I love Christmas lights! They remind me of
the people who voted for Obama.
They all hang together, half of them don't work,
and the ones that do, aren't all that bright.
===
I love Christmas lights! They remind me of
the people who voted for Obama.
They all hang together, half of them don't work,
Tobin on Obama and his need to reassure because of his failed policy and half hearted actions.
Half hearted is heartless when it results in world misery but it sure makes for a convenient political club with which to beat Republicans over the head.(See 1 below.)
===
What difference does it make when your ethics make no difference. (See 2 below.)
===
Bill Whittle murders the moralists when it comes to where America rates in guns and their murder rate consequences.
Bill Whittle murders the moralists when it comes to where America rates in guns and their murder rate consequences.
GUN NUT CAPITOL OF THE WORLD!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1)
No Known Threat. Also, No Confidence
Today President Obama announced to the nation, “Right now, we know of no specific and credible intelligence indicating a plot on the homeland.” I suppose that’s better than announcing that American intelligence was aware of such a plot. But the reason why the president felt compelled to make such an anodyne pronouncement had more to do with what’s wrong with public perceptions about U.S. security than about what is right.
The president was seeking to calm the public prior to the Thanksgiving holiday and squelch the panic that has spread in some quarters since the Paris terror attacks. To the extent that he was able to project a degree of assurance about the possibility of a similar atrocity happening here and give Americans confidence that they can go about their celebrations in peace that was a good thing. The president and his allies have been working overtime to calm the nation and to pour cold water on those expressing worry about his determination to take in Syrian refugees that, according to the FBI, can’t really be vetted. But the concern here isn’t that some Americans are succumbing to unreasonable fears about terrorism and need the president to talk some sense about the subject. The problem is that much of the country understands all too well is that the president has been waging a half-hearted military campaign against ISIS and other Islamist terrorist groups like al-Qaeda that has clearly failed.
For most of the last two weeks, the president and his allies have been dismissing fears about terrorist infiltration via Syrian refugees. Those who have voiced such concerns have denounced as bigots or Islamophobes. We are told that we should stop being the prisoner of our fears and instead embrace compassion.
But Americans don’t lack compassion. Nor are they foolishly giving in to fear by noting the flimsy excuses being given for continuing the refugee program in spite of its obvious shortcomings. What they lack is confidence in Barack Obama as a war leader.
Had President Obama sought to inspire the country by a call to arms against ISIS a year ago, they would have responded with near acclimation to any effort he proposed. The same can be said of virtually any speech he has given on the subject. But instead of passion, they got excuses and angry denunciations of critics. For the last year, they’ve heard rationalizations of a policy that is predicated on a belief that America cannot or should not lead the struggle against a brutal enemy that has demonstrated its ability to inflict horror on the world. Nor has he been honest with them about the nature of that enemy since he consistently refuses to note that Islamist theology is what is driving this terror movement.
The fact that the Pentagon has apparently been feeding the White House with false or misleading information about the threat also undermines confidence in the war effort since it’s obvious that Obama is being told what he wants to hear.
A president who was perceived to be taking this war seriously and prosecuting it with the sort of strength and competence that the task requires might not have to tell Americans that there are no known threats for Thanksgiving. They would assume that he would tell them something substantial if there was something to be worried about and not worry if he said nothing. But with Obama, the talk about security is so obviously a matter of show rather than substance that the act of reassurance probably does as much harm as good.
What the country needs isn’t a president to tell them that all is well. It needs a leader who will admit his mistakes and prepare them for possible sacrifices that will be needed if evil is to be defeated. President Obama is not such a leader and that is a troubling thought for all Americans as they head into the holiday no matter what their partisan affiliations might be.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)State Department: Iran Deal Is Not ‘Legally Binding’ and Iran Didn’t Sign It
by JOEL GEHRKE
by JOEL GEHRKE
President Obama didn’t require Iranian leaders to sign the nuclear deal that his team negotiated with the regime, and the deal is not “legally binding,” his administration acknowledged in a letter to Representative Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) obtained by National Review.
“The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) is not a treaty or an executive agreement, and is not a signed document,” wrote Julia Frifield, the State Department assistant secretary for legislative affairs, in the November 19 letter.
Frifield wrote the letter in response to a letter Pompeo sent Secretary of State John Kerry, in which he observed that the deal the president had submitted to Congress was unsigned and wondered if the administration had given lawmakers the final agreement. Frifield’s response emphasizes that Congress did receive the final version of the deal. But by characterizing the JCPOA as a set of “political commitments” rather than a more formal agreement, it is sure to heighten congressional concerns that Iran might violate the deal’s terms.
“The success of the JCPOA will depend not on whether it is legally binding or signed, but rather on the extensive verification measures we have put in place, as well as Iran’s understanding that we have the capacity to re-impose — and ramp up — our sanctions if Iran does not meet its commitments,” Frifield wrote to Pompeo.
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani discouraged his nation’s parliament from voting on the nuclear deal in order to avoid placing legal burdens on the regime. “If the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action is sent to [and passed by] parliament, it will create an obligation for the government. It will mean the president, who has not signed it so far, will have to sign it,” Rouhani said in August. “Why should we place an unnecessary legal restriction on the Iranian people?”
Pompeo cited that comment in his letter to Kerry, but Frifield did not explicitly address it in her reply. “This is not a mere formality,” Pompeo wrote in his September 19 letter. “Those signatures represent the commitment of the signatory and the country on whose behalf he or she is signing. A signature also serves to make clear precisely who the parties to the agreement are and the authority under which that nation entered into the agreement. In short, just as with any legal instrument, signing matters.”
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment