Sunday, October 3, 2021

They Are Spenders/Politicians And Can't Say No Completely. Riley Offers Sound Advice. Can Republicans Take It? Greta Right, Nature Wrong.

















By now, even to liberals it should be obvious the mass media are liars and committed to a party of their choosing.  Even the mass media have to find it difficult to swallow/believe what they write, see, think. and report. They have run out of erasers and whitener.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Bret is right but they cannot say no because they are prone to spend and cannot disconnect from the party in which they feel comfortable. 


https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/28/opinion/biden-infrastructure-congress.html

 

Manchin and Sinema Should Just Say No

By BRET STEPHENS


Dear Senators Manchin and Sinema,

Whether the occasion is social or political, the hero of the party is the person who’ll grab the keys before the drunks can get behind their wheels.

This week, it falls to the two of you to be that person. The progressives in your party think you’re all that stands in the way of their expensive utopia, and they’re willing to hold a popular infrastructure bill as hostage in order to get their wish. The leaders in your party expect you to go along, at least partway, with a $4.5 trillion spending bonanza — $1 trillion for infrastructure, an additional $3.5 trillion for new entitlements — because that’s what some members of their caucus demand. If you don’t, much of the media will cast you as the villains who kneecapped an already faltering Biden presidency.

And they are doing this in the week when the only thing that ought to matter to Congress is raising the debt ceiling to avert default.

This is dumb. The likeliest way for President Biden to fail — and for Democrats to lose their congressional majorities next year and for Donald Trump to return to the White House next term — is for the spending bills to pass mostly as they are. A Democratic Party that abandons its center (where many congressional seats are vulnerable) for the sake of its left (where the seats are usually safe) is heading straight for the minority come November 2022.

Let them call you names now so that they can thank you for your sobriety later.

The working class faces no greater thief than inflation. The rich can switch among asset classes, find different tax shelters, rely on financial experts, ride it out. The less fortunate — your constituency and much of the Democratic base — depend on regular paychecks to pay the rent. And rents are now skyrocketing.

In June, the inflation forecast was 3.4 percent for the year. The forecast has since risen to 4.2 percent — more than double the Federal Reserve’s target rate of 2 percent. The Fed hopes this will taper once the pandemic ends and supply disruptions, supposedly the cause of inflation, cease.

But what if it isn’t just supply disruptions that are causing prices to rise but rather a case of too much money chasing too few goods? And what if the pandemic continues to defy expectations and carries over until next year? Congress has already appropriated close to $6 trillion for Covid relief. A continuing pandemic would most likely require further trillions in spending. How does that square, fiscally, with the $4.5 trillion extravaganza?

This is what ought to keep Democratic leaders awake at night, along with the record spike in homicides, an incoherent and chaotic policy on the southern border and the possibility that a ticking real-estate debt bomb in China could be the world’s next Lehman Brothers collapse.

Instead, they’re pushing for the biggest expansion of the welfare state since the 1960s, to be financed with the biggest tax increase in decades and to be passed with a three-vote edge in the House and a tiebreaker vote in the Senate on a 100 percent partisan basis. This is not what swing voters had in mind when they elected Biden on his pledge to be a unifier, a compromiser and a moderate.

And it shows: Biden began with a 61 percent approval rating among independents, according to Gallup. Eight months later, it’s at 37 percent. This is another stark portent of a midterm blowout.

Would it help the cause if Democrats came up with a lower topline? Nope: It would be a classic case of falling between two stools, placating neither friends nor critics. Is it honest to claim the bill adds nothing to the national debt? “Biden’s own budget officials earlier this year estimated that his agenda would increase the national debt by nearly $1.4 trillion over the decade,” The Associated Press reports. Does it help that Biden is now claiming that his spending plan “costs zero dollars”? Only if you enjoy having your intelligence insulted.

Which neither of you do.

There’s a way out of this standoff. Trade a clean vote in the House on infrastructure for Senate Republican support for a debt-ceiling increase, gained by putting the $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill on ice. Or simply hold a clean House vote on infrastructure and increase the debt ceiling unilaterally through reconciliation. Then disaggregate the spending bill into separate items of legislation that could be voted on à la carte, according to their merits and political appeal. Let the American people know what’s in this huge legislative burrito. Maybe they’ll find some of it appetizing.

For Biden, it’s a way of realigning himself with the center of the country with a policy win on infrastructure and strengthening moderates of the party with a political win over the left. For the two of you, it’s a chance to be both statesmanlike and politically shrewd.

Sometimes, the heroes of the story are those who just say no. Here’s your chance.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jason Riley offers sound advice to Republicans.  Will they listen?  Can they?  Time will tell.

 

Identity Politics Isn’t the Only Way to Appeal to Minority Voters

The GOP should realize that blacks and Hispanics like safe neighborhoods and low taxes too.


Readers often ask why blacks vote in such high percentages for the Democratic Party while supporting issues like school choice and crime control that are more closely associated with Republicans. But this phenomenon is hardly limited to blacks.

In California last year, Asian-American voters helped defeat a ballot referendum that would have reinstated racial preferences in college admissions. Yet Asian-Americans in California also voted overwhelmingly for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, who vocally supported the ballot measure. The old political joke about Jews, who are nearly as loyal to Democrats as blacks have been, is that they earn like Episcopalians and vote like Puerto Ricans. There is a temptation to accuse people of voting against their rational interests. But who are we to determine what is “rational” for others?

Within these reliably Democratic voting blocs there have always been exceptions, of course. Religious Jews, for example, are more likely to back Republicans. And black men vote Republican at higher rates than black women. Nor are these voting trends unshakable. As recently as the 1960s, Republicans enjoyed significant black support, and in the 1970s and ’80s the GOP performed well among Asians in California. So-called Reagan Democrats, who were mostly white ethnics, left their party and helped power the Gipper to a 49-state victory in 1984.

The simplest explanation for why Republicans don’t win more black voters is that GOP candidates rarely seek them out. Republicans who can be bothered to court this bloc—former mayors like Richard Riordan of Los Angeles and Stephen Goldsmith of Indianapolis, or former governors like Chris Christie of New Jersey—have found that campaigning in black communities can pay dividends. Even if you don’t win the vote outright, you win goodwill and make it more difficult for your opponent to paint you as antiblack, which is how Democrats habitually describe Republicans to draw attention away from liberalism’s policy failures.

When Republican Gov. Larry Hogan of Maryland ran for re-election in 2018, he won 28% of the black vote, which was double the amount he’d won four years earlier. This was all the more impressive because his opponent not only was black but also a former head of the NAACP, and Democrats enjoyed a blue wave nationally that year. Mr. Hogan’s gains among blacks didn’t come from making overt racial appeals. Instead, black supporters cited the governor’s push for lower taxes and his decision to send federal troops to Baltimore during the 2015 riots. Apparently, identity politics isn’t the only way to win the votes of blacks, who like safe neighborhoods and low tax rates just like a lot of other Americans.

This history is forgotten or ignored by too many conservative commentators, who maintain that Hispanics are forever lost to the Republican Party. The argument is that Latinos—those already here and, especially, those who are trying to come—are natural Democrats who can be counted on to vote against the GOP until kingdom come. I wouldn’t bet on that. Besides, can a party that has won the popular vote in only one presidential election since the end of the Cold War really afford to write off support from one of the county’s largest and fastest-growing minority groups?

The irony is that recent news about Hispanic voting patterns has Democratic strategists panicking. According to Catalist, a politically progressive election-data firm, Donald Trump’s support among Hispanics increased by 8 points between 2016 and 2020 as Democrats gave priority to the interests of elites over those of the working class. In the California recall election this month, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom held on, but his Hispanic support dipped. President Biden has watched his job-approval rating among Hispanic voters in Texas fall even further than it has among all voters nationally. None of this is consistent with claims that Hispanic voters are demographically destined to pull the lever for Democrats.

I recall conversations with any number of Democratic operatives in the 2000s who openly acknowledged that Hispanic outreach by George W. Bush and his top strategists—Karl Rove, Ken Mehlman, Matthew Dowd —had caught them flat-footed. In 2004, exit polls showed that Mr. Bush won at least 40% of the Hispanic vote nationally en route to a second term. In states with large Latino populations, including Texas, New Mexico and Arizona, he won more than 40%. Democrats had forgotten that Hispanics are swing voters, and Republicans reminded them. Incidentally, 2004 was also the last presidential election in which the Republican candidate won the national popular vote. Draw your own conclusions.

Republicans are justifiably outraged at the lawlessness on the border and the Biden administration’s half-hearted efforts to address it. Still, there’s a difference between wanting politicians to enforce immigration laws, and wanting them to seal off the border based on misguided fears that your party has nothing to offer the country’s newest arrivals.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Something is wrong with nature.  We need to spend trillions of dollars to prove that robot named Greta is correct.

South Pole!  posts most severe cold season on record, a surprise in a warming world

While the rest of the world sizzled, the South Pole shivered with an average temperature of minus-78 degrees over the past six months.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Get ready for the "second coming!!!!!"

NBC News: Biden admin preparing for the biggest surge of migrants at the border in decades over judge's ruling

NEWS

Officials think up to 400,000 new migrants may try to cross the border in October

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



ht
 








 

No comments: