We’re not even a year into this national nightmare. Joe Biden was always going to be a terrible president, but this feels like we're on the Titanic. The fight we’re currently in is the ultimate one that will determine if America survives. Democrats are trying to enact full-blown authoritarian socialism. You already know this—but not only is America itself facing an existential threat, so are we here at Townhall.
Enter Gigi Sohn. She’s Joe Biden’s nominee for FCC commissioner and she’s hell-bent on destroying us. She’s even gone as far as calling Fox News state propaganda and will seek to regulate conservative media out of existence. The worst part is that she apparently has allies in Newsmax and One America News Network. What these idiots are thinking, I don’t know—but Sohn is one of the picks that seeks our total erasure. The enemy is at the gates. Liberal state media is a few small steps away.
By joining Townhall VIP, you would become part of the Townhall army that is working to defend against the censorship enemy at the gates and destroy the Biden radical leftist agenda before they can annihilate us.
The good news is that Biden is also falling apart on his own. The man cannot do the job—and it becomes more explicit with each passing day. Joe probably pooped himself in front of Pope Francis before he farted all over the place in front of the Brits. He has no plan to combat inflation. His COVID strategy has failed, and with Omicron, he’s seeking to lock down the country again.
Before he can do that, he’s trying to force his unconstitutional vaccine mandate on all of us. The man has totally lost it. Biden isn’t up to the task of being president - he’s too stupid, too slow, and too mentally diminished to do anything.
As a VIP member, you get exclusive access to Col. Kurt Schlichter’s columns, podcasts, and Stream of Kurtiousness videos, which are arrows straight into liberal America. You also get Katie’s columns and those from Larry O’Connor who slices through the media’s fake news narratives like a blowtorch through butter. And you'll also get my weekly VIP column. You fund these efforts. You fund Julio Rosas' trips to the southern border, his coverage of leftist rioting in the cities, and covering key trials like Kyle Rittenhouse’s massive victory for self-defense in America. Because of you, we’re able to have boots on the ground and tell the truth the liberal media doesn’t want out there.
I will say it again. By joining Townhall VIP, you’re supporting the fight for America. This is your piece of the site—without ads and totally untethered to the woke censorship machine that wants to crush us at every turn. It’s here you can read the truth about COVID, the border, Joe Biden, his radical leftist agenda, and family corruption. It’s the stuff that Dr. Anthony Fauci doesn’t want you to read. It’s the stuff that would be put on double-secret probation if the Big Tech lords ever found out.
We don’t say chest-feeding persons or birthing people here. We say "women." We live in reality. This is your refuge from the woke hell holes popping up across the country. It’s a place to reload, rest, and relax. It’s also the platform that has and always will openly attack these leftist clowns. Join us in the fight by becoming a Townhall VIP member. We must protect ourselves from them.
'The Comedy We've All Been Waiting For': Hillary Clinton Reads What Would've Been Her Victory Speech
By Leah BarkoukisLeah Barkoukis|
An emotional Hillary Clinton read the victory speech she prepared for Election Night in 2016, had she not been defeated by Donald Trump.
Clinton took the trip down memory lane as part of a MasterClass series. The former secretary of state has been promoting her class, “The Power of Resilience,” reports The New York Times. Part of her reading of that speech was released Wednesday by the “Today” show.
“In this lesson, I’m going to face one of my most public defeats head-on by sharing with you the speech I had hoped to deliver if I had won the 2016 election,” she says in the clip.
“I’ve never shared this with anybody,” she adds. “I’ve never read it out loud.”
She became emotional when reading a part about her mother, Dorothy Rodham, “who grew up in poverty and was abandoned by her parents as an 8-year-old girl,” according to the Times.
"I dream of going up to her and sitting down next to her, taking her in my arms, and saying ‘look at me, listen to me. You will survive. You will have a good family on your own. And three children. And as hard as it might be to imagine, your daughter will grow up and become the president of the United States,’” she says.
Mrs. Clinton had planned to deliver the speech at an elaborate celebration on the night of Nov. 8, 2016, complete with confetti shaped like glass shards that would fall from the glass ceiling of the Jacob K. Javits Convention Center in Manhattan.
Instead, she gave a hastily scheduled speech in a dreary hotel ballroom on the day after the election, in which she said the country was “more deeply divided than we thought.”
“This loss hurts,” she said that day. “But please never stop believing that fighting for what’s right is worth it.” (NYT)
Critics mocked Clinton over the reading of her planned speech, including Fox News's Gregg Jarrett, who suggested she could instead teach a "MasterClass in cluelessness."
"I had the misfortune of watching all of [the speech]," he told Sean Hannity. "It was pathetic and embarrassing. And actually nauseating. I kept thinking – ‘what kind of a person does this?
"Well, a person who yearns for relevance, to be sure, but an embittered person who refuses to accept personal responsibility for her own failure," he continued. "She lost because she ran a hideous campaign with unpopular policies and came across as unlikable, and yet she is obsessed with blaming others."
"She wrote an entire book blaming everybody else but herself," Jarrett added. "People like this can't stand defeat, criticism. She seems like a classic case of narcissistic personality disorder, this overwrought sense of entitlement, an exaggerated sense of self-importance, and no sense of self-awareness, but on top of it, as you point out, scandal and malfeasance followed her everywhere she goes."
++++++++++++++++++
58% of Israeli Jews back striking Iran’s nuke program without US consent
That number drops to 51% of Israelis when Israel’s entire population is taken into account, including its significant Arab minority.
A significant majority of Jewish Israelis, 58%, would support a strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities even without a green light from Washington, according to an Israel Democracy Institute report published Wednesday.
That number drops to 51% of Israelis when Israel’s entire population is taken into account, including its significant Arab minority.
Still, for a country that was once ready to downgrade or replace its prime ministers if they did not get along with a US president, and where many security experts consider at least a quiet US “wink” as necessary for an attack on Iran, that the general public feels differently was telling.
The Israeli Voice Index survey for November 2021 was published by IDI’s Viterbi Family Center for Public Opinion and Policy Research.
Less than a third (31%) of Jewish Israelis would not support action against Iran without American approval, while around 82% of Arab Israelis would want the Biden administration to sign off.
Next, the report noted that the gaps between the political camps (among Jewish Israelis) was large, with 67% on the political Right supporting a strike without US consent, while only 37.5% of the political Left would support such a strike.
Perhaps most importantly, 50% of the ever-growing political Center in Israel would support such an attack.
Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, Defense Minister Benny Gantz and Foreign Minister Yair Lapid (slated to replace Bennett in 2023) are all viewed as either having right-wing or centrist constituencies.
Though the government also has left-wing and Israeli-Arab parties, these three officials would be the dominant deciders about whether a preemptive strike on Iran’s nuclear program would be necessary, and whether they would be prepared to do so even without US consent.
When Israel struck Iraq’s nuclear program in 1981, then-US president Ronald Reagan was furious, but Israel rode out the fallout.
In contrast, when Israel struck Syria’s nuclear program in 2007, then-US president George Bush was supportive after the fact, and the issue had been discussed between the governments.
The Biden administration is not expected to green-light an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities short of the regime being close to being able to fire a nuclear missile, whereas Jerusalem might feel a need to act at an earlier date to avoid missing its window of opportunity.
Next, 54% of respondents thought that Iran is an existential danger to a “large” or “very large” extent to Israel.
About a quarter of respondents viewed Iran as a “medium danger,” while a minority (13%) saw it as posing only a “small danger.”
On this issue, the report again found a large gap between the Jewish and the Arab interviewees.
A large majority (62%) of the Jewish Israelis thought that Iran constitutes an existential danger to a “large” or “very large” extent, while only a minority (19%) of Arab Israelis agreed.
The survey was conducted on the Internet and by telephone (supplements of groups that are not sufficiently represented on the network) from November 29 to December 1.
Six hundred and fourteen men and women were interviewed in Hebrew, and 150 in Arabic, constituting a representative national sample of the entire adult population.
The maximum sampling error was 3.59 %+/- at a confidence level of 95%, with the fieldwork handled by the Midgam Institute.
++++++++++++++++++++
Biden No Match For Putin
by Paul R. Gregory via What Paul Gregory is Writing About
The December 7 virtual summit between President Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin
proved (as expected) an uneven match. According to the short White House readout, Biden threatened
Russia with “strong economic and other measures” in the event of military escalation and reiterated his
support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
++++++++++++++++
Strategic Empathy: The Foundation For Understanding Threats To American Security And Prosperity
by H. R. McMaster via PolicyEd
H. R. McMaster answers questions about national security from students and explains how important
principles of national security apply to the withdrawal from Afghanistan.
+++
|
No comments:
Post a Comment