Obama's hypocrisy cannot be ignored.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I posted this once before but thought worth doing so again. Sent to me by a very dear and close friend and fellow memo reader. (See 1 below.)
===
Speaker Ryan, is going to different Districts of his Members who might need some bucking up with a program of what he and his Party have all agreed to and hope to pass given the opportunity.
It is a sound expression of main stream conservatism, would be very beneficial for turning the tide in favor of reversing much of the damage Obama has caused and Hillary, most likely, is prepared to continue. It also allows Ryan to be positive in the face of Trump's negativism. For this I commend Ryan but I still believe he should have been less vocal about his contempt for Trump. He did not have to go as far as he did. Should have kept his mouth shut.
+++
News reporters take themselves for their own ride. This is a must hear! (See 2 below.)
===
Even Bob Woodward sees corruption. (See 3 below.)
===
Should Trump become president these are some I would advise he should consider for his Cabinet. (See 4 below.)
+++
I'm from your government and I am here to screw you. (See 5 below.)
===
Dick
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1) Subject: CHECK OUT THE WHITE HOUSE WEBSITE
Read some of them below - unbelievable!
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the
government fears the people, there is liberty." - Thomas Jefferson
Take 1 minute to comprehend what you read below.
During our lifetimes, all Presidents have issued Executive Orders. For various reasons, some have issued more than others. These Orders will directly affect us all, in years to come.
Ike - 2 in 8 years
Kennedy - 4 in 3 years
LBJ - 4 in 5 years
Nixon - 1 in 6 years
Ford - 3 in 2 years
Carter - 3 in 4 years
Reagan - 5 in 8 years
Bush - 3 in 4 years
Clinton - 15 in 8 years
George W. Bush - 62 in 8 years
Obama - 923 in 3 1/2 years! More than 1000+ and counting Executive Orders in 6 years...
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Next step -dictatorship. (Looks like we are there already!).
If you don't get the implications, you're not paying attention. How come all the other presidents in the past 100 years have not found it necessary to INCREASE GOVERNMENT'S POWER OVER THE PEOPLE with more than 1,000 Executive Orders? This is really very scary.
And most Americans have absolutely no idea what is happening.
"YES, THERE IS A REASON THAT THIS PRESIDENT IS DETERMINED TO TAKE CONTROL AWAY FROM THE HOUSE AND THE SENATE.
Even some Democrats in the House have turned on him, plus a very small number of Democrat Senators have questioned him. Rightfully so. -
WHAT IS OBAMA REALLY TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH????
Remember what he told Russia 's Putin: "I'll be more flexible after I'm re-elected? Now look at these:
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 -- allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 -- allows the government to seize and control the communication media.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 -- allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 -- allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 -- allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 -- allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare function
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 -- designates the registration of all persons. Postmaster General to operate a national registration.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 -- allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 -- allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 -- allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 -- assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 -- specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 -- grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 -- allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energ y sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. Financial institution in any undefined national emergency.
It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months.
Feel free to verify the "executive orders" at will. ....and these are just the major ones.
I'm sure you've all heard the tale of the "Frog in the Pot"... Watch Obama's actions, not his words! By his actions he will show you where America is headed.
Obama has issued executive orders that seek to "harmonize" U.S. Economic regulations with the rest of the world. These executive orders are yet another incremental step that is pushing us closer to a North American Union and a one world economic system.
Obama used the stage at the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King's I have a dream speech to announce two new executive orders infringing on your second amendment rights..
The first bans the importation of antique military firearms for sale to sportsman and collectors. He intentionally mislabels them military grade weapons to deceive the people, but make no mistake . . . The order was written specifically to ban the importation of surplus M1 carbines, M1 Garands, 1903 Springfields and other antiques coveted by collectors and sport shooters.
This order is the death knell for the civilian marksmanship program.
Congress had previously passed the sportsman protection act in 1986 which among other things guaranteed that the importation of the historic relics for collectors and the CMP would not be impeded by unreasonable regulations.
Unfortunately, most Americans have absolutely no idea what is happening.
The American people need to understand that Barack Obama is constantly looking for ways to integrate the United States more deeply with the rest of the world.
The globalization of the world economy has accelerated under Obama, and this latest executive order represents a fundamental change in U.S. Economic policy. Now federal regulators will be required to "harmonize" their work with the international community.
If THIS IS DIFFICULT TO BELIEVE, THEN PROVE TO YOURSELF IT'S WRONG - Google it. !!!
2)
Black Female Trump Supporter Leaves News Anchors SPEECHLESS
After the last Presidential deabte, WGN 9 News invited Brunell Donald-Kyei, a Chicago based lawyer who happens to be a black female who supports Donald Trump, on air to talk about her preferred candidate.
Obviously looking to try and play their typical media games of discrediting Trump supporters, specifically those of us who are black, the WGN 9 anchors were left speechless after they discovered that they had bitten off far more than they could chew.
In short, Brunell Donald-Kyei absolutely owned the interview, and the anchors, delivering an incredibly passionate and commonsense argument for her support of Trump.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3) Bob Woodward: Hillary's 'Pay for Play' Is 'Corrupt,' a Scandal
Renowned reporter Bob Woodward called Hillary Clinton's connections to "pay for play" through the Clinton Foundation and the access she had given when she was secretary of state "corrupt" and something that voters should be troubled by, Woodward told Fox News' Chris Wallace on Sunday.
"Yes, it’s corrupt; it’s a scandal,” Woodward told the "Fox News Sunday" panel monitored by Wednesday's presidential debate moderator Wallace, and referencing back Wednesday's debate pivot by Clinton when asked about it.
"And she didn’t answer your question at all, and she turned to embrace the good work that the Clinton Foundation has done . . . But the mixing of speech fees, the Clinton Foundation and actions by the State Department which she ran are all intertwined. And it’s corrupt. You can’t just say it’s unsavory, but there’s no formal investigation going on now, and there are outs that they have.”
Woodward added the election won't be decided by the potential corruption – nor will Trump have any power by refusing to accept the election results.
"That's absurd," Woodward told Wallace. "It has no consequence.
"If Trump loses they're not going to let him in the White House. He's not going to have a transition team.
To focus on that is wrong."
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chief of Staff-Newt Gingrich
Sec. of State - John Bolton or Paul Wolfowitz
Dept of Education and Energy - I would eliminate them both and transfer the nuclear responsibilities to The Defense Department - Bill Bennett
Health and Human resources and The Veteran Administration- I would reduce much of HHA . Dr. Carson
Dept of Commerce: Much of this Dept should also be reduced. Gov. Romney
Dept. of Defense - Sen. Sam. Nunn
EPA - Would eliminate most of the department. Gov. Huckabee
Dept. of Labor - Reduce this department in size as well. Malcolm Forbes.
Atty General - Mayor Guiliani
Other candidates for remaining departments could be drawn from among - top corporate managers, top academic experts etc. in their specific fields and I would specifically focus on some middle road Democrats and more women than men and some black and Hispanics.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5) New SS Checks
THIS IS WORTH THE FEW MINUTES IT TAKES TO READ AND DIGEST!
F.Y.I. By changing the name of SSC contributions, it gives them a means to refute this program in the future. It’s free money for the government to spend under this guise (new name).
It is really sad to think that most people will just roll over and accept this as if there is nothing that can be done, but maybe there is if we make a little noise about our displeasure with what they have done to today’s retirees. Pass it on.
Subject: New SS Checks
The Social Security Check is now (or soon will be) referred to as….. A *Federal Benefit Payment*!!!
The government is now referring to our Social Security Checks as a "Federal Benefit Payment."
This isn't a benefit. It is our money paid out of our earned income! Not only did we all contribute to Social Security, but our employers did too. It totaled 15% of our income before taxes.
If you averaged $30K per year over your working life, that's close to $120,000 invested in Social Security. If you calculate the future value of your monthly investment in social security ($375/month, including both you and your employers contributions) at a meager 1% interest rate compounded monthly, after 40 years of working you'd have more than $1 million dollars saved!
This is your personal investment.
Upon retirement, if you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive $30,000 per year, or $2,500 per month. That's almost two times more than today's average Social Security benefit of $1,230 per month, according to the Social Security Administration.
And your retirement fund would last more than 25 years (until you're 90 if you retire at age 65)! I can only imagine how much better most average-income people COULD LIVE in retirement if our government had just invested our money in low-risk interest-earning accounts. Instead, the folks in Washington pulled off a bigger *Ponzi Scheme* than Bernie Madoff ever did.
They took our money and used it elsewhere. They forgot (oh yes, they knew) that it was OUR money they were taking. They didn't have a referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the money to them. And they didn't pay interest on the debt they assumed. And recently they've told us that the money won't support us for very much longer. (Isn't it funny that they NEVER say this about welfare payments?)
But is it our fault they misused our investments?
And now, to add insult to injury, they're calling it a *benefit*, as if we never worked to earn every penny of it. Just because they borrowed the money, doesn't mean that our investments were a charity!
If Congresspersons were held to the same level as fiduciaries they would all be in jail.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5) New SS Checks
THIS IS WORTH THE FEW MINUTES IT TAKES TO READ AND DIGEST!
F.Y.I. By changing the name of SSC contributions, it gives them a means to refute this program in the future. It’s free money for the government to spend under this guise (new name).
It is really sad to think that most people will just roll over and accept this as if there is nothing that can be done, but maybe there is if we make a little noise about our displeasure with what they have done to today’s retirees. Pass it on.
Subject: New SS Checks
The Social Security Check is now (or soon will be) referred to as….. A *Federal Benefit Payment*!!!
The government is now referring to our Social Security Checks as a "Federal Benefit Payment."
This isn't a benefit. It is our money paid out of our earned income! Not only did we all contribute to Social Security, but our employers did too. It totaled 15% of our income before taxes.
If you averaged $30K per year over your working life, that's close to $120,000 invested in Social Security. If you calculate the future value of your monthly investment in social security ($375/month, including both you and your employers contributions) at a meager 1% interest rate compounded monthly, after 40 years of working you'd have more than $1 million dollars saved!
This is your personal investment.
Upon retirement, if you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive $30,000 per year, or $2,500 per month. That's almost two times more than today's average Social Security benefit of $1,230 per month, according to the Social Security Administration.
And your retirement fund would last more than 25 years (until you're 90 if you retire at age 65)! I can only imagine how much better most average-income people COULD LIVE in retirement if our government had just invested our money in low-risk interest-earning accounts. Instead, the folks in Washington pulled off a bigger *Ponzi Scheme* than Bernie Madoff ever did.
They took our money and used it elsewhere. They forgot (oh yes, they knew) that it was OUR money they were taking. They didn't have a referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the money to them. And they didn't pay interest on the debt they assumed. And recently they've told us that the money won't support us for very much longer. (Isn't it funny that they NEVER say this about welfare payments?)
But is it our fault they misused our investments?
And now, to add insult to injury, they're calling it a *benefit*, as if we never worked to earn every penny of it. Just because they borrowed the money, doesn't mean that our investments were a charity!
If Congresspersons were held to the same level as fiduciaries they would all be in jail.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
No comments:
Post a Comment