Tuesday, February 28, 2023

Will Lightfoot Get Booted ? Iranian- Israeli War Draws Closer.

++++++++++++++++++++++++
'Who's Zoomin' Who?' Joe Biden stays away from East Palestine
By Salena Zito


EAST PALESTINE, Ohio — Late Friday afternoon, as President Joe Biden was departing the White House for Wilmington, Delaware, he was asked by a reporter if he had plans to visit this Columbiana County village.

“Will you go to East Palestine, Ohio? Are you planning to travel to East Palestine, Ohio?” he was asked.

“At this point, I’m not,” Biden said. "I did a whole video — I mean, um, what the hell — on...” Biden said, struggling to find the right words before another reporter jumped in and saved him.

“Zoom?” the reporter asked.

“Zoom! Zoom. All I can hear every time I think of Zoom is that song of my generation,‘Who’s Zoomin’ Who?’” he joked about the Aretha Franklin dance-pop song about checking someone out in the bar scene in 1985.

When pressed, Biden said, “Guys, wait, wait, wait. Let me answer the question."

“The answer is that I had a long meeting with my team as to what they’re doing. … So, I’m keeping very close tabs on it. We’re doing all we can,” he said.

Nearly one month after 38 freight cars derailed a two-mile-long train operated by Norfolk Southern, Biden has largely avoided discussing the wreck that unleashed a variety of chemicals here, including highly toxic vinyl chloride, into the air, soil, and water.

When asked, local and state officials in both Ohio and Pennsylvania, including Mayor Trent Conaway, said they have not participated in a Zoom call with Biden. Some said they have had calls with the White House but nothing on Zoom. Conaway, who is dealing with the burden of this disaster day in and day out, has never even once heard from the president.

Click for the full story: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/whos-zoomin-who-joe-biden-stays-away-from-east-palestine

Washington Examiner | NY Post | CNN 
salenazito.com

Order your copy today

"People struggling to understand what is happening in American politics would do well to read this fascinating book." - Associated Press 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I felt this in my gut because I don't believe much of what comes out of government.  I was forced to wear masks and did but concluded they were ineffective and I thought if you survived Covid your immune system was pretty damn good but never voiced this strongly.

If and when government acts it over does it because those seeking power and control act irrationally.
+++
Get Tomorrow’s Disinformation Today!

This disinformation business sure has gotten complicated lately.

In the past few days, a key federal agency concluded that COVID was likely the result of a Chinese lab leak. A prestigious medical journal reported that natural immunity is better than vaccines against COVID. Another that mask mandates were worthless. And President Joe Biden’s advanced age is now, according to Biden, a legitimate issue.

All of these claims had been labeled as “disinformation” by the mainstream press, by “independent” fact-checkers, by social media platforms. Anyone who espoused them was attacked as a crazy anti-vaxxer, QAnon racist, Russian stooge who deserved to be de-platformed, demonetized, and discredited.

Take the lab-leak story. The Energy Department, “citing new intelligence,” changed its view on the origins of COVID-19 and now thinks it did, in fact, escape from a lab in Wuhan, China.

It wasn’t long ago that such a claim opened you up to ridicule or worse.

A-list journalist Anne Applebaum once compared Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., to a Soviet propagandist for suggesting that COVID came from a lab. A New York Times reporter said the lab-leak theory had “racist roots.” The editor in chief of Scientific American called it a “conspiracy theory.”  CNN said it was “like something out of a comic book.”

Politifact, one of the supposed independent guardians against disinformation, said that any such claim was “inaccurate and ridiculous. We rate it Pants on Fire!” Facebook banned posts mentioning the lab-leak theory.

How about COVID vaccines? We were told that vaccines were far superior to natural immunity in fighting the virus. In October 2021, Centers for Disease Control Director Rochelle Walensky said that “we now have additional evidence that reaffirms the importance of COVID-19 vaccines.” The CDC insisted that even those who already had COVID should still get vaccinated. Anyone who disagreed was an anti-science troglodyte.

Then last week, the highly prestigious British medical journal, The Lancet, looked at all the existing research and concluded that natural immunity is just as effective as the vaccine at preventing both re-infection and serious illness from COVID.

Critics of mask mandates – who’d been derided as the moral equivalent of mass murderers – also turned out to be right. (We were among those early critics. See: Still More Evidence That Biden Is Wrong About Mask Mandates.)

As we noted in this space last week, Cochrane – an international collaborative effort funded by the Nation Institutes of Health that is regarded as employing “the highest standard in evidence-based health care” – looked at all the data and concluded that there is no evidence that masks made any difference.

The latest disinformation wrinkle comes right out of Biden’s own mouth.

When we reported on our own I&I/TIPP poll about the public’s concerns regarding Biden’s mental health – Americans Very Worried About Biden’s Mental Health: I&I/TIPP Poll – Google labeled it “dangerous and derogatory” – a category which includes content that “incites hatred against, promotes discrimination of, or disparages an individual or group on the basis of their race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, age …” As punishment, Google’s advertising network wouldn’t show ads on that page.

But, in an interview with ABC News that aired over the weekend, Biden said “it’s legitimate for people to raise issues about my age. It’s totally legitimate to do that. And the only thing I can say is, watch me.”

Presumably, Biden wasn’t encouraging viewers to watch him stumble while climbing the stairs to Air Force One, or clips of him reaching out to shake hands with thin air, or appearing to lose his bearings on the White House lawn, or the garbled gibberish he often utters, or the countless other examples of his physical and mental decline.

But if Biden now admits concern about his age is a legitimate issue, why are articles bringing it up being attacked as dangerous disinformation?

Meanwhile, actual media disinformation goes unpunished.

A recent batch of Twitter files, for example, showed that the Alliance Defending Democracy’s widely cited Hamilton 68 dashboard of Twitter accounts “linked to Russian influence” was bogus – which meant that every mainstream press outlet that relied on Hamilton 68 was involved in a massive disinformation campaign organized by a left-wing group.

But no matter how many times the leftist press is shown to have peddled misinformation, it continues to get gold stars for reliability from “independent” groups.

A Washington Examiner investigation found one such well-funded group, the Global Disinformation Index, gives sites such as the far-left Huffington Post top-level reliability scores while labeling the RealClearPolitics site – which links to both liberal and conservative news and commentary (including I&I editorials) – as one of the 10 “riskiest” in the nation. “All of the websites that GDI ranks as the ‘least risky’ lean left in their news coverage,” the Examiner found.

Worse, the GDI is offering its top-secret “dynamic exclusion list” as a way for “advertisers, suppliers, platforms and search engines to defund and downrank domains and apps with the highest disinformation risk.”

Worse still, the Examiner found that the State Department has bankrolled two organizations that donated substantial amounts of grant money to the GDI, raising legitimate concerns about government censorship.

We have first-hand knowledge of how this works.

When we launched this site in 2019, we initially relied on Google’s AdSense network to place ads in several spots on each page. (We’ve since cut its presence on our site to one ad at the very bottom of the page.)

What we found was that Google – which gets top ratings by the GDI for its efforts to defund “disinformation” – starting flagging much of our content as “dangerous,” “misleading,” “unreliable,” and “harmful,” and blocked ads from appearing on those pages.

One of the articles that Google is right now targeting is our Feb. 23 editorial applauding Congress for investigating COVID vaccines (Congress To Probe COVID Vaccines — And It’s About Time).

Apparently, merely calling for a congressional investigation “promotes harmful health claims or relates to a current, major health crisis and contradicts authoritative scientific consensus,” according to Google’s thought police.

So, let’s review.

The stuff labeled as dangerous disinformation keeps turning out to be true. The supposed guardians of credible information turn out to be some of the biggest peddlers of actual disinformation. And groups that are supposedly targeting disinformation are really just out to defund conservatives.  

In all this confusion, one thing is perfectly clear. If you want to know what will be labeled as disinformation tomorrow, just look at whatever is on the left’s agenda today.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

We Could Use Your Help
Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
A complex and fascinating listen:
+++
If you missed the webinar, please visit our YouTube channel to view the recording, here.

The New, New Middle East: China, Iran, and Turkey

with David Goldman

 

Russia's invasion of Ukraine has begun to reshape realities in the Middle East. Both China and Turkey are playing more prominent roles in the region, while Iran has been afforded a dangerous path to achieving its Islamist goals. How will this impact demographics and geopolitics? Is there any pushback by the West?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Second City Shambles

The teacher union-controlled school system in Chicago is an abject failure.

By Larry Sand 


The numbers are jaw-dropping. In 30 Chicago public schools, not a single student can read at grade level. In total, just 20 percent of 3rd through 8th graders in the Windy City are proficient in reading and only 15 percent are proficient in math.

As such, it’s easy to see why students are bailing en masse. In fact, more than one-third of Chicago’s 473 traditional public schools are currently running at half-full or worse, according to data released in December. Douglass High School, which bills itself as “The Jewel Of The Westside,” has a capacity for 888 students, but just 34 are enrolled, and not one of them is proficient in reading. In the past 10 years, the city’s total public school enrollment has gone from over 400,000 to 322,000 and the bleeding shows no sign of abating.

The spending hawks can’t claim it’s due to a lack of funding. When all local, state and federal dollars are added up, Chicago’s per student outlay is now $29,207.

Additionally, the underpaid teacher excuse can’t get any traction in Chi-town as a starting teacher makes $64,000 a year and can earn up to $122,000 per annum—not including pension and healthcare perks.

Chicago schools took a hit in 2018 when the Chicago Tribune released “Betrayed,” a series of articles that drew attention to numerous shocking incidents of sexual misconduct against students throughout the city. The Trib reported that “between 2008 and 2017, the Chicago Police Department had conducted 523 investigations that involved sexual assault or abuse of children within Chicago schools by fellow students or adults.”

Corruption has also been rampant throughout the district. As reported by Wirepoints, former Chicago Public Schools’ CEO Barbra Byrd-Bennett spent time in federal prison for steering contracts to a former employer in 2015. And Forest Claypool, another former CPS CEO, had to resign under a cloud of ethics violations in 2017.

And then there’s the Chicago Teachers Union, the most noxious teachers union in the country, especially since 2010, when the Caucus of Rank-and-file Educators (CORE) began to rule the roost. In the past 13 years, the union has held five strikes or “work stoppages.”

Mayor Lori Lightfoot, hardly a right-winger, stated during a recent debate with two of her opponents in the Chicago mayoral race that the Chicago Teachers Union brought chaos to the schools. Lightfoot blamed CTU for the district’s enrollment decline and criticized the union’s frequent work stoppages that plagued the city.

In January 2022, the union illegally staged a last-minute walkout over the district’s COVID-19 protocols, which gave parents just a few hours to scramble for a back-up plan for their children. The response to the protest was fast and furious. Mincing no words, Mayor Lightfoot called the walkout illegal and said, “If you care about our students, if you care about our families, as we do, we will not relent. Enough is enough. We are standing firm and we are going to fight to get our kids back to in-person learning. Period. Full stop.”

For good measure, she added, “I will not allow them to take our children hostage . . . Why are we here again when we know that the safest place for our children is in school? Why are we here again when we know that our schools are safe?”

While most teachers unions are political in nature and kids are merely a blip on their radar, CTU is in a league of its own. As reported by Mailee Smith, staff attorney and director of labor policy at the Illinois Policy Institute, since CORE took over the union in 2010, the union has invested heavily in political campaigns, giving more than $17 million to state and local election committees. “In 2021, only 19 percent of CTU spending—$5.9 million of $31 million—was used to represent teachers, according to reports that the CTU filed with the Department of Labor. The rest went to politics, administration, and other union leadership priorities. Last year, the CTU spent more than $1 million on political activities and lobbying, which doesn’t include money spent by its political action committee.”

Since 2010, CTU has directed nearly $17.2 million to political committees, according to the Illinois State Board of Elections, including over $2.5 million to Illinois Senate and House candidates, more than $1.3 million to current Chicago mayoral candidates, and over $505,000 to current Chicago aldermanic candidates.

CTU also wants to eliminate Illinois’ only private school choice program. The Invest in Kids Act is a tax credit program which provides a choice for families that are seeking a better fit for their kids, but can’t afford private school. If CTU gets its way, over 9,000 low-income students across the state will lose their scholarships to attend their private school, and be forced back into the school system they so desperately tried to escape.

Adding to the overall miasma, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker just signed into law House Bill 5107, which enables school principals to unionize. This gambit will serve to exacerbate an already hostile labor environment and further destabilize the school district.

On February 28, Chicagoans will elect a new mayor. The union’s choice is Brandon Johnson, a CTU lobbyist, avowed Socialist, and recipient of a $590,000 gift from the union. On Jan. 23, Johnson introduced his “tax-the-rich” revenue plan for the city of Chicago, calling for $800 million in new taxes. He is specifically targeting the “wealthy,” but the details of his plan show that much of the pain will be absorbed by the middle class.

A 2004 Fordham Institute study looked at 50 American cities and found that 21.5 percent of urban school teachers send their kids to private schools, while 17.5 percent of non-teachers do. Digging a little deeper, we learn that the disparity is considerably greater for larger urban areas. In Chicago, for example, 39 percent of public school teachers’ kids attend a private school.

Given the state of CPS, I would be shocked if that 39 percent isn’t considerably higher now.

(Having just scratched the surface here, I advise viewing Local 1: The Rise of America’s Most Powerful Teachers Union, Illinois Policy Institute’s just released documentary about the history of the Chicago Teachers Union and its political influence. It is well worth your time.)

Editor’s Note:  A version of this article first appeared at For Kids & Country.

About Larry Sand

Larry Sand, a former classroom teacher, is the president of the non-profit California Teachers Empowerment Network—a nonpartisan, non-political group dedicated to providing teachers and the general public with reliable and balanced information about professional affiliations and positions on educational issues. The views presented here are strictly his own.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
WATCH: Ron DeSantis STUNS Reporter After Perfect Question!

Read This Alert >>>

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
War in the Middle East Is Closer Than You Think 
By Walter Russell Mead 

I was here last week to interview Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the Tikvah Israel Security Conclave. The interview, available on the Journal’s website, combined a tour d’horizon of Mr. Netanyahu’s view of world politics with some candid reflections on the history of Zionism. As for the rest of the conference, I came away thinking that the U.S. is much closer to getting involved in another Middle East war than most in Washington understand, and that minimizing this danger requires rapid and sweeping policy change from an administration still struggling to comprehend the most serious international crisis since the late 1930s.

The Biden administration came to office with an elegant and cohesive geopolitical strategy. It would address the China challenge by driving wedges between China and its fellow revisionist powers. It would park Russia by accommodating Vladimir Putin and stabilize the Middle East by reviving the nuclear deal with Iran even as it pursued aggressive trade and security policies to limit China’s rise. 

From the outset, the administration knew that the American-led world system was in trouble, but it underestimated the severity of the threat and misunderstood its causes. To its credit, Team Biden saw the China challenge clearly from day one, but failed to understand how weak the foundations of American power had become or how far the revisionist powers—China, Russia, Iran and hangers-on such as Venezuela and Syria—were willing to cooperate to weaken an American hegemony they both resented and despised.

Two years later, the Biden administration is struggling to manage the failure of its original design. Its aggressive rhetoric and policy toward China have intensified China’s hostility, but instead of facing an isolated China in an otherwise calm world, the administration faces simultaneous confrontations in Europe and the Far East. Russia isn’t parked, Iran isn’t pacified, and the three revisionists are coordinating their strategy and messaging to an unprecedented degree.

Worse, Iran’s inexorable march toward nuclear weapons, combined with its deepening partnership with Russia, is driving the Middle East steadily closer to a war that is likely to engage the U.S.—one that the Biden administration desperately wants to avoid.

For Mr. Putin, a major military confrontation in the Middle East would be an unmitigated blessing. Oil prices would spike, filling Moscow’s coffers and intensifying pressures on Europe. The Pentagon would have to split available weapons between Ukraine and Middle East allies. The balance in the Taiwan Strait would significantly shift in China’s favor. Spiking energy prices would boost inflation in the U.S. just as Mr. Biden tries to persuade antiwar Democrats to support another American military venture in the Middle East.

And while in a perfect world Russia might oppose an Iranian nuclear weapon, under current circumstances—in which Mr. Putin desperately needs Iran to help disrupt American strategy—Mr. Putin might well decide to help Iran cross the nuclear threshold.

But the Russian dictator doesn’t need to go that far. Simply by increasing Iranian military capabilities that limit Israel’s ability to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, Mr. Putin could force Israel into a pre-emptive strike that would set off a regional war.

The U.S. can’t compel Iran and Russia to avoid actions that trigger a new Middle East war, but strong policy on our part still might deter them. Unfortunately for the Biden administration, that involves precisely the kind of hawkish Middle East posture that many Democrats—including senior Biden officials—viscerally loathe. The American approach to Saudi Arabia will have to move from a fist bump to wholehearted embrace. Drone attacks and other provocations by Iran and its allies against the Saudis, Emiratis and their neighbors will have to be met with the kind of American military response that leaves no doubt of our determination to prevail.

The best way to avoid war, and to minimize direct American engagement should war break out, is to ensure that our Middle East allies have the power to defend themselves. We must make it unmistakably clear that we will ensure our allies win should hostilities break out. Nothing else will do.

The administration seems to be moving, slowly, in the right direction in the Middle East, but time is not on its side. Wishful thinking and strategic incompetence led the bipartisan foreign-policy establishment first to ignore and then to appease rising challengers to the post-Cold War world order.

Now the Biden administration faces the consequences of a generational failure in American foreign policy. We must wish Team Biden success as it struggles to cope with a world that it, along with the American foreign-policy community as a whole, largely failed to foresee.

In an interview with 'Global View' columnist Walter Russell Mead on Feb. 21, 2023, Benjamin Netanyahu gave a tour d’horizon of the region, the world situation and Israeli-US relations. Video: The Tikvah Fund Composite: Mark Kelly
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++




 

No comments: