Wednesday, October 20, 2021

California Truth Not Disclosed. Power Couple? Less But Still Phony. The Two B's Love Stirring Up Hornets.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Very interesting conundrum the CA Legislature has enacted.  People all over the country should know about it.  I didn’t vet it, but then. I don’t feel I need to – if it’s crazy and it hurts the economy, California will be in the forefront in getting it on board.  “The Unions Forever … Harrah Boys … Harrah”

The destruction derby continues ..... What a surprise! 

So now we learn the truth!

Comifornia's Socialist Democrat's and their Media, forgot to (Won't) Tell You This!!!

 The NEWS says the California port situation is caused by a driver shortage. 

Not so fast: It is in part caused by a California Truck Ban which says all trucks must be 2011 or newer, and a law called AB5 which prohibits Owner Operators. 

 Traditionally the ports have been served by Owner Operators (non union).  California has now banned Owner Operators.  Long term, truckers in California are not investing in new trucks because California has a law that makes them illegal in 2035.  The requirement is to purchase electric trucks which DO NOT exist. 

 In the words of Paul Harvey, “Now you know the rest of the story”

 Califonia Air Resources Board (CARB) to begin blocking certain trucks’ DMV registrations in 2020. Carriers domiciled in California with trucks older than 2011 model, or using engines manufactured before 2010, will need to meet the Board’s new Truck & Bus Regulation beginning in 2020 or their vehicles will be blocked from registration with the state’s DMV, the State has said.

The new “health-based requirements” will need to be met before a driver is allowed to register his or her truck through the Dept. of Motor Vehicles, CARB says. A new enforcement tool used by the DMV beginning in 2020 will automatically block 2010 & older trucks from registration.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Kudlow on marriage:

Here’s to the New Washington Power Couple. He Hates Spending, She Is Loath To Tax
By LAWRENCE KUDLOW, Special to the Sun


Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s October 31 trick-or-treat Halloween deadline for a grand Democratic deal on a trillion dollar infrastructure package and a $5 trillion entitlement welfare state, big government socialism, orgy of massive spending, taxing, regulating and green new dealing in all likelihood is not going to be met.

There are two major reasons for this — Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema. Other, quieter Democratic senators lurk in the caucus, but they, too, are not happy with the massive spending bills. Senator Manchin doesn't like spending. Senator Sinema doesn’t like taxing. Together, they make a lovely couple. I’d say they’re the number one power couple in Washington today.

I’m sorry Mr. Manchin will accept tax hikes. but I give him a lot of credit for his insistence that social welfare spending and entitlements must be means tested and include workfare. These are crucial policy principles. Far left progressives don’t like them. Mr. Manchin is holding strong so far.

The one-man Mountain State monument has also done a great service in refusing to sign on to the clean electricity performance bill. That’s the one that sets a target of 2035 for a carbon free electric grid. the bill's worth about $150 billion of renewable subsidies and fossil fuel tax penalties.

Mr. Manchin’s from West Virginia, which produces a lot of coal, oil and natural gas. So I get that. Take a look around the world, and you'll see what a catastrophe President Biden’s idea would be.

The wind stopped blowing in the north sea so the British economy is hemorrhaging with natural gas prices eight times what Americans are paying and now they’re turning to coal.

Germany is a big renewable energy country but President Putin is not providing enough natural gas for the German economy despite Nord Stream 2, and Germany’s experiment with renewables a few years ago was a catastrophe.

So now Germans, too, are scrambling for coal, which at the moment is the dirtiest of the fossil fuels. The moral of the story is that wind and solar are not reliable energy sources. Oil, natural gas, and coal are reliable. Coal sales in America are actually up for the first time since 2014.

Natural gas prices were soaring. They’ve come off a bit, but are still expensive.

The oil price is more than $80 a barrel. It’s the middle class that’s getting hit by this inflation. The best renewable of them all, nuclear power, has been completely shot down by the Greenies. So Mr. Manchin’s doing everybody a favor by stopping this crazy carbon free electric grid idea. Some 80% of American energy is fossil fuels. Mr. biden wants to stomp on it.

The President’s Green New Deal, regulatory threats along with tax hikes and, by the way, jaw-boning banks not to make loans to fossil fuel companies, all have stifled fossil fuel production. We’re 2 million barrels a day short of where we were pre-pandemic. That’s the fossil fuel shortage. Producers don’t want to invest and produce because of government policy threats. Who can blame them?

Renewables excluding nuclear are still only 3% or so of our power. You think this is all going to change in 14 years? That’s the nuttiest thing I've heard yet from the Biden's.

So, we all owe Joe Manchin a big favor.

One other point on social spending, these unbelievable housing subsidies are under fire by Mr. Manchin and other moderates. That issue is an incredible $300 billion subsidy plan that would support $90 billion for rental assistance, which is completely unnecessary because relief money for renters was never spent and the eviction rate remained low during the pandemic.

Some $80 billion to reconstruct public housing along with Green New Deal housing, $37 billion for the National Housing Trust Fund, and my favorite, which is a $10 billion plan that would provide a $25,000 grant to first time homebuyers with eligibility based on minority status.

In other words, more discrimination, more woke, and more Critical Race Theory from the far left. This is not the only program based on discrimination, but the whole lot of them add up to an outrage.

Then of course we come to the massive tax hikes and then programs to subsidize non-work and penalize work, which Casey Mulligan and Vance Ginn in the Wall Street Journal estimate could cost the economy between 5 million and 9 million jobs over the next decade. Incredible.

As far as I know, Senator Sinema is opposed to the tax hike on business and individuals. Good for her. So, Mr. Manchin has our back on welfare dependency, means testing, workfare, and energy. Senator Sinema has our back on taxes. That’s why they make such a lovely couple, and I wish them well.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The $2 Trillion Is Phony Too

Biden is bowing to the left again by keeping new entitlements and disguising their cost.

By The Editorial Board

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Apparently, Biden and Blinken love annoying/stirring up hornets:

Biden Palestinian consulate move will be Bennett’s toughest test

Though delayed, the administration’s gesture to the Palestinians in Israel’s capital will be an invitation to future violence. Is the Israeli government capable of stopping it?


By JONATHAN S. TOBIN


(October 20, 2021 / JNS) Over the course of its first nine months in office, the Biden administration has had a lot of trouble getting out of its own way on just about every conceivable issue, be it domestic or foreign. Yet one of the few areas in which President Joe Biden hasn’t so far either screwed things up and/or appreciably worsened the situation is the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.


That was a result of a combination of factors, including the administration’s being distracted by other crises. It was also a function of recognition on the part of even Biden’s advisers, who believe in a two-state solution with an almost religious faith, that the prospects for restarting the dead-in-the-water peace process were negligible.


But it looks like that will be changing in what may be only a matter of weeks.


The Biden administration signaled earlier this year that it intended to reopen a U.S. consulate in Jerusalem that will be, for all intents and purposes, an embassy to a putative Palestinian state. It agreed to delay implementation of the decision until later in the year. While perhaps Israel’s coalition government and some American supporters of Israel may have hoped that the delay would continue indefinitely, Secretary of State Antony Blinken has made it clear to Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid that the moment will soon arrive when the consulate will be back in business.


The administration is trying to portray this decision as not a big deal. After all, Jerusalem was home to an American consulate whose main purpose was to be the diplomatic focal point for Washington’s relations with the Palestinians until it was closed in 2018 by the Trump administration when it moved the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Despite their opposition to Trump’s recognition of reality, Biden and Blinken have not moved the embassy out of Jerusalem. Still, they believe that reopening the consulate is a gesture that will help reboot relations with the Palestinian Authority and perhaps even encourage an eventual revival of the peace process.


In doing so, they are not merely flouting diplomatic practice since consulates only operate outside of capital cities, as the presence of an embassy renders any other facility superfluous. By re-establishing a consulate to the Palestinians in the Western part of Jerusalem, which is indisputably Israeli territory, Biden is doing more than declaring his belief in two states and the repartition of Jerusalem, which would, in theory, serve as the capital for both Israel and the putative state of Palestine.


Trump’s policies were a signal to Arab and Muslim nations that their support for the century-old Palestinian war against Zionism was getting them nowhere. That paved the way for the first real peace breakthrough in decades in the form of the Abraham Accords. That, in turn, was a message to the Palestinians that the Sunni Arab world was done being held hostage by their intransigence and refusal to make peace with Israel, no matter where its borders might be drawn. Though neither the P.A. nor its Hamas rivals seemed willing to listen, their isolation created a situation where sooner or later, they, too, would realize that normal national life was a better option than clinging to the fantasy of a world without Israel.


However, the consulate reopening will tell Palestinians that they can forget about having to draw the difficult but necessary conclusions that Trump’s policies were pushing them towards. The consulate, situated as it will be in a Jerusalem neighborhood that not even left-wing Israeli governments would ever consider surrendering, will like virtually every similar gesture made by both Democratic and Republican administrations in the last 30 years not encourage Palestinians to think about peace. On the contrary, it will merely serve to convince them that they will pay no price for continuing to refuse to give up a conflict that is utterly futile but which has become an integral feature of their identity.


The only question now is whether anything can be done to stop Biden from this folly.


Were pro-Israel Democrats a powerful voice within Biden’s party, they might act, as Christian evangelicals did with both the George W. Bush and Trump administrations, as a check on any weakening of U.S. support for the Jewish state. But with the anti-Israel progressive left a loud and influential constituency that Biden regards as necessary to the achievement of his domestic agenda and pro-Israel Democratic moderates as deluded about the peace process as the foreign-policy establishment, there’s little chance of them speaking up.


The only force that can do something about it is the Israeli government.


The often incoherent coalition of centrist, left- and right-wing parties headed by Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and Foreign Minister (and prime minister in waiting) Yair Lapid has set as one of its chief goals achieving warm relations with Biden. In principle, that is a laudable goal since it is every Israeli government’s obligation to stay as close as possible to its one superpower ally.


They are aided in this quest by Biden’s and Blinken’s knowledge that this coalition is the only possible alternative to a return to power of former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a prospect that they regard with more horror than perhaps the onset of global warming.


They know that the consulate reopening will severely test the durability of the coalition. That’s because its right-wing elements will insist that Bennett do everything in his power to prevent it from happening, up to and including what would otherwise be a routine approval from the host government. If Bennett responds with nothing more than a few futile complaints, then it is entirely possible that his government will lose enough support to fall.


That’s why Blinken agreed to put off the reopening until after the Israeli government passes a budget next month that would, under normal circumstances, guarantee its longevity for at least the next several months.


Lapid, who pays lip service to his own opposition to the consulate but is clearly prepared to live with it, has been trying to persuade Blinken to continue delaying the move. But Blinken, who said this week that the most he will do is create a joint American-Israeli committee on the issue, isn’t budging.


The foreign minister is counting on the threat of a return of Netanyahu to power to keep his partners in line. All the parties and personalities have a lot to lose if the government falls. But Bennett’s own Yamina Party, as well as others on the right inside the coalition tent, is unlikely to tolerate staying in a government that is being pushed around by Washington on a matter of Israeli national consensus.


In his first few months of office, Bennett has faced some challenges, but none as difficult or as crucial to Israel’s vital interests or his own political future as this one. Yet if he learned anything during his years serving with Netanyahu, it ought to have been that Israel can say “no” to the Americans when necessary. The consulate controversy will be one more such moment.


Dragging Lapid and his left-wing partners along with him in resisting the consulate reopening will be difficult. But what we will now learn about Bennett is whether he is the sort of leader who can make other people do things they don’t want to, or if he is the type who lets others make him act against his principles. A determined stand might just force Biden and Blinken to back down, yet if that’s not possible, Bennett’s ability to shape events—rather than be shaped by them—is about to be put to the test on an issue that will have serious implications for his nation’s hopes to maintain the momentum for peace that the Trump administration established.


Jonathan S. Tobin is editor in chief of JNS—Jewish News Syndicate. 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Poll Conducted for Democratic PAC Shows Absolutely Devastating Results for Senate Democrats

Rebecca Downs

+++



 

No comments: