‘Massive’ Cyberwar Attack Underway
In the past, Russia has repeatedly targeted Ukrain with cyberattacks. It has some of the best hackers in the world, both within the government and outside experts, who often align with the government to use cyber capabilities to hack the infrastructure of other countries. In this case, this may be the first real look at the future of cyberwarfare.
Experts say that it is all but inevitable that Russia will launch a cyberattack on the United States in retaliation for the sanctions President Joe Biden imposed on Russia yesterday.
+++
This from a dear friend and fellow memo reader about why the silence.
+++
My comments are drawn from a fascinating article by Tom Fitton.
One would think it the duty of every pragmatic and thoughtful western leader to call out the suspension of basic human rights and civil liberties where they see them, and yet with the exception of Nayib Bukele, president and self-proclaimed CEO of El Salvador, all of them are terrifyingly silent on the matter.
When peaceful protest is criminalized by political opponents in power , it will engender the kind of violent rebellion the Trudeau regime has fabricated as justification for its tyranny. They are using JFK's famous words to their advantage: "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. They can point to any resistance as violence and offer their prepared solutions — more tyranny.
By Star Parker
+++
Order out of chaos: How the Ukraine conflict is designed to benefit globalists
By Brandon Smith
Within the next few months, it is likely that there will be a direct military conflict in Ukraine, with Russia now openly supporting and recognizing separatist groups in the Donbass region on the eastern edge of the country and apparently positioning to aid them militarily in separation. This is not the first time Russia has sent military units into Ukraine, but it is the first time since 2014 and the annexation of Crimea that the threat of military action has been overt rather than covert.
When conflict erupts, you are going to see a swarm of media stories in western nations trying to outline the complexity of the relationship between Russia and Ukraine since the fall of the Soviet Union, while ignoring certain inconvenient truths. You will see many of these stories construct a narrative that then oversimplifies the situation and paints Russia as the monstrous aggressor. The goal will be to convince the public that our involvement in Ukraine is a moral and geopolitical necessity. There will be attempts to gain American favor and a call for U.S. military involvement. Joe Biden will be at the forefront of this push.
The surface trigger for the confrontation is obviously rooted in the 2009 decision by western powers and Ukrainian officials to consider the country for membership in NATO. Most of Russia's actions when dealing with Ukraine can be owed to NATO involvement in the region, including the Russian invasion of Crimea in 2014. Strategically, it makes sense. Imagine if Mexico suddenly announced it was joining a military alliance with China and that Chinese military assets were going to be transferred near the U.S. southern border? It probably would not end well.
To be sure, Russia has a history of hypocritical behavior when it comes to its involvement in the affairs of its neighbors. For example, only a few months ago Kazakhstan was facing mass protests which the government claimed were caused by "foreign manipulation." Zero proof was presented to justify this assertion. However, the claim was enough to rationalize the deployment of 2300 Russian troops over the border to shut down the protests.
In reality, citizens of Kazakhstan were angry over a spike in inflation and high gas prices which continue to grind down the middle class and those in poverty. In 2019, only 4% of the population lived under the official poverty line. In 2020, that number exploded to 14% of the population. Accurate numbers are difficult to find for 2021, but it is likely that poverty levels are now closer to 16%-20%. The reasons for civil unrest were obvious and justified, but the Kazakhs were accused of being pawns of foreign enemies. As I have noted in many articles lately, this is a typical strategy of governments trying to retain power when the people rise up to rebel for legitimate reasons.
Again, imagine if the Canadian government under Trudeau asked for US military assistance in scattering the trucker protests against his draconian vaccine mandates? We need to look at these decisions in context in order to grasp how insane they really are.
Ironically, Russia is happy to support the unrest of separatists in Ukraine while helping to silence unrest in Kazakhstan. Keep this pattern in mind because it will help in understanding how events surrounding Russia reflect a global trend that might affect Americans in the future.
The diplomatic mess between Ukraine and Russia can be blamed in part on both sides, and it's this kind of historical ambiguity where globalists tend to thrive. The fog of war helps to obscure their activities and often it is hard for people to see who is truly benefiting from the chaos until it's too late. It is my belief that the Ukraine problem is at least partially engineered and that it is designed as a first domino in a chain of intended crises.
I don't think there is anything unique to the Ukraine conflict for the globalists; they could have just as easily tried to initiate a regional war in Taiwan, North Korea, Iran, etc. There are numerous powder keg countries that they have been cultivating for a couple of decades. We should not hyperfocus on who is to blame between Ukraine or Russia, but on the effects that will result from any major regional disaster and how the globalists exploit such catastrophes to further the agenda of total centralization of power.
The Ukraine scenario could be easily defused if both sides took some basic diplomatic measures, but this is not going to happen. NATO officials could take a step back from the pursuit of adding Ukraine to the ranks. The U.S. could stop pouring cash and weaponry into Ukraine to the tune of $5.4 billion since 2014. Over 90 tons of military equipment has been sent to the country in 2022 alone. Russia could stop sending covert special operations units into the Donbass and be more willing to come to the table to discuss diplomatic solutions. The reason these things do not happen is because they are not allowed to happen by the power brokers behind the curtain.
We are all aware of the globalist influences behind US and NATO leaders, we present undeniable evidence of this on a regular basis. Biden's penchant for globalist institutions is well known. But what about Russia?
There are some in the alternative media and the liberty movement who falsely believe that Russia is anti-globalist. Nothing could be further from the truth. As with many political leaders, Putin will sometimes use anti-globalist rhetoric, but his relationships tell another story. In Putin's first autobiography, titled First Person, he discusses with fondness his first encounter with New World Order globalist Henry Kissinger as a member of the FSB (formerly the KGB). As Putin rose through the political ranks, he maintained a steady friendship with Kissinger and to this day they have regular lunches and Kissinger has been an adviser to multiple branches of the Kremlin.
It doesn't stop there, though. Putin and the Kremlin have also kept a steady dialogue with the World Economic Forum, the project of the now notorious globalist Klaus Schwab. In fact, only last year Russia announced it was joining the WEF's "Fourth Industrial Revolution Network" which focuses on economic socialization, artificial intelligence, the "internet of things" and a host of other globalist interests which will all lead to worldwide technocracy and tyranny.
Again, the Russian government is not anti-globalist. This claim is nonsense and always has been. I would attribute the fantasy of Russian opposition to a steady stream of propaganda and what I call the False East/West Paradigm. The fraudulent notion that the globalist agenda is a purely Western or American agenda and that countries like China and Russia are opposed to it. If you look at the close interactions between the east and the globalists, this idea completely falls apart.
It's important to understand that most conflicts between the East and the West are engineered conflicts and the leaders of both sides are not really at odds with each other. Rather, these wars are Kabuki Theater; they are wars of convenience to achieve covert ends while mesmerizing the masses with moments of terror and calamity. For anyone who has doubts about this, I highly recommend they read the thoroughly researched and evidenced works of professional historian and economist Antony Sutton, who quite accidentally stumbled onto the facts surrounding the globalist conspiracy and went on to expose their habit of playing both sides of nearly every war over the past century from the Bolshevik Revolution to WWII and onward.
The strategy of order out of chaos is nothing new, it's something the globalists have been doing for a very long time. The number of open revelations post-COVID about the "Great Reset" that globalists have publicly admitted to is so staggering that their plans can no longer be denied. Anyone who does at this point should be suspected of having a single-digit IQ.
So, now that we have established the reality of globalist involvement in both the West and in Russia, we need to ask ourselves how they benefit from initiating a crisis in Ukraine? What do they get out of it?
As I have noted in recent articles, it appears to me that Ukraine is a Plan B attempt to conjure more smoke and mirrors where the COVID pandemic in many respects failed to satisfy the Great Reset plan. As Klaus Schwab and the WEF have constantly asserted, they saw the pandemic as the perfect "opportunity" to force the Fourth Industrial Revolution on the world. As globalist Rahm Emanual once opined in the wake of the 2008 economic crash:
"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is it's an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before."
The WEF is an old hand at this tactic. Klaus Schwab also used the same exact language right after the credit crash of 2008 as he has used after the spread of COVID, always trying to sell global governance as the solution to every disaster:
"What we are experiencing is the birth of a new era, a wake-up call to overhaul our institutions, our systems and, above all, our thinking, and to adjust our attitudes and values to the needs of a world which rightly expects a much higher degree of responsibility and accountability," he explained. "If we recognize this crisis as being really transformational, we can lay the fundaments for a more stable, more sustainable and even more prosperous world."
- Klaus Schwab on the Global Redesign Initiative, 2009
Schwab jumped the gun back then just as he jumped the gun in 2020 when he declared the Great Reset an inevitability in the face of COVID. The globalists must have expected a much higher death rate from the virus because they were practically dancing in the streets, elated over the amount of power they could steal in the name of "protecting the public from a global health threat." If you look at the WEF and Gates Foundation simulation of a COVID pandemic, Event 201 which was held only two months before the real thing happened, they clearly expected COVID to do way more damage, predicting an initial death tally of 65 million. This never happened; it isn't even close.
It's hard to say why an obvious bioweapon like COVID failed to do the job. Viruses tend to mutate rapidly in the wild and behave differently than they do in a lab setting. I would even consider the possibility of divine intervention. Whatever the reason, the globalists did not get what they wanted and now they need yet another crisis to oil the gears of the Reset machine. With the already tiny death rate of COVID now dropping even further with the Omicron variant and half the states of the U.S. in full defiance of the vax mandates it is only a matter of time before the rest of the world asks why they are still under medical authoritarianism?
War in Ukraine and the mere threat of that war expanding beyond the region could accomplish a number of things COVID has not. It provides an ongoing cover for the stagflationary collapse which is now in full swing in the U.S., the supply chain problems that continue globally, as well as the destabilization of the European economy. In particular, the EU is strongly reliant on Russian natural gas in order to heat homes and maintain its economy. Russia has strangled natural gas supplies to Europe in the past and they will do it again.
War is always a distraction from economic sabotage. Even though the seeds of financial crashes are often planted and watered well in advance by central banks, the banks never get the blame because international conflicts take center stage. By extension, global economic crisis causes mass poverty, mass desperation and mass hysteria, and globalists will say that it requires an international solution that they will happily provide in the form of centralization.
In the U.S. and in many other western nations which have a large number of people still defending individual freedom, the globalists clearly want to use tensions with Russia as a means to silence public dissent over authoritarian policies. Already, I am seeing numerous instances of establishment officials and leftists on social media suggesting that liberty activists are "pawns of the Russians" and that we are being used to "divide and conquer." This is nonsense backed by nothing, but they are trying out the narrative anyway to see if it sticks.
I have no doubt that any rebellion in the U.S. against the globalists will be blamed on foreign interference. As mentioned earlier, the last thing the elites want is movements of free people obstructing the Reset in the name of liberty. We witnessed this in Canada where Trudeau announced unilateral emergency powers against the trucker protests, giving himself totalitarian levels of control. Even the Russian government has intervened in such public actions to prevent any kind of activist momentum. Biden will try to do the same thing, and war, even a smaller regional war, gives him a rationale to oppress public dissent in the name of public security.
Interesting, martial law in the U.S. is also much easier to legally and historically justify for the government as long as it is done in response to the invasion of a foreign enemy. The Russian influence narrative may very well be in preparation for martial law within America. Whether or not this actually succeeds is another matter.
The consequences of a shooting event in Ukraine would be far reaching well beyond a distraction for the American public; my intent here is not to suggest only Americans will be affected. My point is that there are certain places in the world that are naturally resistant to the globalist scheme, and freedom-minded Americans are a primary obstacle. If there is a large-scale rebellion against the Great Reset, it's going to start here. The globalists know this as well, which is why the U.S. will undoubtedly be centrally involved in the Ukraine quagmire. While the event would be disastrous for Ukrainians and probably many Russians, there are deeper and more dangerous underlying threats intended for the U.S.
To truth and knowledge,
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ross rants:
I often talk about black swans. We are in one of history’s biggest black swan moments right now. While the Ukraine situation was developing over the past several months, none of us thought it would come to where it is-a potential shooting war in Europe with potentially tens of thousands dead. It is impossible to know what Putin is really going to do, but he is putting on a very effective power show if he is not intending to really invade. He has the whole world running to Moscow to beg him to stop. What a great position he has created for himself while doing nothing other than moving troops around and staging training exercises. The fact seems to be he has done nothing new, and not really pulled back any troops. I still do not believe he will fully invade Ukraine, and will instead use other means to continue to apply pressure, and to try to overthrow the government so he can install his puppet. Invading means thousands of dead and wounded Russian soldiers and serious economic problems for the Russian civilian population. 40% of Ukrainians are Russian origin, or related, with family in Russia. If he kills tens of thousands of Ukrainians in a senseless war, he just angers his own people, and he ruins the wealth of his oligarch buddies, and his own secret holdings. None of this makes sense to me which is why I continue to think this is all a masterful bluff. If he was going to kill a few million Germans, or Muslims, he likely would have the support of his people, but killing other Russians living in Ukraine is very different. He can, and will, use other means and continued pressure on Ukraine thru disinformation, street protests by his people in Ukraine, cyber, and economic strangulation, to get much of what he wants in the 2023 Ukraine elections without the bloodshed and economic problems for Russia. He wants regime change, and he will continue to press to get that. He got Belarus even though the populace did not want that. He will not let up the pressure. It occurs to me the White House suddenly ramped up talk of war threats soon after the inflation report came out and Biden’s poll numbers dropped to a record low. What a great diversion. Don’t get excited by talk of a diplomatic solution that the stock market will go up, or oil will now go down. Neither is going to happen
If the west really does sanction Russia, keep in mind, Russia supplies a lot of oil to the world, and a large portion of energy to the EU. They also supply 90% of freon used in semiconductors, 35% of palladium, 2/3 of the world’s ammonium nitrate used for fertilizer, and much of the titanium used by Boeing. If things really do blow up, the economic damage to Russia and the world would be bad. Germany would be hard hit, which is why they will do anything to prevent this from going to war and sanctions. The economic damage to Russia would be substantial. This is one of the big reasons why I do not believe he will invade. There is too much at stake for everyone in this interconnected world. The whole thing could spin out of control when the cyberattacks begin, as that is a new form of warfare where there are no rules. Ukraine has a lot of raw materials the world needs and Putin would also like to get control of those.
Oil prices may have declined a little temporarily, but with Covid now quickly going away, and the world reopening, travel and production will pick up around the world, and oil demand will rise materially. There is no reason to believe oil prices will decline as we get to summer. There are several oil industry forecasts that oil will soon be at $125 and could go as high as $150. Even though the US drillers are ramping up as prices rise, and if Iran comes back into production, the demand will still outstrip supply. OPEC has been under producing by up to 700,000 barrels per month. They are enjoying the huge profits, and have little incentive right now to increase production and push down prices. Inventories need to be rebuilt, especially for LNG in the EU. There is only minimal increases in production capacity as the US does all it can to end oil drilling. The oil companies are making a fortune right now, and will continue to have great cash flow all year. Even though they are once again opening some new wells, the margins at $90 -$100 are huge. The oil company stocks should do very well all year as they raise dividends and possibly buybacks. I have sizable holdings in oil stocks. Reality-there was never going to be an invasion, and so Ukraine has no more than a very brief impact on where oil prices are going. Demand is going to far outstrip supply. Larry Fink is doing a lot of damage to US national security and the economy.
Last year many pointed to a steep drop in lumber prices starting in May to prove inflation was headed down. They are way up again to 3x their pre-covid level, although still below the last April peak. One commodity does not determine inflation so just because lumber or some other commodity drops temporarily in price is no indicator of a drop in inflation ahead.
The market could go down considerably further despite the remaining cash consumers and corporations are sitting on, and even if there is some sort of agreement on Ukraine. The PPI is at a record high. That means Inflation will remain high for a quite a while as oil prices continue to go higher. As long as the administration continues to push to quash new wells, and to add regulations and fees to oil production, there is no reason the price will decline. If Raskin is confirmed, along with the other far left FMOC nominees, then capital for the oil drillers will be constrained. It appears the Republicans now have a way to stop Raskin, but they need to stop the other two as well. Cook is a far left activist who is more interested in stirring racial issues than monetary policy. I am 25% in simple cash plus a sizable piece in oil. I may go higher in cash. I am happy to just sit on plain cash and earn nil than to buy bonds or other fixed income. Losing a little value to inflation is far less than losing 25%-40% in holding stocks of companies with little cash flow or little upside for the next year. Cash is king right now.
It is absurd that we have high inflation, but the administration continues to try to eliminate oil production in the face of Ukraine which just raises the cost of energy for everything. Stupid does not begin to describe the left focus on ending fossil fuels with no recognition that by doing so they are doing a lot of damage to national security as well as low and middle income people. Their answer seems to be to try to push OPEC to produce more, and to make America dependent once again on Mideast and Russian sources. We have been increasing imports of oil from Russia while we threaten them with sanctions if they invade. Putin must be in awe of the stupidity. Why would OPEC limit prices when Biden is publicly begging them to cover our needs, and the EU is desperate for gas supplies due to their own insanity of shutting down the nuke and coal utilities and the Dutch gas fields. Germany created its own energy problems of shortages and extremely high prices by adhering to their climate ideology instead of economic reality. We will have the same situation here if Biden does not shift his anti-fossil ideology, or until the Republicans get full control in January. The good news is the EU is now importing a record amount of LNG from the US and will continue to do so. This will continue all year. We should be building another LNG terminal.
Goldman and some others in Wall St are forecasting the stock market will end the year higher then ever. 4900 on the SPX, and maybe even higher, over 5000. I think that makes no sense. Their reasoning is not even intellectually consistent. On the one hand they say the Fed will raise 7 times, which implies they believe inflation is going to continue at too high levels all year, and rates will rise all year. If that is the case, which I believe it will be, then it means the economy has a real problem with inflation, and will be declining as consumers and producers pull back. It also implies that housing will be further priced out of reach for most people, and the rise in home prices could potentially turn down. If that happens, and housing development and sales turn down, then the economy starts to decline. Goldman is also forecasting very high oil prices. Another reason for high inflation leading to high interest rates and high inflation, which means lower stock prices. You don’t have a record high stock market in such a situation. Goldman has been wrong often.
People are never fully returning to the office, 76% have no intention of 5 days a week in office. In NYC and several other major urban locations the occupancy is still under 30%. That will grow to maybe 40% per day, or maybe a little over 50% but from here on, hybrid is going to be the rule. Two or three days in office for most will become the norm. Think of the ramifications for landlords of B and C buildings and local small businesses and city tax revenues. The results are only starting to be known. A lot of courts are continuing some hearings and some testimony on Zoom. For simple hearings that might never change back. Zoom changed the world. There are all sorts of social and cultural changes coming if there is no full scale return to the office.
The White House and the Dems in Congress still believe in their Modern Monetary Theory, and Yellen’s make believe Modern Supply Side theory, and they will continue to push for more spending and higher taxes on the successful. The underlying basis is that more spending on social programs will create jobs and lower inflation, and make everyone more prosperous, thereby assuring Democratic control. This is right out of Bernie’s and the squad’s socialist playbook. It is the underlying theory that Moody’s was paid to put forth in economic models for the White House, which said: the main goal needs to be increasing jobs, and the only way to get there is by materially ramping up spending. What I am told directly by the head of Moody’s Analytics, which you will never hear anywhere else, is that he believes this will potentially lead to problems later in 2022, and maybe a stock market collapse of 20% later in the year. You may wonder how can they say, spend a lot more, then say, but in the end it may lead to a bad outcome. Answer is, start with very liberal political views at Moody, and then get paid a lot to develop a policy model that conforms with the goal of increasing entitlements and jobs. Then get the Secy of Treasury to come with a false theory to further justify it. Now add the squad and Bernie and Warren pushing a far left agenda. Schumer is going far left to try to fend off a run by the bartender from the Bronx for his senate seat, and a president and White House staff that have zero economic understanding, and view everything from the point of view of paying everyone to feel good to get votes.. It is all about retaining power. Combine that with their voting right bills, and now you understand what is going on. It is well proven over decades to be very bad economic theory, and it will end badly. Just look at the slow economic growth in the EU with its excessive entitlement economics and politics, over the past decade vs the US under Trump’s tax and regulation reductions.
You likely forgot about Durham. A lot of readers kept saying I was off base by saying Durham would eventually bring a massive case. Don’t forget Durham. He just filed court documents claiming Hilary paid a tech company to infiltrate Trump and White House computers to make it falsely appear he was involved with Russia. You have to believe this is true or Durham would not have filed these papers. He is still going forward, and the story gets a lot worse the more that comes out. I believe he is not close to finished, and when the whole story is finally put together in public it will be the worst scandal in American history. We have no idea why it is taking them years to assemble all the evidence, but it is likely so complex and top level, that he needs absolute proof to overcome what will be massive press attacks to discredit him, but they seem to have found the keys now. The press is already ignoring the story or claiming there is nothing to the new Durham filing. They are wrong again. People are talking to the grand jury to save themselves. Sussman will take his shot in court, but we have not yet heard what Durham really has, so wait to hear. He is too careful to put on a losing case. It sounds like they have a lot of pressure on Sussman now. Durham will surface with a huge report and a lot of indictments at some point, and destroy Hilary and the Dems, and possibly Perkins Coie, the law firm at the center of the whole dossier fraud. Unfortunately, it will allow Trump to say I told you so, and make him more of a problem. The only question is whether Hilary gets charged with multiple felonies including treason, and if they can charge Mark Elias with felonies and send him to jail. This is going to make Watergate look like kindergarten. Just in time for the midterms. The worst part of this situation is none of the MSM has reported even one word of this, and when a senior Dem was asked about it he tried to claim it is just a unproven story, and probably just another false claim. The press just continues to disgrace itself by ignoring the story. On the flip side, Trump’s accountants disavowed all of the Trump organization financial for 11 years. Their reasons are pretty compelling. It does appear there was a substantial amount of false information provided to the accountants by Trump. It is not simply a question of whether the appraisers did an accurate job, which they almost never do.
The Olympics are disgraced forever now that they allowed the Russian skater to do drugs and then be allowed to compete. This on top of choosing China in light of their genocide and crushing of Hong Kong. The IOC has put the Olympics into the category of corruption and dishonor for.
RUTHIE BLUM-OPINION
Assessing Israel’s vow to prevent a nuclear Iran
The Bennett-Lapid government’s attitude towards the Biden administration casts doubt on its threat to go it alone.
(February 22, 2022 / JNS) Aside from the concrete threat that Iran’s military activities pose to the Jewish state, the Israeli government has two major problems with what is emerging from Vienna as an imminent return of world powers to the nuclear deal with the mullah-led regime in Tehran. CONTINUE
And:
Netanyahu: New Iran nuclear deal will ‘bring war, and then another war’
BY ALEX TRAIMAN 02/22/2022
(JNS) Former Israeli prime minister and current opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu told a group of American Jewish leaders on Tuesday that the nuclear deal with Iran taking shape in Vienna would lead to war.
“This deal will bring war. This deal that [the Americans and world powers] are coming back to,” he said. “This region will become a nuclear tinderbox. This will bring war, and then another war,” he said. “We are going from a bad deal to a worse deal.” CONTINUE
++++++++++++++++++++++
No comments:
Post a Comment