%20(1)%20(4)%20(1)%20(1).jpg)
By Matt Vespa
+++
Karine Jean-Pierre Comes Up With Quite the Spin on Biden's Role in 2022 Midterms
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Because the Biden Administration is corrupt, the Justice Department totally out of control, and The FBI has turned America into a police state, Americans appear to have thrown up their hands in abject disgust and are acting out of character.
Indifference, under the circumstances, is understandable, but it is also dangerous because it allows a corrupt government to dig it's heels in sheltered by an equally corrupt mass media. This indifference simply accelerates the pace at which we decline.
Meanwhile, our adversaries, like vultures, sit on the sideline observing in gleeful derision. It takes decades to achieve preeminence but decline often comes at a rapid pace. This is what I believe is happening and it is very sad.
+++
EXCLUSIVE: Maricopa County Poll Worker’s Affidavit Reveals How Democrats With Out-of-State Driver’s Licenses And No Voter Registration Were Allowed To Vote
By Jordan Conradson
Another Maricopa County election judge has come forward with more evidence of illegality in Arizona’s 2022 Midterm Election.
The Gateway Pundit reported that voting machine failures and tabulation issues led to massive and unprecedented voter disenfranchisement at the polls.
A corrupt Obama Judge recently sanctioned Kari Lake in order to “send a message” and prevent election lawsuits from exposing the massive amounts of fraud. Lake was sanctioned for a lawsuit to ban the machines, citing vulnerabilities and potential for failure. Can you believe it?!
Voting machines and printers suddenly stopped working at over 30% of voting centers the moment the polls opened on election day. Republican voters were forced to wait in extremely long lines, turned away from the polls, or told to deposit their ballots in the questionable “box 3” for misread ballots.
Because of this, despite having had only 17% of the turnout on election day, Democrats outperformed Republicans in multiple counties, which is unlikely, if not impossible.
The tabulation issues were not present at the Chandler voting center, according to the election judge. Still, “the massive lines were real. We had close to 200 people in line at one point, and it was a two-hour wait. And we had people walking off of the line because they just couldn’t wait anymore.” This is because “the troubleshooter was calling other sites and telling them to send people to us because their machines were down.”
Some voters were unsure if their vote would count at the second location if they had already checked in at another location. In a now-deleted tweet, Maricopa County officials told voters that they could it’s ok to leave their voting center and go to another voting center. However, they never mention that you must check out first. This directly contradicts a recent letter from the County to the Arizona Attorney General’s office stating that voters must check out before leaving the polls if they intend to vote at another location.
Our source told us, “there was no checkout procedure that we were trained on it,” and because of this, many were forced to vote on a provisional ballot that may not have been counted.
In addition to the issues described above, the new testimony reveals that two Democratic voters were registered to vote just days before Election Day, using out-of-state driver’s licenses in at least one polling location in Chandler, Arizona. One voter was allowed to register after she “indicated she had only been in the valley for a few weeks.”
The legal deadline to register was October 11. This also goes against poll worker instructions to give these voters provisional ballots to be further investigated before counting.
The election judge told The Gateway Pundit, “the system on the site book will tell you when someone’s registered. And so I pulled her up [in the site book]. I said, ‘well, you know, you’re not registered. We can give you a conditional, provisional ballot, but you know, you’re not in the system.’ And the inspector [Ronda Owens] came over and said, ‘no, no, I’ll fix it,’ and I said, ‘well, what do you mean?’ And she called the hotline, and she spoke to someone at the hotline, and then suddenly, she was registered and able to vote a regular ballot.”
“I was stunned. Like, how do you do that? And she said, ‘well, because she filled out the first part of the information beforehand, and it just didn’t go through.’ And I said, ‘that doesn’t make any sense. You have to be completely registered to vote,’” the judge continued.
Another woman who was “clearly not registered” walked into the polling center with an Illinois driver’s license and listed a commercial building as her residence. “Now the thing is, when you fill out the registration paperwork, there are two sheets. There’s the one you submit, and then you have a receipt, and she had both,” said the election judge. “The paper was not signed. She had signed somewhere else on the document. There’s a signature block, and she signed outside of that.”
They continued, “Again, Ronda called [the hotline] downtown, and they said, ‘well, the address is a commercial building.’ And then somehow they changed that, and then suddenly she was registered to vote.”
The election judge told us that both of the women were Democrats.
The judge said they told Ronda, “That’s not kosher. You can’t be registering people after the deadline.” According to them, “she said, ‘well, the person had intended to register. They had the paperwork, and it just wasn’t completed.’ I’m like, ‘yeah, but it has to be completed before that.'” Ronda then “stopped doing it after that.”
The judge also told us that “they were accepting photographs of ID” instead of physical proof of identity. “You didn’t need an actual certified paper. You could use a photograph of it. So technically, I could take my auto registration and my auto insurance card and Photoshop, take pictures of them and walk in and vote as anyone I want,” they said. The Arizona Secretary of State’s webpage states that a valid Arizona Vehicle Registration and Arizona vehicle insurance card are acceptable forms of ID for voting. “The inspector said that pictures of it were ok,” the judge continued.
After seeing the issues at this polling location and hearing about tabulator malfunctions across the valley, the judge concluded, “I have no confidence at all that this election was run fairly.”
The election judge who submitted this affidavit asked The Gateway Pundit to redact his name; however, they are prepared to reveal their identity if asked to testify in court.
For the election of Nov 8, 2022, I worked election day and the preceding days corresponding to a twelve day site. I worked as an election judge at Chandler Gilbert Community College located at 2626 Pecos Road, Gilbert Arizona. During the early voting period, we had two people come in that weren’t registered. The inspector called the hotline and they were then registered and permitted to vote.
The first person was a tall Caucasian woman with blonde hair. She was approximately 5′ 8″, medium build wearing athletic clothing. She had a California driver’s license and indicated she had only been in the valley for a few weeks.
The second person was a woman with an Illinois driver’s license. She said she was only here for a two to three weeks. She was African American with dark hair. She was approximately 5′ 4″ heavy build wearing dark clothing. Her registration didn’t complete because the address that she provided was a commercial building. She became agitated when she found out she wasn’t registered because she was flying back to Chicago the next day.
The registration deadline for this election was 10/11/2022. Two people whose registrations were not completed before then were permitted to vote.
“I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signed on the 1 day of December 2022.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Radical Palestinians are all over this country spreading their hatred:
+++
Palestinian Activist Pleads Guilty to Antisemitic Assaults
Saadah Masoud, 29, from Staten Island, pleaded guilty to one count of participating in a conspiracy to commit hate crime acts.
Masoud is involved with Within Our Lifetime (WOL), a virulent antisemitic and anti-Israel group and offshoot of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) in New York City.
As part of his plea, Masoud admitted to three assaults, including one on a victim wearing a kippah and other Jewish clothing, and one wearing a Star of David necklace, in New York City between 2021 and 2022. Read Now
Finally:
+++++++++++++++++
Dear Friend,
In 2018, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis drafted a top-secret plan called "Project Overmatch."
It says that the weapons we have right now were designed to win wars in the 20th century.
But to "Overmatch" our enemies in the 21st Century, we're going to need 21st century weapons.
Now here's what most people don't know.
"Project Overmatch" just received final approval to be implemented in March.
That's given the Pentagon an extra $37.2 billion to spend on adding next generation weapons over the next 12 months.
At the center of all this spending is a new "living missile."
CBS News Reports:"It's an entirely new type of weapon."
The NY Times Reports:"No existing defense can stop it."
And the U.S. Army said, "We're going to make a lot of them very quickly."
We've just prepared a new report on the small defense contractor that makes this weapon - plus three other small defense firms best positioned to ride this mega-trend...
Please take a few seconds and download a pdf copy right now before the report link expires...
GET: "21st Century Battlefield: 4 Companies Changing Warfare" >>>
"The Buck Stops Here,"
Dylan Jovine
CEO & Founder,
Behind the Markets
Meanwhile, thank you Obama, Biden and Europe.:
Iran may be able to build 'crude' nukes within six months - report
A new think tank report details how to deter Tehran from making the move to build a few crudely made nuclear weapons
A new think tank report obtained by The Jerusalem Post warns of the possibility of Iran launching an accelerated effort to achieve a few “crude” nuclear weapons in six months.
According to Monday’s report by Institute for Science and International Security president David Albright, even though top Israeli officials recently told the Post that the Islamic Republic’s weapons group was two years away from being able to deliver a nuclear warhead via a ballistic missile, there could be a much more pressing threat.
In popular discussions, this option is often referred to as a “dirty” or “suitcase nuclear bomb,” but the truth is much more complex, although still quite threatening.
What is a "dirty" nuclear bomb?
The extra nuance is that no nuclear device, no matter how small, really fits into a suitcase or could be carried around by a single person.
Experts concerned about an improvised or crude nuclear bomb tend to discuss it being delivered by a vehicle, such as a truck. The explosive power of such a nuclear weapon would be much less than a full-fledged weapon delivered on a ballistic missile, but it could still be devastating.
By avoiding having to solve all of the challenges associated with measuring, miniaturizing and detonating a nuclear warhead via a ballistic missile, a smaller number of tasks could be solved in about six months.
Most of these would relate to bringing together the myriad components needed to build an actual bomb, some of which the ayatollahs have concealed in various locations across Iran dating back to 2003. Crossing at least a crude nuclear-device threshold could also involve performing an underground test to make sure the device would not be a dud.
One goal of Albright’s latest report is to inhibit or deter Iran from making a final decision to build nuclear weapons, taking into account how far along the program already is.
According to International Atomic Energy Agency reports, Iran already possesses a mix of 60% and 20% enriched uranium sufficient to build around four nuclear bombs within a period of several months – if it moves forward in a “crash course” rapid manner.
A nuclear time-crunch
The report first dissected how Tehran would most likely go about accelerating the process to finish building a nuclear device.
Although some analysts present Iran’s choice as binary – go after a full-fledged nuclear missile, which takes two years, or drop that effort and pursue just an accelerated “crude” device approach – Albright said the ayatollahs could easily move forward on parallel tracks at the same time.
According to the report, “A frequently propagated red herring is that Iran’s leadership has not decided to build nuclear weapons, [and that] it does not have a nuclear weapons program – as if only a directive to build them or the act of building them qualifies. However, for a country like Iran, a simplistic binary model does not suffice.
“Similarly, this type of categorization did not apply to Taiwan in the 1980s, when it had a program of being ready to build nuclear weapons in short order, if requested by the regime’s leadership. Taiwan had not made a decision to actually build nuclear weapons, nor had it shown any intention to build them, but it wanted to be ready to do so quickly in case a Chinese invasion was imminent,” the report said.
In that case, the US showed the resolve to take dramatic and secret steps to not only shut the program down, but insisted that Taiwan dismantle much of its associated infrastructure, including a research reactor, a secret plutonium separation plant and an extensive secret nuclear-weapons simulation and high-explosives testing program.
Further, as a lesson regarding Iran, the report said, “Taiwan had given the unfinished secret plutonium separation project a civilian cover story, and the research reactor was under International Atomic Energy Agency inspections. Nonetheless, the US government was determined to block Taiwan’s pathway to a nuclear weapon once and for all.”
Likewise, the report said Iran currently “does not appear to have a program focused on the actual building of nuclear weapons. But it does appear to have a program to be prepared to make nuclear weapons and to do so in short order based on covert and overt activities and facilities.”
Nuclear weapons on demand
In essence, the report warned: “Rather than a traditional nuclear weapons program, Iran threatens the region and the world with a program ready to produce nuclear weapons ‘on demand.’”
“This type of program serves the Iranian regime’s interests,” Albright wrote. “While Iran increasingly is viewed as a nuclear power, it has so far been able to avoid harsh international and regional penalties... Given its existing capabilities, this approach also permits Iran to minimize the need for secret nuclear weapon development activities, which if discovered, could catalyze more dangerous threats against the regime.”
Next, the report gave concrete recommendations to dissuade the Islamic Republic from deciding to pursue a nuclear device of any kind beyond any progress already made.
Albright discussed increased intelligence collection being able to detect any new decisions, as well as various political pressures, including diplomatic threats to snap back global sanctions to pull Iran in line.
Crucially, however, the report also said: “Iran needs to be made fully aware that building nuclear weapons will require drastic and serious actions by the international community, including military action.
“The threat of military force weakened after the negotiation of the JCPOA in 2015. Iran grew to perceive the United States as reluctant to use force and Israel as fearful and unable to launch an effective attack,” the report said, using the abbreviation for the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action nuclear deal.
“This tendency is being reversed, but not quickly enough,” the report said. “The Western powers should get serious about offensive military options to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities if Iran moves to build nuclear weapons, diverts nuclear material, or withdraws from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.”
More specifically, Albright emphasized, “A useful first step is President [Joe] Biden’s declaration that military force could be used as a last resort to stop Iran building nuclear weapons; the United States and Israel’s recent drill simulating a strike on Iran is also important.”
Moreover, he said, “US military cooperation with Israel should continue to be bolstered, ensuring Israel can decisively strike Iran’s nuclear sites on short notice if there are signs Iran is moving to build nuclear weapons, including the ability of delivering a second strike if Iran reconstitutes those activities.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Harvard the elitist's "cesspool."
The Wahabi element/strain of the Saudi Regime has poured hundreds of millions into"Hahvahd" to create hatred and their pusillanimous administrators have welcomed same. All the intellectual Ivies have become anti-semite "petri" bowls. My own University, Penn, is right among the top.
+++
Harvard University ranks first in antisemitism
The redefinition, suppression and denigration of Jewish identity on campus are at all-time highs. Op-ed.
Harvard University
(JNS) Harvard prides itself on ranking first in all things. And now they do—on three measures of campus antisemitism.
The AMCHA Initiative, which tracks campus antisemitism, recently issued a report covering the 2021-2022 school year. It quantifies threats to Jewish identity, explained as the redefinition, denigration and suppression of Jewish identity. Amcha’s study shows a coordinated attempt to redefine for Jews what it means to be Jewish and what acceptable Jewish expression entails.
There were 254 incidents that fit at least one category—redefinition, suppression or denigration—“at 63 (58%) of the 109 U.S. schools” most popular with Jewish students. Redefinition and denigration were most likely to take place on campuses with five or more faculty members supportive of academically boycotting Israel. Suppression, however, was most likely on campuses with “one or more anti-Zionist student groups.” Harvard, with 25 incidents, topped every category.
Harvard Public Affairs & Communications and President Lawrence Bacow did not respond to requests for comment. However, it’s clear the campus climate has changed. Among numerous examples, in Feb. 2022, Hillel Executive Director Rabbi Jonah Steinberg noted “the anti-Israel stickers appearing on Sabra hummus in the dining halls, the tearing down of Harvard Hillel posters all over campus, about which the Dean of Students Office had to issue a statement just this past week, and the black-colored posters everywhere against the Harvard College Israel Trek.”
This is not 1990s Harvard, when the “student body was said to be nearly a quarter Jewish” and those students were warmly welcomed. A mere 5.3% of Harvard’s class of 2023 identifies as Jewish, along with 5.2% of the class of 2024 and 7.4% of the class of 2025. So, not only is the campus climate more hostile, but there are fewer Jewish students to protest it.
Harvard sophomore Alex Bernat recalled Passover 2022, when “a swastika is found in [undergraduate dorm] Currier House, which went underreported by [student newspaper] The Crimson, the PSC [Harvard College Palestine Solidarity Committee] put up a wall with Holocaust imagery and antisemitic statements and the school paper endorsed BDS.” Bernat reflected, “Day-to-day, I don’t feel much antisemitism or anti-Zionism, but when it flares up here, it flares up quite massively.”
One Jewish, Zionist Harvard graduate who works at the university, Ira Stoll, said, “having been around the university now on and off for more than 30 years, the level of antisemitism on campus over the past year is shocking, embarrassing, disgraceful—like nothing I’ve seen before.”
Stoll, who is the managing editor of Education Next, which is based at the Harvard Kennedy School, said, “All of us who care about the University really need to work urgently to improve the situation or else face a real risk of Harvard losing Jewish talent and excellence to other, less hostile institutions.”
So, what can be done to improve campus life at Harvard and elsewhere?
Zionist families whose children aren’t spending their college years in Israel need a college guide with detailed student commentary, indicating which campuses welcome Jewish and Christian Zionists.
Families should fortify relevant religious and historical education pre-college. When students hear attacks on Jews, Judaism, Zionists or Israel, they should recognize falsehoods and, if they feel comfortable doing so, counter them.
Jewish Studies Zionist Network scholars should offer videos and podcasts to educate high school and college students about Israel, along with Jewish history, literature, culture and religion.
Synagogues and other Jewish organizations, like the Harold Grinspoon Foundation, should send Jewish high school seniors Ben Freeman’s Jewish Pride: Rebuilding a People. Freeman offers an overview of Jewish history and antisemitism and encourages pride in Jewish identity.
Finally, more students from Jewish and Christian Zionist families should visit Israel and experience the country on its own terms. While Covid affected Israel trips, Brandeis University Professor Leonard Saxe estimates that, by age 18, “at least 15% and perhaps close to 20%” of American Jews have been to Israel. However, only 7% of evangelical Christians of any age have visited Israel.
Knowledge is the best antidote to slanted narratives. Parents, campuses have changed. Prepare your students.
Melissa Langsam Braunstein is an independent writer in metro Washington.
+++++++++++++++++++++
Democrat Voter Fraud: A Brief History
By J.R. Dunn, AMER THINKER
This is a “brief history” because the complete history of Democrat electoral malfeasance reaching back to Tammany Hall and Tweed would require four volumes or more. (I’m running into the same problem with a new book I’m outlining analyzing the Democrats as a criminal organization, much like the Mafia or the Camorra.)
So a brief history it is, limited to the past thirty years or so. Believe you me, there’s no lack of cases even in that short span.
The Dinkins Magic Voting Machines
Just days before voting in the 1993 David Dinkins/Rudolf Giuliani election, the New York Times reported that a number of voting machines had been found in a closed Manhattan school. All the machines were loaded with votes for Democrat incumbent David Dinkins.
Voting proceeded without the help of those machines, and of course Rudy was elected. But that was the end of it. As far as I’ve been able to learn, there was no investigation, no inquiries, or, for that matter, any further reportage on it. A Democrat attempt to steal the NYC mayoral election was flushed down the memory hole.
An Inconvenient Decision
We all know the absurdist story of the 2000 presidential election. But it’s often overlooked that Al Gore was attempting an outright steal of a presidential election, a bold move not to be repeated until 2020 – and he attempted it with the open assistance of the judiciary.
The leftist version is well known, since it’s all we ever hear – George W. Bush was only ahead by 900 votes in Florida when Gore, in the pure interest of fairness, requested a simple recount, at which point the right-wing extremist Supreme Court leapt in and handed the victory to Bush by fiat. (This, by the way, has served as an excuse for all electoral cheating since that point – “the GOP started it in 2000… We have to cheat, to protect democracy.” As to what excuses the myriad cases of cheating that occurred beforehand… well, don’t ask me. I dunno.)
What actually happened is that Gore’s crowd created a strategy in which every possible vote-counting method would be utilized, with recounts repeated as many times as necessary until one was finally discovered that would overturn the results. These included attempts to carry out recounts only in Democrat strongholds such as Dade County while shutting down any such efforts on the Panhandle, home to many military retirees.
The Bush campaign took Gore to court to prevent such schemes, until finally, given the opportunity at last, the Florida State Supreme Court – almost exclusively Democrat-appointed — found in favor of Gore’s demand that ‘undervotes” – ballots showing no presidential vote at all – be counted, while at the same time “awarding” him nearly 500 votes, a novel concept unheard of in American jurisprudence up to that date.
It was here, facing the prospect of a presidential election thrown by a corrupt Democrat court in full public view and in defiance of established precedent, that the U.S. Supreme Court finally stepped in, overturning the Florida court’s decision and ending the recount circus. Bush won with 537 votes. (A later media recount showed that Bush’s lead would have held in any reasonable recount process.)
Votes from the 8th Dimension
The 2004 Washington state gubernatorial contest between Republican Dino Rossi and Democrat Christine Gregoire ended with Rossi up by 261 votes. A machine recount left him still ahead by 42 votes. The state Democrats paid over $700,000 for a hand recount, and whaddaya know… Votes started appearing from any and all conceivable sources. A bag containing votes here… an electoral official’s car there… it’s surprising they didn’t start falling out of the sky like the frogs in Magnolia.
By the end of the year Gregoire was ahead by 130 votes and was inaugurated on January 12. Rossi, God love him, continued fighting, taking Gregoire to court over the blatantly illegitimate votes. A Pierce County judge tossed the votes out, only to be overruled by the Washington State Supreme Court. A final decision didn’t come for six months, when Judge John Bridges, a Democrat appointee, tossed aside the concept of “chain of custody” to find in favor of Gregoire. Rossi should have continued on to the U.S. Supreme Court – after all, a critical legal concept was being overthrown – but he does get an E for Effort, since he did more than any other Republican in recent memory.
The Washington case enshrined the concept that all Democratic votes, whether they emerged from a portal into hyperspace or were discovered in a 2000 B.C. Sumerian temple, had to be counted no matter what the circumstances. GOP votes… not so much.
Goshdarnit, People Liked Him
A similar chain of events occurred in the election of Al Franken in Minnesota in 2008. Incumbent Norm Coleman originally prevailed with over 700 votes, which were mysteriously whittled down to 200 in short order. Franken called for a recount, and begorrah, the votes suddenly started appearing. Some, anyway — an envelope of votes from one county simply disappeared, but were counted regardless, the totals evidently being read out from tea leaves. By the time it all ended, Franken was ahead by 312 votes. Coleman, a Republican gentleman of the old school, made perfunctory efforts at protest, but was undercut by the GOP itself, led by former governor Arne Carlson, a RINO to rule them all, who had refused to endorse Coleman during the campaign.
Shortly after the election, it was discovered that at least 1,099 illegal votes had been cast by felons, and this had been known during the vote count, but had been ignored. Franken exchanged his diapers for a suit and spent the better part of two terms voting the way he was told and embarrassing his party before being forced out during the “MeToo” craze.
Trump Agonistes
At this point anyone who needs convincing about cheating during the 2020 election needs their own personal TED Talk covering it. While media keeps telling us it has been “debunked,” they never quite get around to details such as when, where, by whom, and on what grounds.
What’s often overlooked is that 2020 was layered operation, with efforts taking place from the most exalted corridors of power down to the lowest one-legged precinct worker. Consider the Hunter scandal(s). Following the NY Post’s blockbuster report, 52 members of the “Intelligence Community” published a letter in Politico asserting that it was a Russian dezinformatsiya exercise. Intelligence operatives also approached social media outlets such as Twitter and Facebook with the same yarn, with Dorsey and Zuckerberg eagerly censoring the story. The entire saga, featuring hookers, crack, stifled investigations, payoffs from China and Ukraine, and 10% for the “Big Guy,” was buried until well after the election. This, playmates, goes by the term “election interference.”
Following the vote, polls revealed that up to 17% of voters would not have voted for Biden if they’d known about Hunter’s escapades. That’s the election right there. So how has this been debunked? It hasn’t — there’s no way it could be; it’s right out there in the open, stinking like a dead skunk. It has simply been ignored.
As for cheating at the voting level, everything that needs to be said was said in 2000 Mules, which summarized True the Vote’s investigation into the “irregularities” surrounding the election. The mechanism was simple: left-wing operatives dumping armfuls of votes into isolated drop-boxes at three in the morning. Literally thousands of hours of footage of this activity exists, and is featured in the film. (My favorite bit of evidence here involves the single bust of voter fraud that occurred – in Louisiana, of all places — A critical piece of evidence involved fingerprints on the fake ballots. Within hours, vote dumpers across the nation appeared suddenly accoutered with vinyl gloves.)
It seems to me that it would be easy enough to “debunk” this if you really wanted to – simply track down those lefty operatives (we know who they are) and find out what they were actually doing in the middle of the night dropping boxloads of ballots while wearing gloves. If they’ve got a reasonable answer, fine. But they don’t… that’s why such “debunking” has never and will never occur.
True the Vote’s Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips were arrested on trumped-up contempt charges just a week before the 2022 election. What a coincidence!
2022
Which brings us to the latest reports, in which the Democratic Party astonished the world by abandoning 170 years of duplicity to allow the first completely clean national election in nearly two centuries.
Actually, no… having gotten away with 2020 — so far — the Dems saw no reason to hold back. While something on the order of 400 laws reforming electoral procedures have hit the books since 2020, it wasn’t enough. None of these were in blue states, and few if any in purple ones.
So Fetterman was not elected in Pennsylvania, and Kelly and Hobbs were not elected in Arizona, and Cortez Masto was not elected in Nevada. These are the results of cheating, blatant cheating in Arizona and Pennsylvania (250,000 bogus votes were intercepted in PA before the election, and sequestered by order of both the state and federal Supreme Courts, decisions which acting Secretary of State Leigh M. Chapman ordered election officials to ignore. Does anyone want to bet those were the only ones?)
Arizona is a unique situation, with the contest overseen by… Katie Hobbs, acting as secretary of state. This is unbelievable, the equivalent of putting Hunter Biden in charge of the DEA. Kari Lake is admirable in many ways, but how she allowed this one to get by her I cannot surmise. This should have been a major issue from day one and fought relentlessly all the way through. It’s a simple fact of nature: give a Democrat an opportunity to cheat, and cheating will happen, as the sparks fly upward. There is no excuse for overlooking this by anyone, anywhere, anytime.
Once again, we need to call on Goldfinger’s dictum: once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action. We are way past “three times” at this point.
Three points follow. First, Democrat electoral cheating is not a Trump fantasy. The Dems have been cheating since they first emerged from the roiling chaos of Andrew Jackson’s id. Tammany, the Locofocos, the Jim Crow South, Frank Hague, Tom Pendergast, Harry Hopkins, the Cook County machine, Joe Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson… It’s one long saga of corruption from beginning to end. The suggestion that the Dems are totally corrupt in their approach to elections is not a novelty, nor is it a slander. It is a simple statement of fact. Claims to the contrary are nonsense, as are the media assist-me-to-my-fainting-couch fits every time the topic comes up.
The Dems have taken a system of fraud developed over a century’s time and steadily weaponized it over the past three decades. It is a science at this point. Its most glaring weakness is that, like any con, it requires near-open cooperation from its victims to work.
Which the GOPe has been happy to supply. Republicans have made next to no effort at any point to put a stop to it. Not even Rudy, the GOP’s attack dog, made an effort to shine a spotlight on Dinkins and his little games. And if the man who took down the New York mob wouldn’t touch it, what can we expect from the flock of capons currently running the Republican Party?
Years ago, when I was in real estate in New Jersey, there was an immigrant from a Slavic country living in downtown Passaic. He had been mugged over sixty times. Local thugs would wait until he left to shop for groceries, then follow him to the store and simply relieve him of the bag when he emerged. The city cops offered him a radio (this was well before the cellphone era) so that he could summon them when it happened again. “No, no,” he wailed. “It would only be taken from me.”
The emotions aroused by this story include pity, sympathy, and heavy admixture of glee and contempt. This may seem mean, but it’s also healthy.
The Republican response to Dem electoral cheating arises from the same source, a gutlessness indistinguishable from sheer cowardice.
Things may at last be changing. Trump blew the whistle on the whole scam – one of the major reasons they hate him. Now Kari Lake is redeeming herself by promising to hammer Kathy Hobbs and the Arizona Dems for as long as it takes. This is a good start — but it’s only a start.
There are dozens – perhaps as many as a hundred – populist conservatives joining Congress at the beginning of next year. Investigating voter fraud (particularly involving Hobbs, and her snipers on the rooftop) represents their opportunity to make their mark.
This is the second election in a row marked by impossible results. Not “extraordinary,” not “unusual,” but impossible. Joe Biden did not get 81 million votes. Fetterman could not have been elected by a sane electorate. Catherine Cortez Masto was not saved by magic votes arising from spontaneous generation. All these outcomes are outside the realm of the possible. All were produced by a sophisticated, highly developed system of cheating. Eventually, we’ll have to put a stop to it, one way or another.
+++++++++++++++
From a cardiologist friend and fellow memo reader:
https://hotair.com/david-strom
++++++++++++++++++++
No comments:
Post a Comment