http://www.israelvideonetwork.com/pm-netanyahu-just-rocked-the-world-in-this-2-minute-speech/?omhide=true&utm_source=MadMimi&utm_medium=email&utm_content=PM+Netanyahu+just+ROCKED+the+world+in+this+2+minute+speech&utm_campaign=20160914_m134283043_09%2F14+Today%27s+Israel+Connection%3A+PM+Netanyahu+just+ROCKED+the+world+in+this+2+minute+speech&utm_term=PM_Netanyahu-_jpg_3F1473833862 (See 1 below and you decide.)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I would like to suggest Americans have come from being an independent people who endured hardships yet went West and found the boundaries of this nation and now have become :
Parody Nanny State Millennial Citizens?
1. Trump proposes day care and maternity leave because liberal policies wrecked our economy along with the inflation associated with wars and big government mistakes so now even two adults working cannot earn enough to sustain a family and then , of course, the black family has been totally destroyed. Yes, liberals freed women, no more glass ceilings. In fact no more ceilings period.
2) If you can find work you are not earning enough so government demands you be paid a higher minimum wage, provides food stamps and other subsistence.
3) Hillary wants to pay for college so everyone can get some education. Thus, by 18 you have been exposed to a womb to tomb existence and environment.
The colleges you will attend will also have safe zones so if students disagree with your views you can run and hide from their exercise of free speech or perhaps you can go to the college administrators and have them arrested for expressing themselves and disturbing the academic atmosphere.
4) Then, when you get out of college and still cannot find a job you might remain with your parents who can insure you til you are 26 and no doubt that will be extended over time. (Government programs , once begun, always increase benefits and they never end. What's free never has to be paid for?)
5) Should you wish to earn more credits from the government you can volunteer for The Jobs Corp, Peace Corps or go into the military so when you finish, if you have not lost your life helping people who hate you to live in a half baked democracy, the concepts of which they do not understand, you can get more education and graduate with a higher degree but still unable to earn a middle class wage.
6) By now you are in your 20's have lost confidence in the failed promises of Big Government and have probably moved to Colorado where you can buy Pot, live on the street, pick up a little money doing odd jobs, play your guitar and go to concerts. God forbid you have sustained a service injury and have to seek care from the local V.A, which, though new, cost far more than taxpayers were told it would..
7)You are now in your late 20's and get the urge to find someone of the opposite or same sex to hang out with, but since marriage is out of the question, because it costs money and creates a situation where you have to show some modicum of responsibility, you just live together. Experimentation is good because it still allows freedom and flexibility.
8) If that does not work, it is far easier to pick up your toothbrush, if you own one, and leave than to marry so you depart your 'mate' abandoning several children who came along because the government refused to pay for birth control pills or, if you were of the same sex, you chose the adoption route.
9) Now, one of you, is back to where you possibly began, seeking assistance and subsistence from Uncle Sam who, himself, has gotten older, poorer and in need of help so we find him selling bonds he cannot redeem and paying eventually crippling interest to China etc.
10) You are now entering mid life, thoroughly disgusted, frustrated and confused so you join the latest protest, go around speaking ill of the police, smashing windows of stores or cars of others who are trying to be productive citizens, stealing their goods and are treated as a hero because Big Brother Government and those who run it do not want to offend your sensibilities and support your 'righteous' cause. Why, because George Soros funds their campaigns.
11) It finally dawns on you around 40 plus you have lived a rather aimless life and because government has failed you, made promises it could not keep and you are dependent on it you are really ticked.
Rather than face yourself and reality it is far easier to blame the rich and the entitled so you spend the next few years in further protests against the wealthy who Obama told us did not create anything because the government did it all.
During these years you have the luxury of watching million dollar athletes join in protest as the national anthem is played thereby, bolstering your confidence of feeling you are justified.
12) Then, if not earlier, along comes some Islamic Terrorist Organization promising you weapons, a free meal and a way to destroy the world, you have come to hate, so you can assuage your hurt pride. You enlist only to find you have to kill people in ways you had not contemplated. The problem is you cannot extricate yourself so easily so you either comply or are killed exiting.
Now, obviously, this is an extreme presentation that touches on some truths to make a point. The point being when you quit having faith in yourself and depend upon some external entity you are most likely insuring you will live a life of dependency and that ain't what was intended by being an American. We still have the freedom to change our direction but the time for doing so is short and slipping from our grasp. That is most evident because the current president's ill designed accomplishments are quickly turning to dust, as many, but not enough, knew they would and because of the current two nominees of our two worthless parties. Having said that, as of today, I am still going to vote for Trump and not the candidate who does not know where or what Aleppo is all about.
I never gave thought to voting for Hillary and am glad I did because now that she has some unexplained cough and/or health condition I do not want my country to be infected be her breathlessness.
There is an old saying you are known by the company you keep or elect!
+++
The modern svengali. (See 2 below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1)
As far as the Palestinians, the Israeli left, and the Obama administration are concerned, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has gone too far.
In a video released by his office last week, the prime minister claimed that what the Palestinians were really after in their quest to force the removal of Israeli settlements in the West Bank was the “ethnic cleansing” of Jews. The Palestinian Authority responded angrily that they had nothing against Jews but what they wanted was the end of the Israeli “occupation.”
The U.S. State Department agreed with Netanyahu’s critics, saying there was no connection between opposition to settlements and bigotry. Washington thinks the issue is the need to advance a two-state solution. To frame the discussion as one about the right of Jews to live in the West Bank is, to Obama’s administration, irrelevant. But the problem with the State Department’s view of the issue—which was criticized by the Donald Trump campaign—is that it’s clear that a two-state solution means a Palestinian state that would be only for Arabs alongside an Israel in which an Arab minority enjoys full legal rights, as they do today.
On this point, there is some argument. Netanyahu can point to statements such as one made by PA leader Mahmoud Abbas in 2013. “In a final resolution,”
Abbas told Egyptian journalists, “we would not see the presence of a single Israeli—civilian or soldier—on our lands.” Apologists for the Palestinians point to other comments made by various Palestinian leaders—almost always to Western audiences or journalists rather than in Arabic to their own people—in which they say Jews would enjoy equal rights in a state of Palestine.
Which view of Palestinian intentions is correct?
Given the drumbeat of incitement to hatred of Jews and Israelis heard and read in Palestinian media and in their schools, it is hard to argue, as some critics of Netanyahu do, that Jews wouldn’t be at risk in their state. The wave of Palestinian violence known as the “stabbing intifada” is rooted in a religious-based rage against the Jewish presence throughout the country. That includes the “settlements” of Tel Aviv and Haifa that are within the 1967 borders and not just the West Bank and Jerusalem. The primary reason Israel withdrew every settler and soldier when it evacuated Gaza in 2005 is the certainty that Jews whose lives would depend on the mercy of the Palestinians would be as good as dead. Indeed, deprived of the opportunity to attack individual Jews after the Israelis withdrew, Palestinian mobs vented their rage on the abandoned buildings the Jews left behind, including the greenhouses that had been purchased by well-meaning philanthropists for use by the Arab population.
Though the U.S., its European allies, and the United Nations claim that the settlements violate international law, Israelis correctly note that Jews were guaranteed the right of settlement in the League of Nations’ Mandate for Palestine. The West Bank is not and never has been sovereign Palestinian Arab territory. The disposition of this land is a matter of dispute and subject to negotiation. The Israelis have repeatedly offered the Palestinians an independent state in almost all of the West Bank and even a share of Jerusalem but neither Abbas nor his predecessor, Yasir Arafat, could ever muster the will to say yes. If Palestinians still refuse to recognize the legitimacy of a Jewish state no matter where its borders might be drawn, how can Israelis believe they would respect the rights of Jews who will be essentially defenseless?
That is why Netanyahu’s attempt to reframe the discussion about settlements requires more than the impatient dismissal it got from Washington. Nobody on either side of this conflict or in Washington believes for a minute that Jews in remote communities, let alone the hundreds of thousands who live in blocs along the border and in parts of Jerusalem (that were illegally occupied by Jordan from 1949 to 1967) can safely stay if their homes become part of a Palestinian state.
In any other conflict, we would label the Palestinian demand for the removal of Jewish communities (or those of any other group) with the same words used by Netanyahu: ethnic cleansing. But when it comes to Jews living in their ancient homeland, the rules are different, and bigotry is not only accepted but also supported. Until Palestinian hostility to the presence of Jews is addressed by both the U.S. and the international community rather than ignored, the peace everyone claims to be seeking will never happen.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2)
OUR WORLD: SOROS'S CAMPAIGN OF GLOBAL CHAOS
By Caroline Glick
Major media outlets in the United States have ignored the leak of thousands of emails from billionaire George Soros’s Open Society Foundation by the activist hacker group DCLeaks.
The OSF is the vehicle through which Soros has funneled billions of dollars over the past two decades to non-profit organizations in the US and throughout the world.
According to the documents, Soros has given more than $30 million to groups working for Hillary Clinton’s election in November, making him her largest single donor. So it is likely the case that the media’s support for Clinton has played some role in the mainstream media’s bid to bury the story. It is also likely however, that at least some news editors failed to understand why the leaked documents were worth covering. Most of the information was already public knowledge. Soros’s massive funding of far-left groups in the US and throughout the world has been documented for more than a decade.
But failing to see the significance of the wider story because many of the details were already known is a case of missing the forest for the trees. The DCLeaks document dump is a major story because it exposes the forest of Soros’s funding networks.
The first thing that we see is the megalomaniacal nature of Soros’s philanthropic project. No corner of the globe is unaffected by his efforts. No policy area is left untouched. On the surface, the vast number of groups and people he supports seem unrelated. After all, what does climate change have to do with illegal African immigration to Israel? What does Occupy Wall Street have to do with Greek immigration policies? But the fact is that Soros-backed projects share basic common attributes.
They all work to weaken the ability of national and local authorities in Western democracies to uphold the laws and values of their nations and communities.
They all work to hinder free markets, whether those markets are financial, ideological, political or scientific. They do so in the name of democracy, human rights, economic, racial and sexual justice and other lofty terms.
In other words, their goal is to subvert Western democracies and make it impossible for governments to maintain order or for societies to retain their unique identities and values.
Black Lives Matter, which has received $650,000 from Soros-controlled groups over the past year, is a classic example of these efforts. Until recently, the police were universally admired in the US as the domestic equivalent of the military. BLM emerged as a social force bent on politicizing support for police.
Its central contention is that in the US, police are not a force for good, enabling society to function by maintaining law and order. Rather, police are a tool of white repression of blacks.
Law enforcement in predominantly African American communities is under assault as inherently racist.
BLM agitation, which has been accused of inspiring the murders of police in several US cities, has brought about two responses from rank and file police. First, they have been demoralized, as they find themselves criminalized for trying to keep their cities safe from criminals.
Second, their willingness to use force in situations that demand the use of force has diminished. Fear of criminal charges on the one hand, and public condemnation as “racists” on the other causes police to prefer inaction even when situations require that they act.
The demoralization and intimidation of police is very likely to cause a steep increase in violent crimes.
Then there are Soros’s actions on behalf of illegal immigration. From the US to Europe to Israel, Soros has implemented a worldwide push to use immigration to undermine the national identity and demographic composition of Western democracies. The leaked emails show that his groups have interfered in European elections to get politicians elected who support open border policies for immigrants from the Arab world and to financially and otherwise support journalists who report sympathetically on immigrants.
Soros’s groups are on the ground enabling illegal immigrants to enter the US and Europe. They have sought to influence US Supreme Court rulings on illegal immigration from Mexico. They have worked with Muslim and other groups to demonize Americans and Europeans who oppose open borders.
In Israel as well, Soros opposes government efforts to end the flow of illegal immigration from Africa through the border with Egypt.
The notion at the heart of the push for the legalization of unfettered immigration is that states should not be able to protect their national identities.
If it is racist for Greeks to protect their national identity by seeking to block the entrance of millions of Syrians to their territory, then it is racist for Greece – or France, Germany, Hungary, Sweden the US or Poland – to exist.
Parallel to these efforts are others geared toward rejecting the right of Western democracies to uphold long-held social norms. Soros-supported groups, for instance, stand behind the push not only for gay marriage but for unisex public bathrooms.
They support not only the right of women to serve in combat units, but efforts to force soldiers to live in unisex barracks. In other words, they support efforts aimed at denying citizens of Western democracies the right to maintain any distance between themselves and Soros’s rejection of their most intimate values – their sexual privacy and identity.
As far as Israel is concerned, Soros-backed groups work to delegitimize every aspect of Israeli society as racist and illegitimate. The Palestinians are focal point of his attacks. He uses them to claim that Israel is a racist state. Soros funds moderate leftist groups, radical leftist groups, Israeli Arab groups and Palestinian groups. In various, complementary ways, these groups tell their target audiences that Israel has no right to defend itself or enforce its laws toward its non-Jewish citizens.
In the US, Soros backed groups from BLM to J Street work to make it socially and politically acceptable to oppose Israel.
The thrust of Soros’s efforts from Ferguson to Berlin to Jerusalem is to induce mayhem and chaos as local authorities, paralyzed by his supported groups, are unable to secure their societies or even argue coherently that they deserve security.
In many ways, Donald Trump’s campaign is a direct response not to Clinton, but to Soros himself.
By calling for the erection of a border wall, supporting Britain’s exit from the EU, supporting Israel, supporting a temporary ban on Muslim immigration and supporting the police against BLM, Trump acts as a direct foil to Soros’s multi-billion dollar efforts.
The DCLeaks exposed the immensity of the Soros-funded Left’s campaign against the foundations of liberal democracies. The “direct democracy” movements that Soros support are nothing less than calls for mob rule.
The peoples of the West need to recognize the common foundations of all Soros’s actions. They need to realize as well that the only response to these premeditated campaigns of subversion is for the people of the West to stand up for their national rights and their individual right to security. They must stand with the national institutions that guarantee that security, in accordance with the rule of the law, and uphold and defend their national values and traditions.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
No comments:
Post a Comment