Saturday, September 25, 2021

Hanson and Fitton Again. Personal Reflections - How Sad Indeed.

=======================================

Reflections On 2020-The Worst Year In The Last Half-Century: Part Two
by Victor Davis Hanson via VDH's Blade of Perseus

In George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984, the author describes a soulless world created by an authoritarian cadre that controlled even the thoughts of its subjects through massive electronic surveillance. An all-powerful state bureaucracy warped language, ideas, and history to convince and coerce the residents of Oceania that a benevolent “Big Brother” was ensuring them a society of caring, equality, and fairness—despite being opposed by a myriad of purported enemies, foreign and domestic.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Tom Fitton and his organization keep up the good fight seeking to return America back to a nation that deserves respect and respects the law but it is an uphill fight.  Shame not many seem to care any more.

Tom is the conservative equivalent of the old Morris Dees, I met when I was a stock broker.  Morris and his partner, the eventual founder of Habitat for Humanity, were very liberal.  Morris was the first to raise money by mail solicitations and campaigned for Jimmy Carter.  He was a fighter but  subsequently the  group he founded, Southern Poverty Law Center, became radicalized, threw him out the door and I have lost track of him. 

+++

Judicial Watch Sues DOJ for Answers About its Challenge to Georgia’s Voter Integrity Bill

For years we have reported on Democrats blocking efforts to make elections honest. Not surprisingly, the problem continues under Joe Biden.

The latest battlefield is Georgia. We filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice for records of communications between the DOJ and various left-wing groups and individuals concerning the DOJ’s decision to challenge Georgia’s election integrity law (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:21-cv-02427)).

We filed the lawsuit on September 15, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, after the DOJ failed to respond to a July 26, 2021, FOIA request to the Justice Department’s Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division for the following records:

All documents and communications between (1) the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, or any of their officers, employees, members, agents, or affiliates, and (2) any of the following people and organizations, including any of their officers, members, agents, parent organizations, affiliated entities, branches, subordinate organizations, or chapters, concerning the U.S. Department of Justice’s Voting Rights Act Section 2 lawsuit against the State of Georgia, et al., in the Northern District of Georgia, Civ. No. 21-2575:

ACLU Foundation of Georgia, American Civil Liberties Union, League of Women Voters, Brennan Center for Justice, Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Common Cause, NAACP, Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, Campaign Legal Center, Fair Fight, Fair Fight Action, Stacy Abrams, Perkins Coie LLP, Marc Elias.

The Justice Department’s lawsuit challenging Georgia’s election law asks the court to strike down major parts of the act, including strengthened voter ID requirements for voting by mail.

The leftists who control the Justice Department have a long record of working hand in glove with extremist and partisan interest groups who oppose any efforts to make it harder to steal votes and elections.

A week after the DOJ filed its lawsuit against Georgia, on July 1 of this year, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld two Arizona voting provisions that Democrats and civil rights groups had challenged as disproportionately burdening minority voters. We and the Allied Educational Foundation filed amici curiae (friends of the court) briefs in support of Arizona’s law. The court’s decision is what I called a knockout blow to the Left’s tsunami of harassing lawsuits challenging virtually any effort by any state to modestly increase the security of elections and minimize the impact of voter fraud.

In response to the Supreme Court ruling, the Left appears to have become desperate to short circuit the efforts of states to implement security measures such as voter ID.

We remain front and center in the fight for clean elections, from our historic election integrity victory in L.A. County, to the current election-related lawsuits in North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Colorado. Attorney Robert Popper is the director of our clean elections initiative.

In 2018, the Supreme Court upheld a voter-roll cleanup program that resulted from our settlement of a federal lawsuit with Ohio. Kentucky began cleaning up hundreds of thousands of old registrations in 2019 after it too entered a consent decree in 2018 to end another of our lawsuits.

Based on this research, in 2020, a federal court ordered the State of Maryland to produce complete voter registration records for Montgomery County that include the registered voters’ dates of birth.

In September 2020, we filed a lawsuit on behalf of the Illinois Conservative Union (ICU) and three of its officers, after Illinois state officials refused to allow them to obtain a copy of the state’s voter registration database. In June 2021, a federal court ruled the lawsuit could proceed.

After years of litigation, it is hard not to conclude that the Democrats can’t win the game and so must change the rules.

HHS Documents Reveal Sexual and Physical Abuse of Unaccompanied Minors

The Biden border crisis is as heartbreaking as it is horrible.

We received 41 pages of documents from the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement that list 33 separate incidences of alleged sexual abuse in just one month.

The records include a spreadsheet of data that lists 33 “sexual abuse allegations” involving “unaccompanied children” (UAC) for the time period of January 21, 2021, to February 26, 2021. These incidents seemed to be tied to “voluntary agencies” (VOLAGs), which are contractors for the federal government. Ten of the allegations of sexual abuse were made against staff and “non-staff” members. Twenty-one incidents of children sexually assaulting other children while in government contracted care facilities were reported. See the data for yourself:


No. | Event ID | SA Type of Incident | SA Type of Allegation | Program Name

1   290249   Sexual Abuse Staff and UAC   Friends of Youth McEachern

2   290519   Sexual Abuse Staff and UAC   BCFS San Antonio Staff Secure

3   290969   Sexual Abuse UAC and Other   Bethany Christian Services TFC Michigan

4   291649   Sexual Abuse UAC and UAC   Lincoln Hall Boys Haven

5   292060   Sexual Abuse Staff and UAC   Mercy First RTC

6   292284   Sexual Abuse UAC and UAC   Abbott House TFC

7   292365   Sexual Abuse Non-Staff Adult and UAC   Bethany LIRS

8   294303   Sexual Abuse Non-Staff Adult and UAC   Cayuga Centers

9   294669   Sexual Abuse UAC and UAC   Sunny Glen Childrens Home New Day Resiliency Center

10  295225   Sexual Abuse UAC and UAC   Sunny Glen Childrens Home New Day Resiliency Center

11  296007   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   Southwest Key Casa Padre

12  296169   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   Sunny Glen Childrens Home New Day Resiliency Center

13  296641   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   Southwest Key Casa Padre

14  296810   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   Southwest Key El Presidente

15  297632   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   Southwest Key Casa Padre

16  298189   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   Heartland Inti Childrens RC

17  298428   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   Leake and Watts

18  298597   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   Sunny Glen Childrens Home New Day Resiliency Center

19  298743   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   CHS Stanford House

20  298928   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   His House

21  299067   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   Children First Residential Care TX Sunnyside

22  299640   Sexual Abuse Non-Staff Adult and UC   Southwest Key Rio Grande

23  299761   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   Mercy First RTC

24  300102   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   Friends of Youth Colin Ferguson

25  300290   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   Sunny Glen Childrens Home New Day Resiliency Center

26  300467   Sexual Abuse Non-Staff Adult and UC   Southwest Key El Presidente

27  300532   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   BCFS Raymondville

28  300650   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   Southwest Key Cas a Houston

29  300706   Sexual Abuse Non-Staff Adult and UC   Southwest Key Casa Padre

30  300804   Sexual Abuse UC and UC   Children's Home of Poughkeepsie- Nuevas Alas Program

31  300848   Sexual Abuse UC and Other   SWK Processing Center

32  301043   Sexual Abuse Non-Staff Adult and UC   Southwest Key Antigua

33  301253   Sexual Abuse Staff and UC   Cayuga Centers L TFC


No details were provided as to who the alleged attackers or victims were other than that they were UACs. Additionally, no incident reports were provided by HHS.

On February 22, 2021, at the BCFS (Baptist Children and Family Services) shelter in Baytown, Texas, a UAC reported that another UAC, a 17-year-old boy from Guatemala, had been punched with a closed fist in his ribcage by his roommate while the victim was lying down. The victim of the alleged attack did not want to discuss it with shelter officials. The report notes “Minor was moved to another room to ensure other minor’s safety.” The follow up questions in the report: “Was the incident investigated?”; was it “Reported to CPS?”; and was it “Reported to Local Law Enforcement?” were all answered “No.”

On April 7, 2021, Fox News reported: “Gov. Greg Abbott demanded that the White House close a San Antonio facility housing migrant children Wednesday following allegations that children there were being sexually assaulted.” Additionally, “The governor said that separate complaints were sent to the Department of Health and Human Services and the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services Wednesday, alleging four different kinds of child abuse.”

And it was recently confirmed that the Biden administration just this year alone “lost contact with thousands” of unaccompanied illegal immigrant children who had been released from federal custody.

We forced the release of the documents through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against Health and Human Services for:

All summaries from individual case files of reports of physical and/or sexual abuse or assault of Unaccompanied Alien Children under the care of HHS, its sub-agencies, and or VOLAGs [voluntary agency], contractors, grantees, and sub-grantees, to include all segregable, non-exempt information.

Records reflecting aggregated data of physical and/or sexual abuse and assault of UACs under the care of HHS, its sub-agencies, and or VOLAGs, contractors, grantees, and sub-grantees.

These documents show that not only are there shocking reports of sexual abuse occurring in shelters for unaccompanied children, but that there is violence amongst the UACs themselves. It is no surprise that the Biden administration’s enabling of human trafficking has resulted in violence and the abuse of children

Judicial Watch Sues HHS for Details of Biden’s COVID-19 Community Corps

This spring, the Biden Administration announced that HHS was going to launch “a nationwide, grassroots network of local voices and trusted community leaders to encourage vaccinations, with more than 275 founding member organizations that have the ability to reach millions of Americans.” We want to know the details.

We filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services seeking all records related to the so-called COVID-19 Community Corps (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (No. 1:21-cv-02315)).


We sued in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after HHS failed to reply to an April 19, 2021, FOIA request for:

All records regarding the Department of Health and Human Services’ “COVID-19 Community Corps” program, which was announced by the department on April 1, 2021. This request includes the following:

All records depicting the application process and selection criteria for organizations participating in the program.

All records related to the consideration of any organization considered for participation in the program that were not selected.

All records concerning any awarded or proposed related grants or contracts with any organization participating in the program.

All related records of communication between any representative of the Department of Health and Human Services and any representative of any organization participating in the program.

The HHS website describes the COVID-19 Community Corps as “an initiative to increase confidence in COVID-19 vaccines and reinforce basic prevention measures.” The government program also seeks to enlist minors (16 and older). The site reports “over 4,000 organizations and almost 10,000 individuals across the United States have joined the COVID-19 Community Corps. They’ve committed to take action to encourage their families, friends, and members of their communities to get vaccinated for COVID-19.”

The federal government organizing a ‘corps’ of private individuals, minors, corporations, and unions to push controversial COVID policies is concerning. Also concerning is the Biden administration’s unlawful refusal to turn over records about this program to the American people.

Judicial Watch Sues HHS for Biodistribution Studies of the COVID Vaccines

The Biden Administration isn’t eager to reveal some of the details of how the vaccines were tested before they were distributed. One type of testing, biodistribution, studies how a vaccine moves through the body.

We filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for biodistribution studies and related data for the Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson vaccines (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (No. 1:21-cv-02418)).

We sued after the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease failed to respond to a June 8, 2021, FOIA request for:

[A]ccess to biodistribution studies and related data for the Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson vaccines used to treat and/or prevent SARS-CoV-2 and/or COVID-19.

Similarly, HHS’s Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) failed to respond to the same request sent on July 15, 2021, after the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease advised us that BARDA “would be the appropriate federal agency to submit a request,” to obtain the records if they existed. 

The Biden administration should follow the law and release any biodistribution studies concerning the vaccines. Americans have a right to know as much as possible about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines.

California Judge Heard Arguments on Gender Quotas for Corporate Boards

This week, Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis of the California Superior Court heard arguments in our case challenging California’s gender quotas for corporate boards.

We filed suit in Los Angeles County Superior Court on August 6, 2019, on behalf of three California taxpayers, Robin Crest, Earl De Vries and Judy De Vries. The 2018 law, known as Senate Bill 826 (SB 826), requires every publicly held corporation headquartered in California to have at least one director “who self-identifies her gender as a woman” on its board of directors by December 31, 2019. The law also requires corporations to have up to three such persons on their boards by December 31, 2021, depending on the size of the board (Robin Crest et al. v. Alex Padilla (No.19STCV27561)).

The lawsuit alleges that the quota violates the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution, among other provisions, and asks the court to order that no taxpayer funds be spent on the illegal provision.  Both sides have asked the court to enter judgment in their favor. The hearing was to address those requests.

In July 2020, the court cleared the way for the lawsuit to proceed, holding that our clients had standing under state law to sue.

We argue in our court filings:

SB 826 requires that subject corporations set aside a certain number of board seats for women or create new seats for which only women may apply…. SB 826 imposes the additional requirement that one or more seats be set aside or created for women. The only criterion for occupying these seats is being female. Men are excluded from the seats no matter how well-qualified they might be …

We included expert analysis from Jonathan Klick, Ph.D., J.D., an expert in econometrics, statistics, and corporate law, who concludes:

In my opinion, the evidence offered in [the] declarations supporting Secretary Padilla’s motion for each of these points (underrepresentation of women on boards, discrimination as the cause of this underrepresentation, and that research shows a differential benefit of appointing women, as opposed to men, in terms of firm performance) is deficient and unreliable.

California politicians want to use SB826 to upend decades of settled constitutional law that prohibits discrimination based on sex. We hope this lawsuit vindicates the rule of law and the commonsense principle that the way to end any discrimination based on sex is to stop discriminating on the basis of the sex.

Until next week …

Tom Fitton

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I re-read the 5:15 AM memo that was posted earlier but sent on September 24th.  I often  do this  as much for content as for mistakes I failed to catch in the lost hope I will improve my typing and self-editing.

This memo focused on Hanson's review of the sad state of America and he analogized our status to that of Afghanistan, in that we had become what we were trying to change like ourselves into them.  This often happens and reminds me of the great line by the Colonel In the Teahouse Book about Okinawa which went something like this: " I am going to teach them democracy if I have to kill everyone of them."  Live with dogs you eventually get their fleas kind of thing.

The rest of the memo discussed Milley's betrayal and other items I thought of interest.

As you know, if you read my memos, I believe America has changed, will never be the same and probably has peaked as a dominant world power That is not to say we will not remain powerful and a force to contend with but the days of our imminence is over because we are financially weak, have become a split personality,  politically speaking,  and the words "United States" are now foreign to describing who we are. We are the 240 plus year Humpty Dumpty, The Mother Hubbard of the Western World. Fractured and bare.

How did we get there?  We succeeded but lost sight of what got us there. To make matters even more pitiful, we allowed Trojan Horses full of radicals, who took advantage of the document and economic system that made us great, to convince us to take new paths leading to nations who tried them and always failed.  We embraced throwing the baby out with the bath water, so to speak, because change became more important than success.

We embraced progressivism and liberalism which morphed into radicalism.  Ism's can kill you - caveat emptor.

Liberals, by nature, are an  impatient breed, seldom satisfied with status quo. That can be good but it also can be bad. It is good when improvement is the ultimate goal and positives result.  It is dangerous when restlessness drives change for the sake of change and the results are destructive as seems far more common today.

We are a nation adrift without an anchor and we are being captained by an old and reckless fool who is both physically and mentally beyond redemption because he is, and always was, unprincipled. He was able to climb the political ladder and reach the pinnacle of his own incompetence because his successor was unorthodox,  personality-wise, and grating to our nerves. Our distaste was further driven by a mass media that has come under corporate ownership and driven more by profit and entertainment motives than by reporting  facts and impartial integrity. The Fourth Estate is no longer the nation's Ombudsman.

We have even sunk to the irrational state where many believe we can maintain law and order without a police force.  America, the nation founded upon respect for law and order, that unique nation where government served "we the people" is no more. Worst of all ,the nation where God was pre-imminent and citizens had, enumerated on parchment, inalienable rights which are now being attacked as unconstitutional by radicals bent on the destruction of our nation because the longer America exists the more difficult we make their desire for anarchy an impossible accomplishment.

How sad indeed.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



 





 

No comments: