Why America Is Four F!

I have posted the above before but individually.
---
Why America is Four F:

Liberals Fixed what Functioned and now we are F------ Forever!

From Wilson-FDR Socialism, to Carter-Johnson Progressivism to Obama Entitlement Egalitrarianism - consequence:

A once great and productive nation is economically dimmed because:

Increased debt will result in increased carrying costs which will suck the wind out of private sector sails.

Inane rules, regulations and bureaucratic red tape will impact private sector margins and earnings.

Efforts to elevate the bottom by transferring from the top will result in increased entitlement seekers at the cost of dispiriting  the successful, and finally

Increased taxation at all levels will dis-incentivise resulting in either a prolonged period of GDP undergrowth or a permanent one.

Employment growth is accomplished when shackles are removed from the private sector but since the goal of Obama adherents is to enlarge government dependency employment will remain challenged.

Welcome to The New Year and Obamaism!
---
I do not endorse NFL players playing after concussions as they seem to do each week but I find it most ironic that they do so and yet Hillary Clinton is incapable of coming out from hiding to testify why her  mis-management of the State Department cannot investigated.

The State Department's internal report was a white wash, concluded there were deficiencies but blamed no one. Four people supposedly resigned only to wind up across the aisle in new jobs and so the cover up continues.  Just another lurid example of Obama's open government.

Word is, Hillary has recovered from intestinal flu and will soon testify.
---
Even the concept of knowing your enemy can be carried to the point of lunacy.  Obama has gone beyond what is rational in his desire to burden our military with crippling demands (See 1 below.)
---
History is rife with broken promises by nations.  When so, it becomes diplomacy by deception.  (See 2 below)
---
Dick
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1)LYONS: Draft of new U.S. Army handbook must be scrapped

Military supposed to defend First Amendment rights

After the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” the erosion of our military’s moral principles, regretfully, continues.

A recent Wall Street Journal article described the U.S. Army’s final-draft handbook, which indoctrinates our military personnel heading to Afghanistan in how to be sensitive to and accept Muslim and Afghan 7th-century customs and values — or possibly be killed by our Afghan partners.

Unbelievable. This is being done to prevent the so-called “green-on-blue” attacks, which have cost 63 American lives this year.

According to the Army’s Combined Arms Center at Ft. Leavenworth, Kan., it is our military’s ignorance and lack of empathy for Muslim and Afghan cultural norms that is the basic cause for our Afghan military partners to react violently and kill our troops.

For example, if our military personnel hear or witness an Afghan soldier sodomizing a young boy, the handbook tells U.S. service members to voice no objection, accept it or ignore it, or they could be killed. If an Afghan beats, rapes or kills a woman in the presence of a U.S. serviceman, they are not to interfere or stand up for women’s rights or else they might be killed.

What the Army is saying, in effect, is that if Afghan partners conduct violence against U.S. service personnel, it is the serviceman’s fault. This is mind-boggling. We know, according to former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen, that nine out of 10 Afghan military personnel are illiterate and cannot be counted on in combat. Endemic corruption is embedded in Afghan culture and certainly extends to their military. They cannot be trusted.

Other cultural norms our professional U.S. military must accept without reservation by our Afghan partners is desertion, drug use, thievery, dog torture and collusion with the enemy, the Taliban. Also, U.S. military members must not discuss Islam in any form.

All of this guidance is un-American. It is totally against our core principles and everything we stand for as Americans. It threatens to further diminish our military principles, stature and fighting spirit. As columnist Diana West stated in a recent article, if this handbook directive is implemented, we will be forcing our military to submit to Islam and its governing Shariah law or die — exactly the choice offered to infidels who have been vanquished by jihad. Our military’s silence and acquiescence would be the humiliating price for their existence.

This should be seen as another attempt to undercut our professional military and our warrior reputation that has guaranteed our freedom and way of life for the past 236 years.

None of this humiliating guidance should come as a surprise. The Obama administration has had a massive purge under way to remove all training manuals, lectures and instructors who link Islamic doctrine and its governing Shariah law in a factual way to Islamic terrorism. These manuals are being removed from all government agencies, including the Department of Defense and intelligence agencies. All our training manuals have been purged of the true nature of the threat from Islam and Shariah.

The degrading of our military’s fundamental principles should be viewed in a much broader perspective. We cannot overlook the fact that with or without sequestration, we are unilaterally disarming our military force. This is happening in spite of an uncertain world situation with the Mideast still in a state of turmoil and evolving threats posed by China, Russia and Iran.

Separately, we see our First Amendment rights being trashed by our secretary of state through her participation in the Istanbul Process championed by the 57-member-nation Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). The OIC is sponsoring a United Nations mandate that would make it a crime to express anything they consider blasphemous against Islam or the Prophet Muhammad. This same theme was expressed by President Obama in his September speech to the U.N. General Assembly in New York.

If these attacks on America’s exceptionalism and core principles are collectively analyzed, it appears that there is an insidious agenda at work to fundamentally change America. All of these negative factors must be challenged and defeated. As a first step, the Army’s draft handbook should be trashed.

Second, Congress must take positive action to protect our First Amendment rights and force the Obama administration to withdraw from any further participation in the Istanbul Process. Third, the unilateral disarmament of our military must be reversed. It’s time for members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to take a position that supports the oath they took to protect and defend our Constitution.

Retired Adm. James A. Lyons was commander in chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet and senior U.S. military representative to the United Nations.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2)  

Implementing the Balfour Declaration

 By ALEXANDER ZVIELLI

T.E. Lawrence on British-Jewish- Arab cooperation

Photo by: Courtesy

You won’t find this truth in the lengthy biography of Thomas Edward Lawrence, the legendary “Lawrence of Arabia” in the Encyclopaedia Britannica. Don’t expect to hear about this on the BBC. The world remembers Lawrence as a guide, friend and champion of Arabs, but hardly knows that he believed in Zionism as a force to restore Palestine to its ancient glory, brought about by active British-Jewish-Arab cooperation.

T.E. Lawrence, an English officer, an Arab hero, an archeologist, orientalist and author who, precisely because he was such a devoted champion of the Arab cause, supported the Jewish settlement in Palestine.

LAWRENCE, BORN on August 15, 1888, in Caernarvonshire, Wales, knew prewar Turkish-occupied Palestine much better than most European Zionist leaders, including Chaim Weizmann. Already at Oxford he had submitted a thesis on the subject of Crusader castles in France, Syria and Palestine, which won him first-class honors in history in 1910. As a protégé of Oxford archeologist D.G. Howard, he excavated from 1911 the Hittite settlement of Carchemish on the Euphrates.

Lawrence used his three-year scholarship to travel throughout Palestine, learning the language, customs and people. Early in 1914, he and Sir Leonard Woolley explored the northern Sinai extensively, in what was actually a strategic drawing and map-making of the Negev sponsored by the Palestine Exploration Fund. World War I found him in London as an expert on the Middle East and Arab affairs, employed in the map section of the War Office. Delegated to join the staff of the British HQ in Cairo, he persuaded the Arabs to revolt against the Turkish regime under the protection of British forces.

Lawrence, with his knowledge, experience and enthusiasm, and the aid of gold sovereigns, organized an Arab fighting unit commanded by Emir Feisal, son of Sherif Hussein of Mecca, to whom the British had addressed the McMahon Declaration of 1916 pledging the liberation of Arab countries from Turkish rule and support for Sherif Hussein as king.

Lawrence served Emir Feisal in this unit as a British liaison officer and political adviser, and was successful in capturing Aqaba in 1916. The unit entered Damascus in 1918. During the summer of 1918 it was still carrying out sabotage behind the Turkish lines when a historic meeting between Emir Feisal, Lawrence and Dr.

Chaim Weizmann took place.

WEIZMANN RECALLS in his memoirs, published in his book Trial and Error, how he arrived in Cairo in the spring of 1918 as the head of the Zionist Commission, charged with advising the British Government on the implementation of the Balfour Declaration.

In Cairo, Weizmann was advised by General Edmund Allenby, the CO of British forces in Egypt, to try to make direct contact with the Arab leaders and seek their support for the common development of Palestine.

Allenby suggested Weizmann approach Emir Feisal “for a least a tentative agreement on the Zionist program for Palestine.” Feisal, in Allenby’s opinion, was the only Arab representative of influence, who could be regarded as the sole Arab leader.

Thus in June 1918, Weizmann, assisted by a British liaison officer, Major Ormsby- Gore, embarked on a difficult journey to meet Emir Feisal. However, on the way Ormsby-Gore became ill with dysentery.

Another British officer was appointed to accompany Weizmann to Feisal’s camp in Trans-Jordan. This unexpected substitution made Weizmann’s task all the more difficult, since Ormsby-Gore was sympathetic to Zionism.

It was a pleasant surprise to Weizmann, exhausted after a most tiring journey, when upon his arrival at Feisal’s camp he was greeted by Lawrence, friendly to the Zionist cause. Lawrence instructed Weizmann on how to approach Emir Feisal and how to present his cause, and proved himself to be not only a good translator, since Weizmann did not know Arabic, but a trusted friend who persuaded Feisal that the Jewish settlement in Palestine would be of great benefit to the country and the Arab people.

To Lawrence, who had met Jewish pioneers and admired their zeal, the formula of Jews and Arabs joined together under the British aegis in a common effort to rebuild Palestine after centuries of neglect, sounded most promising.

Lawrence, well aware of Palestinian poverty and neglect under Turkish rule, was convinced that Jewish effort and money would be of ultimate benefit to both peoples.

He presented this idea again after the end of World War I, when he served with the British delegation to the Paris Peace Conference and as a representative of Emir Feisal, representing Arab interests.

Lawrence assisted in the editing of the Weizmann-Feisal agreement by which the national and historic rights of Jews in Palestine were recognized. Britain was to become the trustee power in Palestine, expected to absorb millions of Jews who would extend financial and technical aid to the Arabs.

During the 1919 Paris Peace Conference Lawrence was present at the crucial meeting between Emir Feisal and the American Zionist Felix Frankfurter. A historic letter was published on March 3, 1919, on behalf of the Hedjaz delegation, signed by Emir Feisal. The letter had clearly stated the Arab position: 

“Dear Mr. Frankfurter, I want to take this opportunity of my first contact with American Zionists, to tell you what I have often been able to say to Dr. Weizmann in Arabia and Europe. We feel that the Arabs and Jews are cousins by race, suffering similar oppression at the hands of powers stronger than themselves, and by happy coincidence have been able to take first step towards the attainment of their national ideals together. We Arabs, especially the educated among us, look with the deepest sympathy on the Zionist movement...”

As Weizmann commented, “this remarkable letter should be of interest to the critics who have accused us of beginning our Zionist work in Palestine without ever consulting the wishes or welfare of the Arab world... Of equal interest to the critics should be the agreement into which Emir Feisal, as the head of the Arab delegation to the Peace Conference, entered with me on January 3, 1919.”

This agreement stated that the Palestine Administration would carry into effect the British Government’s (Balfour) Declaration of November 2, 1917, encouraging Jewish immigration to Palestine.

HOWEVER, EMIR Feisal’s goodwill was hardly shared by a vast majority of the British military authorities or the Administration of Palestine, which largely ignored the Balfour Declaration. It was hostile to Jews, in particular to the Jewish immigrants from Russia, whom they regarded as Bolshevik emissaries acting according to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

This attitude surely affected Arabs and assisted Syrian Muslim fanatics in spreading their anti-Jewish propaganda. The British policy of divide and rule was an obstacle to any conciliation.

Emir Feisal failed to become the king of Syria. The Supreme Allied Conference, which met at San Remo on April 20, 1920, gave Britain a mandate for Palestine, with the obligation to establish in it the Jewish National Home, promised in the Balfour Declaration. France received a mandate for Lebanon and Syria.

This proved to be a disappointment to Lawrence and the Arabs, many of whom felt betrayed and their interests set aside by Britain and France. Emir Feisal quit the Peace Conference in anger.

Lawrence went home, but he returned to the Middle East in March 1921, as a personal adviser to Winston Churchill, the colonial secretary, who pacified Arabs by offering Feisal the Kingdom of Iraq, and his brother Abdullah the Emirate of Trans-Jordan.

In 1922, Churchill severed Trans-Jordan from Palestine, hoping that this would satisfy Arab demands for a separate state. After a few months in Amman, Lawrence returned to London where, in 1926, he published his book The Seven Pillars of Wisdom, which appeared in 1927 in a shorter version.

Lawrence, who missed adventure, enlisted in the British forces twice as a private.

He died on May 19, 1935, in Dorset. His other books were published posthumously.

His work on behalf of the possibility of joint British-Jewish-Arab development in Palestine has been almost completely forgotten.

----------------------------------------------------------------------