Merkel was deemed to be the German equivalent of Thatcher. It turns out this proved far from the truth. In fact, Merkel proved to be a stubborn, pig headed disaster in many ways. She allowed far too many Muslims into the country, she cuddled up to Putin regarding Germany's energy dependence, she fought Trump when it came to paying Germany's fair share of NATO participation and Germans finally tired of her so her official days are numbered..
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
We do not have a border crisis. It is simply an every day challenge. Biden is not aware of what is going on because his handlers have not told him and because they did not want to wake him up from his "nappy." Bless his heart.
Even the President of Mexico knows more of what is going on than our own president. At least our president is a folksy uncle type who, before becoming president, was deemed a worthy replacement for nasty Trump. Now that syrupy "Uncle" Biden has become our president we have the ability to compare what Trump did and what syrupy "Uncle" Biden is doing.
Trump built a wall to protect our border and Biden is letting anyone enter America who wants to come. Trump made us energy independent and "Uncle" Biden decided we should become dependent so gasoline has risen some 30%. Trump pressured the drug industry and various government agencies to come up with a vaccine at warp speed. Biden could not remember he was vaccinated with the vaccine Trump allowed to be developed in record time.
Trump was very dismissive of PC'ism. Biden has re-introduced cancel culture so children are now sitting home with "adults" instead of parents and no longer are encouraged to learn what Dr. Seuss taught.
Trump tried his best to drain the swamp of those who wanted to transform America but he lost the battle. Now the "transformers" like Obama, are back in control and you can bank on them doing a lot more damage to our rights, freedoms and culture. In fact, I predict you will not recognize America by the time the mid year election rolls around. I further predict if you speak out against the "transformers" you will be subject to their wrath, their intimidation and you risk being called a racist.
Finally, "Uncle" Biden soothes us with syrupy words and homey phrases while Trump hurt our ears with vulgarity. Trump got things done that were good for America, for our allies and for the world. "Uncle" Biden is a hopeless and dangerous flop who is being manipulated by radicals and will not be around much longer because Obama and "Wing Man" wants their stooge, Karmala, to take over.
And:
more dictatorship and dodging:
New Biden Executive Order Gives Criminals In Jail Increased Voting and Voter Registration Access
Stay tuned.
++++++++++++++++++++
This from a dear friend and fellow memo reader who sent the below op ed which validates what I had just written:
"Remember the tag line from IBM
commercials from of old? NYT has gone 180 degrees the other way now. I guess
they are so confused in their attempts at thinking rationally that they don’t
want anyone else to have similar problems. J--"
"Don't
Go Down The Rabbit Hole" - NYTimes Decries Critical Thinking, Tells
Americans To Trust Google Instead
Authored
by Gavin Nascimento via The Free Thought Project,
A new article
from the New York Times claims that instead of engaging with someone that challenges your
worldview, you should “resist the lure of Rabbit Holes” and go to more
authoritative sources such as Google and Wikipedia.
The New York Times appears
to have declared war on traditional critical thinking, which they say “isn’t
helping in the fight against misinformation”.
Sharing the insights of “a
digital literacy expert” named Michael Caulfield, the article reads as follows:
“We’re taught that, in order to protect
ourselves from bad information, we need to deeply engage with the stuff that
washes up in front of us,” Mr. Caulfield told me recently. He suggested that
the dominant mode of media literacy (if kids get taught any at all) is that
“you’ll get imperfect information and then use reasoning to fix that somehow.
But in reality, that strategy can completely backfire.”
In other words: Resist the lure of
rabbit holes, in part, by reimagining media literacy for the internet hellscape
we occupy.
What Does The New York Times Suggest We Do Instead?
Caulfield argues that the
best way to learn about a source of information is to “leave it and look
elsewhere”, by seeing how that source of information measures up to the
existing status quo.
For further clarification,
the New York Times’ “digital literacy expert” provides us with an example by
investigating a post (which they do not offer any link to) made by Robert F
Kennedy Jr on Instagram:
He copied Mr. Kennedy’s name in the
Instagram post and popped it into Google. “Look how fast this
is,” he told me as he counted the seconds out loud. In
15 seconds,
he navigated to Wikipedia and scrolled
through the introductory section of the page, highlighting with his cursor the
last sentence, which reads that Mr. Kennedy is an anti-vaccine activist and a
conspiracy theorist.
In short, the New York
Times and their “expert” are telling us that instead of investigating the
claims of someone that challenges the status quo and our understanding and
perception of reality, we should instead avoid them and go directly to the
authorities to tell us what to think.
Considering the Wall Street
Journal’s detailed investigation and
an academic study both
uncovering Google’s deliberate manipulation of search results (for which they
have also been
fined) and reports of organizations like the Vatican,
CIA and FBI editing
Wikipedia entries, this advice needs to be viewed with the highest suspicion
for obvious reasons.
This is the Exact Opposite of How We Establish the Truth
There is an expression that
“rejecting something you know nothing about is the highest form of ignorance,” and
that’s basically what the New York Times and their “digital literacy expert”
are encouraging their followers to do. “Resist the lure of Rabbit Holes” and go
to Google, where in just “15 seconds”, you can get the Truth from Wikipedia —
It’s genuinely shocking to read this.
History is overwhelmed by
examples that prove this method to be deeply flawed. Galileo Galilei, Martin
Luther King Jr, Nelson Mandela, and countless others were attacked by the
authorities for challenging the status quo. In fact, it could be argued that
this has been a consistent theme throughout history and clearly represents that
what the New York Times are encouraging us to do, is the exact opposite of
establishing the Truth. No, it’s not a 15 second process, and no, you don’t
mindlessly rely on the authorities to give you the Truth.
New York Times Has a Documented History of Spreading Dangerous
Propaganda
Unsurprisingly, the New
York Times has a well documented history of spreading dangerous propaganda and
working with the authorities to uphold the status quo.
The CIA’s infamous Operation Mockingbird,
which reportedly began in the late 40’s and continued into the 70’s, included
the New York Times.
During the 1990’s, after
journalist Gary Webb exposed
how the CIA were working with drug traffickers, the New York Times
and other establishment media outlets embarked on a campaign
of character assassination claiming Webb was lying, when he was
actually telling
the Truth.
Correspondingly, in
2012 Glen
Greenwald wrote an article on the “correspondence and
collusion” between the CIA and the New York Times. In 2015, Professor Noam
Chomsky wrote of how the news giant helped cover up war crimes
for the U.S. government.
Frustrated Establishment Media No Longer Has a Monopoly on
Information
Although this New York
Time’s article is revolting, it’s also quite insightful as to how desperate
some establishment media outlets have become in their efforts to control the
narrative, which has grown more and more frivolous with the introduction of the
internet where people such as myself can use verifiable evidence to expose how
hypocritical and deceptive they are.
And:
 |
No comments:
Post a Comment