++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ted Nugent certainly gets an A+ for correctly answering the question of the animal activist
Ted Nugent, rock star and avid bow hunter from Michigan, was being interviewed by a liberal journalist who also happens to be an animal rights activist. The discussion came around to deer hunting. The journalist asked, "What do you think is the last thought in the head of a deer before you shoot him? Is it, 'Are you my friend?' or is it 'Are you the one who killed my brother?'"
Nugent replied, "Deer aren't capable of that kind of thinking. All they care about is what am I going to eat next, who am I going to screw next, and can I run fast enough to get away. They are very much like the Democrats in Congress."
The interview ended.
And:
Please recommend www.verygoodnewsisrael. blogspot.com and forward this email to friends, family and colleagues and especially to any individuals whom you think need to know about the good work that Israel does.
Finally:
What’s in a word? Does it matter, for example, whether we call a foreigner who illegally moves to the United States an “illegal alien” or an “undocumented immigrant”? Because language shapes how we see our world, the culture war is first and foremost a war of words – and the left is winning. The consequences can be seen everywhere: in politics, in education, in media. In this week’s video, Michael Knowles, host of the Michael Knowles Show, explains why we should not cede another syllable.
Nugent replied, "Deer aren't capable of that kind of thinking. All they care about is what am I going to eat next, who am I going to screw next, and can I run fast enough to get away. They are very much like the Democrats in Congress."
The interview ended.
And:
Please recommend www.verygoodnewsisrael.
Finally:
What’s in a word? Does it matter, for example, whether we call a foreigner who illegally moves to the United States an “illegal alien” or an “undocumented immigrant”? Because language shapes how we see our world, the culture war is first and foremost a war of words – and the left is winning. The consequences can be seen everywhere: in politics, in education, in media. In this week’s video, Michael Knowles, host of the Michael Knowles Show, explains why we should not cede another syllable.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Mass media hits a new low? You decide.
Controversy swirls around White House Correspondent's Dinner after profane headline performance. https://tiny.iavian.net/mpdb |
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Netanyahu makes stunning broadcast revealing Israel has obtained archival evidence Iran has been lying and is/has been in violation of The Iran Deal because they have a nuclear program (Project Amad) which has 5 components.
Their secret nuclear project involves 5 Hiroshima size bombs.
Five Components:
Designing nuclear weapons
Developing nuclear cores.
Building nuclear implosion systems
Preparing nuclear tests
Integrating nuclear warheads on missiles.
In addition to the above, Iran continues working on missile delivery capabilities.
Conclusion:
Iran lied
Iran continued to expand their files after The Iran Deal. Went to covert to overt.
Iran lied and continues to lie. All of these conclusions are based on 100,000 purloined files Israel obtained.
Netanyahu has provided all of these files to the U.S and is willing to send them to any nation wanting to review them. Bibi has challenged Trump to renounce the Iran Deal.
Europe is trying to stick with the deal for commercial reasons.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Democrats are looking increasingly pathetic when it comes to having supported Obama's Iran Deal, when it comes to videos showing caravans of illegals seeking to make a mockery of our laws as well as the sanctity of our borders. Additionally vicious attacks on Trump Administration personnel and their slow walking and scurrilous attacks on his appointees are other tactics beginning to show Democrats in the most negative light.Comey's effort to sell his self-serving book of lies and admissions and his biased cover up of the way he led his agency into a brick wall is another tragic episode which Democrats and Obama were so much a part of as they pursued their campaign support of Hillary.
Mid-term elections never bring out large number of voters and this is the risk Republicans run in order to hold onto The House because the news and events should not favor Democrats who look more pitiful with the passing of each day The economy is improving, N Korea seems to looking more positive, The Iran Deal looks less viable, Trump's favor-ability is rising and these are positive factors. Republicans need to avoid internal food fights and nominate some worthy candidates.I doubt they will and the number of their retirees and candidates up for re-election does not favor them.
If Democrats take The House they will seek Trump's impeachment unless more sensible heads prevail so very little will happen in the last two year's of his first term.
Quite early to make such comments but this is the way I see things at this time. (See 1 and 1a below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
We leave again this Saturday to attend a Diabetes Fund Raiser event in Atlanta, returning late Sunday.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dick
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
On Monday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced to the world that Israel had carried out a stunning intelligence operation: their agents had smuggled tens of thousands of physical documents about Iran’s nuclear program out of Iran itself. Those “half a ton” of documents demonstrate Iran’s ongoing nuclear program, and the fact that the Obama administration lied constantly and repeatedly to the public about Iran’s newfound moderation in order to scam the public into approving Obama’s Iran nuclear deal – a deal that allowed Iran to maximize its regional power with income from the West.
Netanyahu announced, “Iran lied. Big time. After signing the nuclear deal in 2015, Iran intensified its efforts to hide its secret nuclear files.” Netanyahu said that a dilapidated warehouse contained Iran’s nuclear files: “55,000 pages, another 55,000 files on 188 CDs.” The files included incriminating documents, charts, and presentations.
According to Netanyahu, Iran had a comprehensive program, Project Amad, to design and develop nuclear weapons, and they have now disassembled the program for later reassembly. The specific goal of Project Amad: designing nuclear weapons; developing nuclear cores; preparing nuclear implosions; preparing nuclear tests; integrating nuclear warheads on missiles. Iran devised a plan after the beginning of the Second Gulf War to further develop its nuclear weapons program in secret – and to form new organizations to continue the work of Project Amad. Today, Netanyahu said, the work was carried out inside the Iranian Defense Ministry, and many of Amad’s key personnel continued to work on the project. The Iranians did not declare their program to the International Atomic Energy Agency. Iran instead denied the existence of a program and specifically denied the Amad plan.
This presentation was undoubtedly carried out with the knowledge of the United States; Netanyahu said that the information had been shared with the United States.
This is likely the precursor to the Trump administration moving to end the Iran nuclear deal, as they should. The Obama administration misled the American public, promoted Iranian lies repeatedly, and as Netanyahu said, “The nuclear deal is based on lies. 100,000 files right here prove that they lied…Iran continues to lie…The nuclear deal gives Iran a clear path to an atomic arsenal.”
1a)
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday dropped a Mossad intelligence bombshell on Iran, and on the Obama administration-led international community that negotiated the 2015 nuclear deal with Tehran. He showcased a vast archive of Iran’s own documentation demonstrating that Tehran worked to develop a nuclear weapons arsenal, lied to the international community about it, and has taken the steps necessary to ensure it can proceed to the bomb within the framework of the 2015 deal.
1a)
‘Iran lied’: Netanyahu drops a Mossad bombshell on the Iranian nuclear deal
Israel always claimed Iran duped the world, and the 2015 deal paved its path to a nuclear arsenal. Armed with Iran's own archive, PM now looks to Trump to do 'the right thing'
By David Horovitz
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday dropped a Mossad intelligence bombshell on Iran, and on the Obama administration-led international community that negotiated the 2015 nuclear deal with Tehran. He showcased a vast archive of Iran’s own documentation demonstrating that Tehran worked to develop a nuclear weapons arsenal, lied to the international community about it, and has taken the steps necessary to ensure it can proceed to the bomb within the framework of the 2015 deal.
In a brief, devastating presentation at the Tel Aviv Defense Ministry headquarters, Netanyahu unveiled what he described as one of Israeli intelligence’s greatest ever achievements — getting its hands on Iran’s own archived nuclear weapons program paperwork: 55,000 pages, and another 55,000 files on 183 CDs, he said. That archive faithfully records the progress of Iran’s comprehensive program to build nuclear weapons, named Project Amad, he noted — speaking in English, for maximal international resonance. And by obtaining that material, he declared, Israel could now incontrovertibly demonstrate that Iran’s leaders have “brazenly” lied to the world, and that the 2015 accord is founded on Iranian “deception.”
“100,000 files right here prove that they lied,” he declared, standing in front of what he said were copies of the Iranian files and CDs.
Netanyahu said he had already shared the material with the United States, and that the US could vouch for its authenticity. He said he would also share it with other countries and the International Atomic Energy Agency. The prime minister has always opposed the 2015 deal, negotiated by the P5+1 powers led by President Barack Obama. His presentation on Monday was plainly designed, among other factors, to advance his “fix it or nix it” demand — a stance, crucially, shared by US President Donald Trump, who has to decide in less than two weeks whether to withdraw from the accord.Watching the prime minister’s presentation in a TV studio, the former head of Military Intelligence in the Israeli army, Amos Yadlin, called the material “conclusive proof” of Tehran’s duplicity — vindication of Israel’s consistent claim that Iran had a nuclear weapons program, continued to work on it in recent years, and duped the world about it. The captured archive material contains “no smoking gun since 2015,” Yadlin observed, because that most recent material presumably hasn’t been archived yet. However, since Iran now demonstrably lied to the world until 2015, Yadlin added dryly, “it has presumably continued to lie since then as well.”
The prime minister was notably non-specific regarding what action he thinks the US and the other P5+1 countries should take. As in, should they fix it, or should they nix it? He simply said that he was certain Trump would do “the right thing — the right thing for the United States, the right thing for Israel, and the right thing for the peace of the world.”
For the first time anyone could recall, Netanyahu had skipped his scheduled speech at Monday’s opening of the new Knesset session in order to marshall his material and prepare his speech. That cancellation, which came just hours after a reported major raid on an Iranian base in Syria, sparked a mini-panic among some Israelis. Awaiting Netanyahu’s address, the news anchor at Israel’s Hadashot TV news assessed, with only a small degree of exaggeration, that “every household in Israel” was now bracing for the prime minister’s address and wondering whether war with Iran was “inevitable.”
“No,” came the succinct answer from military analyst Roni Daniel.
Elaborating, a widely respected former Defense Ministry official, Amos Gilad, said in the studio: “Let’s reassure the public: There is no danger of war. And Iran is not attacking us.”
Gilad, however, then rather undermined his attempts at defusing panic by adding: “Iran is determined to get rid of Israel. They take the historical view… They are developing missiles. They say the agreement with Obama allows them in eight years time to develop nuclear weapons if they want to…”
It is that patient Iranian approach, that relentless Iranian threat, that Netanyahu was determined to highlight in his presentation. To that end, his speech had several complementary goals:
First, showing the Iranians the potency of Israel’s security and intelligence apparatuses — capable of removing Iran’s own closely guarded material from right under its nose (and consequently capable of identifying the key personnel, like Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, leading the nuclear weapons program).
Second, detailing, stage by stage, the progress of the Iranian nuclear weapons program as gleaned from Iran’s own documents, map, photos and videos — in five stages that he showcased slide by slide: from designing nuclear weapons, to developing nuclear cores, to building nuclear implosion systems, to preparing nuclear tests and, finally, to integrating nuclear weapons on missiles.
Third, giving the international community extraordinary evidence on which to formulate a more appropriate response to Tehran’s terrifying duplicity.
US President Donald Trump speaks during a joint press conference with Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari in the Rose Garden of the White House on April 30, 2018, in Washington, DC. Trump said the current Iranian nuclear deal was ‘unacceptable.’ (AFP/Saul Loeb)
And, fourth, providing Trump with the intelligence information he needs to take the firmest stance against the maintenance of the 2015 deal in its current form — no matter how derisive or threatening the Iranian response.
Will it work? Will the P5+1 countries suddenly discover a new iron will when it comes to confronting the malevolent ayatollahs? Netanyahu, for one, evidently puts little faith in that. But, as he detailed, he has been coordinating with the Trump administration. And the president, within minutes of Netanyahu’s presentation in Tel Aviv, was declaring on the White House lawn that Netanyahu had sent the right message, and that an Iranian path to the bomb in seven years is “not acceptable.”
Netanyahu argued Monday, as he has argued consistently all along, that the 2015 accord is “a terrible deal” that “should never have been concluded.” Now, he said, he had the proof.
Then US president Barack Obama, right, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hold a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on November 9, 2015. (AFP/Saul Loeb)
The Obama administration claimed that no deal would have satisfied Israel, but that was always untrue. Israel wanted to see a deal that would dismantle Iran’s entire nuclear weapons program; the 2015 deal simply didn’t do that. Again, Netanyahu now had the proof.
Even Monday, armed with that Iranian archive of danger and duplicity, Netanyahu did not demand that the deal be scrapped. He stressed, rather, that the accord, as it stands, gives Iran a clear path to a nuclear arsenal, and asserted that the material he was presenting shows without a shadow of doubt that the Iranians fully intend to follow that path — to enrich mountains of uranium, to develop their ballistic missiles, to weaponize.
His message to the world on Iran’s rapacious leaders and their nuclear goals: They’re dangerous. They’re duplicitous. They have to be stopped. And… it’s not too late
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
No comments:
Post a Comment