This is a response to my friend who sent me the video on the shopkeeper in France which I posted earlier. (See 1 below.)
===
The consequences of our feckless president, whose foreign policy initiatives have proven his abysmal understanding of radical Islamists and human nature, are now surfacing. (See 2, 2a, 2b and 2c below.)
===
Humor is one of the best balms available to humans and Jews have developed a fine sense of humor. This is a satirical spoof explaining El Al's new relationship with Jet Blue passengers! (See 3 below.)
===
Kerry and Israel. (See 4 below.)
===
Dr. Mordechai Kedar, the Director of the Center for the Study of the Middle East and Islam (under formation), a research associate of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies and a lecturer in the Department of Arabic at Bar-Ilan University in Israel, is one of Israel's leading figures in understanding the Arab world. He is the Middle East analyst of the daily newspaper “Makor Rishon” as well as other publications. Dr. Kedar is a frequent guest in the Israeli, Arab and international media.
At 8:00 P.M., Dr. Kedar will discuss, "Israel in a Changing Middle East - Challenges and Opportunities" at the World Affairs Council of Savannah (with social hour starting at 7:30). Again, there are no tickets or admission cost. The location is 305 Fahm St. in Savannah, (behind the Savannah Convention and Visitors Bureau).
===
Dick
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) Thanks for this video. Part of it is true but some is exagerated as usual. I agree that our politicians do not talk enough and act against this islamisation and when for example our former President Sarkozy wanted to debate nationally about it, it was rejected by the left wing parties on the fact that immigration was good for France. I don’t really see how it can be good when the country has more than 10% unemployment (more than 3 million people) !
===
The consequences of our feckless president, whose foreign policy initiatives have proven his abysmal understanding of radical Islamists and human nature, are now surfacing. (See 2, 2a, 2b and 2c below.)
===
Humor is one of the best balms available to humans and Jews have developed a fine sense of humor. This is a satirical spoof explaining El Al's new relationship with Jet Blue passengers! (See 3 below.)
===
Kerry and Israel. (See 4 below.)
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry is being mocked in a new video, part of a campaign by nationalists warning against Kerry’s plans to impose an agreement with the Palestinian Authority (PA) on Israel. The video which was produced as part of the campaign mocks Kerry for his “creative” but useless solutions to Israel’s security problems. Kerry is presented as running a company called “John Kerry Solutions Ltd.”, the motto of which is, “We don’t have good solutions but hey, we have to do something!”
|
===
Dr. Mordechai Kedar, the Director of the Center for the Study of the Middle East and Islam (under formation), a research associate of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies and a lecturer in the Department of Arabic at Bar-Ilan University in Israel, is one of Israel's leading figures in understanding the Arab world. He is the Middle East analyst of the daily newspaper “Makor Rishon” as well as other publications. Dr. Kedar is a frequent guest in the Israeli, Arab and international media.
At 8:00 P.M., Dr. Kedar will discuss, "Israel in a Changing Middle East - Challenges and Opportunities" at the World Affairs Council of Savannah (with social hour starting at 7:30). Again, there are no tickets or admission cost. The location is 305 Fahm St. in Savannah, (behind the Savannah Convention and Visitors Bureau).
===
Dick
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) Thanks for this video. Part of it is true but some is exagerated as usual. I agree that our politicians do not talk enough and act against this islamisation and when for example our former President Sarkozy wanted to debate nationally about it, it was rejected by the left wing parties on the fact that immigration was good for France. I don’t really see how it can be good when the country has more than 10% unemployment (more than 3 million people) !
We as French Jews are worried about our future in France in 10 or 20 years when the Muslim population will be probably around 30 % as they will have the French Nationality and be able to vote. Today, the Socialist party is listening this young Muslim and French population as they represent a new voting population probably more in favour of the left wing ideas.
In the programm of our President Hollande, he wants to give the voting ability to foreign people for local elections which is dangerous for our democracy. At the moment only Europeans are able to vote locally.
This is also why the extreme-right wing party headed by Mme Le Pen is becoming more an more popular especially among the workers who 20 years ago were voting Communist !
We are watching this evolution very carefully and the CRIF which is representing the Jews politically are constantly talking to the government to try to influence them. But it is a hard battle and I am afraid that it is now too late to reverse this situation.
All the best.
Lionel Bercault
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)
Americans want to forget about Iraq and Syria, especially since President Obama walked back from his bombing threat in September, but Syria and Iraq haven't forgotten America. The contagion from Syria's civil war is spilling across borders in ways that are already requiring U.S. involvement and may eventually cost American lives.
And yet he got elected, not once but twice. Thanks to those that did not think it was important to vote for freedom and those that were willing to give up their freedoms for entitlements.
Almost four years after President Obama tried to engage the radical leaders of Iran, it is too late to stop the Islamic regime from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Now we have a more immediate crisis to worry about: a biological attack on the United States, which Iran is preparing.
A highly credible source within thesupreme leader's office has said the regime is actively working on its nuclear bomb program from three secret sites besides those already known to the International Atomic Energy Agency, and it has enough weaponized-grade uranium and, through North Korea, plutonium, for three nuclear bombs. It also has produced several extremely dangerous viral and bacterial weapons.
As of several months ago, the regime was working on arming its missiles with nuclear warheads. It has armed 37 ballistic missiles and many cluster bombs with microbial weapons.
The Iranian government thinks the Obama administration's efforts to reach a negotiated solution with Iran and normalize relations have bought it time to reach the nuclear capability it has today.
The Kuwaiti newspaper Alrai last week reported that Mr. Obama has stated his willingness to travel to Iran and meet with the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, to open the doors of America and the West to Iran and recognize its role in the region if the Iranians would agree to a negotiated solution over their nuclear program.
While Mr. Obama pushed his agenda, Russia and North Korea helped the regime with its nuclear and biologicalprograms . With more than 1,000 ballistic missiles in the nation's inventory , the radicals ruling Iran are able to target not only Israel and all U.S. bases in the Middle East, but also capitals in Europe. Iran soon will have the capability, with North Korea's help, to target any point on the planet as it completes its intercontinental ballistic missile program. That was underscored recently by North Korea's successful test of a three-stage rocket, showing its ability to build an ICBM.
The lure of negotiations gave the Islamic regime exactly what it was looking for -- time -- something that still haunts the West as it pushes for further dialogue, knowing full well that Iran indeed has crossed the red line. Yet, weary of war, the West has allowed a much more dangerous situation to take place in which any confrontation now will be much more devastating than before.
The source also provided valuable information on terrorist teams that have infiltrated America, France and Germany, getting ready for attacks on the scale of Sept. 11, 2001, if not greater, should the West further increase sanctions or gear up for confrontation with Iran over its illicit nuclear program.
The information, which has been passed on to U.S. officials, is being taken seriously, and it is clear that there is a good understanding of the threat Iran poses to America and world stability.
What makes it worse is that Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and other terrorist proxies of the Iranian government have been armed with microbial weapons. Chemical and microbial weapons have been transferred to Iran's proxies in the region. However, Iranian scientists, with the help of Russia, are working on 18 biological agents and already have developed several, including anthrax, encephalitis, SARS, Ebola, cholera, smallpox and the plague.
Most disturbing, though, is that with the help of North Korea, Iran has managed to genetically alter smallpox so Western vaccines will be worthless against it. Iran is working out of several sites on projects to make insects the carriers of diseases such as the plague, the "Black Death" that killed one-third of Europe's population during the Middle Ages.
The regime also knows that once its medium-range ballistic missiles and ICBMs armed with nuclear warheads are operational, the U.S. deterrent umbrella in the region will be undermined, as America itself could become a target.
More important, Iran will become the domino player in the stability of the Strait of Hormuz, through which more than 20 percent of the world's petroleum passes. Knowing quite well that a full-blown war and a nuclear exchange in the oil-rich region could collapse the global economy, sending the world into the greatest depression it has seen, the world will become hostage to the goals of the radicals ruling Iran, who already are threatening the existence of Israel and inciting rebellion against U.S.-friendly governments in the region. Moreover, Iran has terror cells on the world stage, with a big presence in Africa and Latin America, that threaten the stability of Western countries.
In recent days, the media of the Islamic regime have been celebrating the probable new appointees in Mr. Obama's second term, calling John F. Kerry and Chuck Hagel Iran-friendly and stating that the president will continue his policy of dialogue rather than confrontation with Iran.
Washington must recognize that the lure of negotiations can no longer serve our national interests and that our security is on the line. It must act immediately with our European allies to drastically increase pressure on the regime politically and economically, while at the same time through various means help the Iranian people, the majority of whom resent their radical rulers, in their fight for change from within.
Mr. Obama must realize that negotiations and sanctions will not lead the Islamists to change course. It is not about the economy -- it is the ideology. Now more than ever, the president must accept and act on this fact, as millions of lives are on the line.
Reza Kahlili is a pseudonym for an ex-CIA spy who requires anonymity for safety reasons. He is a senior fellow with EMPact America and the author of A Time to Betray, a book about his double-life as a CIA agent in Iran's Revolutionary Guards, published by Threshold Editions, Simon & Schuster, April 2010. A Time to Betray was the winner of the 2010 National Best Book Award and the 2011 International Best Book Award.
4)
As the Syrian civil war grows nastier and nastier, there is a growing consensus among mainstream Westernpolicy analysts that the United States can best combat the growth of jihadist groups battling Syrian president Bashar al-Assad by patronizing a more respectable coterie of rebels fighting alongside them. While there may be some reasonable grounds for considering U.S. intervention in the conflict, this isn't one of them.
According to the emerging conventional wisdom, the jihadist surge is fueled by the international community's failure tosupport the predominantly Sunni Arab Syrian population's fight against Assad's Iranian-backed, Alawite-dominated regime. While Western governments have been unwilling to intervene militarily or provide weapons, the global Sunni Salafi-jihadist movement has poured money, men and material into the country, enabling its leaders to win support "from a population that would otherwise ignore them."
Interventionists argue that American sponsorship of carefully vetted rebel units will counter these effects by bringing the civil war to an end sooner, closing the resource gap between moderates and extremists in the eventually-to-be victorious Sunni Arab opposition, and bolstering U.S. leverage over the successor regime.
To be sure, expediting an end to the conflict and the restoration of a functioning unitary state would do much to solve the problem. Jihadists surge wherever weakened state institutions in the Islamic world provide opportunities to organize, recruit followers, or kill perceived unbelievers. Conditions in Syria, where a majority Sunni Muslim population is being brutalized daily by a secular non-Sunni dictatorship that can't control its own territory or borders, have made it an extremely permissive environment for Islamists.
But even if an American infusion of arms into the Syrian arena could "ensure the collapse of the Assad regime in weeks," as some interventionists implausibly maintain, it wouldn't necessarily bring a "faster resolution to the fighting." Many Alawites are sure to fight on in the hinterlands of northwestern Syria so long as Iran is willing to supply them, while the country's Kurdish minority won't be eager to relinquish control of its remote enclaves to the likes of those now leading the rebel effort. Christian militias in Aleppo may not disband quietly. The rebels may turn on each other. Chronic ethno-sectarian and factional conflict could drag on for years.
Syria hawks maintain that if the United States arms and finances combatants, it will ameliorate this rocky transition by ensuring that "weapons go to those advocating a non-sectarian, decent political system for Syria and are denied to those seeking a sectarian outcome." Yet even if such outward distinctions can be taken at face value, increasing the material resources available to "moderates" won't make less resources available to Al-Qaeda affiliates (and might even free up their resources for more nefarious aims).
Those who claim otherwise are assuming that Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other Arab Gulf monarchies will end their covert support for jihadist groups if Washington helps pacify Syria. But they have little incentive to support a secular-democratic political model that might inspire their own subjects to demand freedom, and still less to take action that might threaten the political quietism of Islamists at home. A large U.S. footprint in Syria won't change these considerations and may actually discourage more responsible behavior among these Middle Eastern kingdoms—they could go on doing what they're doing without worrying that Al-Qaeda will take over the country.
In any event, resources aren't the only cause of the Islamist surge. Though most Syrian Sunnis do not embrace the jihadist message, the messengers are popular because they have proven themselves bolder and braver than their not-quite-so-god-fearing counterparts. While Jabhat al-Nusra comprises less than 10 percent of the fighters loosely organized under the Free Syrian Army (FSA) banner, moderate FSA commanders estimate that members of the jihadist group account for a majority of those killed and wounded in recent months, in large part from charging heavily defended regime outposts. They have also proven themselves more capable of delivering public services and combating petty crime in areas under their control, and less prone to murderous internal feuds. Even if U.S.-backed groups managed to gain preeminence on the battlefield, it is naïve to expect that they could be persuaded to square off against those who have played such a celebrated role in bringing the Assad regime to its knees.
Unfortunately, there is little the United States can do to counteract the glaring Islamization of rebel ranks (and accompanying Alawite retrenchment) in Syria. But what little it can and must do is very simple: browbeat Arab governments into cutting off the regional support networks of those who preach sectarian hatred while keeping distance from a rebellion that is steadily abandoning the moral high ground.
Gary C. Gambill is an associate fellow at the Philadelphia-based Middle East Forum.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)
The Costs of U.S. Retreat
Al Qaeda revives in Iraq and Syria's contagion spreads to Lebanon.
Americans want to forget about Iraq and Syria, especially since President Obama walked back from his bombing threat in September, but Syria and Iraq haven't forgotten America. The contagion from Syria's civil war is spilling across borders in ways that are already requiring U.S. involvement and may eventually cost American lives.
The casualties include the stability of Lebanon, which like Syria is riven by Shiite-Sunni divisions. Thousands of Shiite Hezbollah militia have joined the war on behalf of Syrian strongman Bashar Assad, and the opposition is retaliating with a terror campaign inside Lebanon.
Lebanese investigators inspect the damage at the scene in Beirut, Lebanon, 03 January 2014, where of a large car bomb went off on 02 January. European Pressphoto Agency
An al Qaeda affiliate took credit for the car bomb that exploded on Thursday in a residential neighborhood of Beirut that is a Hezbollah stronghold. This followed the car-bombing murder of Sunni moderate Mohamad Chatah a week earlier that had the hallmarks of Hezbollah. The Saudis recently pledged $3 billion to turn the Lebanon military into a viable counterforce to Hezbollah.
Meanwhile, our Journal colleagues report that Hezbollah has smuggled advanced antiship missile systems into Lebanon from Syria. The missiles are intended for use against Israel, which has attacked arms shipments headed for Lebanon at least five times in the last year.
The dangers are that the violence in Lebanon devolves into another civil war, or that Hezbollah provokes Israel into a response like the 2006 war. Hezbollah already has upwards of 100,000 missiles, many of them unsophisticated Katyushas, but two or three times the number it had in 2006. Hezbollah may be stockpiling higher-quality missiles in order to retaliate after an Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear program or on another arms shipment. This could escalate into another war.
Syria's contagion is also spilling into Iraq with the revival of al Qaeda in neighboring Anbar province. Anbar was the heart of the Sunni insurgency in Iraq after the U.S. invasion in 2003, and American soldiers paid dearly to reclaim cities like Ramadi and Fallujah. Al Qaeda was defeated when Sunni tribal chiefs turned on them amid the U.S. troop surge in 2007.
But now al Qaeda is coming back, thanks to the heavy-handed sectarian rule of Shiite Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and to the rise of jihadists in Syria. The U.S. refusal to help the moderate Syrian opposition has given the advantage to Sunni jihadists, including many from Europe and probably the U.S. too. Much of eastern Syria is now controlled by the al-Nusrah front or the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, and they move with ease back and forth into Iraq. Men flying the flag of al Qaeda took over large parts of Ramadi and Fallujah last week, ousting the Iraq army.
Editorial board member Matt Kaminski on the spillover from Syria's civil war. Photos: AP
The Iraqis are promising a counterattack to retake Fallujah, but insurgencies aren't easily beaten when they have support in the local population. Many local Sunni leaders no longer trust the Maliki government, which may not be able to protect them against al Qaeda reprisals.
The U.S. recently supplied Mr. Maliki with Hellfire missiles to use against the insurgency, and he wants American intelligence and drone support. It's clearly in the U.S. interest to defeat the jihadists. If al Qaeda can operate with impunity in Anbar, it could develop safe havens from which it can plot attacks outside Iraq. As we learned from Afghanistan before 2001, that includes attacks on the U.S.
The best use of such aid would be as part of a counterinsurgency campaign to win back the Sunni population. But the U.S. gave up most of its leverage with Mr. Maliki when President Obama chose to leave Iraq in toto to serve his re-election theme that "the tide of war is receding." It would have been far better for U.S. security to have kept 5,000 or 10,000 troops, as well as air and intelligence assets, as a bulwark against al Qaeda's revival and Iran's regional dominance.
Mr. Obama's retreat has squandered the gains of the surge, and now we're slowly being dragged back in. Secretary of State John Kerry said on Sunday that the U.S. is "very, very concerned" about events in Iraq but that the U.S. won't send troops because "this is their fight." That's true until jihadists based in Iraq attack U.S. targets. If the Iraq insurgency grows, don't be surprised if Mr. Obama is urged to send in military advisers.
President Obama and the Rand Paul Republicans want Americans to believe we can avoid the world's conflicts with good intentions and strategic retreat. The costs and consequences of that retreat are now becoming clear in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and beyond. Those costs may end up being far greater than if we had stayed engaged in Iraq and attempted to help the moderate opposition in Syria.
2a)
How Al Qaeda Terrorized Its Way Back in Iraq
As the country edges closer to civil war, much of the blame goes to Prime Minister Maliki—and the White House.
The climactic battles of the American War in Iraq were fought in Anbar Province, with U.S. forces at great cost retaking the city of Fallujah at the end of 2004 and Ramadi, the provincial capital, in 2006-07. The latter success was sparked by an unlikely alliance with tribal fighters that turned around what had been a losing war effort and made possible the success of what became known as "the surge." By 2009, violence had fallen more than 90%, creating an unexpected opportunity to build a stable, democratic and prosperous country in the heart of the Middle East.
It is now obvious that this opportunity has been squandered, with tragic consequences for the entire region. In recent days the Iraqi army appears to have been pushed, at least temporarily, out of Fallujah and Ramadi by al Qaeda in Iraq militants. A battle is raging for control of Anbar Province with some tribal fighters supporting the government and others AQI. Mosul, the major city of northern Iraq and a longtime hotbed of AQI activity, could be next to fall. If it does, AQI would gain effective control of the Sunni Triangle, an area north and west of Baghdad the size of New England.
AQI's control would stretch beyond the Sunni Triangle because its offshoot, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, dominates a significant portion of Syrian territory across the border. This creates the potential for a new nightmare: an al Qaeda state incorporating northern Syria and western Iraq.
A man shows off the V-sign for victory as he stand on top of a burn out truck on the side of the main highway leading West out of Baghdad to Fallujah, on January 5, 2014. Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
Even if this worst-case scenario does not come to pass—even if Mosul holds and even if the Iraqi army succeeds in regaining control of Ramadi and Fallujah—the odds of Iraq becoming embroiled, like Syria, in a full-blown civil war are growing by the day. Iraq is almost there already: The United Nations reports that last year 8,868 Iraqis were killed, the highest death toll since the dark days of 2008. Car bombings have become such a regular occurrence that they barely make the news.
What happened? How did Iraq go from relatively good to god-awful in the last two years?
The chief culprit is al Qaeda, which has shown a disturbing but nevertheless impressive ability to bounce back from near-defeat. But it would never have been able to do so if it did not enjoy significant support among the Sunni population of Anbar, Ninewah, Diyala and other provinces. When the group lost that support in 2007, AQI's operatives were quickly rolled up. Today it enjoys freedom to maneuver because it has the backing of many Sunnis who now see it as a defender against a predatory, sectarian Shiite government.
Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has no one but himself to blame. If he had embraced the Sunni Awakening movement, Iraq likely would have remained relatively peaceful. Instead, the moment that U.S. troops left Iraq, he immediately began victimizing prominent Sunnis.
In December 2011 Mr. Maliki sent his security forces to arrest Vice President Tariq al-Hashemi, who escaped but was sentenced to death in absentia based on the testimony of his bodyguards, allegedly extracted under torture. In December 2012, security forces arrested the bodyguards of Raffi al-Essawi, a former finance minister, and other leading Sunni politicians. Mr. Essawi narrowly missed winding up in prison. Another prominent Sunni parliamentarian, Ahmed al-Awlani, was arrested just a few days ago, on Dec. 28, after a gunfight between his bodyguards and Iraqi security forces that left his brother dead.
Mr. Awlani's arrest set off the events that culminated in al Qaeda fighters, dressed in black, parading through the streets of Fallujah and Ramadi. Mr. Maliki reacted to protests over Mr. Awlani's detention by sending his security forces to close down a protest camp in Ramadi. This sparked major fighting, with many Sunni leaders in Anbar urging their followers to resist government troops under the orders of a Shiite regime. Sheikh Abdul Malek al Saadi's message, translated by the Institute for the Study of War, was typical: "Oh heroes of Fallujah and other towns. Cut the road and prevent Maliki's troops from reaching your brothers in the heart of Anbar. Maliki wants to wipe out every one of the people he dislikes, using the antiterrorism pretext again."
Not all is necessarily lost. While some Anbar sheiks have cast their lot with AQI, others continue to side with the government and cooperate with local police, if not with the Iraqi army. Most prominent has been Sheikh Ahmed Abu Risha, one of the Sunni Awakening leaders. On Jan. 1 he called on his followers to fight against AQI's attempts "to commit their crimes, to cut off the heads, blow up houses, kill scholars and disrupt life."
Iraq may once again stumble back from the brink of all-out civil war. But it is unlikely to recover the promise of 2009-11—in retrospect, a mini-golden age—because Mr. Maliki is unlikely to mend his ways.
What Iraq needs now is what it saw in 2007 when Gen. David Petraeus orchestrated a full-blown counterinsurgency strategy. Such a strategy has many facets, but one of the most important is a political "line of operations," which in this case means fostering reconciliation between the prime minister and tribal leaders of Anbar.
The U.S. lost most of its leverage to do that when it foolishly pulled its troops out of Iraq at the end of 2011 after the failure of halfhearted negotiations overseen by Vice President Joe Biden. Selling Iraq Hellfire missiles, as the Obama administration has just done, is a poor substitute. It is positively destructive because it only further inflames the situation and creates the impression that the Americans are siding with militant Shiites in a sectarian civil war.
Washington should make clear that military and intelligence help, which Baghdad has requested, will be forthcoming only if Mr. Maliki extends an open hand, rather than a clenched fist, to his country's Sunnis.
Mr. Boot is a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and author of "Invisible Armies: An Epic History of Guerrilla Warfare from Ancient Times to the Present" (Liveright, 2013)
2b)
|
And yet he got elected, not once but twice. Thanks to those that did not think it was important to vote for freedom and those that were willing to give up their freedoms for entitlements.
Remember you don't have to be on a southern plantation to be a slave, if you are dependent on government entitlements you just have a different slave owner.
2c)
Obama's Engagement with Mullahs Has Only Bought Them Time
Reza Kahlili
Family Security Matters
Family Security Matters
Almost four years after President Obama tried to engage the radical leaders of Iran, it is too late to stop the Islamic regime from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Now we have a more immediate crisis to worry about: a biological attack on the United States, which Iran is preparing.
A highly credible source within the
As of several months ago, the regime was working on arming its missiles with nuclear warheads. It has armed 37 ballistic missiles and many cluster bombs with microbial weapons.
The Iranian government thinks the Obama administration's efforts to reach a negotiated solution with Iran and normalize relations have bought it time to reach the nuclear capability it has today.
The Kuwaiti newspaper Alrai last week reported that Mr. Obama has stated his willingness to travel to Iran and meet with the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, to open the doors of America and the West to Iran and recognize its role in the region if the Iranians would agree to a negotiated solution over their nuclear program.
While Mr. Obama pushed his agenda, Russia and North Korea helped the regime with its nuclear and biological
The lure of negotiations gave the Islamic regime exactly what it was looking for -- time -- something that still haunts the West as it pushes for further dialogue, knowing full well that Iran indeed has crossed the red line. Yet, weary of war, the West has allowed a much more dangerous situation to take place in which any confrontation now will be much more devastating than before.
The source also provided valuable information on terrorist teams that have infiltrated America, France and Germany, getting ready for attacks on the scale of Sept. 11, 2001, if not greater, should the West further increase sanctions or gear up for confrontation with Iran over its illicit nuclear program.
The information, which has been passed on to U.S. officials, is being taken seriously, and it is clear that there is a good understanding of the threat Iran poses to America and world stability.
What makes it worse is that Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and other terrorist proxies of the Iranian government have been armed with microbial weapons. Chemical and microbial weapons have been transferred to Iran's proxies in the region. However, Iranian scientists, with the help of Russia, are working on 18 biological agents and already have developed several, including anthrax, encephalitis, SARS, Ebola, cholera, smallpox and the plague.
Most disturbing, though, is that with the help of North Korea, Iran has managed to genetically alter smallpox so Western vaccines will be worthless against it. Iran is working out of several sites on projects to make insects the carriers of diseases such as the plague, the "Black Death" that killed one-third of Europe's population during the Middle Ages.
The regime also knows that once its medium-range ballistic missiles and ICBMs armed with nuclear warheads are operational, the U.S. deterrent umbrella in the region will be undermined, as America itself could become a target.
More important, Iran will become the domino player in the stability of the Strait of Hormuz, through which more than 20 percent of the world's petroleum passes. Knowing quite well that a full-blown war and a nuclear exchange in the oil-rich region could collapse the global economy, sending the world into the greatest depression it has seen, the world will become hostage to the goals of the radicals ruling Iran, who already are threatening the existence of Israel and inciting rebellion against U.S.-friendly governments in the region. Moreover, Iran has terror cells on the world stage, with a big presence in Africa and Latin America, that threaten the stability of Western countries.
In recent days, the media of the Islamic regime have been celebrating the probable new appointees in Mr. Obama's second term, calling John F. Kerry and Chuck Hagel Iran-friendly and stating that the president will continue his policy of dialogue rather than confrontation with Iran.
Washington must recognize that the lure of negotiations can no longer serve our national interests and that our security is on the line. It must act immediately with our European allies to drastically increase pressure on the regime politically and economically, while at the same time through various means help the Iranian people, the majority of whom resent their radical rulers, in their fight for change from within.
Mr. Obama must realize that negotiations and sanctions will not lead the Islamists to change course. It is not about the economy -- it is the ideology. Now more than ever, the president must accept and act on this fact, as millions of lives are on the line.
Reza Kahlili is a pseudonym for an ex-CIA spy who requires anonymity for safety reasons. He is a senior fellow with EMPact America and the author of A Time to Betray, a book about his double-life as a CIA agent in Iran's Revolutionary Guards, published by Threshold Editions, Simon & Schuster, April 2010. A Time to Betray was the winner of the 2010 National Best Book Award and the 2011 International Best Book Award.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You may know that El Al (Israel 's National Airline) and JetBlue recently signed an agreement to provide connecting options for customers flying between the United States and Israel.
You don't have to be Jewish to understand all of these... but it helps. :)
Copy of a leaked memo from El Al to JetBlue employees Subject: Unique aspects of flying to Israel
Dear JetBlue employees:
Welcome to the El Al family - or as we say in Hebrew, Bruchim haba'im!
We're so excited about our new partnership. We here at Israel's national air carrier are eager to make this transition as smooth as possible and thought it would be helpful to sensitize you to some of the cultural differences you may encounter with your new customer base.
Security lines: Passengers are instructed to arrive at the airport six hours before a flight. This may seem excessive, but Israel 's crack security service demands it on the theory that no terrorist would be dedicated enough to spend six hours in a crowd of Jews.
The six-hour time period allows our security team to ask essential questions of our passengers, including "Do you have family in Israel ? Where do they live? What is the purpose of your visit?"
It also allows time for the person behind you in line to ask the very same questions, in even greater detail. What you might call "intrusive rudeness" is merely what our people call "Jewish geography."
Luggage: We allow each passenger to stow luggage weighing up to 6,000 pounds. Again, this may seem generous by American standards, but it is in response to our passengers' need to bring books for their cousins in B'nei Brak, appliances for their neighbors' in-laws in French Hill, and industrial-size boxes of M & M's for Israeli soldiers.
Boarding: We board our flights for maximum efficiency, in the following order:
- Families with young children, families with six or more young children, families with eight or more young children,
- individuals with physical limitations, individuals with aches and pains that may be something but they won't know until they see a specialist,
- individuals who cut in line.
Carry-on luggage: You may not think a double stroller, six Borsalino hat boxes and a Samsung flat-screen television are able to fit in an overhead bin, but please don't underestimate our passengers.
During this portion of the flight it might be a good idea for flight
attendants to retreat to the galley and have a beer. Or two.
Safety instructions: Hebrew is written from right to left. Similarly, in order to accommodate our passengers' unique sensibility, our instructions are delivered backward.
- When we say, "Please do NOT stow items under the seat in front of you," our passengers think, "I'll damn well stow my items anywhere I want to," before stowing them under the seat in front of them.
- When we say, "Please move freely about the cabin," our passengers respond, "If they think I am budging from this seat, they have another thing coming." It works like a charm.
In-flight behavior: At some point during the lengthy overseas flight, bearded men will crowd the aisle, wrapped in leather straps and white shawls. Do not be alarmed. They will not ask you to join them!
Food service: As a Jewish airline, we serve clientele with unique dietary needs. Our choices include
- kosher,
- glatt kosher,
- kosher dairy,
- kosher meat,
- kosher pareve,
- glatt kosher dairy,
- gluten-free kosher meat,
- lactose-free kosher with nuts,
- lactose-free kosher without nuts,
- low-salt kosher pareve,
- high-salt gluten-free kosher meat
- and "just bring me a box of cereal and some milk."
Remain calm and do not reach for the emergency chute.
Landing: Passengers will often burst into applause when the plane touches down in Israel.
This is because:
a) they are deeply moved by the thought of arriving in the Land of their Ancestors;
b) they are still surprised, even after 60 years, that a Jew can safely pilot an airplane.
Your Friends at El Al
4)
The Folly of Arming Syria's Rebels
Gary C. Gambill
The National Interest
The National Interest
As the Syrian civil war grows nastier and nastier, there is a growing consensus among mainstream Western
According to the emerging conventional wisdom, the jihadist surge is fueled by the international community's failure to
Interventionists argue that American sponsorship of carefully vetted rebel units will counter these effects by bringing the civil war to an end sooner, closing the resource gap between moderates and extremists in the eventually-to-be victorious Sunni Arab opposition, and bolstering U.S. leverage over the successor regime.
To be sure, expediting an end to the conflict and the restoration of a functioning unitary state would do much to solve the problem. Jihadists surge wherever weakened state institutions in the Islamic world provide opportunities to organize, recruit followers, or kill perceived unbelievers. Conditions in Syria, where a majority Sunni Muslim population is being brutalized daily by a secular non-Sunni dictatorship that can't control its own territory or borders, have made it an extremely permissive environment for Islamists.
But even if an American infusion of arms into the Syrian arena could "ensure the collapse of the Assad regime in weeks," as some interventionists implausibly maintain, it wouldn't necessarily bring a "faster resolution to the fighting." Many Alawites are sure to fight on in the hinterlands of northwestern Syria so long as Iran is willing to supply them, while the country's Kurdish minority won't be eager to relinquish control of its remote enclaves to the likes of those now leading the rebel effort. Christian militias in Aleppo may not disband quietly. The rebels may turn on each other. Chronic ethno-sectarian and factional conflict could drag on for years.
Syria hawks maintain that if the United States arms and finances combatants, it will ameliorate this rocky transition by ensuring that "weapons go to those advocating a non-sectarian, decent political system for Syria and are denied to those seeking a sectarian outcome." Yet even if such outward distinctions can be taken at face value, increasing the material resources available to "moderates" won't make less resources available to Al-Qaeda affiliates (and might even free up their resources for more nefarious aims).
Those who claim otherwise are assuming that Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other Arab Gulf monarchies will end their covert support for jihadist groups if Washington helps pacify Syria. But they have little incentive to support a secular-democratic political model that might inspire their own subjects to demand freedom, and still less to take action that might threaten the political quietism of Islamists at home. A large U.S. footprint in Syria won't change these considerations and may actually discourage more responsible behavior among these Middle Eastern kingdoms—they could go on doing what they're doing without worrying that Al-Qaeda will take over the country.
In any event, resources aren't the only cause of the Islamist surge. Though most Syrian Sunnis do not embrace the jihadist message, the messengers are popular because they have proven themselves bolder and braver than their not-quite-so-god-fearing counterparts. While Jabhat al-Nusra comprises less than 10 percent of the fighters loosely organized under the Free Syrian Army (FSA) banner, moderate FSA commanders estimate that members of the jihadist group account for a majority of those killed and wounded in recent months, in large part from charging heavily defended regime outposts. They have also proven themselves more capable of delivering public services and combating petty crime in areas under their control, and less prone to murderous internal feuds. Even if U.S.-backed groups managed to gain preeminence on the battlefield, it is naïve to expect that they could be persuaded to square off against those who have played such a celebrated role in bringing the Assad regime to its knees.
Unfortunately, there is little the United States can do to counteract the glaring Islamization of rebel ranks (and accompanying Alawite retrenchment) in Syria. But what little it can and must do is very simple: browbeat Arab governments into cutting off the regional support networks of those who preach sectarian hatred while keeping distance from a rebellion that is steadily abandoning the moral high ground.
Gary C. Gambill is an associate fellow at the Philadelphia-based Middle East Forum.
No comments:
Post a Comment