Click here: Side By Side
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Give anarchists what they want and they never stop because total destruction is their ultimate goal.
Far too many Higher Education Administrators are pitiful puppies. They hide behind their desks while wetting the floor.(See 1 and 1a below)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sent to me by a very dear friend and fellow memo reader.(See 2 below - very harsh but factually hard to debate.)
I do own a slave. It is my wife who tries, as hard as she can, to turn me into a better slave owner but , to this date and after 44 years, ( I thought better about asking her the number.) she has failed in her mission. I am thinking of putting her up for auction.
Now a story about my father and his fight to wrest Birmingham from the authoritative control of Police Commissioner Bull Connor who brought nothing but shame to the city.
My father practiced law for over 50 years and though his firm was small by most standards it was a well respected firm among the Birmingham Bar and my father received many awards, accolades and honors for both his Civil Right's work as well as his efforts on behalf of the establishment and arming of the new state of Israel.
I often wonder what he would think about the current scene. He was a social liberal but a fiscal conservative. He was to be thanked by President Kennedy for his Civil Rights efforts and his assistance to some of the key staff of Robert Kennedy's Justice Department (Burke Marshall) but the President's tragic assassination came first.
When Robert Kennedy ran for Senator in New York, he asked my father to campaign for him which he did. He even stayed in Kennedy's suite in the Carlyle Hotel and when he returned I kidded him about maybe never taking another bath.
Many who think they know me by the letters/memos I write, but who have never sat down and engaged me in a conversation, think my views are the antithesis of my father. They are not because I am a social liberal as well but I am not a fool nor was my father and I daresay he would be appalled at what is happening on college campuses today, the divisiveness , the deficits, the political and social discord, the unconstitutional effort to avoid The Iran Deal being called a treaty etc.
Though I never practiced law, after I got my own law degree, I believe I knew him as well as his beloved partners and the firm's associates and I am confident he would be disturbed and saddened by the plight of the black community and how they have been foot balled politically. But then I will never know. I can only speculate.
This I do know for sure, he was outspoken and courageous. (See 2a below.)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Let's get rid of the police because Liberal Supreme Court Justices and The ACLU will protect us. (See 3 below.)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
More food for thought based on logic but then, who cares about logic any more because PC'ism is alive and well. (See 4 below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dick
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1)UC Berkeley Students Are Now Calling Exams Racist
It seems as if there is no end to the damages of identity politics and victim mentality. As if shouting down anyone who you happen to disagree with as being a racist Nazi wasn’t enough, leftist students are now using these buzzwords to protest anything and everything that inconveniences them. Their latest target – exams.
At UC Berkeley, a small group of minority students interrupted an exam to march forward to the front of the classroom and demand that the professor cancel the exam and instead give them a take-home essay and extra time to prepare for it at that. Their reasoning for this demand was that since minority students are supposedly facing so much violence and oppression they could not be expected to perform well on an in-class exam. Hence, forcing them to be held to the same standards as the privileged white people in the class is a horribly racist form of oppression itself.
One student said that, “Our well-beings are being put on the line because of our emotional, mental, and physical stress that [Berkeley] is compounding with what is already going on in our everyday lives.”
Another protester stated, “The content of this class and the way it is being taught is not satisfactory. And even if it is … we feel that we haven’t had the opportunity to interact with the text and information. We demand that you make and [hold space] to [study] the voices of students of color.”
When one student spoke up and said he was just trying to take his test, he was quickly shouted down by a protestor saying, “We’re trying to live our lives … white boy with privilege.”
After almost five minutes of this nonsense, the professor was finally given an opportunity to respond. Though he was noticeably candid in his response – though who can blame him in an age where professors are fired for hurting students’ feelings – he did not cave to their demands, saying at one point, “You may disagree with it — and I respect your opinion for disagreeing with it; I respect you getting up here and stating your disagreements — but with that, we are going to go ahead with the exam, not despite the demonstrations, but to show that all of us, as part of a community, are capable of doing what a university does absent that kind of interference. Otherwise, anytime 25, 50, or 1,000 people want to stop this dead, it becomes their possibility, and we’ve demonstrated that that’s what will happen.”
Undeterred, the student protestors still refused to take the exam and walked out of the classroom. It’s unclear as of now whether these students were given a zero or if other accommodations were made. One student did say that they intended to take their complaints to the university’s Department of Ethnic Studies.
Such is the current disarray of modern higher education. Rather than being sharpened by challenges and opposing viewpoints, students now protest anything and everything that challenges them in the slightest as being unfair, racist, and oppressive. To make matters infinitely worst, most universities have rolled over and allowed them to get away with this. There are rarely ever repercussions for such behavior, and more often than not, such behavior is followed by a letter from the administration backing and supporting the protesting students.
This type of atmosphere is entirely unsustainable. The type of students who are refusing to take exams and calling them racist would receive more preparation to succeed in the real world at a daycare center than they are currently receiving at their university.
Meanwhile, the students who really are trying to further their education — which is still the majority, though the numbers dwindle every day — are having their studies interrupted and held back by this constant barrage of pointless protests and PC culture. How can these students expect to succeed in an environment where they can’t even take a test without it being interrupted by protests and can’t even voice an opinion that strays from leftist ideals in the slightest without being verbally and, sometimes physically, attacked?
The political tides in America may be changing for the better, but the political tides at our top universities are worse than they have ever been. If you have a child nearing college age, you may want to consider sending them either to a trade school or a private university. The current environment in public universities that were once considered the pinnacle of higher education has now become dangerously detrimental.
~ Liberty Planet
1a)It’s 1968 All Over Again
The United States and the world appear to be reliving the language, politics, and global instability of 1968.By Victor Davis Hanson
– Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, and the author of The Second World Wars: How the First Global Conflict Was Fought and Won, to appear in October from Basic Books.Almost a half-century ago, in 1968, the United States seemed to be falling apart.The Vietnam War, a bitter and close presidential election, antiwar protests, racial riots, political assassinations, terrorism, and a recession looming on the horizon left the country divided between a loud radical minority and a silent conservative majority.The United States avoided a civil war. But America suffered a collective psychological depression, civil unrest, defeat in Vietnam, and assorted disasters for the next decade — until the election of a once-polarizing Ronald Reagan ushered in five consecutive presidential terms of relative bipartisan calm and prosperity from 1981 to 2001.It appears as if 2017 might be another 1968. Recent traumatic hurricanes seem to reflect the country’s human turmoil.After the polarizing Obama presidency and the contested election of Donald Trump, the country is once again split in two. But this time the divide is far deeper, both ideologically and geographically — and more 50/50, with the two liberal coasts pitted against red-state America in between.Century-old mute stone statues are torn down in the dead of night, apparently on the theory that by attacking the Confederate dead, the lives of the living might improve.All the old standbys of American life seem to be eroding. The National Football League is imploding as it devolves into a political circus. Multimillionaire players refuse to stand for the national anthem, turning off millions of fans whose former loyalties paid their salaries.Politics — or rather a progressive hatred of the provocative Donald Trump — permeates almost every nook and cranny of popular culture.The new allegiance of the media, late-night television, stand-up comedy, Hollywood, professional sports, and universities is committed to liberal sermonizing. Politically correct obscenity and vulgarity among celebrities and entertainers are a substitute for talent, even as Hollywood is wracked by sexual-harassment scandals and other perversities.The smears “racist,” “fascist,” “white privilege,” and “Nazi” — like “Commie” of the 1950s — are so overused as to become meaningless. There is now less free speech on campus than during the McCarthy era of the early 1950s.As was the case in 1968, the world abroad is also falling apart.The European Union, model of the future, is unraveling. The EU has been paralyzed by the exit of Great Britain, the divide between Spain and Catalonia, the bankruptcy of Mediterranean nation members, insidious terrorist attacks in major European cities, and the onslaught of millions of immigrants — mostly young, male, and Muslim — from the war-torn Middle East. Germany is once again becoming imperious, but this time insidiously by means other than arms.The failed state of North Korea claims that it has nuclear-tipped missiles capable of reaching America’s West Coast — and apparently wants some sort of bribe not to launch them.Iran is likely to follow the North Korea nuclear trajectory. In the meantime, its new Shiite hegemony in the Middle East is feeding on the carcasses of Syria and Iraq.Is the chaos of 2017 a catharsis — a necessary and long overdue purge of dangerous and neglected pathologies? Will the bedlam within the United States descend into more nihilism or offer a remedy to the status quo that had divided and nearly bankrupted the country?Is the problem too much democracy, as the volatile and fickle mob runs roughshod over establishment experts and experienced bureaucrats? Or is the crisis too little democracy, as populists strive to dethrone a scandal-plagued, anti-democratic, incompetent, and overrated entrenched elite?Neither traditional political party has any answers. Democrats are being overwhelmed by the identity politics and socialism of progressives. Republicans are torn asunder between upstart populist nationalists and the calcified establishment status quo.Yet for all the social instability and media hysteria, life in the United States quietly seems to be getting better. The economy is growing. Unemployment and inflation remain low. The stock market and middle-class incomes are up. Business and consumer confidence are high. Corporate profits are up. Energy production has expanded. The border with Mexico is being enforced.Is the instability less a symptom that America is falling apart and more a sign that the loud conventional wisdom of the past — about the benefits of a globalized economy, the insignificance of national borders, and the importance of identity politics — is drawing to a close, along with the careers of those who profited from it?In the past, any crisis that did not destroy the United States ended up making it stronger. But for now, the fight grows over which is more toxic — the chronic statist malady that was eating away the country, or the new populist medicine deemed necessary to cure it.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2)L. Todd Wood, a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy, flew special operations helicopters supporting SEAL Team 6, Delta Force and others. After leaving the military, he pursued his other passion, finance, spending 18 years on Wall Street trading emerging market debt, and later, writing. The first of his many thrillers is "Currency." Todd is a contributor to Fox Business, Newsmax TV, Moscow Times, the New York Post, the National Review, Zero Hedge and others. For more information about L. Todd Wood, visit LToddWood.com.
ANALYSIS/OPINION:I know of no white person alive today in the United States who has ever legally owned a black slave, or any slave for that matter. Almost 700,000 mostly white men died 160 years ago to end slavery. Jim Crow ended generations ago. Yet black America, for the most part, is still locked in inner-city gang violence and economic hardship. Why?
Is it because America is racist? Is it because of some overhanging white supremacy? Is it because of the Illuminati?
No, unfortunately, it is because of black culture and the adoption of Democratic Party government dependency.
We have just had eight years of the first black president. Black athletes, and entertainers, routinely earn multi-million dollar incomes. I can easily name several black billionaires without even trying too hard. A large percentage of black America is very successful. But, it is not enough. Too many black youth are being left behind.
And it is no one but black America’s fault.
No one can solve this problem but black America. No one can throw enough money at it. We’ve tried that. Black America needs to look in the mirror and stop blaming others, especially white people.
I am obviously white and conservative, and I served in the military, which, during my time, was as color blind as you could be. I can also honestly say I don’t give a damn what color your skin is, neither do any of my friends. I do care about your actions.
Blacks are around 15 percent of the population. Depending on what study you look at, they commit around 40 percent to 50 percent of violent crime in America. Of course, there is going to be a problem with police. And, of course, there are some bad policemen. However, those bad apples do not kill black people statistically anymore than they kill white people. Even Harvard said that recently. If you were a cop, and you had to work in a neighborhood infested with crime and murder, wouldn’t you act differently than in a neighborhood where there was little crime? The most effective thing black America could do to improve its relationship with police is to significantly reduce violent crime where they live. Yes, that means change the culture of where you live and your community.
I for one am tired of being blamed. I am tired of dealing with people who only want something from others. I don’t oppress anyone. I don’t hold anyone down. I’m tired of getting on the D.C. metro and seeing white people being harassed by roaming gangs of black youth with their pants around their knees. Yes, you want a white person uncomfortable? That makes me uncomfortable. It’s our nation’s capital and it’s embarrassing.
Blacks have nothing but opportunity in America. Try finding the same opportunity anywhere else in the world. If you are born in America you’ve won life’s economic lottery. Take advantage of it.
The problem is this generation has been taught an agenda of cultural Marxism by our education system. They’ve been taught to be a victim, and it’s still going on. All you have to do is watch the young black, female student at Yale screaming at the college president to understand that. Blacks in America don’t even know how good they have it.
Don’t kneel when my anthem is played. Too many people died for that flag. You are free to protest but not then. I am free to not watch, or pay to watch you play if you do that. The NFL should make it a rule that you stand for the national anthem. There is no free speech to disobey a private employer on private property. This would solve the problem immediately.
The NFL has deeply offended most of America. They will pay an economic and reputational price, as they should.
We have a real cultural problem in this country, the result of the Leftist multicultural agenda. Multi-ethnicity is perfect and should be encouraged. Having more than one American culture is destroying the country. But then again, that is what the Left wants.
Do BlackLives Matter
It is your job to determine if this is a racist rant or just a review of factual data...
WHAT IF ALL THE BLACKS SUDDENLY LEFT AMERICA, WHICH IS 13.3% OF THE TOTAL U.S.POPULATION:
Amount of people in poverty would drop - 34%,
The prison population would go down by -37%,
Welfare recipients would go down by - - - 42%,
Gang members would go down by - -- - - - 53%
Chlamydia cases would go down - --- - - - - 54%,
Homelessness would go down - - --- - - - - -57%
Syphilis would go down - - - - - - - --- - - - - 58%.
AIDS & HIV would go down by - - --- - - - - -65%,
Gonorrhea would go down - - - - - - - - - - --69%,
Average ACT scores would go UP - - - -- - 5.5 points.
Average IQ would go UP - - - - - - - - - - - -7.4 points, putting us 3rd in the world tied with Japan,
Average SAT scores would go UP almost 100 points,
The average income for Americans would go UP over $20,000 a year,
BUT DEMOCRATS WOULD LOSE 76% OF THEIR VOTING BASE!!!
And, many criminal defense attorneys would have to find another line of work!
Yes, Black lives DO matter!
2a)
Birmingham Office Born From Civil Rights Movement
Diversity Matters Newsletter
In 2003, the Birmingham firm of Berkowitz, Lefkovits, Isom & Kushner merged with Baker Donelson and, though Mr. Berkowitz had died in December 1985, the addition of his name to the surviving firm was a matter of grave importance to the shareholders of the Birmingham office.
So the question presents itself: why did the name of a man dead for almost twenty years at the time of the merger continue to carry such importance? The answer to that question takes us back into the events in Birmingham of 1962 and 1963, a time referred to as the Civil Rights Movement, events in which Mr. Berkowitz was deeply committed and involved.Mr. Berkowitz had practiced law in Birmingham since 1928 at the age of twenty. His first legal action was a petition to have his disability of non-age removed. He practiced alone during the years of the Great Depression. Arnold Lefkovits joined him in 1950, and they practiced together for many years. But in late 1963, their small firm of two lawyers admitted three additional partners and became known as Berkowitz, Lefkovits, Vann, Patrick & Smith. The reason they came together as partners is intertwined with the history of Birmingham.
The City of Birmingham was governed by a three-person commission, one of whom was Public Safety Commissioner Eugene "Bull" Connor, who had become a virtual dictator. Under his leadership, Birmingham's reputation had suffered nationally and internationally as he and his all-white police force attempted to enforce the Jim Crow laws of Birmingham and the state of Alabama. In May 1961, Birmingham became an international pariah as the consequence of the attack, without any police intervention, by a mob on a busload of Freedom Riders.
Soon after, the Birmingham Bar Association appointed Abe Berkowitz to head a committee of lawyers to study the three forms of city government authorized by the state constitution and to recommend which would best serve Birmingham. Mr. Berkowitz understood that the real but not verbalized reason was to displace Commissioner Connor. The Bar committee recommended in February 1962 a change from the commission form of government to a mayor-city council form. But the question was, how to effect the change? Members of the committee understood that the Commissioners, particularly Bull Connor, would oppose any attempt to change the form of government.
An election had been called in August 1962 for ten new legislators representing Jefferson County pursuant to the "one man – one vote" case, Baker vs. Carr, which had been decided by the United States Supreme Court. David Vann, an attorney with one of Birmingham's largest law firms at the time, had been one of the attorneys who filed the action. He discussed with Mr. Berkowitz his idea of how to obtain the requisite number of signatures to call a referendum on the mayor-council form. He suggested that it could be accomplished simply by setting up booths at each polling station on the day of the election and getting the signatures in one day, before Connor could mobilize resistance. But it was then only ten days before the election. They arranged a committee to implement the plan. Serving on that committee were Abe Berkowitz, David J. Vann, J. Vernon Patrick Jr., Erskine Smith and others. It's a long story, but the plan worked, the required signatures were obtained and an election was set in November 1962 for the adoption of the mayor-council form of government, which won by a slim margin. Then in April 1963, Albert Boutwell was narrowly elected over Connor for mayor of the city. Litigation ensued, and eventually Connor was forced from office, but not before Martin Luther King Jr. brought his Project C (Confrontation) to Birmingham.
In response, Connor, who continued in office under an appeal bond, led the police and fire departments in resistance to the civil rights marches in Birmingham during the spring of 1963, in which police dogs were used to intimidate the protestors and fire hoses were used to rout the children's protest, including the jailing of over one thousand children. Abe Berkowitz and David Vann were deeply involved in mediations among Department of Justice officials, department store owners and leaders of the African American community to resolve the racial injustices that brought about the marches. Many of those meetings occurred in Mr. Berkowitz's office.
The violence culminated on September 15 with the bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church that killed four young girls. 1963 was a pivotal year in the history of Birmingham and in the history of civil rights in the United States. And as that pivotal year come to a close, David J. Vann, J. Vernon Patrick Jr. and Erskine Smith all lost their jobs at law firms, paying for their support of civil rights in Birmingham. It was Abe Berkowitz, their elder guru, who gathered them in like a mother hen and gave them a home.
David J. Vann, J. Vernon Patrick Jr., Erskine Smith: these were the partners in the firm. Joining them of counsel was Charles F. Zukoski Jr., the sixty-five year old head of the Trust Department of the First National Bank of Birmingham, who had been pushed into retirement because of his civil rights activities. The name of the new firm was Berkowitz, Lefkovits, Vann, Patrick, & Smith, a firm actually born out of the Civil Rights Movement.This is the firm I joined following law school in May 1967. Though Mr. Berkowitz died in December 1985, the firm continued to be identified by his name. Forty years after the founding of the firm, it merged in 2003 with Baker, Donelson, Bearman and Caldwell, P.C., a large firm with Tennessee roots. Because the continuation of the use of his name was imperative to us in Birmingham, the surviving firm added Mr. Berkowitz' name to its title and the firm continues to this day to be known as Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C., a Firm with over 630 lawyers and public policy advisors conducting a national and international law practice.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++This is a summary of a longer article written by Chervis Isom, which is available for review upon request.
3) War on Cops Goes to Court
The war on cops is moving from the streets to the U.S. Supreme Court. Last week, the Justices heard a case that threatens police officers with financial ruin if they make arrests, and the charges later get dropped.
It started with a late night bash. District of Columbia police officers were called by neighbors at 1 a.m. to investigate a rowdy party at an unoccupied row house. The police found 21 partygoers, liquor, trash and used condoms strewn about, along with the smell of marijuana and women with cash coming out of their pants. The partygoers scattered, hiding in closets.
When questioned, some told police “Peaches had invited them.” Some gave other stories. The police phoned “Peaches,” who admitted to not having the owner’s permission to use the house. The police then called the owner, who confirmed no one had permission. Two hours after being summoned, the police made the decision to arrest the partygoers for trespassing — the judgment call an issue in this case.
The charges were later dropped, because it wasn’t clear beyond a reasonable doubt the partygoers knew they were trespassing. But 16 turned around and sued the police for false arrest and violating their constitutional rights.
They never claimed the police verbally or physically abused them. They sued simply for having been arrested, cuffed and hauled to the police station. Amazingly, the lower courts slapped the police with nearly $1 million in damages and legal fees — one of numerous recent lower court decisions making cops personally liable for decisions they made on duty.
The justices should put a stop to it. Fortunately, the Court has a long record of protecting the police from legal liability, provided there’s no evidence of malice or a deliberate violation of the Constitution.
If merely making an arrest puts cops at risk of getting sued and clobbered with legal fees and damage awards, what police officer will ever make an arrest? One mistake could mean losing their home and everything else. Faced with that risk, who would ever want to be a cop?
Twenty-six states and the federal Justice Department are weighing in with a strong warning that allowing the lower court ruling to stand would have “vast consequences” for law enforcement everywhere. On the other side, the American Civil Liberties Union is pushing to shrink or even eliminate the police’s legal immunity. The ACLU wants police to have no room for error.
Last week’s oral argument signals how the Justices are likely to vote. Justice Stephen Breyer sympathized with the partygoers, suggesting it’s out of “the Middle Ages” to expect them to know who’s hosting. Justice Elena Kagan bragged she herself had gone to parties without knowing who the host was and where “marijuana was maybe present.”
Justice Sonia Sotomayor was determined to play the race card, though race wasn’t raised by either side. She asked “if police officers arrived at a wealthy home and it was white teenagers having a party … I doubt very much those kids would be arrested.” Shame on Sotomayor.
Neighbors called the cops because they were concerned about the debauchery going on next door to them. Of course, people in an upscale neighborhood would do the same. Rich people and poor people, black and white alike, want police protection and quiet enjoyment of their homes.
That protection is being eroded. You can thank Black Lives Matter street protests and pandering politicians. Manhattan Institute scholar Heather MacDonald reports a nationwide slowdown in policing, because cops are feeling vulnerable and hesitating to make arrests. That means the war on cops is hurting all of us.
A majority of the Justices seem to get that. The Court’s newest member, Justice Neil Gorsuch, has frequently cautioned against courts “second-guessing” police for the actions they take in “tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving circumstances.” That’s why the Court should rule in favor of legal immunity for the police. Our public safety depends on it.
Betsy McCaughey is a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research and a former lieutenant governor of New York State. Contact her at betsy@betsymccaughey.com. To find out more about Betsy McCaughey and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4) Just one more thing on ObamaCare Repeal.
Since only 8 million people have ObamaCare, how will 24 million people die if it is repealed? Will 16 million people be randomly shot?
Just one more thing on Donald Trump.
If Donald Trump deleted all of his emails, wiped his server with Bleachbit and destroyed all of his phones with a hammer, would the Mainstream Media suddenly lose all interest in the story and declare him innocent?
Just one more thing on equal pay.
If women do the same job for less money, why do companies hire men to do the same job for more money?
Just one more thing on Sanctuary Cities.
If you rob a bank in a Sanctuary City, is it illegal or is it just an Undocumented Withdrawal?
Just one more thing on ISIS.
Each ISIS attack now is a reaction to Trump policies, but all ISIS attacks during Obama's term were due to Climate Change and a plea for jobs.
Just one more thing on the London 'Lone Wolf' terror attack.
After the London 'Lone Wolf' terrorist attack government officials have arrested at least eight other 'Lone Wolves' who had conspired with the original 'Lone Wolf'. Even though all involved are Muslims, you can be assured, the 'Lone Wolf; attack has nothing at all to do with Islam, just like the other 1000 plus 'Lone Wolf' attacks by Muslims, are completely un-associated with Islam.
Just one more thing on Entitlements.
We should stop calling them all 'Entitlements'.
Welfare, Food Stamps, WIC, ad nauseum are not entitlements. They are taxpayer-funded handouts, and shouldn't be called entitlements at all. They are intended to provide a safety net, not a benefit for life under most circumstances.
Social Security and Veterans Benefits are Entitlements because the recipients earned and paid/performed for them.
Just one more thing on the Muslim Refugees.
If Muslims want to run away from a Muslim country, does that mean they're Islamophobic?
Just one more thing on The Women's March.
If Liberals don't believe in biological gender then why did they march for women's rights?
Just one more thing on the Russians hacking the election.
How did the Russians get Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the DNC to steal the Primary from Bernie Sanders? How did Russia get Donna Brazile to leak debate questions to Hillary Clinton in advance of the debates?
Just one more thing on Democrats and the Electoral College.
Why is it that Democrats think Super delegates are fine, but they have a problem with the Electoral College?
Just one more thing on the FBI and elections.
If you don't want the FBI involved in elections, don't nominate someone who's being investigated by the FBI.
Just one more thing on Hillary's speeches.
If Hillary's speeches cost $250,000 an hour, how come so few show up to her free ones?
Just one more thing on Russia manipulating our election.
The DNC is mad at Russia because they 'think' they are trying to manipulate our election by exposing the DNC for manipulating our election?
Just one more thing on Trump's 'Locker Room Banter'.
Why is it Liberals and the Mass Media are upset about words Trump used 11 years ago but are alright with Adult men using the Ladies Room with your Wives and Daughters? And then came Harvey.
+++++++++++++++++++
No comments:
Post a Comment