Fani Willis’s Black Panther Father Was Live-In Lover w/ Commie Radical Angela Davis
By Mark Pellin - an editor at Headline USA..
The father of the Fulton County district attorney prosecuting Donald Trump wasn’t just a former Black Panther Party founder, but also the live-in lover of notorious 1960s radical activist Angela Davis, a two-time vice-presidential candidate for the Communist Party.
John Floyd III, the father of District Attorney Fani Willis, let slip during an interview that during the 1960s he was shacking-up with Davis, according to the Washington Examiner.
Floyd, who reportedly raised Willis as a single-dad and still maintains daily contact with her, explained his conjugal relationship with Davis during the ’60s.
“At that time, I was dating Angela Davis, and she and I were actually living together,” Floyd said during a rambling discussion about his exploits with infamous black activists Huey Newton, Bobby Seale and Stokely Carmichael.
In its breaking reporting earlier this month on Floyd’s relation to Fani Willis, the New York Post noted Floyd had “dated” Davis.
The Examiner expanded on that reporting in detail to include the pair’s live-in lover relationship based on Floyd’s interview with the Bradley Center for its “Black Panther Archives” series.
Davis has the dubious distinction of being only the third woman to make the FBI’s Most Wanted list after she “was accused of involvement in kidnappings and murders related to the armed seizure of a courthouse in Marin County, California,” the Post reported.
The botched 1970 jailbreak resulted in the killing of Superior Court Judge Harold Haley and three others.
Following 16 months in jail, she was acquitted by a friendly jury and has since enjoyed a distinguished career in left-wing academia while translating her prison time into a powerful tool for even more radical activism.
Angela Davis’ shadow over politics today is stunning. Not only is she mentor to the BLM activists who transform society. Turns out that Davis, the bootlicker of all communist dictators, was a live-in lover of Trump prosecutor Fani Willis’ dad. https://t.co/meRH8xE1QF via @nypost pic.twitter.com/XovdhZ1MSG
The radical Marxist trail of social unrest activism that Davis left in her wake has lifted her to icon status with BLM leaders, who consider her an “ideological mentor,” the Examiner reported.
What Fani Willis considers the former live-in lover of her father is unclear, as is any potential biological tie. The opaque history of Willis’s biological mother remains a mystery.
“Willis has claimed she was raised by a ‘single dad’ and it is unclear what happened to her mother,” the Post reported. “Floyd remarried in 1989 but his second wife died in 2012 due to complications from a brain tumor.”
The years in between are equally cloudy, but based on Floyd’s Bradley Center reveal, he was lovers with Davis around 1966 and the two reportedly remained close through their Black Panther activism and leadership roles. Davis was arrested in 1970. Willis was born in 1971.
The Post reported that Davis mentioned Floyd twice in her 1974 memoir, but didn’t say if they dated. Willis told the Post: “You’re not the first time I’ve ever heard that, let’s say that,” apparently in response to a question about Floyd’s relationship with Davis.
Probably only Fani and her father know the name of her actual mother. It’s a mystery that remains to be solved.
+++++++++++++++++++
If a bomb had hit this region, the scar would be no less severe on its landscape.
By Salena Zito
CAMPBELL, Ohio — Forty years ago, on Sept. 19, thousands of men walked into the Campbell Works of Youngstown Sheet and Tube along the Mahoning River before the early shift.
Like every fall morning, they were armed with lunch pails and hard hats; the only worry on their minds was the upcoming Pittsburgh Steelers game on “Monday Night Football.” The only arguing you heard was whether quarterback Terry Bradshaw had fully recovered from the dramatic hit he took from a Cleveland Browns player the season before.
It was just before 7 a.m., and the fog that had settled over the river was beginning to lift. As the sun began to streak through the mist, the men made their way into the labyrinth of buildings where they worked.
In the next hour, their lives would change forever.
From then on, this date in 1977 would be known as Black Monday in the Steel Valley, which stretches from Mahoning and Trumbull counties in Ohio eastward toward Pittsburgh. It is the date when Youngstown Sheet and Tube abruptly furloughed 5,000 workers in one day.
The bleeding never stopped.
Within the next 18 months, US Steel announced that the nation’s largest steel producer was also shutting down 16 plants across the nation, including their Ohio Works in Youngstown, a move that eliminated an additional 4,000 workers here. That announcement came one day before Jones and Laughlin Steel Corp. said they were cutting thousands of jobs at their facilities in the Mahoning Valley, too.
Within a decade, 40,000 jobs were gone. Within that same decade, 50,000 people had left the region, and by the next decade, that number was up to 100,000. Today the 22 miles of booming steel mills and the support industries that once lined the Mahoning River have mostly disappeared — either blown up, dismantled or reclaimed by nature.
Click for the full storyCartels sending migrant mobs of thousands to overwhelm the US border
By MaryAnn Martinez
Drug cartels are sieging the border by deliberately sending thousands of migrants a day to hand themselves over to Border Patrol officers in different US border towns, sources revealed to The Post.
The tactic is meant to tie up already overworked border agents so Mexico’s cartels can carry on their drug and human smuggling operations undisturbed in less populated areas, law enforcement officials explained.
A migrant group of 2,200 people turned themselves over to officers in Eagle Pass, Texas, Monday morning, according to Fox News, which showed video of the migrants lined up in blocks to be processed by Border Patrol.
Nearly 500 miles away in the western-most tip of the state, El Paso has also been seeing migrant surges in the last week.
Sources there said on Thursday alone some 1,700 migrants were encountered in a 24-hour period and every day since multiple groups of migrants numbering in the hundreds have lined up along the border wall to surrender to officers and claim asylum in the US.
The mass give-ups are being fueled by cartel lies including about the Biden administration’s CBP One app to schedule immigration appointments, multiple law enforcement sources told The Post.
“They’re circulating false information that anyone waiting for a CBP One appointment can turn themselves in and get asylum,” one source revealed.
Up to 500 mostly Venezuelan asylum-seekers lined up at El Paso Monday to cross into the US, according to local TV station KVIA.
The mix of single adults and families had crossed the border illegally but are hoping to stay in the US while their asylum cases are heard, a process which usually takes years.
“CBP is aware of reports that criminal organizations in the El Paso, Texas/Juarez, Mexico areas are spreading falsehoods and putting migrants’ lives at risk for their own financial gain,” US Customs and Border Protection, the Border Patrol’s parent agency, told The Post in a statement.
These rumors are absolutely false and yet another dangerous example of bad actors sharing bad information. The border is not open to illegal migration.”
City data showed over 4,000 people were in Border Patrol (CBP) custody in the city on Monday.
“The way it’s being orchestrated through the cartels, I believe it’s meant to overwhelm the system. The [places] that are being impacted the most are border communities,” former El Paso City Councilmember Claudia Rodriquez told The Post.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Will the president of The Univ. of Penn wake up, listen and realize she is destroying my alma mater?
+++
“Obscene Festival of Hate”: Open Letter to University of Pennsylvania President
As a recipient of federal funds, UPenn is also bound by its obligations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, including prevention of hostile and discriminatory environments for students.
We further wish to draw your attention to the fact that, as a recipient of federal funds, UPenn is also bound by its obligations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, including prevention of hostile and discriminatory environments for students, such as one that will inevitably be created as a result of this event.
If the organizers of the event wish to conduct this obscene festival of hate, they should not be afforded the privilege of doing so on university grounds, and sponsored by the university itself. Doing so would be not only a gross affront to the Jewish students and community on campus, it would also run contrary to UPenn’s mission of inclusion, respect and diversity, and be in breach of your federal legal obligations under the Civil Rights Act.
++++
President, University of Pennsylvania
Dear President Magill,
We write this letter to you on behalf of The International Legal Forum (ILF), an NGO and global network of over 4,000 lawyers and activists, including in the United States, committed to combating antisemitism and terror, and promoting peace in the Middle East.
We wish to convey our grave concern at the upcoming ‘Palestine Writes’ festival to be held at UPenn on 22-24th September, featuring speakers which have expressed highly inflammatory, racist and antisemitic views, as well as connections to US-designated terror groups and calls for the destruction of Israel.
The fact that this event is also happening during Yom Kippur, the holiest day of the Jewish calendar, is inexcusable, and only adds further offense and insult to the Jewish community.
Whilst we firmly believe in literature and culture as a form of expression, this event is not a celebration of art, but a festival of unhinged hate, bigotry and incitement against Jews. It is simply inconceivable that a university of UPenn’s stature, or any higher academic institution for that matter, would provide a platform for such unvarnished and blatant display of hatred, which would never be tolerated against any other minority, and nor should it be accepted with respect to Jewish students.
Some of the speakers scheduled to participate at the event for example, include the likes of Roger Waters, who has repeatedly engaged in antisemitism, including making such mendacious and racist claims about the “the Jewish lobby”. Mr. Waters is now being investigated by the German police, over engaging in Holocaust distortion, while wearing a mock-SS uniform during a recent series of concerts in the country. The US State Department has even said that Waters has “a long track record of using anti-Semitic tropes to denigrate Jewish people.”
Another speaker, Randa Abdel-Fattah, has previously claimed that “Israel is a demonic, sick project and I can’t way for the day we commemorate its end.”
Marc Lamont-Hill, also speaking at the festival, was previously fired by CNN, after calling for Israel’s destruction. He has also previously said that calls for Palestinians to “reject hatred and terrorism” was “offensive and counterproductive.” Meantime, Wisam Rafeedie, another speaker at the event, is a convicted member of US-designated terror group PFLP.
Susan Abulhawa, the executive director of ‘Palestine Writes’, has also previously expressed support for US-designated Palestinian terror groups Hamas, Islamic Jihad and PFLP, describing their terrorist actions, including those which have resulted in the murder of American citizens, as “self-defence by resistance groups”, while comparing Israel to Nazis and calling for a boycott of the Jewish state.
Is there truly no limit to the kind of unbridled Jew hatred and outright calls for incitement and display for terror, that will be directed at Jewish students and community on campus today, all in the purported name of ‘free speech’?
Whilst we acknowledge the statement released this week by UPenn leadership, including yourself, noting that some of the speakers at the event have a “troubling history of engaging in antisemitism by speaking and acting in ways that denigrate Jewish people”, with all due respect, the university’s statement and refusal to act in any meaningful manner, is woefully insufficient, flies in the face of the university’s legal obligations, and quite frankly, is utterly offensive to the Jewish community.
The fact that this public event is not organized by the university, as you claim, is besides the point. It is being held on university grounds, and is being sponsored, in part, by the University of Pennsylvania School of Arts and Sciences. There is no affirmative obligation upon the university to agree to hold such an event on your grounds, let alone sponsor it, especially when the university has a record of cancelling events in the past, following concerns raised by the student community, however, yet again, the concerns of the Jewish students and community here are being completely dismissed and ignored.
As Member of Congress and UPenn alumnus, Rep. Josh Gottheimer, wrote to you in a recent letter of 10th September, 2023, “While policy discussions and differing views are a welcome and critical part of building cultural understanding, they cannot provide a bully pulpit for those who seek to divide others. If the University’s goal is to promote mutual understanding and bring students together, it will fail so long as anti-Semites and anti-Israel advocates are given a platform to spew hatred.”
With anti-Semitism in the United States, including at universities, already at record high, events such as the upcoming ‘Palestine Writes’ festival, only exacerbate the already hostile environment faced by Jewish students, fanning the flames of Jew hatred and potentially leading to anti-Semitic harassment and violence on campus. We understand that these concerns have also been expressed to you directly by Jewish students at the university and the local Jewish community.
We further wish to draw your attention to the fact that, as a recipient of federal funds, UPenn is also bound by its obligations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, including prevention of hostile and discriminatory environments for students, such as one that will inevitably be created as a result of this event.
If the organizers of the event wish to conduct this obscene festival of hate, they should not be afforded the privilege of doing so on university grounds, and sponsored by the university itself. Doing so would be not only a gross affront to the Jewish students and community on campus, it would also run contrary to UPenn’s mission of inclusion, respect and diversity, and be in breach of your federal legal obligations under the Civil Rights Act.
Accordingly, we call on the university to immediately:
1. Disinvite the extremist, anti-Semitic and terror affiliated speakers above, from participating at the event;
2. Revoke any official university sponsorship from the festival; and
3. Rescind the approval to hold the event on campus grounds.
We also urge the university to formally adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) Working Definition of Antisemitism, to guide you in identifying, calling out and investigating instances of antisemitism and harassment of Jewish students on your campus, as testament to your commitment to combating anti-Jewish hatred and discrimination.
With antisemitism, incitement and violence against Jewish students on campus already at record high, there can be zero tolerance for such unchecked hate.
We await your urgent response.
Yours sincerely,
Arsen Ostrovsky
Attorney & CEO, The International Legal Forum
++++++++++++
How Biden Will Circle the Wagons
As impeachment becomes inevitable, the President's defense schemes are predictable
By Victor Davis Hanson
The strategies of saving the Biden presidency from an impeachment and a Senate trial despite overwhelming evidence of his corruption are starting to emerge.
The Family is confronted with damning evidence from the laptop, from the testimonies of Hunter’s business associates Bobulinksi and Archer, from Ukrainian oligarchs and Viktor Shokin, from IRS whistleblowers, from FBI writs, from a likely pseudonymous Biden trove of 4,000 emails to his son and associates, and from the absolute paranoia of a White House that must constantly change its narrative of denials to adjust to a growing portrait of utter corruption, bribery, and perhaps even the treason of warping U.S. policy to fit Biden family interests.
The Defense in Depth
One of their strategies is to deny, then hedge, then ignore, then grow silent—and repeat the wash/rinse/spin cycle of stonewalling as many times as necessary to evade the mounting truth.
Insidiously Joe Biden has retreated from his once loud protestations that he supposedly had no idea of what Hunter and his associates were doing. Such a patently dishonest denial set the model that the President would have no compunction about lying to the American people until the evidence of his wrongdoing becomes overwhelming.
But this first line of defense did not crumble for years—only to be replaced by a second line of denial: Biden may have known of Hunter’s shenanigans, but he had no business interests with him. That was another blatant untruth.
And that additional stalling also allowed Biden to ignore the closing walls of incrimination for even more months. When these two forward lines of defense collapsed, as the Biden consortium knew they eventually would, a retreat to a third line of defense followed: yes, Joe knew, after all, of Hunter’s miscreant shakedowns; and, yes, Joe, after all, conceded that from time to time he did meet Hunter’s business associates, and upon requests made phone calls to Hunter’s clientele. But he did not profit from such knowledge and associations. Instead an upright old Joe from Scranton was playing along with the “illusion” of influence peddling: Scranton naiveté is not D.C. criminality.
Biden’s tripartite lines of defense always got shorter and shallower as evidence mounted. But so far Biden has managed to consume 31 months of his presidency through these strategic retreats. His fourth and final line of defense will likely be that he was involved, that he had rather than feigned contact, but that he did nothing other than what scores of other high-ranking politicians do who rub shoulders with would-be miscreants, sycophants, and crooks—and so did not knowingly take “loans” and “gifts” that had strings attached.
To breach this fourth defense line, House Republicans will have to break through the labyrinth of Biden paywalls and find how much money was rerouted into Biden coffers. And then they must additionally compare what came into the Biden hands with a) what the family reported on their respective income tax returns, and b) whether their various properties and lifestyles were remotely possible without such massive hidden income. And getting bank records from the Bidens will be near impossible.
The Ukraine Factor
Joe Biden has successfully profited by using American foreign aid to stop prosecutorial inquiries into his son’s and, indirectly per the laptop admissions, his own quid pro quo payments from corrupt Ukrainians.
The firing of Viktor Shokin who knew of Hunter Biden’s corruption was one of the most blatantly corrupt and self-interested acts of a Vice President since the career of Spiro Agnew. Still, there is no reason why Biden would now give up such a proven successful strategy.
Yet there are important issues for Biden at stake. One, Viktor Shokin is convinced that the Bidens were recipients of Ukrainian bribes intended to win U.S. foreign aid and influence over American foreign policy in Eastern Europe and vis a vis Russia.
And two, an FBI confidential source has sworn that “a foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden allegedly has audio recordings of his conversations with them — 17 such recordings.” And three, to corroborate testimonies from these Ukrainian players or to subpoena the purported 17 recordings would now translate into risking the wrath of Joe Biden the giver of massive Ukrainian military aid—now likely over $100 billion—and formerly on record of being perfectly willing to cancel Ukrainian aid unless Kyiv bent to his personal agenda.
Now in an existential war, Ukrainians will likely not wish either Viktor Shokin or Mykola Zlochevsky, former head of Burisma and said to be in possession of the 17 recordings (including two that purportedly involve Joe Biden directly), to embarrass much less help to remove Biden by producing evidence confirming their charges.
So we should assume the Ukrainian government will do its best to protect Biden from fellow Ukrainian accusers, mostly by silencing any Ukrainian who would dare endanger their stream of arms and money. For Kyiv, the ongoing Biden exemption from impeachment and conviction is likely seen as a matter of life and death.
The Big Lie
A third defense has been outright lying, the bolder and more absurd, all the better. Here Joe Biden has prepped the lying battlefield, whether deliberately or inadvertently, both through his pathological fabrications about his autobiography and the events of our time, and by the collapse of his cognitive facilities.
Either way, his lies are contextualized by the media as “that’s just ole Joe spinning his tales.” In Biden’s fantasy world, he visited Ground Zero the day after the September 11 attacks, he taught a course on “political theory” at the University of Pennsylvania, his son Beau came home from Iraq in a coffin, and a catastrophic fire nearly consumed the Biden residence.
All these were not only lies, but callous lies that played on the emotions of those in crisis and suffering—to the purported empathetic advantage of Joe Biden himself. So Biden has no compunction of lying ad infinitum.
Remember, for years he lied that he fired Shokin because he was corrupt, that his government knew that, that the Europeans agreed, and that he did not leverage U.S. aid to ensure Shokin did not pursue Hunter’s Burisma nefariousness.
All that was a total lie, but a media-protected lie nonetheless that served Biden well for at least five years.
So we should expect the Left to embrace the full Biden lie and claim his serial contact with Hunter was the natural concern of a dutiful father, one who has suffered family tragedies and merely periodically called and emailed to cement family solidarity with other equally aggrieved Biden's.
And when evidence mounts that Biden really did receive funds via Hunter’s dummy companies we will be told that these were loans, or Joe was gifting them to grandchildren—or, most likely, Joe was completely unaware that such funds eventually found their way into his bank accounts and were used to buy and rent his various sumptuous residences.
Trump 24/7
At each stage of the walls closing around Joe Biden, a commensurate “Trump did it” news bulletin emerged. Collate the indictments or the leaks about impending indictments from the supposedly uncoordinated work of Alvin Bragg, Letitia James, Jack Smith, and Fani Willis both with iconic primary election dates ahead, and periodic revelations about the depth of Biden family corruption—and the synchronized distraction is quite stunning.
Expect in the next year for each new incriminating document released, each new witness that comes forward with a tale of Biden corruption, almost immediately the headlines will blare about a new Trump gag order, a new scheduled Trump court appearance, a new flipped witness cooperating with a prosecutor, and a new leak about a “certain” conviction and jail time. The new media war will make its old Russian collusion’s “all-star,” “hunter-killer team,” and “dream team” prosecutors and the “bombshell” and “walls are closing in” revelations seem like child’s play.
A Hit-bottom Media
After being utterly discredited by fixating for years on the Russian “collusion” hoax, and hyping the laptop Russian “disinformation” fable, any professional media would by now have apologized, conducted mass firings, and pledged to report the news rather than massage and invent it.
But no sooner does one media embarrassment end than the media ventures onto another, on the theory that it is so discredited and has hit bottom that it no longer has any reputation to defend. So a now liberated but bankrupt media feels it matters nothing whether its mythologies have a grain of truth.
The Biden family corruption and the exemptions given Hunter Biden by a corrupt Biden department of Justice have been contextualized by the media as a prelude to what we can expect of the impeachment inquiry.
In the modern American media, a Trump phone call threatening to delay offensive military aid until the Ukraine government could guarantee that its operatives were not empowering the Biden quid pro quo clan was an impeachable offense. A self-confessed Biden effort to alter US policy to fire a Ukrainian prosecutor, dutifully investigating the Hunter Biden/Biden family corruption, by threatening to cancel all U.S. aid to Kyiv was mere “familial” concern. Where incidentally is the outrage from current vehement supporters of blank-check, on-to-Moscow support for Ukraine over Joe Biden’s prior threats to cut critical military aid to Ukraine in efforts to ensure uninterrupted money streams to his own family treasure chest
In sum, the media is more tarnished than ever, and therefore more dangerous because it accepts it has no reputation left to defend and now is entirely unbound to invent, to fabricate, and to smear.
The Deep State
In 0017 under media and Democratic pressure, the Trump-appointed Attorney General Jeff Sessions was bullied into recusing himself. He appointed in his place Robert Mueller as special counsel, empowered by an unlimited budget and a blank-check concerning time and resources to find “collusion.”
In contrast, in 2023 the Biden-appointed AG Merrick Garland, under fierce criticism for delaying the Hunter Biden investigation in order to run out of the clock on the statute of limitations on tax fraud, appointed David Weiss as special counsel. He was the prior chief culprit in providing cover for Hunter from indictments. So the proverbial fox is now in charge of the hen house.
In 2019 the “whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella was considered a sacrosanct patriot, even though he had no firsthand knowledge of the supposed crimes he was accusing the president of committing. Instead, the whistleblower was selectively being spoon-fed information from Alexander Vindman, the expatriate U.S. Lt. Colonel, who, in the midst of his accusations, admitted he was offered the Ministry of Defense by the Ukrainian government. Vindman, currently in the second round of his careerist Ukrainian melodrama, is self-appointed CEO of his middleman company, seeking to profit from the war by facilitating the transfer and service of arms from the U.S. government to Ukraine.
Note the difference: in 2023 whistle blowers are now considered rogues, whether they be honest IRS investigators sickened by the corruption of their own DOJ prosecutorial counterparts, or FBI agents tired of the warping of their agency to facilitate the Biden coverups.
The net result will be a near impossible congressional task in forcing any federal agency to honor a congressional subpoena, as most will follow the Eric Holder model of a cocky snub of Congress with certainty of exemption.
The “Do You Really Want President Harris?” Factor
If the evidence trumps the Biden reliance on administrative state suppression, media bias and character assassination, there is one ace in the Biden hole—Kamala Harris. She is, as has been widely remarked upon, the Spiro Agnew of our age. (Yet the latter, in fact, on the stump was a Cicero in comparison to Harris’s 500-word vocabulary.)
In other words, the country is more scared of a not corrupt Harris than it is a senile and crooked Biden. And Biden has done nothing to dispel those impressions given that such a Nixonian fear of his Vice President is his last ticket to finishing out his term.
Not just Biden but millions in the country are anxious that the president is one fall, one new email disclosure from oblivion. His ensuing removal would not just give Harris the presidency in the next year and a half, but also the advantage of incumbency going into the 2024 election year and beyond.
So expect that the more the proverbial noose tightens around Biden, all the more his West Wing will leak daily stories about Harris’s puerility, her lightness of being, and her abject incompetence, and the dangers she would pose to the republic.
The DEFCON 1 Option
There is a final nihilist gambit. If Biden is confronted with his own email evidence of corruption, tapes of his agreement to financial exchanges, bank accounts with large foreign deposits, and direct testimonies that he received cash, he has one last refuge: the “Hunter did it all!” ruse.
Hunter is all too aware of his own danger. Collate his mischievous recent grifting artistic career, the Malibu-renting Hunter trying to plead poverty to reduce child-support payments, the mysterious cocaine that turns up in a West Wing cubicle, his laptop anger at his Mr. Big Guy’s and Mr. 10 Percent’s underappreciation of Hunter’s bagman role, and Hunter’s threat to call the President of the United States to testify that a now trapped Hunter is innocent of everything.
The resulting picture that emerges is an out-of-control Hunter—who lost a laptop, a crack pipe, and an illegally registered handgun—now very worried that he will become Joe’s scapegoat.
Hunter still believes he is a Samson that can pull down the Biden temple upon them all—if the alternative is that he is the only Biden to stew for years in jail.
Remember, Hunter also knows his father all too well—Joe’s long resume of plagiarism, greed, arrogance, corruption, lying, and fantasies—and so rightly believes at some point Joe might easily shrug, and in one of his “senile” moments, utter, “Well, no Joke, man—it was all Hunter’s stuff, not mine.”
+++++++++++++++
No comments:
Post a Comment