I Draw A Line In The Sand & Now Understand Obama's anti-Colonial Rage!

This memo is devoted entirely to reviewing: "The Roots of Obama's Rage!" by Dinesh D'Souza.

I will do my best to be brief.

First, why even review D'Souza's book? Because, as I have written many times before, to understand and defeat your enemy you must first know him. I continue to believe Obama is the enemy of Capitalism, Americanism and yes, Israel - the apartheid nation!

Second, why does this book help me understand Obama, yet could never quite put my finger on the actual reason(s)why I never trusted him from the git go. Because, D'Souza helps me understand why I always rejected The Manchurian Candidate argument but now understand Obama is actually a 'self-imposed/directed Manchurian Candidate' as it were.

Even though I have not finished the book, and have several more chapters to go, what I have read fills in enough blanks for me.

D"Souza begins by walking you through 'Barry's' early youth, his relationship with his white mother who, deserted her race and embraced the black race and culture, eventually married Barack Obama Sr. who, in turn, deserted the family, moved to Africa, became influenced by various anti-Colonialist Kenyan political leaders and eventually met a tragic death.

Obama Sr., as a result of his African political associations, was sent to Harvard, returned to Kenya and rose and fell as the anti-Colonialist Kenya party he did not support came to power. Eventually Obama Sr. lost his appointed public office, took up with another women, married her (though still married), came under the sway of alcohol, as a result of his rejected circumstances, and eventually killed himself in a drunken car wreck.

Barry Obama's mother inculcated in her son a reverence for his deserting father. Barry's father eventually visited his family in Hawaii when Barry was around 10. Barry's teacher had invited the Sr. Obama to speak about his African experience and culture to Barry's class. Barry was then attending a private prep school in Hawaii.

The author relates how impressed Barry was with his father's presentation and from that moment on Barry morphed into an association with his father and his father's anti-Colonial philosophy. He changed his name from Barry to Barack, eventually took Hussein for his middle name and from this moment forward a series of developments led him to embrace and, to this day, implement the anti-Colonial ideas of his father.

The author describes various forms Anti-Colonialism takes and those of Obama Sr encapsulated two basics - whites had plundered blacks and their control over their African territories and possessionst thus, must be totally eliminated. Second, white Colonialists must repay for having plundered Africans of their possessions etc.. This has come to be known as neo-colonialism.

The author then takes you through young Barack's development, his associations with Saul Alinsky, Andrew Kull, Frantz Fanon and others of anti-Colonial persuasion, Reverend Wright etc. and concludes, in Chapters Six and Seven entitled respectively: "Becoming Barack and "Putting On The Mask," how all of this transpired and shaped Barack's thinking, his obsessive drive to become his father and to implement,through a variety of fortuitous, well planned and executed circumstances, his father's philosophy and eventually becoming president.

Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" introduced Obama into the world of how to get people to give voluntarily, even happily and how, by being a certain type of black, he could tap into the reservoir of American white guilt. If appropriately manipulated, whites could actually even become accessories in a large scale project, ie the presidency.

Though Alinsky was/is a radical he was a pragmatist and understood blacks could not succeed without white support and/or association with them through an alliance. Alinsky also understood "the middle class was where the power is" and because of their anger over their deteriorating economic plight they were ripe for picking, so to speak.

The process Obama embraced has come to be called 'lactification' and in Obama's case took two routes. First, Obama knew he must avoid the race issue and to project a nonracial image. Second, he must present himself as part of the mainstream culture in order to become accepted by whites. Obama understood he had to become the black who would be not threatening to whites unlike two of the most contemporary, prominent American 'black hustlers,' ie Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, whom the author notes has now begun to wear suits, lost weight and is supporting and defending Obama unlike Jackson who still 'wants to cut off Obama's nuts.'

Ironically, Jesse Jackson, and even Vice President Biden, saw through Obama's 'lactification' which meant changing his speech pattern, dress and even adopting 'white/mainstream' mannerisms. Obama positioned himself as an outside guy who understood and embraced mainstream/middle class values. The media bought it, adored him, and to this day, continue to never lay a finger on him. As Obama became more 'Tom Brokaw' like the lap dogs, aka Chris Matthews, Anna Quindlen etc. fell in line. The author dubs them "The Obama Choir."

In Chapter Nine: "Humbling The Overclass" the author describes Obama Sr's concept of neocolonialism ie., the situation facing a nation after actual colonialism has ended but their exploitation remains through economic means. Since the wealth of the colonizing nation belongs to the exploited Africans one begins to understand Obama's writings and actions as he seeks to transfer from 'the big guys to the little guys,' doing so through environmental and energy policies, through taking over industry and financial institutions and the nation's health care system etc.

Obama has done so by implementing Alinsky's concepts, through enlisting the anger of the 'out crowd' against the 'in crowd,'through class-warfare and the rest is history.

D'Souza also picks up on and describes an appealing Obama method which I also understood. In positioning himself as the 'reasonable force for appropriate change' Obama sets up two mythical extremes and then positions himself in the middle.

I know the "Obama Choir' liberals will reject D"Souza's explanations as poppycock but when you observe Obama's walk and hear his talk through the prism of anti-Colonial thinking, I begin to understand why Churchill's bust was returned. I understand why Obama is anti-Capitalist and why his initial reaction was to defend the Harvard Professor who was arrested after he cursed the white police officer who thought he was breaking into a home and why Obama pulled back so quickly so as not to appear too racial. What could be better than to pop a 'bubba' beer! I better understand the Genesis of Obama's divide and conquer strategy, his crippling and punishing economic policies. His entire presidency is rooted in rage and why psychophant liberals buy Obama and most of all liberal guilt ridden Jews and blacks enslaved to the Democrat Party, adore and defend this president and swoon over his every stylized word.

For me, D'Souza has fleshed out my skeletal thinking and helped me re-affirm why I distrust and, therefore fear, this president. It is not political party allegiance crap with me because I felt comparably so about Nixon and voted for Kennedy and Carter (the first time.)

I intuitively do not like/trust someone who 'messes' with my view of Americanism and even my pro Israelism, because I confess to being a Jingoist, a Fifty Four Forty or Fight kind of guy who draws a line in the sand., I hold dear my feelings about my Country and my ethnicity and this is why I distrust those who are appeasing Chamberlain like. This is why I do not believe Obama when it comes to Israel. History, in that regard, is on my side.

So my advice is buy a copy of D'Souza's book, read it, think for yourself and make up our own mind.

Dick