Biden's Disastrous Policies. Our Problems Are Serious But Can Be Solved. Very Dark?

++++

Gen. Keane and I are on the same page in that we are sickened by Biden's policies that have crippled our military and made us more vulnerable in defending our nation.  Xi has to be delirious at the fact that we have played into his hands and strengthened them.

But Biden's disastrous policies do not end there.  

When it comes to Israel he has increased that tiny nation's ability to actually survive as a viable entity.

Finally, the simple act of closing of our borders and sealing them alone should be enough to elect Trump.

I admit to being hawkish.t I believe Israel has every right to pre-empt an attack on Iran.  When a radical Islamist nation threatens you and tells you what they intend to do believe them.  You have no moral obligation to wait to defend yourself by first being attacked and then responding unless you are Israel.

+++

Hey Richard, 

The SAVE ACT - which will protect American voters and prevent illegal aliens from voting in federal elections, but Senate Democrats BLOCKED it from passing.

The only reason they opposed it is because they want non-citizens to vote, and influence the outcome of our elections, which is extremely likely now that the 'Border Czar’ Kamala Harris is in the running for President.

This is a major threat to our nation, and the SAVE ACT is our last chance to protect our elections. It’s not dead YET.

If Republicans in Congress force passage of the SAVE Act, ensuring that noncitizens won't be able to vote in federal elections, by attaching it to the next continuing resolution, which must be passed by September 30th to avoid a shutdown - it can still become law.

So, if everyone reading this email today chips in EVEN JUST $1 right now, our teams will have the resources we need to get the SAVE Act PASSED.

Chip in just $1 so we can get this bill to the finish line: chiproy.com/saveact-senate

$1: PASS THE SAVE ACT: chiproy.com/saveact-senate

We’re fighting for YOU, we’re fighting for our nation, and we’re fighting to prevent non-citizens from dictating our elections.

Chip in just $1 and stand with us today to PROTECT OUR ELECTIONS: chiproy.com/saveact-senate

Thanks,

Chip Roy and Mike Lee

++++

Our issues are serious, our debt is crushing but the solutions are not beyond our reach if we make a commitment to do so.

First, the production of energy will jumpstart the economy because it 

is used in just about every product and declining energy prices will reduce inflation.

Second, the government is choking with restrictive rules and regulations that increases the cost of productivity.  Third, our government is bloated and waste abounds and needs to be addressed.

Finally  reduction in taxes will cause manufacturers to restart production , increase employment and taxes on salaries, if dedicated to tax reduction, is the final step.

The basic problem are politicians who refuse to throw their lot into mix because they use taxpayer funds for their perks and love spending.

+++ 

In terms of the SSA investigation , the person in charge of co-ordinating the same technology between the local police and the  SSA and  failed to do so and, whom ever that person is, is the key to the multitude of subsequent failures. That person  should be revealed by name and fired at the vey least.  If that person broke laws they  should be tried.

It is a simple thing and why it takes 21 or more days would suggest this person is in cahoots with Biden and Comey in covering  something very dark.

+++

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The most serious problem facing those who believe in reliable elections are going to be disappointed  as the Democrats are registering illegal non-citizens.  The basis for a fraudulent election is a forgone conclusion. 

+++

 Prince vs. Party

What Donald Trump and Kamala Harris reveal about our political order

In most elections, American voters choose between two candidates, who represent a pair of alternatives within the same political model. The candidates bundle together a set of policies and pitch themselves as the nation’s most plausible leader.

The upcoming election presents a different choice. Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, the Republican and Democratic candidates for the presidency, respectively, represent not only two alternatives on policy but also two entirely different political models.

We might call these models the Prince and the Party. Trump represents the Prince, or, the politics of the man; Harris represents the Party, or, the politics of the machine. Each model has something to be said for and against it.

Consider two recent events that illustrate the difference: the attempted assassination of President Trump and the succession of Kamala Harris as presidential nominee.

The most important lesson of the Trump assassination attempt was counterfactual: had the assassin been successful, it would have meant an end to the populist-conservative movement and total disarray for the Republican Party, which would be forced to find a suitable successor to Trump or revert to the party’s status quo ante.

Trump is, in the metaphorical sense, a Prince. He entered politics as an outsider and orchestrated a hostile takeover of the GOP, radically changing the policies and priorities of a major political party. He shaped them; they did not shape him.

Trump managed the White House in much the same manner, running the government on his instincts and social media account. He tried to do what machine politicians could not even conceptualize, much less execute. What victories he achieved were, in part, due to this arrangement.

There are advantages to this approach. Prior to Trump, the Republican Party had for many voters become moribund, offering a political formula that had grown stale and failed to speak to the interests of millions of disaffected Americans. It took a powerful outsider to break through the old consensus and expand the ideological terrain.

The disadvantages are obvious: the political formula of the Prince, in the literal or metaphorical sense, depends on one man, magnifying both his strengths and his weaknesses. And, as we saw nearly happen in the fields of Butler, Pennsylvania, all of it can end in a moment.

Compare this state of affairs with the successful removal campaign—or, as some have called it, “palace coup”—against President Biden, who was, a week after the attempted assassination, unceremoniously replaced with Kamala Harris as the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee.

This replacement was executed free of debate, conflict, or delay. It simply happened. Why? Because, within the Party model, both Biden and Harris are figureheads. They follow wherever the Party directs them. Tough, then soft, on crime; strong, then weak, on the border. The Party provides the political formula; they are the vessels for communicating it to the public and advancing it in the White House.

There is an advantage to this method. The Party is durable, decentralized, and adaptable. If, God forbid, something were to happen to Vice President Harris, the Party could readily find a substitute and seek to manufacture enthusiasm through its media apparatus, as it did with Harris, who, before her elevation to nominee, had been historically unpopular.

The disadvantage is less obvious. Though the Party currently enjoys hegemony over nearly all the American institutions that matter, it will gradually lose the capacity for creativity and fall prey to the whims—and stupidity—of the crowd. Genius is an individual phenomenon; a party that governs on “diversity, equity, and inclusion” will produce loyal mediocrities, with all the pitfalls that this entails.

We are hurtling into the final stretch of the presidential campaign, which provides a choice for voters: Trump versus Harris; Prince versus Party. That our two most recent presidential elections have been so close makes clear that for the American electorate writ large, it is a choice that remains very much in play.

++++