I have heard from many people after the Ryan selection today and a recurring theme is ' ok, Romney and Ryan may have some answers but how do they get the "takers" to give up/off their "dole?"
To this I have several answers.
First, with leadership you can get people to participate, to sacrifice. Whether they do it through guilt or desire to better themselves and move beyond is unimportant. That they are ultimately willing to put their shoulder to the wheel is what is important.
Obama was elected partly because of misplaced 'white guilt' and look where it got us - deeper in the hole!
Marine Corps training and leadership is what has led, and still leads, young men to make sacrifices they never thought they would or could.
Obviously, the leadership has to lay out a plan that is credible, understandable, balanced and acceptable.
Obama has no plan. Therefore, the only plan left for him and his thugs is - demonize opponents so no one notices he has no plan. Furthermore, whatever plan Ovbama had has resulted in abject failure by any standard and/or measurement. That is not a biased political statement. That is a statistical fact which his supporters cannot deny, though they do so by trying to change the debate.
The change Obama talked about has come down to simply that - change the debate, change the subject, change the focus.
Second, I hate it when a politician says I am going to do this and I am going to do that for you. It is as repulsive to me when a Republican says it as when a Democrat says it, not only because that is the Obama narcissistic way but because it is a lie.
No president can make unemployment drop. He can introduce policies that can help but it takes the combined response of people to accomplish change.
Government can impede change and it can enable change but change comes from the people and that is something Obama , as he recently evidenced, does not understand. Romney and Ryan do understand it but must quit with the " I " business, in my humble opinion. Let Obama be Mr I.
Romney and Ryan need to say to voters we cannot do it ourselves so when you elect us you, the American people, must help and be part of the team. They must acknowledge it will take sacrifice in order to reverse these trends. This is why they should also appeal to voters to give them a majority in both the Senate and Congress. Obama had a majority early on and got his legislation and radical solutions shoved through and down our throats but never a budget that paid for all the crap..
Third and last, Obama and his thugs are going to attack. As they do, the contrast between their hype and mythical nonsense will come up against realism and practical solutions. Obama and his goons will talk about how Romney/Ryan favor the wealthy, about enhancing the rich, punishing the middle class blah blah blah. In the process, they will disparage success and the list of their negativism's will spew forth and should be seen for what it is - vomiting on American ideals and exceptionalism.
Meanwhile, Romney/Ryan will focus on solutions, the pain and sacrifice entailed in making the progress we can if all put shoulder to the wheel and do so in the spirit of continuing the dream of what America has always been about - more prosperity for all through work and faith and not through government handouts. Spreading the pain for all is far better than spreading earned wealth among the unearned.
That said, the policies Romney/Ryan develop and 'pitch' must be seen both as equitable and worthy. Ryan has proposed it can be done without cutting wealthy people off at the their knees but by offering policies and ideas that create a way to get America's train back on the track so that America's middle class can recover from Obamism and providing comparable opportunities for those not in the middle class but who aspire to reaching the middle class.
This means touching the third rail, as Bush tried and was shot down , lamentably, by the feckless within his own party.
Logic and common sense dictates that continuing to spend what we do not have is both dumb and shows contempt for reason. That is the Obama way and he will demagogue and lie about all the ideas Romney/Ryan put forth. Obama will twist and stomp on the truth and repeat his lies repeatedly in the demoniacal hope they will become believable. That is the Saul Alinsky way, the Alinsky play book.
Romney/Ryan must, therefore, be up to the task and if American voters cannot see through the Obama distortions set against objective common sense reality then America deserves what it gets - four more years of the same!
At least Romney/Ryan will go down having given the nation the prescription it needs. If the patient
is unwilling, incapable and/or too stupid and selfish to get aboard then the patient deserves to be thrown under Obama and Rev. Wright's 'g-- damn America's' bus!
That is what the election is shaping up to be about because Romney has chosen Ryan. So let the music begin and the chips fall where they may.
My money remains on Romney, and now Ryan, to win and I remain even more confident now they will because I cannot bring myself to believe America is the land of the stupid.
Now let me conclude with a comment about the market.
World Central Banks are committed to saving world currencies. That is a policy they cannot sustain because eventually it will lead to inflation and/or deflation. The sick nations do not have the leadership to reverse course. However, with better leadership Romney/Ryan can bring to our own nation's fiscal and monetary problems our ship of state might be righted and thus confidence throughout the world could build.
Certainly, I anticipate Monday's market to move north as a result of Romney's choice. How long it can sustain remains to be seen. I am on record in previous memos stating should Romney's election become more evident it would have a positive market effect. (See 1 below)
Interesting times!
---
Dick
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1)Romney Picks Ryan as Vice-Presidential Running Mate
By SARA MURRAY, COLLEEN MCCAIN NELSON and PATRICK O'CONNOR
NORFOLK, Va.—Mitt Romney picked Rep. Paul Ryan as his running mate, a decision that could spark enthusiasm for the Republican ticket among conservatives and all but ensures the election will turn to deep philosophical divisions between the two parties over spending, taxes and entitlements.
In Mr. Ryan, 42 years old, the Romney campaign gets a conservative who has spent recent years at the center of national debates about the size and scope of the federal government. With his proposals to revamp entitlement programs for future retirees and the poor, he has become a hero to conservatives and a target for liberals.
Mr. Romney praised Mr. Ryan as "an intellectual leader of the Republican Party" who also has "shown the ability to work with members of both parties to find common ground" on tough issues. "I don't know of anyone who doesn't respect his character and judgment," he said in front of USS Wisconsin, a World War II battleship that now is a museum and carries the name of Rep. Ryan's home state.
President Barack Obama's re-election campaign suggested the pick represents a stark choice for voters. "Mitt Romney has chosen a leader of the House Republicans who shares his commitment to the flawed theory that new budget-busting tax cuts for the wealthy, while placing greater burdens on the middle class and seniors, will somehow deliver a stronger economy," said Obama campaign manager Jim Messina.
Mr. Romney told Beth Myers—his longtime adviser who was the head of the vice-presidential search—on Aug. 1 that he wanted Mr. Ryan as his running mate. He then called Mr. Ryan and asked to get together, according to an aide. The pick was officially announced on Mr. Romney's phone app just after 7 a.m. on Saturday.
At the Romney event, Dee and Brenda Packard, visiting Norfolk from Rigby, Idaho, praised the Ryan selection. "It's all about the budget and the economy. They are fiscal conservatives who would provide financial leadership," Mr. Packard said.
The history of vice-presidential picks suggests the choice can hurt a campaign, but rarely makes a difference on the upside. Typically, running mates are chosen to help buttress a campaign's appeal to certain parts of the country or states, or to complement a candidate's personality.
Ryan on Video
Mr. Romney's choice, by contrast, could have a more significant impact. It could go a long way to address nagging doubts about the Republican's candidacy voiced by the party's conservative wing, which has been seeking a more dramatic embrace of policy solutions to the U.S.'s long-term fiscal woes.
These kinds of big-picture budget policies, while hinted at by Messrs. Romney and Obama, have been debated on the campaign only infrequently.
"I believe that my record of getting things done in Congress will be a very helpful complement to Governor Romney's executive and private sector success outside of Washington," Mr. Ryan said. "We won't duck the tough issues—we will lead."
GOP campaign officials said Mr. Ryan will remain on Tuesday's Republican primary ballot for his Wisconsin House seat and will run in November for both that seat and as part of the presidential race. There would be a special election later if Mr. Romney and he win.
In recent days, Republicans and conservative opinion leaders have split into two groups—one urging a safe pick and the other urging a bolder and perhaps riskier choice.
The first group had pushed for figures such as Ohio Sen. Rob Portman or former Minn. Gov Tim Pawlenty, who they believe would shore up Mr. Romney's image as a steady, competent leader who can get the economy growing strongly again.
The second group had backed choices such as Mr. Ryan, as well as Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana and Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, who are known for tough lines on fiscal matters. The idea: Picking such a candidate would tether Mr. Romney to a younger, reformist wing of the party.
Earlier in Opinion: Why Not Paul Ryan?
The Wall Street Journal's editorial page makes the case earlier this week for choosing Ryan as Romney's running mate.
"For those who thought the governor would 'play it safe' and choose someone less daring and sobering—they were wrong,'' said Don Adams, president of the Independence Hall Tea Party PAC, a Philadelphia-area group that backed Mr. Romney in the primary. "From this brave selection, we can deduce that Governor Romney takes the debt crisis so seriously that he's willing to risk his campaign on the Ryan budget plan—which seriously addresses the Federal government's disastrous and suicidal spending levels."
Said former GOP presidential candidate Steve Forbes, who had backed Texas Gov. Rick Perry in Republican primaries: "Governor Romney has made an election-winning decision. Paul Ryan is a superb choice; he has Reaganesque optimism about America's limitless possibilities."
Mr. Jindal endorsed the choice, too. "Paul is a good friend and one of the smartest guys I served with in Congress. He has the courage of his convictions, which is what our nation needs," he said.
Mr. Ryan told the crowd in Norfolk that the economy can be quickly turned around because of the can-do attitude of its citizens. "America is an idea. It's the only country founded on an idea," Mr. Ryan said. "Our rights come from nature and God, not from government."
Potential downsides of the Ryan pick include offering Democrats a single, personalized target to attack the GOP's plan for tackling the budget deficit, which has topped $1 trillion in each year of the Obama presidency. In addition, while a hero to many on the right, a congressman of 14 years and House Budget Committee chairman, Mr. Ryan remains relatively unknown outside of political and budget circles.
It is also possible Mr. Ryan's detailed prescriptions for fixing the budget could serve also to highlight the relative lack of detail so far presented by Mr. Romney.
The pick suggests a strategic rethink for Mr. Romney, whose campaign until this point seemed geared toward making the election a referendum on the president, with the GOP candidate maintaining a relatively low policy profile. The embrace of Mr. Ryan, and his budget prescriptions, turns that idea on its head.
Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, who has worked closely with Mr. Ryan as senior Democrat on the House Budget Committee, reinforced Mr. Romney's contention that even people who disagree with him like and respect Mr. Ryan. "We've had a lot of spirited but civil debates. He is a nice guy," he said. "It's just we have sharp disagreements on policy and campaigns are about the direction for the country."
Mr. Van Hollen said the selection sharpens the policy differences between the parties in a way that works to Democrats' advantage: "It will demonstrate clearly that we face choices. The Ryan budget is great for people like Mitt Romney. It stinks for the rest of the country. It is an uncompromising, unapologetic reflection of Bush trickle-down economics on steroids.''
Messrs. Ryan and Romney seemed to have genuine chemistry on the campaign trail. At one point, Mr. Ryan—who, like Vice President Joe Biden, is a Catholic—played an April Fool's joke on the former Massachusetts governor by introducing him to an empty room when he stumped with the presumptive nominee days before the critical Wisconsin primary earlier this year.
During his congressional career, Mr. Ryan has written bills that would allow future retirees to invest a portion of their Social Security taxes in the stock market and transform Medicare, the health-care program for the elderly, into a system of subsidized private insurance. The congressman contends that these changes—none of which became law—are critical to avoiding the programs' insolvency.
Mr. Ryan's initial proposal to overhaul Medicare became a flash point last year when he included a version of it in his first budget blueprint as committee chairman. He has since offered a revised version that would allow younger Americans to receive standard Medicare coverage or use tax subsidies to buy private insurance.
"Higher unemployment, declining incomes and crushing debt is not a new normal," Mr. Ryan said. "It is the result of misguided policies. And next January, our economy will begin a comeback with the Romney Plan for a Stronger Middle Class that will lead to more jobs and more take home pay for working Americans."
His colleagues in Congress haven't always warmed to his proposals. Last year, GOP leaders urged Mr. Ryan not to include versions of his Social Security changes in his initial budget blueprint.
Meet Paul Ryan
Highlights
- Age: 42 (born: Jan. 29, 1970)
- Birthplace: Janesville, Wis.
- Education: Miami University of Ohio, B.A. in economics and political science, 1992
- Family: Wife, Janna, three children.
- Experience: Elected to the U.S. House in 1998 at the age of 28; chairman of the Budget Committee since 2011; and senior member of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee. He was an intern and later an aide to former Wisconsin Sen. Bob Kasten, a staff assistant at Empower America, a free-market think tank, and an aide to Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas.
- Notable Career Moments: He released a budget plan, "The Path to Prosperity," in April 2011, a blueprint for a major overhaul of spending with $6.2 trillion in spending cuts over 10 years from the Obama plan. The plan has since been revised, and while it has passed the House, it has had no traction in the Senate. In April, he sought to rebut his Catholic critics, telling an audience at Georgetown University that fellow Catholics can hold different views on how the church's social doctrine should influence budget policy.
His revised Medicare plan is the product of negotiations with Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, a rare act of bipartisan cooperation in a divided Congress that could confound the caricature of Mr. Ryan.
Mr. Ryan has ample experience debating the president and his allies, but the relationship wasn't always so icy. Mr. Obama initially applauded the congressman for laying out detailed policy prescriptions to balance the budget, but those cheers quickly became jeers as the president and his team savaged the proposals, at one point with Mr. Ryan in attendance, saying they would undermine long-term promises to future retirees.
Those attacks have struck a chord with older voters in some key swing states, but they have also elevated Mr. Ryan to the national stage. After spending almost two years parrying these attacks from Democrats in Congress and in his numerous TV news-show appearances, Mr. Ryan appears well prepared to combat this criticism on the campaign trail.
A fifth-generation native of Janesville, Wis., Mr. Ryan adds stronger Midwestern roots to a ticket already topped by the son of a former Michigan governor. The Romney campaign is looking to flip states Mr. Obama won, from Iowa to Pennsylvania. He also offers the ticket a youthful face.
While Mr. Ryan may hold strong appeal for outside-the-Beltway tea-party types, he has spent much of his professional life in the nation's capital.
Picking a Running Mate
See how close to the conventions some recent candidates were named.
In college, Mr. Ryan worked as an intern for former Wisconsin Sen. Bob Kasten. After earning a degree in economics and political science from Miami University in Oxford, Ohio, he returned to Washington as an aide to the Republican senator, helping to pay the bills with stints as a personal trainer and as a waiter at a Mexican restaurant a few blocks from the Capitol.
When Mr. Kasten lost to Russ Feingold in 1992, Mr. Ryan signed on with Empower America, a free-market think tank led by former New York Rep. Jack Kemp. The two men eventually formed a political bond, and Mr. Ryan often credits the former congressman as a mentor.
This isn't Mr. Ryan's first brush with presidential politics: When former Kansas Sen. Bob Dole named Mr. Kemp as his running mate in 1996, Mr. Ryan signed on as a speechwriter to the vice-presidential nominee.
Mr. Ryan remains a fitness enthusiast, who leads regular morning workouts for a band of younger, mostly Republican lawmakers. He is also an avid hunter who used to grow a beard during deer season to mask his scent.
As Mr. Romney unveiled his vice presidential pick, he accidentally promoted him. "Join me in welcoming the next president of the United States, Paul Ryan," Mr. Romney said as Mr. Ryan took the stage.
The actual presidential candidate quickly realized his error. "Every now and then I'm known to make a mistake," Mr. Romney said. "I did not make a mistake with this guy. But I can tell you this, he's going to be the next vice president of the United States."
Mr. Obama had a similar oops moment four years ago in Springfield, Ill., when he introduced Mr. Biden as "the next president…the next vice president of the United States of America.
In addition to Mr. Ryan, Mr. Romney will be joined on a bus tour starting in Norfolk by much of his inner circle, including Ms. Myers, longtime adviser Eric Fehrnstrom and Bob White, one of the candidate's closest friends. And not wanting to waste any time capitalizing on the pick, Messrs. Romney and Ryan will participate on a fundraising call with top donors Sunday.
—Janet Hook contributed to this article.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment