Picture taken at the Fort Snelling National Cemetery in Minneapolis , MN on a June morning - as it appeared in the Minneapolis Star/Tribune.
Fitting Memorial Day Photo!
---
So what's new?
RNC Catches Obama Campaign In Booker Lie, Coverup Source: breitbart.com
In a blistering new ad, the Republican National Committee catches the Obama Campaign lying to the press about their influence in strong-arming Newark Mayor Cory Booker into taking back his criticism of President Obama's attack on Bain Capital.
Worth repeating. (See 1 below.)
In a blistering new ad, the Republican National Committee catches the Obama Campaign lying to the press about their influence in strong-arming Newark Mayor Cory Booker into taking back his criticism of President Obama's attack on Bain Capital.
Worth repeating. (See 1 below.)
---
More to watch on PJTV: "Uncommon Knowledge: John Stossel on Why the Media Hates Business and Why Governments Fail
If the above is not sad enough what do we have to show for Obama's three years of tragic leadership?
a) Riots by energized radicals reminiscent of the anti-authority Viet Nam period. 'The March On' movement is being funded by radicals and those leading it have come out of their lairs and by their actions demonstrate how misguided they truly are.
b) An exploding deficit that creates uncertainty which, in turn, burdens our economic recovery.
c) A leadership style based on division, lies and now it is being discovered has repaid supporters with questionable loans and outright stuffing of their coffers with tax money in the hope they will reward him with re-election. When history is written, the Obama administration will have proven more corrupt than when Grant was president.
d) An economic recovery so anemic that it ranks among the worst in recent history.
e) Finally, a foreign policy that conveys we are destined to become a pitiful giant whose word is unreliable, whose message is confused, whose commitments are questionable and one that has not only not won us respect but has actually lost us both respect and support among our so called friends.
Re-elect Obama at our peril.
---
Gullibility wins the day. Must be Obama supporters ! (See 3 below.)
---
Iran rejects as expected. Will Israel be forced to bell the cat? (See 4 below.)
---
Fissures within the Democrat's ranks? Cory and Christie would make a great team! (See 5 below.)
---
More to watch on PJTV: "Uncommon Knowledge: John Stossel on Why the Media Hates Business and Why Governments Fail
Peter Robinson interviews John Stossel, TV personality and author of "No They Can't.” Stossel discusses why he believes the government should not get in the way of people’s lives, and he explains how the government played a large part in the cause of the economic crisis. He also talks about the disdain the media have for business and capitalism.
The White House improved the history of every president going back to Calvin Coolidge by adding the achievements of President Obama. That's right, you cannot read the histories of Presidents Roosevelt, Kennedy or Reagan without reading about President Obama. Find out what the Trifecta gang thinks about Obama's rewriting of presidential history."
---
So you think the lunch Socialists eat is free? (See 2 below.)
---
As Obama's campaign guns its engine, it is even obvious to him he cannot run on his pathetic record. However, if Obama thinks attacking Romney with lies is the way to go I hope Obama pursues this misguided approach with a vengeance.
What Obama's charges against Romney demonstrate is what a pathetic leader Obama is, what a pitiful mean spirited leader Obama is and what an ignorant anti-capitalist Obama is.
a) Riots by energized radicals reminiscent of the anti-authority Viet Nam period. 'The March On' movement is being funded by radicals and those leading it have come out of their lairs and by their actions demonstrate how misguided they truly are.
b) An exploding deficit that creates uncertainty which, in turn, burdens our economic recovery.
c) A leadership style based on division, lies and now it is being discovered has repaid supporters with questionable loans and outright stuffing of their coffers with tax money in the hope they will reward him with re-election. When history is written, the Obama administration will have proven more corrupt than when Grant was president.
d) An economic recovery so anemic that it ranks among the worst in recent history.
e) Finally, a foreign policy that conveys we are destined to become a pitiful giant whose word is unreliable, whose message is confused, whose commitments are questionable and one that has not only not won us respect but has actually lost us both respect and support among our so called friends.
Re-elect Obama at our peril.
---
Gullibility wins the day. Must be Obama supporters ! (See 3 below.)
---
Iran rejects as expected. Will Israel be forced to bell the cat? (See 4 below.)
---
Fissures within the Democrat's ranks? Cory and Christie would make a great team! (See 5 below.)
---
Dick
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) You can confirm its authenticity here : http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/crack.asp
Current European Tax Rates:
United Kingdom
Income Tax: 50%
VAT: 22% TOTAL: 72%
France
Income Tax: 40%
VAT: 19.6% TOTAL: 59.6%
Greece
Income Tax: 40%
VAT: 25% TOTAL: 65%
Spain
Income Tax: 45%
VAT: 16% TOTAL: 61%
Portugal
Income Tax: 42%
VAT: 20% TOTAL: 62%
Sweden
Income Tax: 55%
VAT: 25% TOTAL: 80%
Norway
Income Tax: 54.3%
VAT: 25% TOTAL: 79.3%
Netherlands
Income Tax: 52%
VAT: 19% TOTAL: 71%
Denmark
Income Tax: 58%
VAT: 25% TOTAL: 83%
Finland
Income Tax: 53%
VAT: 22% TOTAL: 75%
If you have started to wonder what the real costs of Socialism are going to be -- once the full program in these United States hits your wallet, take another look at the table above. As you digest these mind-boggling figures, keep in mind that in spite of these astronomical tax rates, these countries are still not financing their social welfare programs exclusively from tax revenues! They are deeply mired in public debt of gargantuan proportions.
Greece has reached the point where its debt is so huge it is in imminent danger of defaulting, and the European Economic Community has intervened to bail them out. If you're following the financial news, you know Spain and Portugal are right behind Greece.
The United States is now heading down the very same path. The VAT (value added tax) in the table is the national sales tax that Europeans pay. Stay tuned, because that is exactly what you can expect to see a Democrat administration proposing after the Fall elections. Of course, the initial percentage in the United States isn't going to be anywhere near the outrageous numbers you now see in Europe. But guess what, the current outrageous numbers in Europe didn't start out as outrageous either. They started out as minuscule - right around the 1% or 2% where they will start out in the United States. Magically, however, they ran up over the years to where they are now. Expect the same thing here.
Our past, immigration, and culture has been driven by the very notion that with hard work and perseverance, anybody can get ahead economically here in the USA . Do you think that can ever happen with tax rates between 60% and 80%? No, it can't. With the government taking that percentage of your money, your life will
be exactly like life is becoming in Europe.
1) You can confirm its authenticity here : http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/crack.asp
When will Obama crack in public?By Mychal Massie
At a time when many Americans can barely afford Burger King and a movie, Obama boasts of spending a billion dollars on his re-election campaign. Questioned at a recent appearance about the spiraling fuel costs, Obama said, "Get used to it" – and with an insouciant grin and chortle, he told another person at the event, who complained about the effect high fuel prices were having on his family, to "get a more fuel-efficient car."
The Obamas behave as if they were sharecroppers living in a trailer and hit the Powerball, but instead of getting new tires for their trailer and a new pickup truck, they moved to Washington . And instead of making possum pie, with goats and chickens in the front yard, they're spending and living large at taxpayer expense – opulent vacations, gala balls, resplendent dinners and exclusive command performances at the White House, grand date nights, golf, basketball, more golf, exclusive resorts and still more golf. In the 1950's they called it acting NIGGER RICH.
Expensive, ill-fitting and ill-chosen wigs and fashions hardly befit the first lady of the United States . The Obamas have behaved in every way but presidential – which is why it's so offensive when we hear Obama say, in order "to restore fiscal responsibility, we all need to share in the sacrifice – but we don't have to sacrifice the America we believe in."
The American people have been sacrificing; it is he and his family who are behaving as if they've never had two nickels to rub together – and now, having hit the mother lode, they're going to spend away their feelings of inadequacy at the taxpayers' expense.
Obama continues to exhibit behavior that, at best, can be described as mobocratic and, at worst, reveals a deeply damaged individual. In a February 2010 column, I asked, "Is Obama unraveling? "I wrote that it was beginning to appear the growing mistrust of him and contempt for his policies was beginning to have a destabilizing effect on him.
At that time, I wrote that not having things go one's way can be a bitter pill, but reasonable people don't behave as he was behaving. He had insulted Republicans at their luncheon, where he had been an invited guest. I had speculated that was, in part, what had led him to falsely accuse Supreme Court justices before Congress, the nation and the world, during the 2010 State of the Union address.
It appeared, at that time, as if he were "fraying around the emotional edges." That behavior has not abated – it has become more pronounced. While addressing the nation, after being forced to explain the validity of his unilateral aggression with Libya , America witnessed a petulant individual scowling and scolding the public for daring to insist he explain his actions.
But during an afternoon speech to address the budget/debt, he took his scornful, unstable despotic behavior to depths that should give the nation cause for concern. Displaying a dark psychopathy more representative of an episode of "The Tudors" television series, he invited Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., to sit in the front row during his speech and then proceeded to berate both Ryan and Ryan's budget-cutting plan. Even liberal Democrats were put off by the act. MSNBC's Joe Scarborough questioned the sanity of Obama's actions.
Today, criticism is coming from all sides. A senior Democrat lawmaker said, "I have been very disappointed in [Obama], to the point where I'm embarrassed that I endorsed him. It's so bad that some of us are thinking, is there some way we can replace him? How do you get rid of this guy?" ("Democrats' Disgust with Obama," The Daily Beast, April 15, 2011)
Steve McCann wrote : Obama's speech "was chock full of lies, deceit and crass fear-mongering. It must be said that [he] is the most dishonest, deceitful and mendacious person in a position of power I have ever witnessed" ("The Mendacity of Barack Obama,"AmericanThinker.com , April 15, 2011).McCann continued : "[His] performance was the culmination of four years of outright lies and narcissism that have been largely ignored by the media, including some in the conservative press and political class who are loath to call [him] what he is in the bluntest of terms : a liar and a fraud. That he relies on his skin color to intimidate, either outright or by insinuation [against] those who oppose his radical agenda only add to his audacity. It is apparent that he has gotten away with his character flaws his entire life, aided and abetted by sycophants around him. ..."
With these being among the kinder rebukes being directed at Obama, and with people becoming less intimidated by his willingness to use race as a bludgeon, with falling poll numbers in every meaningful category and an increasingly aggressive tea-party opposition – how much longer before he cracks completely?
The coming months of political life are not going to be pleasant for Obama. Possessed by a self-perceived palatine mindset, that in his mind places him above criticism, how long before he cracks in public? Can America risk a man with a documented track record of lying and misrepresenting truth as a basic way of life, who is becoming increasingly more contumelious?
Hope you forward this to everyone in your address book as we are going to need every vote we can get to remove Obama. The liberals are just unable to absorb what he is doing to our country and will continue to vote for him. Just imagine what he will do to America if he gets another term !---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2) The Cost of Socialism
Current European Tax Rates:
United Kingdom
Income Tax: 50%
VAT: 22% TOTAL: 72%
France
Income Tax: 40%
VAT: 19.6% TOTAL: 59.6%
Greece
Income Tax: 40%
VAT: 25% TOTAL: 65%
Spain
Income Tax: 45%
VAT: 16% TOTAL: 61%
Portugal
Income Tax: 42%
VAT: 20% TOTAL: 62%
Sweden
Income Tax: 55%
VAT: 25% TOTAL: 80%
Norway
Income Tax: 54.3%
VAT: 25% TOTAL: 79.3%
Netherlands
Income Tax: 52%
VAT: 19% TOTAL: 71%
Denmark
Income Tax: 58%
VAT: 25% TOTAL: 83%
Finland
Income Tax: 53%
VAT: 22% TOTAL: 75%
If you have started to wonder what the real costs of Socialism are going to be -- once the full program in these United States hits your wallet, take another look at the table above. As you digest these mind-boggling figures, keep in mind that in spite of these astronomical tax rates, these countries are still not financing their social welfare programs exclusively from tax revenues! They are deeply mired in public debt of gargantuan proportions.
Greece has reached the point where its debt is so huge it is in imminent danger of defaulting, and the European Economic Community has intervened to bail them out. If you're following the financial news, you know Spain and Portugal are right behind Greece.
The United States is now heading down the very same path. The VAT (value added tax) in the table is the national sales tax that Europeans pay. Stay tuned, because that is exactly what you can expect to see a Democrat administration proposing after the Fall elections. Of course, the initial percentage in the United States isn't going to be anywhere near the outrageous numbers you now see in Europe. But guess what, the current outrageous numbers in Europe didn't start out as outrageous either. They started out as minuscule - right around the 1% or 2% where they will start out in the United States. Magically, however, they ran up over the years to where they are now. Expect the same thing here.
Our past, immigration, and culture has been driven by the very notion that with hard work and perseverance, anybody can get ahead economically here in the USA . Do you think that can ever happen with tax rates between 60% and 80%? No, it can't. With the government taking that percentage of your money, your life will
be exactly like life is becoming in Europe.
"Entitled," "stagnant," "lethargic," "dependent," and "broke" come to mind.
Let's not ever forget the battle cry of the Socialists. It's always the same cry. Equalize income. Spread the wealth to the poor (however the politicians define them at any point in time). Level the economic playing field.
Accomplish that and everything will be rosy. Bull! It's time to take a really hard look at reality. Greece is a perfect example. Despite the Socialist system that has ruled the country for decades, and a 65% tax rate, they are drowning in public debt, would have defaulted without hundreds of billions in bailout money from the EU, and still. . . 20% of their population lives in poverty!
What has all that Socialism bought, besides ultimate power and wealth for the politicians running the show? Do you think the people are "free"? They're not. They are slaves to their compulsory, confiscatory Socialist "system."
If you do not agree with this .... then, I suggest you read it again.
Let's not ever forget the battle cry of the Socialists. It's always the same cry. Equalize income. Spread the wealth to the poor (however the politicians define them at any point in time). Level the economic playing field.
Accomplish that and everything will be rosy. Bull! It's time to take a really hard look at reality. Greece is a perfect example. Despite the Socialist system that has ruled the country for decades, and a 65% tax rate, they are drowning in public debt, would have defaulted without hundreds of billions in bailout money from the EU, and still. . . 20% of their population lives in poverty!
What has all that Socialism bought, besides ultimate power and wealth for the politicians running the show? Do you think the people are "free"? They're not. They are slaves to their compulsory, confiscatory Socialist "system."
If you do not agree with this .... then, I suggest you read it again.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3)Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide!
A freshman at Eagle Rock Junior High won first prize at the Greater Idaho
Falls Science Fair on January 26.
In his project he urged people to sign a petition demanding strict control
or total elimination of the chemical "dihydrogen monoxide." And for plenty
of good reasons, since it can:
1. cause excessive sweating and vomiting
2. it is a major component in acid rain
3. it can cause severe burns in its gaseous state
4. accidental inhalation can kill you
5. it contributes to erosion
6. it decreases effectiveness of automobile brakes
7. it has been found in tumors of terminal cancer patients
He asked 150 people if they supported a ban of the chemical.
One hundred forty-three said yes.
Six were undecided.
Only one knew that the chemical was... Water! (H2O)
The title of his prize winning project was, "How Gullible Are We?"
He was attempting to show how conditioned we have become to the alarmists
practicing junk science and spreading fear of everything in our environment.
The conclusion is obvious.
3)Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide!
A freshman at Eagle Rock Junior High won first prize at the Greater Idaho
Falls Science Fair on January 26.
In his project he urged people to sign a petition demanding strict control
or total elimination of the chemical "dihydrogen monoxide." And for plenty
of good reasons, since it can:
1. cause excessive sweating and vomiting
2. it is a major component in acid rain
3. it can cause severe burns in its gaseous state
4. accidental inhalation can kill you
5. it contributes to erosion
6. it decreases effectiveness of automobile brakes
7. it has been found in tumors of terminal cancer patients
He asked 150 people if they supported a ban of the chemical.
One hundred forty-three said yes.
Six were undecided.
Only one knew that the chemical was... Water! (H2O)
The title of his prize winning project was, "How Gullible Are We?"
He was attempting to show how conditioned we have become to the alarmists
practicing junk science and spreading fear of everything in our environment.
The conclusion is obvious.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4) Iran rejects West's proposal on nuclear curbs
Saeed Jalili demands overhaul to West's plan which one diplomat says falls short of compromise
Iranian negotiators on Thursday rejected proposals by six world powers to curb Tehran's nuclear program, and demanded answers to their own counteroffer meant to alleviate concerns about Iran's ability to build atomic weapons.
Saeed Jalili, Iran's top nuclear negotiator, demanded an overhaul to the plan put forward by the world powers after the Baghdad talks began Wednesday. An Iranian diplomat involved in the discussions said the package falls far short of a compromise.
Jalili conveyed his concerns in a private meeting Thursday with the European Union's foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who is formally leading the talks.
Meanwhile, Iranian media said that the world powers have aligned themselves with Israel on the nuclear issue. "The discourse of the six powers during the talks is very similar to that of Israel's prime minister and his defense minister," the al-Alam TV said.
Iran's Mehr and Fars news agencies voiced similar sentiment and claimed that the powers failed to issue a clear response to Tehran's counter proposal. Fars accused the six of trying to stall and cause a collapse of the talks.
At the heart of the issue are two different proposals. On one side is an incentive package by the six-nation group - the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany - that seeks to halt the most sensitive part of Iran's nuclear fuel production.
Iran, in turn, wants the US and Europe to ease harsh economic sanctions on its oil exports in return for pledges to give wider access for UN inspectors and other concessions.
Western package
The Western package calls on Tehran to end its enrichment of uranium to 20 percent, considered a short technical step away from warhead grade. In exchange they offered benefits, including medical isotopes, some nuclear safety cooperation and spare parts for civilian airliners that are needed in Iran.
But they snubbed Iranian calls for an immediate easing of significant economic sanctions imposed on Tehran for flouting UN Security Council resolutions that demand the suspension of all enrichment.
Earlier on Thursday, an Iranian delegation official said that the oorld powers are hindering talks, creating a "difficult atmosphere".
"What we heard in Istanbul was more interesting... We believe the reason P5+1 is not able to reach a result is America," the official said, asking not to be named. "(P5+1) came to Baghdad without a clear mandate so we think the atmosphere is difficult."
4a)Israel revives military option after Obama rejects its nuclear demands of Iran
A fateful decision is reached on Iran
In public, Israeli ministers still talk as though they believe in results from the Six-Power talks with Iran, which Thursday May 24 limped into their second day in Baghdad with the parties still miles apart. But the presidential veto has essentially cast Israel outside the loop of influence on the outcome of diplomacy.
When Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak met US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta at the Pentagon on May 17 he was told that Obama had rejected Israel’s toned-down demands for Iran to at least to halt high-grade uranium enrichment, export its stocks of material enriched higher than 3.5 percent grade and shut down production at the Fordo nuclear plant near Qom. For six months, the Obama administration tried to sweeten the bitter pill of this rejection by bumping up security aid. The latest appropriation covered another $70 million for manufacturing more Iron Dome short-range missile interceptors.
After talking to Panetta, Barak turned to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and National Security Adviser Tom Donilon in the hope of winning their support for softening Obama’s ruling. Clinton replied she was not involved in the negotiations with Iran and Donilon, that a personal decision by the president was not open to change.
A week of consultations followed the defense minister’s return home, during which it was decided to tear up Israel’s pledge to refrain from attacking Iran during the US presidential campaign. Wednesday, May 23, the day the Baghdad talks began, Barak signaled Washington to this effect.
It was conveyed in a little-noticed early morning radio interview with the defense minister. To make sure his words reached the proper address without misunderstandings, the defense minister’s office issued a verbatim English translation from the Hebrew:
"There is no need to tell us what to do, and we have no reason to panic. Israel is very, very strong, but we do know that the Iranians are accomplished chess players and will try to achieve nuclear capabilities. Our position has not changed. The world must stop Iran from becoming nuclear. All options remain on the table."
As the Baghdad talks went around in circles, Israel’s military option was put back firmly on the table and on the US-Iranian chessboard.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5)Against the Grain
AP PHOTO/MEL EVANS
Fault lines: Booker spotlights frustrations within the Democratic Party.
Newark Mayor Cory Booker’s off-message criticism of the Obama campaign’s attacks on Mitt Romney’s background at Bain Capital gave the campaign an untimely, unwanted headache this week. But more significantly, it exposed a tension that’s developing between the Democratic Party’s centrist wing and its more-outspoken liberal base—one that threatens to fester more openly if President Obama fails to win a second term.
Conversations with liberal activists and labor officials reveal an unmistakable hostility toward the pro-business, free-trade, free-market philosophy that was in vogue during the second half of the Clinton administration. Former White House Chief of Staff William Daley, who tried to steer the Obama administration in a more centrist direction, is the subject of particular derision. Discussion of entitlement reforms, at the heart of the GOP governing agenda, is a nonstarter. The fiscally conservative Blue Dog Democrats are now nearly extinct on Capitol Hill.
Moderate Democratic groups and officials, meanwhile, privately fret about the party’s leftward drift and the Obama campaign’s embrace of an aggressively populist message. They’re disappointed that the administration didn’t take the lead advancing the Simpson-Bowles deficit-reduction proposal, they wish the administration’s focus was on growth over fairness, and they are frustrated with the persistent congressional gridlock. Third Way, the centrist Democratic think tank, has been generating analyses underscoring the need for Democrats to appeal to middle-of-the-road voters, to no avail.
“There are not a lot of moderates left in the Democratic Party, and Cory is one of the few of them left,” said former Democratic Rep. Artur Davis, an early Obama ally who has become increasingly estranged from the party. “I would like to think Cory speaks for a lot of voters in the Democratic Party, but sadly he doesn’t speak for a lot of Democratic operatives within the party. This isn’t Bill Clinton’s Democratic Party anymore.”
The Booker brouhaha exposed an important dynamic. Booker is a leading figure in the centrist faction, and he didn’t hide that fact when he called out the Obama campaign attacks against Romney’s private-equity work. He first made a name for himself by challenging the party’s establishment in the 2002 Newark mayoral race, taking on the cronyism that was endemic in city government. After being elected in 2006 on his second try, he’s worked closely with the business community to revitalize Newark. He’s developed an unlikely odd-couple relationship with Republican Gov. Chris Christie, and the two have rallied behind education reform, taking on the teachers’ unions in the process.
The Booker governing model, premised on bipartisanship and taking on ideological party factions, runs contrary in many ways to Obama’s record. It’s why Booker’s call for Obama to elevate the rhetoric drove Chicago batty: It was a stinging reminder that the candidate’s promise of a post-partisan approach in 2008 had given way to the reality of governing in a polarized Washington and the necessity of running a highly negative campaign against Romney.
It’s easy to ascribe political motivations to Booker’s apostasy, given that he has been mentioned as a prospective candidate for governor in 2013 against Christie or, more likely, for the Senate in 2014 to replace Democrat Frank Lautenberg (who may retire). And the investor set has certainly embraced his mayoralty, helping to fund his campaigns against business-unfriendly candidates. He will need that support in the future.
But Booker’s comments reflect an uncomfortable ideological divide within the elite elements of the Democratic coalition. As I wrote last month, wealthy voters made up a pivotal part of Obama’s winning coalition in 2008—not to mention contributing a good chunk of his campaign cash that cycle. But as Obama’s rhetoric has turned populist to capitalize on Romney’s biographical vulnerabilities, he has alienated some of those voters. Booker isn’t the only high-profile Democrat with Wall Street connections raising questions about the Obama campaign’s populist appeals. It follows similar criticisms from Obama auto adviser Steven Rattner, former Rep. Harold Ford Jr., and JPMorgan Chase’s Jamie Dimon, a past Obama donor and supporter. Meanwhile, Wall Street money has dried up, playing a role in the president’s less-than-imposing fundraising totals for the year.
Over the past generation, losing Democratic presidential campaigns have sparked soul-searching within the party. After Walter Mondale’s landslide defeat in 1984, centrist Democrats formed institutions, like the Democratic Leadership Council, to counter the influence of the old, liberal guard. The DLC later provided the governing fuel for Clinton’s presidency. A decade later, when John Kerry lost to George W. Bush, it sparked the rise of the liberal netroots, which played a key role in the Democratic takeover of Congress two years later. The party’s activist base currently is firmly in charge, but that could change quickly if things turn south.
With Obama at the helm of the party and broadly popular among Democratic voters, there’s little incentive for Democratic critics to openly take on a sitting president. The harsh reaction to Booker’s mild apostasy onMeet the Press, and his subsequent walk-backs, was proof positive of that. But if Obama loses to Romney after embracing a message advocated by the party’s liberal wing, don’t be surprised if the knives come out in force after the election.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment