Will The Mid Term Election Be Corrupt? Great Interview Of A Great Writer. Much More.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 

The mid term election is most likely to be one of the more corrupt:

+++

Real News for Real American Patriots

Dems are Continuing their Election Cheating Ways, Still Counting Ballots Against This GOP Winner a Week After Race Called

Liberal Media Decides Elections Aren’t Safe After All, Warns Dems that Trump Supporters will “Steal” 2024

Breaking News: Biden retiring the US dollar? Could be replaced with this...

2 Key Pieces of Evidence Suggest the FBI Raid on Mar-a-Lago was a Set Up

Global Data on Omicron Variant is Good News for Natural Immunity Theory

Biden retiring the US dollar? Could be replaced with this...

Thanks to President Biden’s Executive Order 14067…

I predict the 3rd Great Dollar Earthquake has started.

These currency upheavals happen about every 40 years.

The first was Roosevelt confiscating private gold in 1934

The second was Nixon abandoning the gold standard in 1971

Now, Biden’s plan could pave the way for “retiring” the US

And replacing it with  THIS.

Amid the turmoil, there will be many losers.

>Click here to see how to win instead.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 

This was sent to me by my closest friend and fellow memo reader: 

https://youtu.be/7LRZ3AaBlt0

I follow David McCullough's optimistic thoughts with this more dire view point: 

Dear Reader,

I don't know if you've seen this or not yet...

But Stephen Schwarzman, the CEO of Blackstone (America's biggest private equity firm), recently went public on CNN predicting America is about to see serious "social unrest". (To see why click here.)

Schwarzman said: "You're going to get very unhappy people around the world... What happens then, is you've got real unrest. This challenges the political system..."

Bill Bonner, an ultra-wealthy entrepreneur who started what is probably America's biggest financial research firm more than 40 years ago, agrees...

Bonner says:

"We are about to enter a very strange period of time in America...

What I see on the horizon could be the worst U.S. crisis ever... which could likely be followed by riots and ultimately some form of revolution."

What has these two super-successful and wealthy men so concerned?

Well, Bill Bonner recently went public with a full explanation, from one of his three European properties... overlooking the Blackwater River.

(View for free on our website here.)

Over the past 50 years, Bonner has made three macro-economic predictions... all of which came true.

And today, from his 60-acre property, he's issuing what he calls his: "4th and Final Warning."

Bonner adds:

"I believe it falls on someone like me to warn people... clearly... and without distraction...

I can do this now because I'm too rich to care about money... and too old to care about what anyone says about me."

Get the facts.

Learn how to protect yourself (Bonner explains his 4 recommended steps), and get a peek inside one of his spectacular properties.

We've posted Bonner's full analysis and footage of his property on our website. You can view it free of charge, right here...

Sincerely,

Mike Palmer
Founding Partner, Stansberry Research

P.S.I think these 4 steps are critical for every American right now. I've already taken the first three. Learn everything you need to know here...

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 

This evil woman is doing to education what Soros and our current AG are doing to law and order:

Randi Weingarten Wields Her Misunderstanding of Judaism Like a Weapon

BY RABBI MICHAEL BARCLAY 

   

I have no doubt that this article will cause me personal challenges, but truth needs to be said. The simple reality is that Randi Weingarten, President of The American Federation of Teachers is acting like a self-hating Jew who needs to stop using her religion to attack Jewish values and conservatives. It is disgraceful and a smear on all of our people.

She recently accused Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) of being an anti-Semite because he tried to force George Soros-backed prosecutors to do their job, follow the law, and prosecute criminals. She then went on to harass him about doing this on the Jewish holiday of Tisha b’Av, where we mourn the destruction of the first and second Temple. She went on to mistakenly claim that Rubio should be extra ashamed because the holiday of Tisha b’Av is about “hatred of Jews” (it’s not). Her arguments for accusing Sen. Rubio of this are based on her own personal hatred and ignorance of Judaism and Jewish practices.

I do not personally know Ms. Weingarten nor Mr. Soros and am always recalcitrant to accuse anyone of ignorance or hate (but would welcome the opportunity to sit down with either and have a discussion about Judaism). But Ms. Weingarten’s words bespeak an ignorance of Jewish history and theology that is astounding. It would also seem that her lack of Jewish awareness and history are reflected in her personal life and practices.

Judaism is committed to abiding by the “law of the land”, called dina d’malchuta dina, a concept whose origins go all the way back to the biblical book of Jeremiah. We are commanded to abide by and protect the laws of the nation in which we live. This is a religious law, and it is directly antithetical to the concept of prosecutors foregoing their responsibility to prosecute criminals. Sen. Rubio, by trying to get prosecutors to do their jobs, was embodying this ancient Jewish principle.

Weingarten attempts to further discredit the senator with her claims that this holy day of Tisha b’Av and the destruction of the Temple is about “hatred of Jews.” But again, she demonstrates her ignorance of Jewish theology. The Talmud (Yoma 9b) is explicitly clear that the Temple was destroyed because of “baseless hatred” between Jews. It teaches that even though the Jews at the time of the Temple were engaged in Torah study, good deeds, and acts of kindness, their baseless hatred of each other (paralleled by Ms. Weingarten’s attacks on Rubio) caused the Temple to be destroyed. The Talmud even states that this baseless hatred is the equivalent of idol worship, forbidden sexual relationships, and bloodshed combined.

But her ignorance is paralleled in her own life. Having recently married a far-left female “Rabbi”, who leads the largest LGBT synagogue in New York, she seems to feel that she is now a “Jewish authority” and has the implicit permission to represent the Jewish people. While I believe her personal choices are and should be her own, her commitment to her relationship in no way represents traditional Jewish practices of thousands of years. She not only has no right to put herself out as a Jewish leader based on her ignorance; she certainly does not have any “Jewish” right to accuse Sen. Rubio of the heinous crime of anti-Semitism for his efforts to create a legal system actually based in law.

The irony of her words is palpable on many levels. While she condemns Rubio for actually acting in harmony with Jewish law, she praises the truly anti-Semitic Ilhan Omar, who has repeatedly demonstrated her hatred of Jews and Israel. Omar, whom Weingarten compliments, has even been condemned by other Democrats for her vitriol against Jews. Weingarten additionally supports vocal anti-Semite and Hamas ally Rashida Tlaib, ignored the complaints of two parents’ groups, and refused to condemn the blatant anti-Semitism of two teachers’ unions in California.

And yet she has now become the self-appointed defender of George Soros’ Judaism and has the audacity to attack a senator who embraces Jewish values in his personal and professional life.

There are many stories about George Soros being a self-hating Jew and even accusing him of collaborating with the Nazis in order to survive the Holocaust. Whether these accusations against him are true or false, there is no doubt that he lived through the most horrific time in human history. For even surviving the hell of the Holocaust, he deserves respect. But this does not make him an exemplary Jewish role model in any way.

Jews, like Christians, are commanded to tithe support to their religious communities. While Soros has donated billions of dollars to charity (apparently over $32 billion, equating to 64% of his original fortune), there seems little evidence of his donating to Jewish causes. While he has supported the University of Cape Town, Open Society Foundations, and the Central European University, it is difficult to find any support of synagogues, Jewish hospitals or schools, Holocaust museums, or anything that is Jewish rather than political. (He did give an undisclosed amount to J Street, a leftist Jewish lobby.)

He has said that he is not a Zionist, not a practicing Jew, and is clearly not demonstrative of any love towards Jewish causes that are religious and apolitical. Other Jewish billionaires like Sheldon Adelson, Stanley Black, Vera Guerin, Jona Goldrich, Nate Shapell, and Max Webb (the last three, like Soros, were Holocaust survivors) gave billions to hospitals, synagogues, Jewish schools, and Holocaust museums. But Mr. Soros seems to have stayed away from Jewish charities in favor of furthering his political agenda.

And yet Ms. Weingarten has the audacity to use Soros as a Jewish “role model” and condemn Sen. Rubio. She conflates survival of the Holocaust with a commitment to Judaism, attacks a senator for promoting values that are truly Jewish, and posits blatantly wrong comments about Jewish history.

One has to wonder why Ms. Weingarten would possibly act in a way that is so clearly antithetical to Judaism. Perhaps she is so blinded by her political passions that she is unable to even distinguish between truth and fiction, between Jewish values and anti-Semitism, or between right and wrong.

Or maybe she is just hoping that Soros will make a large donation to her wife’s temple?

+++

Jews at CUNY Call for the Destruction of Israel

Using the ‘as a Jew’ accusation against the Jewish State.

By Richard L. Cravatts, FPM

As if further confirmation were needed to designate the CUNY system as an egregious purveyor of anti-Israel activism—often replete with anti-Semitic expression—the university is being made to answer for its failure to protect Jewish students and faculty with a new Title VI complaint filed on July 19 ^th by The American Center for Law and Justice.

Read more...

+++++++++++++++++++++++

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Why we no longer trust government and the politicians who  walk the halls. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The Editorial Board  The vote in question came Sunday during amendments to the so-called Inflation Reduction Act, the tax-and-spending bill Senate Democrats passed later that day. Republican Sen. James Lankford proposed an amendment to extend Title 42, the Covid-era policy that allows speedy removal of border crossers. President Biden wants to cancel the policy but a federal judge in May blocked his attempt. The Lankford amendment should’ve looked appealing to several Democrats who have spent months talking tough on immigration. When President Biden first proposed in April to end Title 42, several Democrats joined their GOP peers in backing a bill to keep it in place. That included Arizona Sens. Kyrsten Sinema and Mark Kelly, New Hampshire’s Maggie Hassan, and Jon Tester of Montana. The group held to their stance publicly while knowing Majority Leader Chuck Schumer would block the bill from getting a vote. And when Mr. Lankford’s amendment came up for a vote, they joined fellow Democrats to nix it on a party-line vote. Remarkably, they then devised a way to maintain their hawkish ruse. Shortly after the first Title 42 amendment was shot down, Sen. Tester proposed another. His version also pledged to restore the border-expulsion policy, but unlike Sen. Lankford’s it lacked a funding provision. This time Mr. Tester backed the amendment, joined by Sens. Sinema, Kelly and Hassan, along with Catherine Cortez Masto and Raphael Warnock. The latter four are, not coincidentally, running for re-election this year. But fellow Democrat and Majority Whip Dick Durbin challenged the amendment on procedural grounds, saying its lack of funding violated Senate budget reconciliation rules. The amendment fell short of the 60 votes it needed to pass and was left out of the bill’s final version. Catch the trick? With a waive of the hands, six Senate Democrats gained the ability to tell constituents they voted for border security despite opposing the measure when it counted. Stunts like this are one reason America has a dysfunctional immigration system that works for no one other than the criminal gangs that extort migrants as they make the dangerous trip across the U.S.-Mexico border. ++++++++++++++++++++++ CTC Sentinel | August 2022 VOLUME 15, ISSUE 8 Published by Combating Terrorism Center DOWNLOAD SHARE+ VISIT CTC From the Editor One year ago, the Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan, raising concerns that they would again provide al-Qa`ida with a safe haven. Soberingly, in the months before his death in a U.S. airstrike at the end of July, al-Qa`ida leader Ayman al-Zawahiri was releasing videos encouraging global terror, while living in a salubrious neighborhood of Kabul under the apparent protection of the Haqqani Taliban. This special issue of CTC Sentinel focuses on evolving dynamics relevant to the terrorism threat landscape one year into Taliban rule. In the feature article, Andrew Watkins takes a deep look at the Taliban’s first year in power. He writes: “Until the subtle, almost imperceptible attempts to nudge the needle on controversial issues within the movement gain more momentum, the Taliban’s emphasis on policing public life—and most critically, keeping women out of it—is likely to continue. And given this dynamic, al-Zawahiri’s killing under sanctuary in Kabul may confront the Taliban with a greater obligation to shore up their legitimacy among jihadi circles than to fall in line with international expectations on counterterrorism.” Our interview is with Edmund Fitton-Brown, the outgoing coordinator of the ISIL/Al-Qaida/Taliban Monitoring Team at the United Nations, who argues that a key determinant of the future international terror threat will be the degree to which the Taliban inhibit al-Qa`ida from launching attacks with fingerprints that lead directly back to Afghanistan. Don Rassler and Muhammad al-`Ubaydi evaluate who may be next in line to lead al-Qa`ida. They write: “The decision that al-Qa`ida makes could end up strengthening the group and al-Qa`ida’s status as a global brand. It could also, like someone pulling a loose thread, facilitate a greater unraveling of al-Qa`ida and its network of formally aligned regional affiliate partners.” Tore Hamming and Abdul Sayed assess the evolving threat posed by al-Qa`ida in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS), writing, “it appears that with Taliban-run Afghanistan offering it a platform for regional expansion, AQIS is pivoting its focus to other parts of the South Asia region. Having set its eyes particularly on India and the contested Kashmir region, AQIS is currently pushing out targeted propaganda to recruit new operatives and to instigate new insurgencies in the region.” Nishank Motwani looks at the lessons learned for countering violent extremism in Afghanistan based on a survey of how former governing elites saw the violent extremism problem set in Afghanistan before the Taliban takeover. Paul Cruickshank, Editor in Chief View the Issue THE TALIBAN ONE YEAR ON Andrew Watkins A VIEW FROM THE CT FOXHOLE: EDMUND FITTON-BROWN, OUTGOING COORDINATOR, ISIL (DAESH)/AL-QAIDA/TALIBAN MONITORING TEAM, UNITED NATIONS Paul Cruickshank and Madeline Field THE DEATH OF AYMAN AL-ZAWAHIRI: SUCCESSION CHALLENGES, TRADEOFFS, AND OTHER IMPLICATIONS Don Rassler and Muhammad al-`Ubaydi AL-QA`IDA IN THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT: AN APPRAISAL OF THE THREAT IN THE WAKE OF THE TALIBAN TAKEOVER OF AFGHANISTAN Tore Hamming and Abdul Sayed HOW AFGHANISTAN’S OVERTHROWN GOVERNING ELITES VIEWED THE VIOLENT EXTREMISM CHALLENGE Nishank Motwani +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Nothing more needs to be said. Hometown Battlefield https://www.youtube.com/embed/Wq0X0bwMprQ?feature=player_embedded ++++++++++++++++++