giving Amazon the right of notice about freedom of information act requests so Amazon can intervene in Virginia. In New York, the company will get a helipad.
The free market depends on a level, fair playing field. It does not work when governments redistribute taxpayer money to lure companies into states. Deals like this not only distort market forces, but they also keep states from overall reforming their business laws and regulatory structures by letting one company receive not just exceptions, but also taxpayer dollars.
Whether left, right, or center, we should all oppose these sorts of deals. Amazon is one of many. Too many states, from Georgia to New York, put existing local businesses at competitive disadvantages while...

Read More: 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3)

Trump Officially Names Kavanaugh's Replacement

By TTN Staff

After some speculation, President Trump has officially named current regulatory czar Neomi Rao to replace Brett Kavanaugh on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

According to the Washington Free Beacon:
President Donald Trump announced Tuesday that he has nominated current administration "Regulatory Czar" Neomi Rao to fill Brett Kavanaugh's former seat on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Trump's announcement came during the White House's celebration of Diwali, the Hindu festival of light (Rao, who is Indian-American, was present at the event.) According to reportsfrom the event, Trump said that he had intended to make the announcement on Wednesday, but "seemed delighted to do it in person."

Trump first interviewed Rao for the position in late October, according to Axios. As the Washington Free Beacon reported last week, the Department of Justice actively began vetting her last Friday.

Rao, 45, is currently the administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, the organ of the executive branch responsible for overseeing all major regulations made by the other departments. From that position, Rao told the Free Beacon in an interview in May, she cut some $8 billion worth of regulations in 2017 alone.
Sources have noted that Rao will go before the Senate Judiciary Committee in December and will have a confirmation vote with the full Senate in January if everything goes according to plan.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

No comments: