Halloween was once scary now it is just sexy.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
For any president to allow his son to sell his art and not disclose the buyer is outrageous.
For any president whose son has a history akin to Hunter's and is allowed to sell his art without disclosing the buyer it is more outrageous.
For any president who stated he would have an open administration and then allows his son to sell his art without disclosing the name of the buyers and furthermore, this same son has a history of financial dealings with known adversaries this borders on an impeachable offence.
For any president who stated he would have an open administration and then allows this son to sell his art without disclosing the name of the buyers and furthermore, has a history of financial dealings with known adversaries and there is evidence some of the proceeds may have gone to his father this becomes an impeachable offence.
Anyone who denies and was engaged in hiding these events is a liar and should be prosecuted for shielding unlawful acts at the highest level of government. I would call this sedition.
Will anything come of this? Probably not because the AG is, himself, under suspicion for being a Biden lackey , legal hack and, at the very least, recently displayed untrustworthy judgement.
Hunter Biden Scandal EXPLODES - It's Finally Hitting The Fan! | |||
| |||
Read This Alert >>>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Add to the above the following and you have a president who is opposed to "we the people" and wants to be a dictator: a) Biden and radical Democrats are proposing taxing capital gains before any sale. b) Biden and radical Democrats are in favor of telling parents government will educate their children and parents who complain will be intimidated by the FBI. c) Biden and radical Democrats want to expand the IRS so the agency can track every personal bank transaction under the guise of assuming we the people are crooks for not paying taxes. These three proposals alone thrust America into the realm of what Nazism was all about. Because Biden and radical Democrats are having trouble passing legislation at the level of $3 plus trillion, which everyone knows is double the proposed amount, they are now cutting back to the $2 trillion level. There re two issues with this sleight of hand : a) Virtually all of the raise is unrelated to the dictionary level of infrastructure. It simply falls into the category of welfare funding. b) More importantly, history tells the story that small programs seldom, if ever, get eliminated. They simply remain, get funding and eventually grow/expand like Topsy. All one has to do is track the programs that made up Johnson's War On Poverty. The mind set of Biden and radical Democrats is grow government, crush freedom and ensnare/enslave "we the people." This approach is a far cry from what "the founding father's" intended and envisioned. This is what our founders wanted to distance American's from- taxation without representation. This is why a lot of good tea was thrown overboard. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ But let's not stop . The most egregious acts of all are cheapening the value and meaning of legitimate citizenship while enhancing that of illegals. This means disregarding law enforcement and subjecting Americans to rules and regulations that are not applied to those seeking citizenship illegally and using tax payer dollars to reward illegal entry while arresting protesting legal citizens: Simple examples : c) Showering welfare money on illegal immigrants and making it easy for illegals to vote, to receive paid for education, housing, medical care etc. d) Engaging in transshipping minors most likely to engage in dealing in narcotics and underaged sexual activities . +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Lamentably, the Biden Administration, encouraged by radical Democrats, does not stop at domestic law breaking but extends it to questionable activities regarding foreign affairs like funding terrorism, particularly where Israel is involved:  Is the decision to renew US funding to UNRWA conducive with US law? (edited) By Maurice Hirsch, The Biden administration recently announced that it will contribute an additional US$135.8 million to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), the UN body that exclusively serves the Palestinian refugees. According to the announcement, the latest sum will be additional to the initial US$150 million pledged by the US in April and the US$33 million pledged following the May war. The contribution was made possible after the signing of a new framework agreement between the US and UNRWA. While the process would appear to be a reflection of good governance and diligence, in practice, the decision to renew US funding to UNRWA raises a number of pressing issues. While US law does not limit the amount of aid the administration can give to UNRWA, the law requires that prior to the initial obligation of funds the Secretary of State report to the Appropriations Committees on a number of subjects. Of the different requirements, two subjects are of particular importance. What materials are being taught in UNRWA schools? One of the preconditions for US aid to UNRWA, set out in the Consolidated Appropriations Act 2021, requires the Secretary of State to report to the Committees on Appropriations on whether UNRWA is “taking steps to ensure the content of all educational materials currently taught in UNRWA-administered schools and summer camps is consistent with the values of human rights, dignity, and tolerance and does not induce incitement.” There is no objective way that the Secretary of State could have certified that the materials taught in the UNRWA schools in the areas under the control of the Palestinian Authority meet the standard set or that UNRWA was taking the steps necessary to ensure meeting the standard. In 2017, a dispute arose between UNRWA and the PA regarding the new school textbooks the PA had released. Having reviewed the textbooks, UNRWA approached the PA pointing to concrete examples of content included in the new books that breached the agency’s duty of neutrality. UNRWA then suggested specific changes. The PA rejected all of UNRWA’s reservations and suggestions and demanded that the agency use the PA materials, without making any changes. When UNRWA did not immediately agree to the PA dictates, the PA Ministry of Education decided to suspend all its relations with the agency. Instead of standing its ground, UNRWA capitulated and agreed to continue using the PA schoolbooks without any changes. A later additional attempt by UNRWA to mitigate the content of the schoolbooks was also rejected by PA Multiple reports on the PA schoolbooks demonstrate their content does not meet the standard set by the Consolidated Appropriations Act. A comprehensive report on PA schoolbooks commissioned by the EU found that some of the PA schoolbooks in use today include antisemitic content, present Palestinian violence and terror against Israelis as part of a “heroic struggle,” and deny the legitimacy of Israel's existence through maps that erase Israel and label the entire area “Palestine.” While the PA textbooks, affirm the importance of human rights in general, the notion is not carried through to a discussion of the rights of Israelis. According to the report, “Violence perpetrated by Palestinians, including violence against civilians, is presented as a legitimate means of resistance.” While the EU commissioned report gave the PA curriculum an inherent discount, considering it in the context of “conflict”, similar comprehensive reports written by other organizations, such as IMPACT-se, have found that the PA school books are replete with antisemitism and have content that glorify and justify terror. Since the PA forces UNRWA to use the PA schoolbooks, in order for the Secretary of State to report that UNRWA is taking the necessary steps to ensure that the educational materials taught in its schools meet the standard set by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, he would have had to report, that the UNRWA schools in the areas under the control of the PA no longer uses any of the PA schoolbooks. All other mechanisms, such as an UNRWA evaluation of the educational materials, that do not include an express requirement that UNRWA schools not use the PA schoolbooks is clearly insufficient. Is US aid being used by UNRWA to pay benefits to terrorists? An additional prerequisite for US funding to UNRWA requires the Secretary of State to report on whether UNRWA is in compliance with section 301(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. Section 301(c) provides that the US shall not make a contribution to UNRWA unless the agency takes “all possible measures to assure that no part of the United States contribution shall be used to furnish assistance to any refugee who is receiving military training as a member of the so-called Palestine Liberation Army or any other guerrilla type organization or who has engaged in any act of terrorism.” While the “Palestine Liberation Army” – which was the military arm of the PLO – has practically ceased to exist, “other guerrilla type organization[s],” including, but not limited to, a Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and Fatah’s Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade continue to exist and are actively engaged in acts of terror. All of these organizations, and others, are US designated terror organizations. This provision requires UNRWA to actively vet all the UNRWA aid recipients to ensure that none of them are receiving military training. To meet the standard, among other potential measures, UNRWA could simply provide the list of all the UNRWA beneficiaries living in the Gaza Strip, Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem to the Israeli authorities who would be able to identify the terrorist recipients. Notwithstanding the requirement and the different measures for its implementation, it would appear that the agency is not meeting this basic and elementary standard. According to the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, dozens of Palestinian refugees, who were active terrorists, have been killed in different rounds of violence in the Gaza Strip. In the Hamas organized attempts to breach the barrier between Israel and the Gaza Strip, that started in March 2018, and the 2014 operation Protective Edge the Amit center identified 53 active terrorists killed, who were also refugees. In the May 2021 war, terrorists from Gaza fired over 4,300 missiles indiscriminately targeting Israel’s civilian population. According to the Amit Center, the list of terrorists killed during war included at least 11 terrorist-refugees. While the Amit Center statistics refer to the terrorist-refugees killed, it is clearly reasonable to assume that there were many other terrorist-refugees who were not kille In other words, there are clearly scores of terrorist-refugees who have, and are receiving military training from the terrorist organizations and are/were engaged in terrorism, these terrorist appear still to be benefiting and receiving aid from UNRWA. Following the May 2021 conflict, UNRWA unreservedly announced on its Twitter account that the agency is providing cash assistance to families in Gaza whose houses were destroyed or rendered uninhabitable. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ We've been doing this for decades through welfare etc. In America, We Don't Lower Our Expectations ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 'This Is Insanity': Democrats Discuss New Plan to Help Pay for Massive Spending Bill ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ China knows something about strategic planning. Biden could learn from them but is mentally incapable.
. |
No comments:
Post a Comment