+++
Self-CPR during a heart attack. Please take two minutes of your time and read this:* 1. Let's say it's 7:25 PM, and you're heading home (alone, of course) after an especially tough day at work.
2. You're really tired, agitated, and frustrated.
3. Suddenly, you start experiencing severe chest pain. The pain continues down your arm and up to your jaw. You're about 5 km away from the nearest hospital.
4. Unfortunately, you don't know if you'll be able to make it there.
5. You're trained in performing CPR, but the person who taught you didn't explain how to do it on yourself.
6. How to survive a heart attack when you're alone? Since many people are alone when they suffer a heart attack and the heart's rhythm becomes incorrect, leading to weakness, there are only 10 seconds before losing consciousness.
7. However, these victims can help themselves by coughing forcefully and repeatedly. A deep breath should be taken before each cough, and the cough must be deep and prolonged, as if trying to produce phlegm from deep within the chest. Breathe and cough (repeat this every two seconds without stopping) until help arrives or until you feel the heart beating normally again.
8. Deep breaths bring oxygen into the lungs, and coughing movements press on the heart and maintain blood circulation. The action of pressing on the heart helps it return to its regular rhythm. This way, heart attack victims can reach the hospital.
9. Tell as many people as possible. You can save lives!
10. A cardiologist says that if everyone who receives this message sends it to 10 people, we can save a life at least once.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jews, Communists and Democrats
By Ted Belman
I just began reading Blacklisted by History; The Untold Story of Joe McCarthy. It seeks to establish that many of the people that McCarthy targeted unsuccessfully were later proven to be communists. It brought back many memories for me.
I grew up in the forties and fifties. My father’s family, like many other Polish Jewish families in Canada, were avowed Communists. They were dedicated to Jewish rights, workers’ rights and marched in the streets to advance their causes. They even managed to get one of their own, J P Salsberg, elected to the Ontario legislature representing the Communist Party, then called the Labour-Progressive Party.
I was old enough to remember the heated debates on the trial and execution of the Rosenbergs, the Doctor’s Plot as alleged by Stalin, and the McCarthy hearings. I even watched the hearings on that newfangled device called television. I read the Bintel Brief and The Rise of David Levinsky by the editor of the Forward, Abraham Cahan. I was an avid reader of IB Singer, Bernard Malamud, Phillip Roth (I married a Communist), Irving Howe, Chaim Grade, Sholem Asch, I.J. Singer, and many others. I went beyond the tribe and read Theodore Dreiser, John dos Passos, Upton Sinclair, Sinclair Lewis and John Steinbeck. That was my generation. My Zionist readings had not yet begun.
Massive Jewish emigration from Russia to the U.S. was driven by a wave of anti-Jewish pogroms sponsored by the tsarist government after the assassination of Alexander II in 1881. Russia wanted to suppress those advocating reform. The minister of the Interior gave a speech in 1903 in which he said:
In Western Russia, some 90 per cent of the revolutionaries are Jews, and in Russia generally — some 40 per cent. I shall not conceal from you that the revolutionary movement in Russia worries us but you should know that if you do not deter your youth from the revolutionary movement, we shall make your position untenable to such an extent that you will have to leave Russia, to the very last man!
And so they did in huge numbers.
Wikipedia summarizes:
By 1924, two million Jews had arrived from Eastern Europe. Growing anti-immigration feelings in the United States at this time, resulted in the National Origins Quota of 1924 which severely restricted immigration from many regions including Eastern Europe. The Jewish community took the lead in opposing immigration restrictions, which remained in effect until 1965.
Thereafter, Jews came to Canada as their second choice. They included my father’s family, which were Communists, and my mother’s family, which were Zionists.
In the thirties, America was plagued by the Great Depression. I was proud of my father’s family because they fought for workers’ rights and a better world. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, on the promise of a New Deal, was elected president in 1932, an office he held until his death in 1945. The Jews, Communist or otherwise, worshiped Roosevelt. That worship was little diminished by Roosevelt’s failure to bomb the extermination camps or to allow Jews, even those fleeing the Holocaust, to enter the U.S. He would not allow the Jews on the St. Louis to disembark, leaving them to their fate, which was a return to Europe and death. It was of no concern to U.S. Jews that the New Deal was unconstitutional or ultimately was proven to have extended the Depression. And it was of no concern to the Jewish leadership that Jews were dying by the millions in the Holocaust.
The Jews remained loyal to the Democratic Party throughout. They also remained loyal to liberalism and secularism. Communism was embraced because it offered an antidote to discrimination and persecution as it existed in Russia and in America in the first half of the 20th century; you know, “Workers of the World, Unite!” Even though Communism proved to be a false God, duly noted by Koestler’s The God That Failed, the Jews continued their quest for equality and civil rights. They believe as a result, in the separation of church and state and the responsibility of the state to provide for those in need.
After 2,000 years of Christian antisemitism and discrimination, is it any wonder? To them, the present was never worth preserving. To the contrary, it needed to be transformed. First, the Jews focused on workers’ rights and union rights in America. Then they led the civil rights movement, which resulted in the liberation of blacks. Not that the blacks appreciated it. In fact, black antisemitism is very high compared to in other groups. They see the Jews as responsible for black exploitation rather than black liberation.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) was formed in 1920 by a group of radicals, socialists, and Communists whose purpose was to defend their fellow radicals. The founders were not Jewish. Twenty years later, the ACLU banned Communists from positions of leadership and from its staff. Over the years, Jews became very influential in this organization.
The ACLU’s stated goals were “to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country.” It was prominent in the Scopes trial of 1925, which hoped to ban the teaching of evolution in the public schools; it stood alone in fighting the internment camps for the Japanese after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor; and it paired with the NAACP to challenge racial segregation in public schools. The resulting Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education that ended the era of “separate but equal” was a major victory for racial justice. The ACLU was also involved in the 1973 Supreme Court victories in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, which held that the right to privacy encompasses a woman’s right to decide whether she will terminate or continue a pregnancy. It even fought in defense of freedom of speech, for the rights of Nazis to march against Jews in Skokie, Illinois. It led the attack against the Patriot Act.
The ACLU’s activities have been characterized as anti-God, anti-American, and anti-family, all notable communist goals. Yet the ACLU did what it did in the name of individual rights. Although the ACLU lobbies Congress and state legislatures, its accomplishments derive chiefly from judges who share the ACLU’s view of the Constitution as a “living document.” There is little if any daylight between them and the Democratic Party and Barack Obama. And they are all pro-uncontrolled immigration.
A fellow traveler of the ACLU is the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which was formed in 1913 “to stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all.” It has served a useful purpose and has done good work but, according to Bill Levinson, has strayed from its charter. Levinson charges that “[t]he ADL has also become a facilitator and enabler of the very hate-mongers it claims to oppose,” that it shilled for President Obama by proposing “National Pledge for Unity on Israel,” that it was and is an advocate against Second Amendment Rights to bear arms, and that it is a defender of sharia.
Rabbi Nachum Shifren is not so kind. He writes,
“The ADL has nothing to do with Judaism, Jews, or Jewish Survival. It is a collection of communists, anarchists, Jewish 60’s [sic] drop-outs, bitter about their nothing status and eager to spread their venom about a socialist paradise at which they believe only they can succeed. (The earlier Bolsheviks and Trotskyite’s [sic], they assure us, just didn’t get it right.! [sic])” (Emphases in the original.)
Unfortunately, liberal Jews don’t see it that way. They continue to worship the ACLU and the ADL.
Is it any wonder, then, that 78% of the Jews voted for Barack Obama in ’08 and his goal of “transformation of America,” notwithstanding his pro-Palestinian and anti-American running dogs? Most Jews still support Obama, notwithstanding his very anti-Israel policies.
This is not to say that all Jews, or even many of them, are Communists or anti-Americans. They aren’t. America has been good to them, and they know it. Having been denied civil and human rights for at least a thousand years, they have become fierce defenders of such rights as they see them.
It has been said of the Jews that they earn like Episcopalians and vote like Hispanics. Obviously their economic success and connection to Israel are not enough to separate them from the Democratic Party. The two groups are joined at the hip.
NOTE: This article was also published by AMERICAN THINKER. It elicited a great many comments which I found very interesting
Ben-Gvir: ‘Otzma Yehudit will not support negotiations’
By T. Belman.
Netanyahu has already caved. No surprise there. This fight is not about democracy. It is a fight over values. Do we want the High Court to continue to impose its liberal values or do we want the Knesset to have the say over what values are important to the Jewish state. There is no way that the left will concede on its liberal values so it must be forced to.
Miister Ben-Gvir declared that his party would not support the renewed negotiations on the judicial reform at the President’s house.
Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir today (Monday) criticized the resumption of talks at the President’s Residence and made it clear that Otzma Yehudit would not support the move.
“I am in favor of negotiations, but against surrender,” clarified Minister Ben-Gvir and explained that “the reform is important for the State of Israel, it will balance the three authorities – the legislative, executive and judicial branches. Surrender in the President’s House means humiliating more than half of the people.”
According to him, “Surrender in the President’s Residence means a violation of right-wing values. Otzma Yehudit will not support this. I call on my friends, the heads of the coalition, make your voice heard, let’s go against the surrender.”
The Prime Minister’s Office responded, “Prime Minister Netanyahu is working to exhaust every possibility to reach a national agreement that will bring balance between the three authorities. If such an agreement is reached – no one will prevent its implementation.”
Minister Akunis’ office responded and clarified that the minister calls on all parties to continue their efforts to reach broad compromises and agreements that will be acceptable to a large majority of the Israeli public.
The office stated that “the majority of the people in Israel are now looking forward to calming tensions, to agreements and to opening the new year in a reconciled spirit, in view of the enormous challenges and opportunities facing the State of Israel, in the political, security and economic arenas”.
The minister’s office clarified that the announcement is not coordinated with the prime minister’s office nor at its request.<
Prime Minister Netanyahu reportedly wants to exhaust efforts to reach a compromise before announcing a unilateral softening of the planned reforms.
This morning, Gantz stated that he requires Netanyahu to “first prove his intentions and ability to stand behind his proposals or any proposal he receives.
He added: “In the last few days, the president advanced an outline in which I saw a base for widespread agreements that would protect the democracy and the value of a-politicization of the judiciary system and would give the other side an opportunity to influence to some degree because at the end of the day, the victory of one side or the surrender of the other will cost us dearly.”
“I see the president’s outline as a basis for progress towards agreements. If there is a solution on the table that will preserve democracy – I will be there, no matter what Netanyahu’s motivations are,” Gantz said.
++++++++++++++++++++++
No comments:
Post a Comment