Thursday, July 2, 2020

Will Durham's Report Have Any Impact And Does Anyone Care Any More?




ttps://www.theblaze.com/news/rapper-decries-blm-george-soros
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The king orders the Swiss to lay down their arms at once, and retire to their barracks.
LOUIS XVI
TO HIS SWISS GUARD
10 AUGUST 1792

⚔️
We are near the end of the Republic. A revolution has begun and no decisive counter-revolutionary actions have been ordered. Why has this happened? Because we have been psychologically and linguistically disarmed.
For example — The oath of allegiance of federal officials is to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic; but if we refuse to acknowledge the existence of enemies, if we cannot name our enemies, no defense will be possible. And this is the one thing, above all, that has been forbidden: We are not allowed to name our enemies.
 This is the raw essence of linguistic and psychological disarmament. Add to this a process in which America’s enemies have flooded into the government itself. And now, when mob violence has been deployed on a massive scale, the country finds itself unprepared, disoriented, and defenseless.
How did we get here?
Leftists have gradually taken control of the curriculum of our schools. This curriculum was copied from designs made in the USSR for our express use. (See Robin Eubanks Credentialed to Destroy: How and Why Education Became a Weapon https://www.amazon.com/dp/1492122831/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_JdM2Eb4HBATWR). This curriculum destroys the mind’s ability to work competently with abstractions. It leads our children away from patriotism. It leads women to turn against men, blacks to turn against whites, and Americans to turn against their own country. It is a very simple process of indoctrination that nobody has seriously challenged. We have supported this treason ourselves, with lucrative funding. In consequence, we have been gradually losing control of our own institutions, decade after decade. And that is how we have come to this tragic moment in time.
The phrase that best describes this overall process is, “psychological and linguistic disarmament.” We have been intellectually disarmed and now the process has advanced from the realm of ideas to street violence. If the process is allowed to continue, Americans of all races and beliefs will be slaughtered when the foreign enemy moves his missiles, armies, and fleets into action. At present, our economy is under attack on a number of fronts. Law and order is being stripped from us. First, the police will be defunded; second, the Revolution will defund the U.S. military; third, the Chinese and Russians will bomb and invade the country.
Consider the following occurrences; Around the country, police officers are kneeling before “protestors,” begging forgiveness. Whites in the suburbs are also kneeling before blacks. An appeasing and obsequious spirit has taken hold of a neutered middle class. It is a portent of impending mass expropriation. It is a portent of atrocities, killings, massacres, arbitrary arrests, rampaging mobs, foreign invasion, and military dictatorship.
In blue states, Marxist revolutionaries are using black anger to cover an attack on the country’s economy — to take over the streets, to burn and loot businesses, to intimidate the government and subdue the populace. As of this moment, their strategy is working. If the government does not take back the streets and stop the destruction of property, the revolutionaries will begin to dictate terms. In that event, every negotiation will go against the government until the revolutionaries ARE the government.
Presently, the revolutionaries demand that the prisons are emptied and police disbanded. This will assure their control of the streets indefinitely. It will allow them to use force at will, to confiscate property, and commit “extra-judicial” killings. The revolutionaries will form their own government, modeled after Robespierre’s Committee of Public Safety.
There are many who will say, in answer to the above paragraphs, that I am exaggerating the present troubles. They will say that my anticommunist prejudice has led me to a distorted view of events. They will argue that these protests are “peaceful,” and not about Marxism at all, but have to do with “white privilege” and “systemic racism.” While many protestors are genuinely worried about police brutality and systemic racism, they are but pawns — and a screen for the revolutionary left to conduct its violent attacks.
Many good and generous people believe in a leftist utopia of love and peace. But their’s is an upside-down world in which all facts are seen through the ever-inverting eyeglass of ideology. Sadly, they are ignorant of the actual forces manipulating them. Their knowledge of history and politics is too limited for safe involvement in controversies they do not fully understand. VladimĂ­r Lenin had a name for these good people. He called them “useful idiots.”
The present riots have little to do with white racism and everything to do with Chinese and Russian war preparations against the United States. The left in this country — wittingly or not — is the catspaw of foreign powers. To not realize this is to be a political child. It signifies ignorance.  [. . . and become "useful idiots"]
The battlecry of “systemic white racism” is a theme fronted by our enemies. This theme has always been supported by Beijing and Moscow. It is supported for strategic purposes that are now coming into focus. Whatever our domestic problems may be, kneeling before a protest that is used as a screen by communists and foreign enemies, is suicide.
If we bend the knee to this, nothing will go back to normal. There is a video of vandals breaking into a business; the people inside are shouting, “We are on your side! We are on your side!” But the vandals do not stop. They proceed to smash everything in sight.
Many of our politicians and military leaders are sympathetic to the “protesters.” They are afraid to use force against rampaging looters and incendiaries. And so the looting, the burning and the violence, will continue. The revolutionaries are emboldened, primarily by a weak response — a response reminiscent of the French monarchy of 1792.
It is a dangerous task to defend weak governments. Such governments are never steadfast. They are ready to appease or even capitulate. The police are sworn to protect society with their lives, but they will not be supported (in turn) by weak politicians. They will be hung out to dry. Their every action will be second-guessed. They are, even now, collectively slandered as racists.
The Minneapolis city council is — at this very moment — deliberating on whether to disband the police. In Los Angeles, a measure to partly defund the police and divert the money to black radicals has been approved.
Consider what happened in the French Revolution: King Louis XVI, seeing an insurrection being prepared, and wishing to spare the lives of his subjects, put himself into the hands of the revolutionaries, saying, “Gentlemen, I come here to avoid a great crime; I think I cannot be safer than with you.” He abandoned his palace and gave up the protection of his Swiss guard.
The Revolutionaries, having the king in their custody, ordered the Swiss guard to lay down their weapons and surrender. “We should think ourselves dishonored,” replied the guard. “We are Swiss, and the Swiss do not part with their arms but with their lives.”
Heavy fighting began in and around the palace. The Swiss defended themselves. The revolutionaries were infuriated by the resistance. Louis XVI heard of the fighting and ordered his guard to lay down their arms at once. They attempted to obey and were slaughtered. Of the 900 Swiss guards, 600 were killed immediately. Another 200 died of wounds or were murdered later on.
Here is a summary of the whole process: — To avoid bloodshed the King gave himself up. His guard was slaughtered. The king was later beheaded by the revolutionaries (who had previously promised his safety). His wife, the queen, was beheaded. His children were imprisoned. Thousands of innocent persons were beheaded in turn. The Paris mob dominated the politics of those years, until a young artillery officer, named Napoleon Bonaparte, fired grapeshot point-blank into the Paris mob and dispersed it. No more mob. Guess who the country’s next ruler was?
Do we have any bold, capable, leaders in the U.S. military? Presently, the Army leadership is terrified that racial division within the armed forces will break the Army into mutually hostile camps. It is impolitic, they say, to use the military to stop the burning and pillaging of the leftist revolutionaries.
And so, even the Army generals have bent the knee. The Chinese troops, when they arrive, will tell them to get off their knees. The Chinese will give them shovels, and order them to dig. And when the holes are sufficiently deep, shots will ring out; then body after body will fall into the holes. And the People’s Liberation Army will, with soft dirt, cover the holes into which the corpses have dropped.
To our politically correct jackasses: You ought to be ashamed — because you are a pack of unmanned, sniveling, disgusting, senseless, dead-men-walking. You have earned the fate that is in store for you. You die on your knees because of your foul, weak-minded, moral cowardice. Tomorrow they will burn the suburbs and decimate you. And while you are digging your grave for the “nice” Chinese soldiers, I want these words to be burned into your mind: You betrayed your country for thirty years of peace and prosperity. When your enemy took over the schools, you didn’t care. When everything at the store was made by your enemy, you liked the low prices. When your enemy ran for Congress and the White House you voted for him. And you congratulated yourself on being virtuous. But you aren’t virtuous. You are cowards.
You went along with the communist lies. You flattered yourself about winning the Cold War. You pretended that China was a country we could do business with. But now the time has come for you to suffer.
Paul E Vallely  MG, US Army (Ret)
Chairman, Stand Up America US Foundation
Chairman - Legacy National Security Advisory Group
Founding Member - Citizens Commission on National Security
standupamericausa1@gmail.com
Phone (c) : 406 890-4201
Skype: paulvallely
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Sent to me by a dear friend and fellow memo reader who began a program many decades ago between southern police departments and those in Israel.

https://www.camera.org/article/black-lives-matter-jvps-deadly-exchange-and-israel/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sent by a friend and fellow memo reader and tennis buddy. Attributed to Monet but applicable to  Biden: "The man had never had a thought in his life, but he will defend it to his death."
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
Three cyber attacks have rocked Iran lately.


Are three mysterious explosions in Iran linked? - analysis

Three mysterious incidents, linked by explosions – at least two of them at secretive nuclear and weapons facilities – have rocket Iran in the past week.


Three mysterious incidents, linked by explosions – at least two of them at secretive nuclear and weapons facilities – have rocked Iran in the past week. All three have been reported by Iranian media with various excuses about how they are less serious than
they appear, that they are being investigated and that there is no major story to tell.
On June 25, a massive explosion, seen many miles away in Tehran, burned a hillside near a missile complex at Khojir. On June 30, a medical center suffered a fire in Tehran, killing at least 18 people. And on July 2, an incident at Iran’s Natanz enrichment facility was mentioned by the country’s official media, without elaboration. Officials claimed that only a shed was damaged. In each case, officials appeared to try to get ahead of the story by obfuscating about the seriousness of the incident or why it took place at a sensitive facility.
This leads to key questions about why so many explosions or incidents have affected key aspects of Iran’s military-industrial complex. Rumors posted on social media and elsewhere online have suggested not only a cover up but also allegations of a “cyber” attack or other concerns about how these incidents unfolded. Iran alleged a cyber attack harmed Shahid Rajaee port in May, in the wake of an Iranian cyber attack on Israel.

AT THE HEART of this are concerns about Iran, increasingly pressured by US sanctions, lashing out across the region. The Islamic Republic has systematically walked away from the 2015 Iran deal, enriching uranium and ramping up its weapons programs. It has focused on ballistic missiles and precision guidance for munitions, as well as drones and nuclear facilities. The Natanz facility was well known for being affected by the malicious Stuxnet computer worm in 2010. Stuxnet was developed by the US and Israel according to The New York Times, and may have destroyed up to 1,000 centrifuges at the Natanz facility.Natanz consists of a fuel enrichment plant and is Iran’s largest gas centrifuge uranium enrichment facility, according to the BBC. It began working in 2007. Iran’s Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman for the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization, said on July 2 that there were no casualties at Natanz and that the incident was being investigated. He said there was no need to worry about the possibility of contamination “due to the inactivity of the complex.” It was a strange statement, to deny that anyone had been injured and highlight that the facility was not operating. Kamalvandi’s statements headlined the Iranian Students News Agency website and others in Iran on Thursday.

At the same time, Tehran prosecutors have said that the explosion at the Sina Medical Center in Tehran was unintentional. But at least 18 people are dead. High level officials in the government speaking about the June 30 explosion also highlighted the mystery of it. If it was just a routine tragic fire and mistake, what was the need to have high-level officials looking into it, commenting on it and vowing to investigate?

The explosion at the medical center may be less mysterious than the Natanz and Khojir incidents because it is not immediately clear what links it to Iran’s clandestine military programs. For instance, the explosion at Khojir was initially said by Iran to be in Parchin, with media showing a gas tank that had exploded. The size of the explosion caught on video seemed much bigger than the gas tank Iran alleged it came from.

KAMALVANDI HAS been Iran’s point man for explaining the country’s willingness to systematically break the Iran deal guidelines. In August 2019, he said that Iran could reach up to 20% enrichment of uranium. He confirmed further breaches of the nuclear deal that July. Iran says this is in response to the US walking away from the deal in 2018. An accident or explosion at Natanz would call into question what Iran is really up to and whether its nuclear facilities are as secure as Iran says they are.

The need to rush Kamalvandi in front of the cameras to get Tehran’s story out first appeared to underline his agenda. This also appears to be the messaging behind the medical center and Khojir explosions: Get the news our first so rumors don’t spread. That is why Iran admitted that people died at the medical center and tried to show video of what they claimed was the minor Khojir explosion. This sounds a bit like “nothing to see here.”

Iran can’t hide the Khojir incident because it was too big. Conspiracy theories have been advanced about what might have occurred. Why are at least two of the incidents linked to “gas canisters”? That was the explanation given for the medical center explosion. When the medical center exploded, many reports noted that it was only four days after the Khojir explosion and that both involved gas leaks – supposedly.

While Iran’s Tasnim and Fars News media, linked to the IRGC, posted photos of the medical center explosion, one article at Iran’s official IRNA website said that the center was not linked to radioactive materials. Iraj Harirchi, Iran’s deputy health minister who is well known for having had COVID-19 in February, said that the Sina Athar D-Clinic was a dental and imaging center and there were no radioactive materials affected. He appeared to deny it was linked to any nuclear issues. This is also a strange statement: a high-level official denying rumors apparently floating online. He appeared to deflect the rumors by claiming there was regular radiology at the center.

IT APPEARS that Iran’s messaging is directed at the international community as well as for internal consumption to allay concerns that something very bad is happening in Iran. Iranians consume media reports and the public has been on edge for a year due to sanctions and protests last year that saw the government kill some 1,500 people and shut down the Internet. Protesters have been angered at Tehran’s insistence at plowing money into weapons programs rather than local social programs. Explosions at Natanz and the missile facility at Khojir will lead to questions among the public.


This leaves us with three mysterious incidents and no clear answer as to how they are linked. The Khojir explosion was shown to be falsely linked to Parchin when in fact it was likely at a ballistic missile site linked to important industrial groups that built Iran’s solid- and liquid-fueled missiles. What we can see on the surface however is just a burned patch of earth. It may be that whatever exploded has deeper roots underground. Some of these sites appear nondescript on the surface – just a warehouse or shed – while they are actually more important than they seem.

What is clear is that Iran has attempted to admit and showcase these incidents rather than hide them. This appears to be a concerted effort to try to pretend that it is hiding nothing, such that US officials or others cannot point to these sites after the event and show the explosions as evidence Iran is up to something nefarious. Asked about the explosion at Khojir, for instance, US-Iran envoy Brian Hook was non-committal on a visit to Israel.
Tehran will be quick to try to move these stories off the front page. Having “admitted” that nothing important happened, it will then go on to highlight other regional issues, such as the Houthis fighting Saudi Arabia or Hamas “resisting” Israel. Any suggestion that three incidents in Iran in a week are linked can be brushed aside by Tehran by saying they had already been investigated and commented upon.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


No comments: