Saturday, September 17, 2022

What Is Biden Hiding? It Ain't His Time. Double Standard Application Of Law? Poll Analysis. Hanson. Do They Really Want To?

Truer words were never posted.





++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 

If the tide is truly moving towards lefties then it can only mean several things:

a) Republicans have done another lousy job of giving voters a reason to vote for them.

b)  The SCOTUS decision on Abortion has been distorted.

c) Voters would rather be manipulated regarding (b) above while children are actually dying from illegal drugs Biden has allowed to flood our nation.

d) Voters are unable to prioritize issues threatening our nation.

Personally, as we get closer to the actual election, I believe it will be a total disaster for the lefties. Why? 

I am willing to trust the judgement of "deplorables" more than believe the mass media's polling reports.

Meanwhile, Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch remain a smoking gun.

+++

More potential evidence there are double standards in the application of the law.

+++

President Biden tucked away more than 1,850 boxes of archival records from his 36-year Senate career at the University of Delaware. Of course, Biden and the university don’t want anyone to see them.

Here’s the latest. The Delaware Superior Court ordered the university to respond to our objections to its response justifying its decision to restrict access to the records.

Reviewing an affidavit submitted by the university, and Judicial Watch and the Daily Caller News Foundation’s objections to it, Judge Mary M. Johnston on August 23 gave the University 30 days to respond.

In June the court had ordered the university to provide under oath additional information on its decision, in which the university asserted that no state funds were used on the university’s “matters or undertakings” regarding Biden and that the Biden Senate papers were never discussed at any meetings of the university’s full Board of Trustees.

This began when, with the Daily Caller News Foundation, we filed a July 2020 Delaware Freedom of Information Act lawsuit after the university denied our requests on April 30, 2020, for all of Biden’s Senate records and records about the preservation and any proposed release of the records, including communications with Biden or his representatives (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. University of Delaware, No. N20A-07-001 MMJ (Del. Super.)).

In February of 2021, we appealed an adverse lower court ruling, and the Delaware Supreme Court returned the case to the lower court.

The university then filed an affidavit, citing no documents or other specifics, stating that no state funds were used in its housing of Biden’s Senate papers and that the papers were never discussed at any meetings of the university’s full Board of Trustees.

We argue that the supplemental affidavit submitted by the university on July 27 was essentially a duplicate of the initial affidavit.

In objecting to the university’s filing, we write:

Even after having several opportunities to satisfy its burden of proof, the University submits a five-page affidavit filled with nothing more than hearsay and conclusory statements. By and large, the “Supplemented” affidavit is duplicative of what the University has previously submitted to justify its position. The University continues to fail to satisfy its burden.

What is now clear after the University has tried and tried again is that it cannot or, for whatever reason, refuses to satisfy its burden of proof to justify the denial of access to the records sought by Judicial Watch and DCNF. The Court must require either the turn-over of the records, or, in the least, allow Appellants the opportunity for limited discovery to confirm that the University’s position is totally without merit.

“After all the lectures from the Biden Administration on democracy and the rule of law it’s amazing that the President has a secret deal in place to hide his records from the public,” said Daily Caller News Foundation President Neil Patel. “We are happy that the court is pushing the University of Delaware to stop playing games and come clean.”

What is Biden hiding? Is there classified information in his Senate materials? Joe Biden has a secret deal to hide his Senate records with the University of Delaware—and a court wants more answers. Of course, President Biden could help by simply releasing all his Senate records. The fact that he hasn’t is telling!

+++


What is Biden Hiding?

President Biden tucked away more than 1,850 boxes of archival records from his 36-year Senate career at the University of Delaware. Of course, Biden and the university don’t want anyone to see them.

Here’s the latest. The Delaware Superior Court ordered the university to respond to our objections to its response justifying its decision to restrict access to the records.

Reviewing an affidavit submitted by the university, and Judicial Watch and the Daily Caller News Foundation’s objections to it, Judge Mary M. Johnston on August 23 gave the University 30 days to respond.

In June the court had ordered the university to provide under oath additional information on its decision, in which the university asserted that no state funds were used on the university’s “matters or undertakings” regarding Biden and that the Biden Senate papers were never discussed at any meetings of the university’s full Board of Trustees.

This began when, with the Daily Caller News Foundation, we filed a July 2020 Delaware Freedom of Information Act lawsuit after the university denied our requests on April 30, 2020, for all of Biden’s Senate records and records about the preservation and any proposed release of the records, including communications with Biden or his representatives (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. University of Delaware, No. N20A-07-001 MMJ (Del. Super.)).

In February of 2021, we appealed an adverse lower court ruling, and the Delaware Supreme Court returned the case to the lower court.

The university then filed an affidavit, citing no documents or other specifics, stating that no state funds were used in its housing of Biden’s Senate papers and that the papers were never discussed at any meetings of the university’s full Board of Trustees.

We argue that the supplemental affidavit submitted by the university on July 27 was essentially a duplicate of the initial affidavit.

In objecting to the university’s filing, we write:

Even after having several opportunities to satisfy its burden of proof, the University submits a five-page affidavit filled with nothing more than hearsay and conclusory statements. By and large, the “Supplemented” affidavit is duplicative of what the University has previously submitted to justify its position. The University continues to fail to satisfy its burden.

What is now clear after the University has tried and tried again is that it cannot or, for whatever reason, refuses to satisfy its burden of proof to justify the denial of access to the records sought by Judicial Watch and DCNF. The Court must require either the turn-over of the records, or, in the least, allow Appellants the opportunity for limited discovery to confirm that the University’s position is totally without merit.

“After all the lectures from the Biden Administration on democracy and the rule of law it’s amazing that the President has a secret deal in place to hide his records from the public,” said Daily Caller News Foundation President Neil Patel. “We are happy that the court is pushing the University of Delaware to stop playing games and come clean.”

What is Biden hiding? Is there classified information in his Senate materials? Joe Biden has a secret deal to hide his Senate records with the University of Delaware—and a court wants more answers. Of course, President Biden could help by simply releasing all his Senate records. The fact that he hasn’t is telling!

+++++++++++++++++ 

From HOOVER Weekend:
+++

Ukraine with a Whimper or a Bang?

By Victor Davis Hanson via American Greatness

Victor Davis Hanson ponders whether the United States can help end the war in Ukraine in such a way that the country can unambiguously achieve victory and expel all Russian forces from its territory. Hanson also analyzes Putin’s choices should he face the prospect of losing the war and his credibility. Moreover, the Hoover classicist and historian warns Americans to not discount the prospects of Russia using tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine, or the United States sliding into a nuclear confrontation with the Kremlin.

++++++++++++++++++++++++ 

Does Obama and Biden want to?

+++

21 years later, US still doesn’t recognize Iran’s role in 9/11

Wurmser is an expert on Middle East affairs. He served as senior member of the Bush administration’s National Security Council.

“This administration thinks that the actual ability to restrain Iran isn’t as important as the political gain from having done what Trump couldn’t do or didn’t do,” says Wurmser.

The risks for Israel

Glick and Wurmser go on to talk about how Israel’s security brass is beginning to discuss the necessity of changing Israel’s doctrine for contending with Iran. The notion being bandied about is that Israel must change its strategic goal vis-à-vis Iran’s nuclear weapons program from prevention to deterrence and containment.

Wurmser thus notes that for 25 years, Israel has pledged to block Iran from developing nuclear weapons. A shift in policy now, he argues, would be catastrophic for Israel’s regional and global standing. It will invite aggression at every turn, and worse.

“If Iran develops a nuclear weapon, it changes the fundamental concept of the region,” he says. “Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the others will see Israel as weakened. This can affect the Abraham Accords and peace. It can change the entire climate of the region.”

Wurmser and Glick then discuss what Israel must do to ensure that it does not become a scapegoat, that the world does not blame the Jewish State for Iran’s future threats against Europe.

The two also speak about how the Biden administration will likely behave in the future, as Iran’s status as a nuclear power is acknowledged.

The collective amnesia about September 11

In closing, Glick shares her reflections on the 21st anniversary of September 11, discussing the reasons why the event has largely disappeared from public discourse.

“In the immediate aftermath, George Bush said that the enemy was terrorism. The real enemy, though, is radical Islam, not one group or another,” she says. “For the past 22 years, Americans have never acknowledged it.”

In addition, the United States has also avoided reckoning with Teheran’s role in the attack.

“America’s willful blindness to Iran’s role in global terrorism, including in the September 11 attacks, is part of the collective amnesia about the events of September 11,” she concludes.

++++++++++++++++


 

No comments: