Tuesday, June 26, 2018

According To Tracey Ullman. Potential New President Of Mexico A Dangerous Radical.- Wake Up America And Smell The Prickling Cactus!



I do not think these postings up. I just send them for your edification/enlightenment.

According to Tracey Ullman their future is bleak but they aren't quite aware
:https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/06/26/tracey_ullman_hosts_woke_support_group_on_bbc_show.html
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please read this re-posting and understand how we are duping ourselves into accepting immoral behaviour which will only get worse because the possible new president of Mexico is simply a dangerous version of Bernie Sanders who will radicalize our relationship as matters between America and Mexico worsen.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/06/mexico-what-went-wrong-economy-based-on-exporting-poor-people/amp/

Those who want to destroy America, or at the very least cripple us, are playing us like the guilt ridden  fools we are.  Obama was partly elected because of white guilt.  We are being flooded with refugees out of manufactured guilt which we are buying into because we are powerful, successful and are willing to allow ourselves to be walked over like a rug.  Where is the "Don't Tread On Me Spirit? Gone with the wind?

If you have thoughtfully read this re-posting link, I challenge you to argue against its message.  If you buy into the current nonsense favoring open borders you are a fool along with Maxine Waters.

Yes, we may need those who will do the work subsidized welfare dependent Americans no longer are willing to do  but the process must be accomplished in a legal manner where we can track those who enter.

There is nothing heartless about such legislation.  Allowing our nation to be overrun by those who are pawns in a vicious and immoral foreign policy scheme, predicated on projecting guilt upon America, is insane unless you believe America exists to be a vacuuming haven for anyone who wants to come here and for any reason.

Wake up America and smell the prickling cactus!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hello mudder, hello fadder.  Here I am at Camp Grenada. (See 1 below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The IDF believes it is fish or cut bait time vis a vis Gaza.

Many years ago I suggested to a dear friend who was a Major in the IDF, Israel should drive steel plates into the ground and seal off Gaza.  Seems Israel is now doing something of the sort.  (See  3 below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dick
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1)ANTI-ISRAEL GROUP PLANS TO INDOCTRINATE YOUTH AT JEWISH SUMMER CAMPS
BY: KAREN BEKKER

As your children or grandchildren head off to summer camp, do you know what they will be learning there about Israel?

The anti-Israel group IfNotNow is planning to attempt to infiltrate Jewish summer camps to teach campers “about the occupation.” The group has held two training sessions, one in person and one online, for counselors, in which they suggest, among other things, that camp counselors “practice with them [i.e.,12 to 15 year old campers] saying the Kaddish every morning for Palestinians who have been killed in Gaza or its environs.” Of course, many of those killed in Gaza were Hamas members who, prior to their demise, were bent on destroying Israel. Other strategies for other age groups – as young as six – were discussed.

Although the Ramah camps have made it clear that IfNotNow’s anti-Israel agenda is not welcome, the group still plans to attempt to surreptitiously indoctrinate Ramah campers without the consent of the camp administrations. Moreover, participants in IfNotNow’s training may also be targeting Young Judea camps, the Union of Reform Judaism camps, and Hashomer Hatzair, Habonim Dror, and Bnei Akiva camps.
IfNotNow is a relatively new anti-Israel organization, marketed towards Jewish young adults. The group is reported to have about 1700 members, and it has 14 chapters or “hives” around the country. The group’s websitestates, “the time has come to end our community’s support for the occupation. We will be the generation to do it. The occupation is a daily nightmare for those who live under it and a moral disaster for those who support and administer it. IfNotNow is working to transform the American Jewish community’s support for occupation into a call for freedom and dignity for all.”
http://www.camera.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Screen-Shot-2018-06-19-at-12.40.30-PM-590x240.png
Screen capture from IfNotNow’s website
IfNotNow does not talk about peace, or about ending the violence directed towards Israel by Palestinians and their Arab allies. Israel has in the past pursued repeated efforts to end its presence in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria), including in 2000 and 2001 at Camp David and Taba under Prime Minister Ehud Barak, as well as in 2008 under Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. Former Palestinian Authority President Arafat responded with a terror war and Palestinian Authority President Abbas responded with rejection. Abbas continues to refuse to recognize a Jewish state. Israel’s unilateral withdrawal from Gaza was followed by the rise of Hamas and its seizure of the territory. Yet, IfNotNow ignores these facts, and ignores the attacks and wars that lead to Israeli administration over the West Bank to begin with. They speak only of ending Israel’s “occupation” in a vacuum. (A recent Facebook post declared naively, “if Israel is embarrassed by the Occupation, it can always simply end the Occupation.”) 
The group has garnered attention by staging a protest inside the AIPAC policy conference in 2017 as well as with a one-sided article in Teen Vogue. In April of this year, when the riots at the Israel/Gaza border began, the group organized a Kaddish for those that were killed, despite the fact that most of them were members of Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad. (For more information on the group’s anti-Israel activity, see Professor Miriam Elman’s detailed post on the Legal Insurrection blog.)
As is the case with much of the media bias that CAMERA discusses, IfNotNow’s activism suffers from a complete lack of context. IfNotNow’s claims that, for example, “both peoples are caught in a cycle of violence,” or that it is solely within Israel’s power to “end the occupation,” are based on a misreading of history. Its demonstrations, in which members shout, “If am not for myself, who will be for me? If I am only for myself, what am I?” or recite Kaddish, are largely fact-free. 
IfNotNow’s ahistorical approach can be seen in this flyer that members of the group handed out earlier this week to Taglit Birthright participants at New York’s JFK airport: 
http://www.camera.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Screen-Shot-2018-06-20-at-2.56.47-PM-590x332.png
Some important questions that were omitted: How did “the occupation” start? What has Israel done to try to resolve it? Why does it continue? Those are the questions IfNotNow doesn’t seem to be interested in.

The group also makes clear that, “we do not take a unified stance on BDS, Zionism or the question of statehood.” In other words, they don’t even pretend to be Zionist, or to support the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state, and they don’t oppose BDS (the movement to boycott, divest from, and sanction Israel).

As is exemplified in the group’s name, IfNotNow relies on Jewish traditions and symbols, but twists them to oppose Israel’s right to self-defense. The group claims its name is “inspired by Hillel’s three questions” and its logo is “inspired by the burning bush.” Yet, the group’s actions undermine the Jewish state’s right to defend itself from attack, and it even sympathizes with terrorists who are sworn to destroy Israel.

On May 27, over Memorial Day weekend, the group held a “training” for counselors at Jewish summer camps. The participants included counselors from Reform, Conservative, and liberal Zionist camps. While only about a dozen counselors participated in the in-person training, approximately another 50-60 reportedly joined a follow-up webinar. If they meet with any success this year, we can expect that number to grow next year.

report in the Jewish Press from someone who participated in part of the online workshop stated that it included “young people from the summer camps of the Reform movement, Hashomer Hatzair, Habonim Dror, Young Judea, and even a graduate of Bnei Akiva in the UK … . They all explained why they wanted to instill in their campers an awareness of the ‘occupation.’” This article also stated that one suggestion made during the training was to “practice with them [i.e., 12 to 15 year old campers] saying the Kaddish every morning for Palestinians who have been killed in Gaza or its environs.” As noted above, this is essentially saying Kaddish for terrorists who died while trying to kill or harm Israelis. While some Palestinians who have died in the fighting are innocent, there does not appear to be any attempt made to distinguish the innocent from the terrorists.

Ramah Camps have made clear that they won’t incorporate IfNotNow’s program into their curriculum. It’s unclear, however, whether an individual counselor will be able to undermine Ramah’s approved curriculum. IfNotNow has reportedly indicated that its intention is to do so. As was pointed out in the Legal Insurrection blog, some of this may be occurring without the camp administration’s knowledge. In addition, IfNotNow has also said that it intends to target other camps outside the Ramah system, such as Young Judea and Union for Reform Judaism camps.

This is an insidious attempt to indoctrinate Jewish youth, at a time when they are away from home, and in many cases can’t even reach their parents by phone. Will responsible camp staff take the necessary steps to prevent this? That remains to be seen.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3) War or an agreement: Israel's critical dilemma vis-a-vis Gaza
Analysis: Four years after Operation Protective Edge, Israel must decide whether to wait for a humanitarian arrangement in the strip or launch an offensive which could end with renewed control over two million Gazans; the IDF wants an arrangement but has prepared plans for battle, and the political echelon keeps relying on Egyptian mediation and holding theoretical discussions, which won’t prevent another war in the strip.
According to IDF estimates, the conflict on the Gaza front has reached a crossroads. Senior General Staff members believe the four years of calm provided by Operation Protective Edge have come to an end and the State of Israel must now decide whether it is headed towards an arrangement or towards a war in Gaza. 
The “arrangement” the IDF and the cabinet are talking about is not just a humanitarian-rehabilitative arrangement, but a “package deal,” which also includes aspects of a long-term stable ceasefire and restrictions on the military arming of the strip’s armed groups.
To the defense establishment, a war could only result in Hamas, and likely Islamic Jihad too, needing years to recover—if they even manage to recover.

A fire caused by incendiary kites near Kibbutz Be’eri 
(Photo: EPA)
Whether through a political-diplomatic “arrangement” or through a military battle, the goal is to force Hamas to make a clear and long-term decision: Is the organization a civilian government working in the best interest of the strip’s residents, or is it an active “resistance movement”—in other words, an Islamist terroristic militia waging a war of attrition in creative and diverse ways against the State of Israel and its residents with the purpose of expelling us from “the land of Islam in Palestine.”


(Photo: EPA)

At this stage, the military move isn’t aimed at toppling Hamas in Gaza. Israel will avoid a situation of complete governmental anarchy in the strip until an effective alternative is found to the Hamas rule. Such an anarchy will most definitely spill into Israel and eventually force the state to regain control of two million Gazans and carry the heavy economic, military and political burden this entails.
The IDF, however, is already considering alternatives to the Hamas government—for if and when the organization makes it clear that it isn’t interested in an “arrangement,” leading to a military campaign which will defeat Hamas its allies in Gaza.
There is a feeling in the Southern Command that, this time, the IDF will be able to create a considerable change in the situation if it is required to launch a major campaign in Gaza. In the years that have passed since Operation Protective Edge, IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot and Defense Ministers Moshe Ya’alon and Avigdor Lieberman have allotted resources and put a lot of thought into dealing with the variety of security and public opinion challenges created by the Gazan problem. This was all planned and executed by the Southern Command and its two chiefs in the past few years, Maj. Gen. Sami Turgeman and Maj. Gen. Eyal Zamir.
Damage from a rocket that hit a road in a Gaza vicinity community  (Photo: EPA)
Damage from a rocket that hit a road in a Gaza vicinity community (Photo: EPA)
Turgeman, who commanded the IDF forces that fought in Gaza during Protective Edge, quickly and efficiently fixed the faults discovered in the Southern Command and IDF’s preparations for the operation, and implemented the immediate military lessons drawn during the operation.
Zamir’s mission was to deal with the Gazan front and with the Islamic State in Sinai, while strategically and tactically preparing for major future conflicts on these two fronts.
The Southern Command is basically responsible for two and a half fronts: The two active fronts are Gaza and ISIS’s “Sinai district.” The half-front is the Jordanian border, which doesn’t pose an immediate threat right now, but the instability the Hashemite kingdom is suffering from at this time and the proximity to Sinai provide an explosive potential, which Israel should be prepared for. That’s the reason a border obstacle is being built in the Arava, similar to the one Israel has already put on the Sinai border.
Police sappers collect shrapnel of a rocket launched from Gaza  (Photo: EPA)
Police sappers collect shrapnel of a rocket launched from Gaza (Photo: EPA)
The main tasks on the Gazan front in order of importance were and remain:
  • To think, plan, prepare and train the IDF so that the next major battle in the Gaza Strip would lead to a quick and decisive Israeli victory that would force Hamas and the other groups to seek a ceasefire.
  • To neutralize the threat of attack tunnels infiltrating our territory and to provide the Gaza border area residents with more efficient physical protection and a sense of security.
  • To thwart attempts to abduct Israeli soldiers and civilians, to thwart a mass infiltration of Gazans into Israel and to thwart attempts to disrupt the construction of the barrier along the Gaza border above and below the ground.
  • To prevent the strip’s terror organizations from significantly arming themselves with high-trajectory weapons, drones and lethal quadcopters, and thwarting the Gazan organizations’ attempts to prepare “military” surprises with a psychological effect (a victory image) in the next Gaza campaign. (The incendiary kites, for example, can be seen as a successful “surprise” to boost public opinion in Gaza, despite not being a military measure).

Getting Hamas to request a ceasefire

It’s important to note that the IDF has made considerable progress in recent years in all areas related to the Gazan front. The army has made, for example, significant technological, conceptual and operational breakthroughs that will likely lead to an almost complete neutralization of the threat by the middle of next year.
A significant change has also been recorded in the preparations for the next major battle in Gaza, both on the defensive and the offensive aspects. Strengthening the defensive system includes a reinforcement of the Iron Dome system, which has been upgraded to intercept mortar shells as well.
An Iron Dome interception. The system is now capable of shooting down mortar shells as well  (Photo: AFP)
An Iron Dome interception. The system is now capable of shooting down mortar shells as well (Photo: AFP)
Furthermore, the Gaza Division’s force in times of emergency has been increased, although it will no longer be in charge of offensive missions within the strip. Today, the division has only one mission during times of emergency: Protecting the Gaza border communities and residents as well as IDF troops stationed in the area. For this purpose, at times of emergency the division’s headquarters will be provided with several other territorial brigades that will be deployed deep within the Gaza border area. Together with the two integral frontline brigades, the Gaza Division will have a number of defense brigades, two on the frontline and two deep within the territory.
That’s not all. When the barrier is completed shortly after the end of 2018, it will disrupt and curb attacks on Israeli territory above and under the ground. The establishment of a sea barrier has begun off the Zikim Beach to block naval commando infiltrations into Israeli communities and strategic facilities on Israel’s southern shore. The obstacle will both serve as a physical barrier against infiltrations and warn of such infiltrations.
“The IDF is more prepared for a battle in Gaza than it has ever been, on the offensive aspect as well,” says a senior IDF officer. I have often heard such statements, some of which were unfortunately invalid or insufficiently valid. Today, however, I am pretty confident that the IDF has a detailed operational plan prepared by the Southern Command and that it has trained the forces that are supposed to carry it out.
 (Photo: AFP)
(Photo: AFP)
 Inside the strip will be carried out from now on by the IDF’s tip of the spear storming divisions, which—according to the plan—will enter Gaza and dissect it in two, and even occupy significant parts of it.
Ynet has learned that the plan for the next big offensive in Gaza is modular and was built in a way that would allow the IDF to adjust it to the political echelon’s demands and to the objectives of the fighting, which would determined by the Political-Security Cabinet.
The plan is based on three things: A strong protection of the western Negev and the Israeli home front, a systemic blow of fire in full force from the very first moment, and a quick broad maneuver into the strip to dissect it and conquer parts of it.
The IDF’s systemic goal will be to prevent Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad from gaining psychological achievements and getting them to request a ceasefire as soon as possible following the beginning of the fighting. An equally important goal is to prevent a situation in which Israel and the IDF will be dependent upon the skills and goodwill of a third party/mediator in shaping the agreements to end the fighting and in setting a date for the end of the fighting.

The Israeli interest in Sinai

Unlike what happened at the end of Operation Protective Edge because of lazy and ineffective Egyptian mediation, the IDF wants to reach a military victory in the next war that will be so decisive and unequivocal that it will allow Israel to dictate the terms for the end of the fighting to Hamas and to the Palestinian factions. The mediator in the future scenario planned by the IDF will merely assist with the technical details of carrying out the agreement and determining the timetable.
The sea barrier being built near the Zikim Beach  (Photo: Defense Ministry)
The sea barrier being built near the Zikim Beach (Photo: Defense Ministry)

The IDF is dealing successfully with the rest of its objectives, which have to do with thwarting Hamas’ armament attempts and planned terror attacks, through intelligence. The Mossad is most likely taking part in this effort, mainly by gathering information. As a result of these efforts, Hamas and Islamic Jihad have failed to obtain high-quality weapons and precision-guided rockets from Iran and have been forced to focus on self-production.
 (Photo: Defense Ministry )
(Photo: Defense Ministry )

In this context, we should mention the Egyptians, who have already managed to destroy and decommission 90 percent of the smuggling tunnels on the Gaza-Egypt border in the Rafah area. For this purpose, the Egyptian engineering corps have destroyed all the buildings within 1 kilometer from the border in Egyptian Rafah as part of the al-Sisi government and Egyptian army’s all-out war on ISIS’s “Sinai Province.” Egypt has a strategic interest in severing the ties between Hamas and ISIS-Sinai and stopping the constant flow of Gazan residents who have become religiously radical and are flocking to Sinai to fight together with the jihadist organization.
The underground barrier, which is expected to be completed in early 2019  (Photo: AFP)
The underground barrier, which is expected to be completed in early 2019 (Photo: AFP)

Sinai is basically the only stronghold ISIS has been left with in the Arab world and in the Middle East, after losing the “big caliphate” it established in Syria and Iraq. ISIS no longer has an Islamic state, but only a district in Sinai with armed forces that are mostly comprised of Sinawi militants (Bedouins from Sinai). However, there is also a group of dangerous Gazan Palestinians, with religious enthusiasm, and a large number of Chechens who have fled Syria and Iraq. This group has not only proved its impressive stamina against the Egyptian military forces, but also its dangerous and creative operational abilities.
 (Photo: EPA)
(Photo: EPA)

So far, the “Sinai Province” people have killed hundreds—and perhaps thousands—of Egyptian soldiers in raids, blew up two civilian planes in the air and drowned an Egyptian navy ship with an antitank missile. Recently, they took over another Egyptian navy ship and then drowned it. Simultaneously, they have been carrying out major terror attacks west of the Suez Canal as well, inside Egypt.
ISIS fighters in Sinai. Threatening both Egypt and Israel
ISIS fighters in Sinai. Threatening both Egypt and Israel

ISIS is a strategic threat to the Egyptian regime, but it also poses a significant terror threat to Israel with quite a few terror attacks in recent years: The 2011 attack on vehicles travelling on Highway 12 to Eilat, the APC attack in the Kerem Shalom area, the rockets fired at Eilat and the threat to passenger planes landing in the southern city.

The Israeli chatter

There is no need to explain why Israel has an interest in helping Egypt in its war on ISIS in Sinai. While I can’t go into too much details, the ISIS-related cooperation between Israel and Egypt has grown very tight in recent years. The Egyptian army is now succeeding in curbing and reducing the ISIS activity in northern Sinai and is on its way to further success. The quality of the intelligence the Egyptian forces on the ground receive has improved significantly, and they are now better capable of quickly stopping attacks from the air. In addition to the F-16s they operate in Sinai, the Egyptian army recently purchased armed drones from China, and they are now capable of destroying targets from the air shortly after identifying them.
The Israeli army and the Egyptian mediators have been less successful, however, in the diplomatic area and in the Gazan context. The IDF has detected that Hamas is desperate for an arrangement that will rescue it and the strip’s residents from their horrible distress in all areas, and first and foremost from the humanitarian distress which is threatening to turn into a humanitarian crisis. Hamas’ distress is so big that although it is deterred and doesn’t want a war, and isn’t militarily prepared for one, it will have to initiate a war or be dragged into one in order to escape the dead end it has reached.
Israel doesn’t want to start or get dragged into a war either, which is why a diplomatic economic-humanitarian arrangement is the favored solution by all sides. But the Egyptians, who are currently the only influential mediator, are dragging their feet, just like they did during Protective Edge. At the time, Israel put the Egyptians in charge of the negotiations for a ceasefire, but as a result of their failed management, the fighting continued weeks beyond what was necessary.
Now, the Israeli government is repeating the same mistake. Instead of searching for and finding a mediator or an effective group of mediators among influential elements in the region and in the international arena—elements with the ability and desire to help with Gaza’s humanitarian reconstruction—the cabinet is holding endless theoretical and philosophical discussions on projects that will be implemented—if at all—years from now. The next battle in Gaza, which will leave IDF soldiers and thousands of Gazans dead, won’t be prevented by this chatter. 

No comments: