===
When you vote for Hillary you are voting to place a corrupt person in The Oval Office right from the start. This is a novel approach towards good governance all because you do not like Trump's personality and his coarse manner and buy the story that he is dangerous.
You argue Hillary is experienced yet, everything she has been entrusted to do/with has failed. You are willing to ignore her lies to families of those she allowed to die because she would not oppose Obama's lie. You assert you believe in limited terms yet ignore she and her husband became grossly rich from politics and have run a Foundation which has amassed a fortune by selling their office.
You ignore dirty campaign tricks by the Clinton's and are angered when Trump asserts the election is rigged and yet, the mass media have proven biased in virtually every time they report a story about Trump while covering up for Hillary.
Finally, you accept the story The Director of The FBI used to allow her to slip off the hook and are going to promote a person, who compromised the security of our nation's intelligence, to the highest office in the land because you are willing to blindfold yourself.
When you look in the mirror, after the election, whether Hillary wins or not , and congratulate yourself for the type of citizen you are, I hope you can live with yourself and your values.
Trump is also flawed but he at least tried to fight the better fight, he tried to heal the racial divide Obama exacerbated and Trump sought to support our return to being a nation favoring the rule of law.
Some times life deals you only two poor choices and you have to go with the one least offensive. The allegations against Hillary are real. Many of those thrown at Trump were because of the dirty campaign tactics Liberals always seem to embrace and employ and, once again, were trumped up by their paid for hire goons.
I am sticking with Terrible Trump over Crooked Hillary. (Erick Erickson think I am a fool. (See 2 below.)
Woodward Slams Clinton as ‘Corrupt’ for Mixing of Clinton Foundation and State Department Work (See 2a below)
and then let's hear it from Pat Condell:
+++
Dick
LIEBERMAN: IF HAMAS FORCES WAR ON US, IT WILL BE THEIR LAST
By Elior Levy
In the rare interview with Al-Quds newspaper, the Israeli defense minister outlined his thoughts on Palestinian statehood, a final peace agreement and Mahmoud Abbas; 'if they make the decision to stop digging tunnels, smuggling arms and firing rockets at us, we will be the first investors in the rehabilitation of the Gaza Strip.'
Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman told a Palestinian newspaper in an interview published Monday that while Israel has no desire to return to Gaza or conquer it, “if they force a new war on us—it will be Hamas' last because we will completely destroy them.”
The interview with Al-Quds—the most popular Palestinian daily West Bank and east Jerusalem—sparked outrage on Palestinian social media.
Lieberman in his interview with Al-Quds
Lieberman outlined an alternative reality for Gaza citizens in which the Gaza-Israel border can be a source of development and prosperity, which can create thousands of new jobs.
“There are extremely radical elements in the Gaza Strip who have the destruction of Israel at the top of their priorities,” Lieberman noted. “But I want to be clear: if they make the decision to stop digging tunnels, smuggling arms and firing rockets at us, we will be the first investors in the rehabilitation of the Gaza Strip. We will be the first to invest in a maritime trading port, an airport and an industrial zone. Gaza could one day be the new Hong Kong or Singapore. Hamas invests more than NIS 100 million in military infrastructure instead of in health and education.”
Regarding the issue of Palestinian statehood, Lieberman said, “I recognize the two-state solution and I support it, but I think the problem lies with the Palestinian leadership and not Israel. I feel the right principle is not land for peace. I prefer and exchange of territory and population. I do not understand why we need Umm al-Fahm. (Its residents) recognize themselves as Palestinian and do not recognize Israel as a Jewish state. I am referring to (leader of the northern branch of the Islamic Movement) Sheikh Raed Salah and others that see themselves as Palestinian—so please, be part of the Palestinian state.”
Ra'ad Salach at protest in Umm al-Fahm (Photo: AFP)
Lieberman further went on to state that he believes that large settlement blocs such as Ma'ale Adumim, Givat Ze'ev, Gush Etzion and Ariel will be part of Israel in the event of an agreement with the Palestinians.
In regards to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Lieberman said, “The problem is not with Jerusalem or extremism. The problem lies with Abbas refusing to sign a final agreement. An agreement of this type requires another person who is capable of making the tough decision concerning the Arab world, the Palestinians and even Jerusalem. I imagine the final agreement will be like an earthquake because it will open a new page in our relations with the Middle East and the Arab world. Abbas does not have the ability to market his goods to the people.”
Mahmoud Abbas (Photo: Reuters)
According to Lieberman, the thing that bothers most average Palestinian citizens is the corruption in the Palestinian Authority. “When was the last time Abbas visited Nablus or Tulkarm? He hasn't been there for a decade, but he has been in London, Paris, New York and Moscow. He is the Palestinian president, but he would surely lose in elections, no doubt.”
When asked who Lieberman thought could replace Abbas, he avoided answering the question directly, but made it clear that there are those who are capable of replacing Abbas.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2)
Why Are You Willing To Be An Idiot?
id·i·ot
ˈidēət
noun informala stupid person.synonyms: fool, ass, halfwit, dunce, dolt, ignoramus, cretin, moron, imbecile, simpleton
Rasmussen is one of the worst pollsters to exist in the United States. That’s not my opinion. That is objective fact given Rasmussen’s polling over the last several years. In 2012, Republicans hung their hat on Rasmussen polling only to watch Mitt Romney lose and Scott Rasmussen get booted from his company. Without Scott there, Rasmussen has descended beneath credibility.
But go on Drudge or more paranoid corners of the internet and you’ll find that Trump is winning black voters at a higher number than any Republican since Nixon. The only poll cited is Rasmussen. In fact, no other major pollster out there shows this at all.
But you believe it because you want it to be true.
If the election were held today, based on the polling averages, Hillary Clinton would win and she already has more than 270 Electoral College votes solidly in her camp. Don’t believe me. Fox News is reporting this.
But you do not believe it because you do not want it to be true.
You believe the election is going to be stolen despite the fact that it would take the coordination of over 2 million people keeping it a secret and strategically placing these people in key swing states. You believe Trump is ahead because his rallies are massive, but ignore that Bernie Sanders had massive rallies and lost. You believe anecdote is data and not seeing yard signs for Clinton means she must be losing.
In fact, you will argue that the polls are wrong because Donald Trump supporters are too ashamed to admit they are Trump supporters and therefore will lie to pollsters, but are so proud of Trump that they’ll turn up on TV cameras across America cheering him on at rallies.
I cannot stop you from willfully being an idiot. I cannot stop you from believing lies. I cannot stop you from making a fool of yourself. And I cannot stop you from being angry on November 9th when reality dawns and you realize you’ve been had.
But I do want to point out that you are a smart person and you are being lied to and you know it and do not care. That is the shame of it all.
I hope on November 9 that you will stop being an idiot and come back to reality.
Republicans could have beaten Hillary Clinton this year. Instead, an army of the idiotocracy decided to ensure the nomination of the one man who could not beat her so they can make money off your anger for years to come.
You are being lied to. What makes you an idiot is that deep down you really know it and don’t care. You threw your support to a Clinton donor and now only read websites that lie to you to convince you the lies are truth. That’s pathetic.
2a) Hillary’s 33,000 emails might not be ‘missing’ after all
For months now, we’ve been told that Hillary Clinton’s 33,000 missing emails were permanently erased and destroyed beyond recovery. But newly released FBI notes strongly suggest they still exist in several locations — and they could be recovered, if only someone would impanel a grand jury and seize them.
In a May interview with FBI agents, an executive with the Denver contractor that maintained Clinton’s private server revealed that an underling didn’t bleach-clean all her subpoenaed emails, just ones he stored in a data file he used to transfer the emails from the server to Clinton’s aides, who in turn sorted them for delivery to Congress.
The Platte River Networks executive, whose name was redacted from the interview report, said PRN tech Paul Combetta “created a ‘vehicle’ to transfer email files from the live mailboxes of [Clinton Executive Services Corp.] email accounts [and] then later used BleachBit software to shred the ‘vehicle,’ but the email content still existed in the live email accounts.”
Unless one of Clinton’s aides had the capability to log in to the PRN server as an administrator and remove a mailbox, her archived mailboxes more than likely still reside somewhere in that system. And they may also materialize on an internal “shared drive” that PRN created to control access to the Clinton email accounts among PRN employees. PRN has been under FBI order to preserve all emails and other evidence since the start of its investigation last year.
Clinton’s missing “personal” emails may also be captured on a Google server. According to FBI notes, Combetta “transferred all of the Clinton email content to a personal Google email address he created.” Only the FBI never subpoenaed Google to find out.
The FBI documents also reveal that Hillary’s server was mirrored on a cloud server in Pennsylvania maintained by Datto Inc., a tech firm that performs cloud-to-cloud data protection.
When PRN contracted with Datto, it requested that Hillary’s server be backed up locally and privately. But the techs forgot to order the private node, and they sent the server backup data “remotely to Datto’s secure cloud and not to a local private node.” The FBI never subpoenaed Datto’s server, either.
Then there’s the laptop Combetta loaded with the Clinton email archive and allegedly shipped back to a Clinton aide in Washington, who claims it got “lost” in the mail. Not so fast: The latest FBI document dump includes a series of interviews with an unidentified former “special assistant” to Clinton at the State Department who said the elusive Apple MacBook laptop was actually “shipped to the Clinton Foundation in New York City.”
But in a June follow-up interview, FBI agents inexplicably left it up to this critical witness to “inquire about the shipment” with the foundation’s mailroom manager, who works in Rockefeller Center. The FBI still does not have the laptop in its possession.
It turns out that investigators also know the whereabouts of the original Apple server Clinton used in her first two months in office. Recovering that equipment is critical because it contains a mass of unseen emails from Jan. 21, 2009, to March 18, 2009 — a critical period in Clinton’s tenure at State. Witnesses say the equipment was not discarded, as first believed, but “repurposed” as a “work station” used by staff in Clinton’s Chappaqua residence.Yet the FBI says it “was unable to obtain the original Apple server for a forensic review.” Instead of seizing it, the agency has taken Clinton’s aides’ and lawyers’ word that the server’s bereft of relevant emails. In fact, the agency confesses on Page 27 of its 47-page investigative case summary that it failed to recover other equipment and data as well: “The FBI’s inability to recover all server equipment and the lack of complete server log data for the relevant time period limited the FBI’s forensic analysis of the server systems. As a result, FBI cyber analysis relied, in large part, on witness statements.”
Congressional investigators say FBI Director James Comey in his year-long “investigation” didn’t even bother to send agents to search Clinton’s homes in Chappaqua or Washington, DC. Nor did he dispatch them to the offices of the Clinton Foundation or Clinton Executive Services Corp. in New York City.
“The Clinton residences and other locations should have been treated like any other criminal investigation — with federal grand jury subpoenas or search warrants issued by judges and served in the middle of the night,” said veteran FBI special agent Michael M. Biasello, who worked criminal cases out of New York and other field offices for 27 years.
“Never — I repeat, never — in my career have I or any FBI agent known to me investigated a criminal case without the use of a federal grand jury, grand jury subpoenas or search warrants,” he said. “It’s disgraceful they weren’t used in this case.”
The most damning evidence against Clinton may never have been actually destroyed. It was simply left untouched by the FBI.Paul Sperry, a former DC bureau chief for Investor’s Business Daily and Hoover Institution media fellow, is author of “Infiltration.” Sperry@SperryFiles.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
No comments:
Post a Comment