by Alan M. Dershowitz
Gay, President of Harvard University, Liz Magill, President of University of Pennsylvania, Professor Pamela Nadell of American University, and Sally Kornbluth, President of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, testify before the House Education and Workforce Committee on December 5, 2023 in Washington, DC, on the subject of antisemitism on college campuses. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
The forced resignation of the president of the University of Pennsylvania is a good first step in dealing with a far more pervasive problem in higher education.
The three university presidents who disgraced themselves and their universities by their abysmal testimony before the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce represent a far larger concern.
In recent years, many universities have selected as their presidents woke, progressive cowards who pander to the most extreme and most vocal left-wing students and professors. They are the wrong people, at the wrong time, to be leading American educational institutions.
When I first came to Harvard in 1964, university presidents all came from the same cookie-cutter. They were white Anglo-Saxon males, who represented the wealthy conservative donors and board members. There were no Jewish university presidents and the then president of Harvard – Nathan Marsh Pusey – made it clear that no Jew need apply for the presidency or deanships.
Within a decade, following the civil rights movement, matters changed considerably. Several years ago, many of the most elite universities had Jewish presidents and Jewish deans.
Now matters have changed again and many of the new presidents represent the current political correctness reflected by the "diversity, equity and inclusion" (DEI) bureaucracies. Many also represent, or are sympathetic to, woke progressive movements that today dominate many campuses.
As Ecclesiastes observed, "to everything there is a season". This seems to be the season for woke cowardice. Many of the current university presidents also seem to come from a cookie-cutter. They are different from previous university presidents but seem quite similar to each other in their pandering to the DEI and progressive woke constituencies on campus.
The recent spate of rabid anti-Semitism on so many campuses has posed enormous challenges to this new breed of university presidents. For the most part they have failed miserably to meet these challenges, as reflected by the big three who testified so ineptly.
A friend of mine, who was the president of a major university during the "Jewish period," told me that the one characteristic which is not a qualification for being a current university president is "courage." To that, should be added a commitment to principle.
Also at fault for the selection of current university presidents are the boards of directors who select them in an effort to pander to current student and faculty demands for DEI. They have ignored the majority of students and faculty, as well as the majority of alumni and donors. This overlooked and large constituency wants to see academic excellence and political neutrality on behalf of university presidents, deans and administrators. Most would prefer what has come to be called "the Chicago principles," which require that the university itself stay out of politics.
Only a handful of universities have accepted these principles even in theory. Most universities pick and choose among the political views they publicly espouse. For example, virtually every university condemned the killing of George Floyd by a policeman -- but many refused to condemn Hamas' October 7 murder of more than 1,200 Israelis (and many Americans) and the kidnapping of more than 240 other Israelis. It is this double standard that has opened these administrators to criticism that they are more sensitive to Black lives than to Jewish lives. They are also insensitive to civil liberties and the rights of those with whom they disagree.
Just as many of these new university presidents were selected for symbolism, so too should they be dismissed for symbolism. What they symbolized during the Congressional testimony does a disservice to their students, their faculty and their alumni. It teaches the wrong lessons to current and future students. It creates divisiveness on campuses that makes Jewish students and faculty fearful for their safety when their university president seems unwilling to apply the same standard to those who advocate genocide against Jews as they surely would against anyone who advocated genocide against Blacks or the raping of women or the shooting of gay and transgender people.
It is not enough that these presidents are constantly forced to apologize for their cowardice because of pressure from the outside. What these universities need now are principled advocates of a single standard, rather than leaders who base their decisions on outside pressures and the need to pander to extremist students, faculty and administrators.
These are the wrong leaders for today's educational challenges. Those who selected them were employing the wrong criteria. It will not be easy to find the correct replacements who can strike the proper balance between responding to the pervasive anti-Semitism and "cancel culture" on current campuses. One thing is clear: they should be selected on the basis of relevant, individual meritocratic criteria -- not the cookie-cutter criteria of the DEI bureaucracies.
Alan M. Dershowitz is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus at Harvard Law School, and the author most recently of War Against the Jews: How to End Hamas Barbarism. He is the Jack Roth Charitable Foundation Fellow at Gatestone Institute, and is also the host of "The Dershow" podcast.
++++++++++++++++++++++
I realize my memos, of late, have focused predominantly on Israel, the plight of the Jewish people, the war in Gaza, the support and criticism of Biden regarding Israel and Bibi and anti-Semitic issues Jewish students face on university campuses due, mainly, to the increase in radical Islamist enrollment in American higher education and weak knee administrators, as well as Biden's personal problems and finally the effort of cultural Marxists to bring America down because we are a threat to their fascist aspirations.
These issues pretty much reveal mankind's historic faults and occasional greatness. How it all is resolved remains to be seen and not totally predictable.
The success Americans have enjoyed, because our founders crafted a brilliant document and we chose to buttress our freedoms by embracing capitalism, has also caused us to disregard our responsibilities regarding appreciating what we have.
As Ben Franklin said: "We have a republic if we can keep it." In many ways we have failed to protect ourselves from the Trojan Horses of Marxism.
As I have previously noted, I believe Obama helped accelerate the pace of our decline and continues to manipulate the Biden Administration through holdovers in sensitive positions.
If you are a pessimist there is much meat on the bone for you to chew. If you are an optimist the prospects are bleak because Biden is a corrupt and traitorous disaster. Our powerful adversaries know this and are accordingly bettered.
And:
This year, the Jewish people need the lights of Chanukah more than ever. These lights represent victory on the battlefield and the triumph of light over darkness.
By Alex Traiman
Today, the State of Israel and the Jewish people are under attack once again. This fight is taking place not only on the physical battlefield; it's also a war of ideas. This war is being waged on university campuses, in parliaments around the world, at the United Nations, on social media and in the mainstream media.
JNS is reporting around the clock, but we can't do it alone.
We need our readers to share and subscribe to help spread the truth, so that this Chanukah we can witness not only triumph once again on the battlefield, but also in the war of ideas.
JNS is a reader-supported news organization. So we ask you this Chanukah to please consider donating some Chanukah gelt and make a tax-deductible contribution.
Thank you, and together may we win this war and spread light over darkness once again
Today, the State of Israel and the Jewish people are under attack once again. This fight is taking place not only on the physical battlefield; it's also a war of ideas. This war is being waged on university campuses, in parliaments around the world, at the United Nations, on social media and in the mainstream media.
JNS is reporting around the clock, but we can't do it alone.
We need our readers to share and subscribe to help spread the truth, so that this Chanukah we can witness not only triumph once again on the battlefield, but also in the war of ideas.
JNS is a reader-supported news organization. So we ask you this Chanukah to please consider donating some Chanukah gelt and make a tax-deductible contribution.
Thank you, and together may we win this war and spread light over darkness once again
Today, the State of Israel and the Jewish people are under attack once again. This fight is taking place not only on the physical battlefield; it's also a war of ideas. This war is being waged on university campuses, in parliaments around the world, at the United Nations, on social media and in the mainstream media.
JNS is reporting around the clock, but we can't do it alone.
We need our readers to share and subscribe to help spread the truth, so that this Chanukah we can witness not only triumph once again on the battlefield, but also in the war of ideas.
JNS is a reader-supported news organization. So we ask you this Chanukah to please consider donating some Chanukah gelt and make a tax-deductible contribution.
Thank you, and together may we win this war and spread light over darkness once again
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Hoover Institution Monthly Briefing on National Security
Welcome to the Hoover Institution’s monthly briefing on national security. This month we are looking at extremist groups in conflict; foreign policy miscalculations by the US and its allies; evolution in warfare; challenges to America’s intelligence apparatus; and problematic US policies for supporting allies and confronting adversaries.
ISIS, al-Qaeda, and Hamas—No “Band of Brothers”
The war in Gaza presents an opportunity for extremist groups to manipulate the conflict for their own goals. How al Qaeda and ISIS diverge ideologically from Hamas, explains Hoover Fellow Cole Bunzel, will likely affect their ability to exploit the war. Both Islamist groups view Hamas as deficient in the purity of its cause and corrupted by its connections to Syria, Iran, and even Fatah. Though the issue of Palestine is not central to their respective causes, al-Qaeda and ISIS express support for the movement while rebuking Hamas itself for its apostasy. Rather than on Israel itself, the focus of both extremist groups is on the corrupted Arab regimes that reject the centrality of the caliphate and enable Israel. So, while “the war in Gaza may provoke individual jihadi sympathizers in the West to commit further violent acts . . . it is less likely that the Israel-Hamas war will energize the larger jihadi movement.”
The Grand Illusion
The West has operated for decades under three foreign policy illusions with regard to rival nations that have largely backfired, writes National Security Visiting Fellow Jakub Grygiel. The first is the illusion of deterrence. The US and its allies have failed to deter Russia in Ukraine, Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons, and China’s threat to Taiwan because they have not demonstrated a willingness to use force. The second illusion is reliance on diplomacy and sanctions. Membership in the UN and WTO has done nothing to moderate the ambitions of states that transgress international norms. Last is the illusion that “greater trade and wealth produce peace,” whereas, as Grygiel points out, “many states that traded and grew economically as a result developed large power-projection capabilities.” Ultimately, the author asserts, only military power can defend and advance the interests of the US and its allies.
+++++++++++++++++++++
| How Would Clausewitz See Modern War? | by Josef Joffe via American Purpose His insights into the nature of war are forever. But he would be stumped by the new ways and means, from Hamas and Putin's "little green men" to China's oblique strategies. |
|
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2023/12/14/nolte-jill-biden-releases-widely-ridiculed-white-house-holiday-video/
+++++++++++++++++++
No comments:
Post a Comment