Our Australian "cousin" has just written an anti-PC book as follows:
The book title is THE CHEF WHO MADE ONIONS CRY and it is written under my pseudonym - CHILLI KIPPEN.
It is available through Barnes and Noble and all on line bookstores amazon:google:Apple
Several of our Landings friends, who have been to Australia, have been befriended by Elaine and Lionel. They are very gracious hosts and the family furniture store has been in Australia for over 100 years. Elaine wrote a biography about the store and founding family members.
And:
Being Jewish, I understand what it means to be discriminated against. That said, if America is going to put racial balance before competence then we will eventually become the most balanced defeated nation in the world. The world is not becoming less competitive and we are certainly not improving education by closing schools and refusing to upgrade curricula..
There are plenty of competent well qualified black people who can serve on boards (see first article below,) for instance and maybe Hollywood pictures meeting new Oscar Standards might prove entertaining (see link below.)
However, if we are going to avoid/eliminate discrimination then all teams in both the national basketball and football leagues need to be re-balance and restaurants and fast food places need to fire a lot of menial workers and hire more menial ones who are not black as a start.
After all, if re-balancing is our ultimate goal,simply for statistical reasons as it seems to be, and that means firing people,that seems a fair price we should willingly pay so we can become a balanced nation.
Seems dumb and an "un-balanced" way to do things to me but you gotta do what you gotta do.I once read a satiric essay by an English author entitled "The Burning of a Roast Pig." The owner roasted the pig by burning down his house. Burning down America because BLM seems to be in vogue.
While I remain perched on my high cynical horse let's look at The U.N. The U.N is comprised of most every nation in the world yet, none of these nations have the same anything, ie. different morals, and values, different economic and political systems blah,bah,blah. The founding concept was eventually we would embrace Wilkie's "One World" concept. But whose "One World?" Should America become like Venezuela and/or Russia as Bernie and Pocahontas would like or should China become like America which no one would like?
What purpose does the U.N serve? Has it stopped wars, has it stopped torture, has it stopped dictators killing their own people? Will it stop Iran from going nuclear? Has it stopped trafficking in pedophilia? What are the costly benefits we and/or the world derive from the U.N? Certainly poorer nations benefit because whatever they get is more than they had since they are way behind statistically in most living standard calculations. Has stuffing money in the pockets of dictators in Africa really brought Africans a better life because the U.N exists?
If anyone has answers pro and/or con I invite them.
The only positive thing I can think of is New York would collect more needed parking ticket fines and the U.N. building could be turned into more high priced vacant condos.
NY catering companies would suffer but think about all the canape ingredients that would not be used saving the lives of precious ocean critters. That should make "Greenies" happy.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Zillo, Next Door and Other Companies Pledge To Add Black Directors
Public and Private Firms join the Board Challenge, and effort to improve diversity in corporate boardrooms
By Anne Steele
A new group of U.S. companies is pledging to add a Black director to their boards within the next year in a bid to diversify and help accelerate more inclusion in corporate America.
Zillow Group Inc., ZG +0.36% Nextdoor.com Inc., HopSkipDrive Inc. and Heritage-Crystal Clean Inc. HCCI 0.52% are among public and private companies signing on to the Board Challenge, a pledge for boards to add a Black director within one year. In addition to those 17, more than 20 other companies with Black directors, including Nordstrom Inc., JWN -2.53% United Airlines Holdings Inc. UAL +0.86% and WW International Inc., WW +0.67% have joined the group and pledged to use their resources to accelerate diversity efforts.
The effort comes about a week after California lawmakers passed a bill that would require publicly traded companies based in the state to have at least one director from a minority community by the close of 2021.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has until the end of September to sign or veto the bill. “We don’t typically comment on pending legislation,” the governor’s press office said after the bill passed. “If and when a bill reaches the governor’s desk, it is evaluated on its merits.”
If signed into law in California—which two years ago successfully mandated seats for women on corporate boards—the bill could prompt legislative efforts inland, Illinois and New York, have since enacted or are considering board-diversity legislation. other states, as well as legal challenges. About a dozen other states, including Colorado, Maryland, Illinois and New York, have since enacted or are considering board-diversity legislation.
“I’m adding my voice and Zillow’s voice to this growing chorus to not be passive and to increase diverse representation at the highest level,” Zillow Chief Executive Rich Barton said.
A board seat opened up at the real-estate listings company in April, before George Floyd’s death in police custody in Minneapolis on May 25 touched off a racial reckoning in the U.S.
“Not to be lost is the increasing importance that Zillow plays in turning on the lights of fairness in the real-estate business, which has a long history of structural racism,” said Mr. Barton, who has promised to fill the position with a Black director. “It’s about increasing representation at the top to better reflect society.”
Executives say they hear from employees who want to see people from diverse backgrounds at the top to help encourage more people of color and those in the LGBTQ community to raise their hands for promotions and career advancement.
Facing claims from former employees of discrimination and pay inequity, Pinterest Inc. last month appointed veteran media executive Andrea Wishom as a director, adding a Black woman to its board. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., BMY -1.29% Procter & Gamble Co. PG -0.95% and Nvidia Corp. NVDA -3.30% also added Black directors to their boards this summer.
At the same time, the share of racially and ethnically diverse director placements, however, remained flat, at 23% for a third straight year, according to Heidrick & Struggles. Appointments of African-American board directors slipped to 10% in 2019, down from a high of 11% in the prior two years.
In all, about 66% of Fortune 500 company board members are white men and 18% are white women; 9% are Black men and women, according to Boardlist, a marketplace for diverse board talent in the technology sector. Boardlist is a founder of the Board Challenge, along with tech investment firm Altimeter Capital Management LP and Valence, a networking platform aiming to increase economic opportunity for Black professionals.
On race, “companies have been well-intentioned but not intentional,” Mr. Taylor said. That has changed in recent months, with more companies identifying racial diversity as a blind spot in their board membership, he said.
Boards tend to find new directors from a familiar pool: other company board members, CEOs and other C-level executives. Among directors appointed to Fortune 500 boards, 72% had previous public board experience, half were current or former CEOs, and more than 20% were current or former chief financial officers, according to Heidrick & Struggles.
“We’re saying broaden the aperture,” Mr. Taylor said. “Think about capability and competency and not title.” He is encouraging companies that are seeking diversity to look to people who have demonstrated leadership outside of corporate roles, including in government, the military, the nonprofit world or academia.
Quotas—especially when mandated like in the California legislation—are controversial, with critics saying they violate equal-protection provisions of the law. They could also lead to concerns among board candidates of color about tokenism. Companies looking to attract diverse talent need to define why diversity, and the perspective of a Black director, is important to them and then link that to their business strategy and measure outcomes over time, Mr. Taylor said.
“Candidates will ask,” he said. “They want to know, ‘What is it that I can bring to the board that’s important?’ ”.
WW Chief Executive Mindy Grossman, who signed her company on to the Board Challenge, said there is no lack of Black executive-level talent.
“We don’t have a pipeline problem. It’s about commitment and resolve,” she said.
WW, whose board already counts Black directors—including Oprah Winfrey—among its ranks, said it wants to help bring more Black voices to the table.
“Today more than ever people have to recognize that diversity is not a nice-to-have. It is a business imperative for future success,” Ms. Grossman said. “If you are not inclusive and diverse you will not attract that talent you need for the future or retain the talent you have and want to keep.
And:
Oscar Eligibility Will Officially Be Based on Quotas, Skin Color of Actors and Crew
If producers want their film to be considered for an Oscar after 2024, it will have to meet “diversity” standards. This includes having a specific percentage...
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This is Joe:
https://youtu.be/YGJGI1d96Ns
And:
Who is Kamala?
One of them could become your president because you hate Trump.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Steve Baldwin Exposes Kamala Harris :
One of them could become your president because you hate Trump.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Steve Baldwin Exposes Kamala Harris :
"I watched an interview with her. She is attractive, animated and absurd. She stated that she never had children; yet was a “Mother to her husband’s children.” And she “loved being a Mother.” She said the children called her “Momela”.
Anyway, she led her audience to believe that she mothered these kids. I looked her up. She married her husband when the son was in his 3rd year of college and the daughter was in 10th grade and they actually lived with their biological Mother, except for normal visits with their father—so much for Motherhood. Right after hearing that, I discovered she was an opportunistic liar.
I do remember Kamala Harris. I had just been elected to the State Assembly in 1994 and, at that time, the ultimate “power broker” that controlled every aspect of California’s state government was the Speaker of the House, Willie Brown. He ran Sacramento like it was his own personal fiefdom and handed out jobs to loyalists and fired people who were disloyal. He broke every ethical law in the book, but was never held to account by anyone. He was married, but openly had mistresses which he showed off by bringing them to public events.
At the time I arrived in Sacramento, Willie was seeing a young girl who was in her late 20’s. He was in his 60’s. She was his mistress and he showered her with gifts and appointed her to a number of State government jobs. Her name was Kamala Harris. Willie launched her political career because she was having sex with him. The idea that she is an “independent” woman who worked her way up the political ladder because she worked hard is baloney. It is common knowledge in California that Kamala slept her way into powerful political jobs.
And now she is running for VP with a man who will be unable to govern due to his lack of mental clarity. In essence, she will function as the President of the United States should the Biden/Harris ticket prevail this November. Her views on guns, taxes, immigration, energy, etc. are far to the left of the average America, but you watch the media ignore these positions.
For example, she believes illegal aliens are eligible to ALL government services, including education, welfare benefits, health care, you name it. In other words, she does NOT believe there is a difference between a citizen and a non-citizen. That view alone will cost us billions of dollars if acted upon. Her view of the constitution is frankly bizarre and dangerous and she is willing to enact laws restricting our 2nd Amendment rights even if such laws violate our constitution.
She will be the most radical person to run for VP in American history, but you won’t see any of this on the news. You will soon witness a massive campaign by the media to deceive you about who she is and what she believes. Don’t fall for it."
Steve Baldwin, former Congressman, State of California
AND:
Kamala Harris: The Most Radical VP Nominee in History
by Newt Gingrich
Sen. Kamala Harris is the most radical person ever nominated for president or vice president by a major party. Because of Joe Biden’s frailty, her potential to become president is much greater than for most vice-presidential candidates.
Last month, Rasmussen Reports published a survey which indicted 59 percent of likely voters do not think Democratic Presidential Nominee Biden would finish his first term in office, if he is elected in November.
On Saturday, a supporter of President Donald Trump was killed by the left-wing activists. Apparent Antifa members there practically celebrated his murder.
Even nearly half (49 percent) of Democrats who were asked thought Biden would bow out before four years was up. This is a remarkable statistic and makes the 2020 election even more unique and important, because it means nearly half of Democrats believe they will actually be electing the vice-presidential candidate rather than the top of the ticket. Historically, voters do not heavily consider the vice-presidential candidate when voting, but in 2020, Biden’s clear weakness makes it essential to give Harris much more scrutiny than would normally be warranted.
Of course, the liberal media constantly tries to pitch Biden as a moderate Democrat who could appeal to more people in the middle of the country. No doubt, the media will try to do the same with Harris – although it would be much more difficult.
I don’t want you to take my word for it or count on my judgement. That is why on Newt’s World, I captured some of Harris’s more radical positions -- in her own words – so that Americans can hear directly from the senator how radical she is and keep that in mind as the November election approaches.
|
|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
“October Surprise” - Satellite Images Suggest North Korea Preparing Ballistic Missile Test
The U.S. think tank said satellite images are “suggestive, but not conclusive, of preparations for an upcoming test” for an SLBM.
“Such a forthcoming test would support escalating speculation that North Korea has been making advances in both ballistic missile and SLBM development during the past year and plans to demonstrate these new capabilities around the time of either its national Foundation Day on September 9th or the Korean Workers’ Party Foundation Day on October 10th, CSIS said.
North Korea successfully conducted an underwater launch of its Pukguksong-3 on Oct. 02, 2019, as part of a defensive maneuver to combat external threats.
CSIS noted an “October Surprise,” one where North Korea could launch a ballistic missile ahead of the U.S. presidential elections.
“These apparent launch preparations might indicate the highly-speculated “October Surprise,” which would be consistent with Beyond Parallel historical data that shows heightened provocations around U.S. presidential election years,” CSIS said.
Such a test would highlight the lack of progress between the Trump administration and North Korea in the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
News of the activity has undoubtedly put Southeast Asian leaders and Washington on alert for a possible “October Surprise.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Palestinians believe hatred is a terrible thing to waste.
Palestinians believe hatred is a terrible thing to waste.
More than a missed opportunity for Palestinians
The Arab League’s rejection of their rejectionism should have forced them to rethink their strategy, rather than double down on it. Joe Biden should take note.
If you had any doubt that the era in which the Arab world would continue to grant a veto over Middle East peace to the Palestinians was over, this week’s drama in Cairo put an end to it. In a meeting in the Egyptian capital, the Arab League, an entity that was founded in 1945 in order to help coordinate the war on Zionism, has made it clear that it is opting out of the Palestinian’s century-old battle against the idea of a Jewish state.
The Arab League’s rejection of Palestinian efforts to condemn the United Arab Emirates’ decision to normalize relations with Israel is almost as much of a milestone as the agreement that was pushed by the Trump administration. The Palestinian Authority and their Hamas rivals raged against the UAE’s decision as a “betrayal.” But the Arab states will no longer be dragged into supporting such a pointless conflict.
Predictably, the Palestinians are reacting to their defeat not by drawing conclusions from events and rethinking their approach. Instead, they are doubling down on rejectionism and damning their one-time allies.
But they aren’t the only ones who should be assessing whether their ideas have been rendered obsolete. Americans who have spent decades trying to pressure Israel to enable a two-state solution that would end the conflict should also recognize that the reaction to the normalization agreement demonstrates that their assumptions about the Palestinians’ willingness to make peace have also been finally demolished.
That means that the establishment figures who hope to return to the helm of American foreign policy should former Vice President Joe Biden defeat President Donald Trump in November would also be well-advised to reconsider their plans to revive former President Barack Obama’s Middle East policies. The spectacle that unfolded in Cairo isn’t just a reaffirmation of Trump’s successful effort to bring Israel and the Sunni Arab states together. It’s a wake-up call for those who haven’t yet recognized that the boat has sailed on efforts to persuade the Palestinians to finally take “yes” or an answer when it comes to peace.
The quest for a two-state solution was the centerpiece of U.S. diplomacy for several administrations run by both Republicans and Democrats. Even Trump, whose “Peace to Prosperity” proposal changed the emphasis of the effort from pressure on Israel to an “outside-in” approach in which Arab states would persuade/bribe the Palestinians to give up their war on the Jewish state, had as its end goal two states.
The Palestinians rejected multiple offers of an independent state made by past administrations and wouldn’t cooperate even with Obama’s efforts to tilt the diplomatic playing field in their direction. So their refusal to work with Trump’s foreign-policy team was unsurprising.
But the kleptocracy that runs the P.A. and its leader, Mahmoud Abbas, were slow to realize the impact of Obama’s tilt towards Iran on Arab states that were more afraid of Tehran’s aggressive Islamist regime than they ever were of the Zionists. That led the Arab states to acknowledge that Israel was a strategic ally in their effort to repel Iran’s quest for regional hegemony, as well as a lucrative trading partner. That realization led not just to closer under-the-table ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia, but to Trump’s successful effort to persuade the UAE to make the decision to normalize relations with the Jewish state.
That led to this week’s Palestinian fiasco in which the same Arab League that voted the “three no’s” in Khartoum following the 1967 Six-Day War—no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel and no negotiations with it—made clear it no longer has any use for a Palestinian national movement that is unable to make peace.
If the Palestinians were more interested in advancing their interests than in reaffirming their ideological opposition to the legitimacy of a Jewish state—no matter where its borders are drawn—they could have bargained with Trump. They could have taken advantage of the offers of aid that Arab states were prepared to make in order to subsidize peace efforts. That might have given them a state, as well as chance at a prosperous future.
But they were no more interested in peace in 2020 than they were in 2000, 2001 and 2008, when they rejected even more generous offers, or in any of the opportunities for peace they passed up over the years. Israeli statesman Abba Eban’s quip that the Palestinians “never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity” has never been more relevant. The only difference between now and 1973 when Eban first spoke those words is that it is now Arab states that are saying it, not Israelis.
The Palestinians think they still have some allies. The European Union may be irrelevant to Middle East security issues, yet it can still help subsidize the corruption in Ramallah. And Palestinians can always turn to Iran and perhaps to Qatar, which has helped bankroll Hamas in the Gaza Strip. But a drift towards the radicals will only further damage a cause that most of the Arab world now recognizes is hopelessly out of touch with reality and modernity.
The question now is whether the U.S. presidential election will lead to a return to policies that have long enabled Palestinian rejectionism. There’s little doubt that Biden’s foreign-policy team would be staffed by those who cling to the myth that Palestinians want a state alongside Israel, rather than one instead of it.
Yet even the most dedicated believers in pressure on Israel to make suicidal concessions must now recognize that the Palestinians are incapable of making peace. Palestinian national identity is still inextricably tied to a futile war on Zionism in which they must concede defeat.
It remains to be seen if Democrats are as stuck in the past as the Palestinians. If American voters give them the chance, will they be so blinded by hatred of Trump that they will try to wreck the progress that he has achieved? If so, Arabs and Israelis, as well as the Palestinians who know their leaders are failing them, will be the ones to pay the price of such folly.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I guess it helps to keep your adversaries guessing, worried and scratching their
lice ridden heads.
Trump Reveals U.S. Has Secret Nuclear Weapon Capabilities: Russia, China Don’t Even Know It Exists
President Donald Trump revealed to author Bob Woodward that the U.S. has cutting edge nuclear weapons capabilities that are so secret that America’s enemies do not even know that they exist — a claim that Woodward said he confirmed with sources.
“I have built a nuclear — a weapons system that nobody’s ever had in this country before,” Trump told Woodward. “We have stuff that you haven’t even seen or heard about. We have stuff that Putin and Xi have never heard about before. There’s nobody — what we have is incredible.”The Washington Post reported:
Woodward writes that anonymous people later confirmed that the U.S. military had a secret new weapons system, but they would not provide details, and that the people were surprised Trump had disclosed it.
National security adviser Robert O’Brien was asked about the revelation during a Fox News interview on Wednesday night.
“Well, look, I’m not going to get into what he’s talking about,” O’Brien told Fox News anchor Bret Baier. “But you can rest assured that the men and women who manufacture our weapons and who have always had us on the cutting edge, whether it was back in the old days of the F-117 Nighthawk, to the B-2 bomber, to the F-22, F-35. We’re always on the cutting edge. And we have always got something out there that our adversaries don’t know about.”
“The president didn’t talk about any specific weapons system,” O’Brien continued. “But you can rest assured that we can protect the United States of America against any foe, any threat that’s out there, because of the excellent manufacturing that we do here, the research and development that we do here, and the fine men and women, the servicemen and women who man those platforms.”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Catching up with Hunter:
This is the man who liberals hate and this is what he quietly has done for years:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/
https://www.timesofisrael.com/
https://www.foxnews.com/
https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Catching up with Hunter:
Hunter Biden’s Chinese Firm Helped Buy Out Michigan Automotive Company to Create Jobs Overseas
ByJim Hayek
Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden delivered a speech in Macomb County, Michigan, on Wednesday, slamming the practice of outsourcing. Unmentioned was his son Hunter’s ties to a Chinese government acquisition of a Michigan company that is delivering jobs to China, Mexico, Europe, and South America.
“Make it in Michigan, make it in America, invest in our communities and the workers in places like Warren … Getting a good job in 2020 shouldn’t be a lottery … it should be an expectation,” Biden told American auto workers.
Biden’s pitch, though, is muffled by his son Hunter’s ties to the Chinese government.
First detailed in Peter Schweizer’s, president of the Government Accountability Institute and senior contributor at Breitbart News, 2018 New York Times bestseller Secret Empires, Hunter Biden sat on the board of directors of Bohai Harvest RST (BHR), a private equity firm he founded that was funded with $1.5 billion from the Chinese government via the Bank of China.
The dealings of BHR, from which Hunter Biden stepped down in October 2019, were most recently noted in Schweizer’s Profiles in Corruption.
Specifically, Hunter Biden sat on the board of BHR while the firm jointly acquired Michigan-based Henniges Automotive with the Chinese government-owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) for $600 million.
Before the Obama-Biden administration approved the acquisition, AVIC had been sanctioned five times since 1993 for military technology violations, according to a report by Seamus Bruner and John Solomon. In 2014, Obama’s Commerce Department was considering sanctions for an AVIC subsidiary.
Schweizer writes in Profiles of Corruption:
When the Chinese government’s BHR was established, Hunter Biden was given a slot on the board of directors — supposedly unpaid while his father was vice president. His actual compensation cannot be known; it is confidential. [Emphasis added]
…
BHR, with Hunter Biden on the board of directors and Devon Archer as the vice chairman and Investment Committee member, engaged in a series of financial deals that served the strategic interests of Beijing. In one of their first deals, the firm took an ownership stake in China General Nuclear Power Corporation (CGN), a nuclear energy company. The company was charged in 2016 with espionage against the United States. Also charged was an engineer who stole nuclear secrets from the United States. [Emphassi added]
BHR also helped buy out the American precision machining company Henniges. They bought the company in a joint deal with Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), a military contractor owned by the Chinese government. Because Henniges’s technology has military application, and therefore national security implications, the deal had to be approved by an interagency committee made up of Obama-Biden administration officials. [Emphasis added]
Hunter Biden’s BHR and the Chinese government-owned AVIC’s joint acquisition of Henniges was finalized in September 2015, giving BHR 49 percent control and ACIV the other 51 percent. The acquisition is one of the largest buyouts by China of an American automotive company in United States history, Bruner and Solomon note:
The $600 million acquisition was one of the largest Chinese takeovers of an American automotive company in history, topping AVIC’s 2010 takeover of Michigan-based Nexteer Automotive for $440 million. The purchase also revealed a pattern of Chinese state-backed takeovers of sensitive American companies which included China’s controversial purchase of A123 Systems for $256.6 million in 2013 after the Obama-Biden CFIUS approved the deal.
While the deal was finalized and afterward, executives at Henniges announced manufacturing expansions in China, Mexico, Germany, Poland, the Czech Republic, and South America.
In December 2017, for instance, executives announced the opening of a nearly 80,000-square foot manufacturing plant in Suzhou, China. At the time, executives touted more jobs created — none of which included employing American workers.
“In addition to the new facility in Suzhou, Henniges has plans for further expansions in 2018, including a new manufacturing plant in South America and expanding an engineering facility in Europe,” executives wrote in a release.
Henniges executives also announced in July 2016 the opening of a manufacturing plant in Prudnik, Poland — a plan they said would create more than 500 jobs for Poles by 2021.
Weeks before the BHR-AVIC acquisition was finalized, Henniges executives announced expansions in China, Mexico, and Germany. The Gomez Palacio, Mexico manufacturing plant created about 1,200 jobs for local Mexicans, while the new Munich, Germany, offices created high-paying manager and engineering jobs.
A Beijing, China, technical and tooling facility opened in August 2015, as Henniges executives announced, and has created 60 jobs as of last year for Chinese locals.
Most recently, in February, Henniges executives announced the opening of a 35,800 square-foot Technical and Innovation Center in Mladá Boleslav, Czech Republic. Executives wrote:
The facility officially opened on December 9, with more than 20 employees. Henniges anticipates over the next five years, the facility will house nearly 75 employees, including research and development, and European management, business unit managers, sales representatives, and product experts.
Henniges operates 25 facilities around the globe, at least seven of which are located in China. At least another four Henniges plants are located in Mexico, and at least five plants are located in Europe. It is unclear how many of its 8,700 employees are still based in the U.S. The last reported manufacturing expansion by Henniges was in August 2012, when it added 200 jobs to its New Haven, Missouri, plant.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
According to this analyst, who has been consistently accurate in his predictions, concludes Trump wins hands down.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This is the man who liberals hate and this is what he quietly has done for years:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/
https://www.timesofisrael.com/
https://www.foxnews.com/
https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/
No comments:
Post a Comment