Cats. Radical Progressives, The Black Family, Abortion and Hate Whitey!

 Adam and Eve said, 'Lord, when we were in the garden, you walked with us every day.  Now we do not see you any more. We are lonesome here, and it is difficult for us to remember how much you love us.'--- And God said, I will create a companion for you that will be with you and who will be a reflection of my love for you, so that you will love me even when you cannot see me.  Regardless of how selfish or childish or unlovable you may be, this new companion will accept you as you are and will love you as I do, in spite of yourselves.

And God created a new animal to be a companion for Adam and Eve 

And it was a good animal and God was pleased.  

And the new animal was pleased to be with Adam and Eve and he wagged his tail. 

And Adam said, 'Lord, I have already named all the animals in the Kingdom and I cannot think of a name for this new animal.' 

And God said, 'I have created this new animal to be a reflection of my love for you, his name will be a reflection of my own name, and you will call him DOG.

And Dog lived with Adam and Eve and was a companion to them and loved them. 

And they were comforted. 

And God was pleased.  

And Dog was content and wagged his tail. 

After a while, it came to pass that an angel came to the Lord and said, 'Lord, Adam and Eve have become filled with pride.  They strut and preen like peacocks and they believe they are worthy of adoration.  Dog has indeed taught them that they are loved, but perhaps too well.'  

And God said, I will create for them a companion who will be with them and who will see them as they are.  The companion will remind them of their limitations, so they will know that they are not always worthy of adoration.' 

And God created CAT to be a companion to Adam and Eve.

And Cat would not obey them.  And when Adam and Eve gazed into Cat's eyes, they were reminded that they were not the Supreme Beings.

And Adam and Eve learned humility. 

And they were greatly improved. 

And God was pleased.  

And Dog was happy. 

And the Cat . . . 

didn't give a shit one way or the other……. 

Lewis Grizzard, the Georgia Humorist, hated cats as I do. He said they should be bronzed, placed on the fire hearth to hold logs.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hesitant to report when black American's are involved? (See 1 below.)

No wonder the free press has become suspect.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The last market comment I made suggested market prospects were basically favorable.  We had experienced  a sharp reaction, earnings were going to be decent and The Fed seemed comfortable with observing rather than acting.

Since that time we have experienced a decent rebound which has spread among more stocks and thus, the market base has become less narrow.

I do not expect earnings to equal those of last year but they should be good enough to sustain and send the market higher if a deal with China is announced that is meaningful.  Bossie and Lewandowski are expecting one that will signify Trump is willing to accept less than a full unobtainable  loaf but one that will allow him to continue  nibbling should he be re-elected, as they expect he will.

The most obvious negative would be a strong indictment by Mueller but that seems less a likelihood although Democrats will do everything in their power to continue their "mince meat"performance even if it means skating on thin evidential ice.  Democrats are driven by hate, radical economic insanity and bizarre legislative positions which blind them to the self-inflicting wounds they are causing.

We are approaching what could be a dust up phase. There are plenty of doubters holding significant dry powder and a sharp market upswing could cause them to rush in driven by fear of missing the parade.

While I am on the subject of Democrat and radical  progressive stupidity there are several matters I do not understand.

For instance: Black Americans are slaves to the Democrat Party and Democrats depend upon black votes yet, Democrats support abortion.  Abortion results in more deaths of future black voters.  Why would a party allow, even encourage, the killing of its future voting base and, even worse, why would blacks continue to vote for a party that encourages and/or provides for them being aborted?

Second, Black women have increasingly become the breadwinner and thus resort to abortion to keep the number of dependents at a level they can support.  Progressive radical laws have contributed to breaking up the family structure and , as I often remind readers of my memos, how can a black male father compete against Uncle Sam's largess when it is more profitable for black women to depend upon government subsidies than a working husband.

If what I have said holds even a modicum of water why do blacks continue to feel obligated to a party that has assisted in the destruction of their family unit etc.?

We have factual evidence children of a single parent family, under economic stress, have a bleaker future both economically and socially.

Pelosi, buying votes with tax payer funds carries a high cost and is far  more immoral than Trump's walls!

If this is not bad enough, the rise in the economic cost of raising a child has also resulted in white Americans having smaller families. Consequently, America's racial mix is rapidly changing. The cost to a family to raise and educate a child attending  a state university, without any residual college debt, now takes about$150,000 of pre tax dollars.

So what we have is shrinking  white Americans families funding the cost of larger black American families and radicals are out in the streets telling us to "hate whitey."

Even if I am taking some "poetic"  liberties there is much truth in what I have written.  Welcome to  the consequences of what we have allowed to occur politically.

Even one of my heroes, who happens to be black, Tomas Sowell, understands.

MANY COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES ARE OPENLY OPPOSED TO PERMITTING DR. SOWEL TO LECTURE THEIR STUDENTS AND FACULTY;I WONDER WHY? 

Dr. Sowell grew up in Harlem, served in the Marine Corp during Korean War. He Graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard, Masters from Columbia University & earned his doctorate in economics from the University of Chicago....Economist, Social Theorist, Philosopher, Author...Senior Fellow. Hoover Institution, Stanford University...National Humanities Medal... Francis Boyer Award....

































+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dick
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1) The Epidemic Of Anti-Jewish Hate Crimes In Brooklyn Is No Hoax While the nation was focused on a hoaxed hate crime, Brooklyn’s Jews have been repeatedly and actually attacked. Are we not discussing it because most of the perpetrators are black? By David Marcus
Posted By Ruth King

As much of the country was transfixed by a hoaxed hate crime in Chicago over the past month, a very real wave of hate crimes in Brooklyn has been taking place. In New York City overall there have been 36 hate crimes against Jews so far this year, according to The New York Times, compared to only 21 last year. In the Crown Heights neighborhood of Brooklyn alone, ultra-orthodox Jews have been violently attacked at least 15 times since October of last year.

In most of these cases there is no apparent motive beyond anti-Semitism. No robbery occurs, and often the attackers — generally black men — and their victims are complete strangers. State and local government, as well as the New York City Police Department, have stepped up measures to protect the community, but the incidents have continued apace.

The spate of anti-Semitic attacks raises some significant questions. First and foremost, why is this happening and how can it be stopped? But also, why have the news media and the nation’s politicians been so quiet about an epidemic of hate crime in our country’s largest city? Why isn’t this a big story?

To get at an answer to the first question, we have to peer back through some troubling Brooklyn history. In 1991, the Crown Heights riots exploded in the Brooklyn neighborhood shared mainly by black and ultra-orthodox New Yorkers. Tensions between the two groups had existed for years. Then, a Jewish driver killed a black child. The crash was clearly shown to be an accident, not intentional or negligent, but deadly violence was the result nonetheless. In the years since, tensions have calmed, but never truly disappeared.

The roots of the disputes are murky. The ultra-orthodox are a strange set of neighbors in New York City. It is an insular community, in which a strict form of Jewish law, including dress codes and famously hats, is enforced. Anyone who attempts to leave the community, or live outside of its silo, is cut off from friends and family.

This is not the kind of attitude one typically looks for in neighbors. Its one thing for the Amish to promulgate this kind of lifestyle in rural Pennsylvania, but the ultra-orthodox are smack in the middle of the most populous borough of New York City. Existing in such an exclusive way in that environment is sure to cause tension, but just as surely is not grounds to be physically attacked.

For its part, the black community in New York City has struggled with accusations of anti-Semitism dating back at least to the riots. Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam has a foothold in the community, and with that comes some pretty awful messages about Jews. Even non-adherents to the Nation of Islam in the black community have a complicated relationship to Farrakhan and his message.

Recently Women’s March leader Tamika Mallory put this in some perspective when she refused to denounce Farrakhan’s anti-Semitism, citing the good works he has done in black communities. To a lot of Jews, this is like saying you won’t denounce the Klan’s racism because they do a Christmas toy drive. Jewish organizations have attempted to do outreach into the black community, but frankly, the black community has its own work to do, especially in terms of condemning anti-Semites like Farrakhan.

The question of why this onslaught of anti Jewish violence is happening so quietly is not as important as stopping the violence, but it’s still important. Any fair-minded observer would agree that if 15 black people had been victims of racially motivated beatings in relatively white Bensonhurst since October, it would be a big national story. In fact, just one such alleged incident in Chicago got more coverage on its own than the attacks in Brooklyn have.

To some degree this is explained by the fact that the ultra-orthodox keep their own counsel, and do not engage in a lot of public relations outreach. But it’s more than that. It is very clear that news outlets are much more comfortable not only reporting, but also extrapolating on white violence against blacks than they are black violence against Jews.

Some of this reticence may be understandable. It can be reasonable for journalists to consider race in how they cover a story. Given the unfair stereotypes about black men regarding crime and violence, it makes sense to try to avoid feeding that stereotype. But the answer cannot simply be to bury the story because it is uncomfortable. Rather, the facts and context can be reported and explored in a nuanced manner that makes clear no broad generalizations about anyone are being asserted.

Likewise, politicians both locally and nationally need to speak up about this violence against Jews. In the wake of the alleged Smollett attacks, the tweets poured like wine from Democratic presidential candidates, yet none seem very interested in these repeated attacks on Jews in Brooklyn. That should change.

Shining a spotlight on white racists, such as the abhorrent participants in Charlottesville, is easy. It comports with a comfortable narrative about how vestiges of white supremacy still exist and must be confronted. Talking about black men committing violent hate crimes against Jews is far more complicated and difficult, yet it has to happen.

If these attacks continue, and the press continues to shield the city and country from it, people are going to die, just as they did in 1991. Now is the time when we need strong leadership from local officials and a news media willing to be upfront about what is going on. If that doesn’t happen, there is every reason to believe Brooklyn’s ultra-orthodox Jewish and black communities could be headed back into the bad old days.

David Marcus is the Federalist’s New York Correspondent and the Artistic Director of Blue Box World, a Brooklyn based theater project. Follow him on Twitter,

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++