No One Can Be That Incompetent If They Can Dress Them Self!

===
No Hillary giggle just an IRA gloat! (See 1 and 1a blow.)
===
Obama says we cannot 'whackamole ISSIS."  I accept that and for the sake of discussion I accept the fact that Islam is a peaceful religion.

The problem is, this' peaceful' religion has been hijacked by radical religious thugs.  Those who hijacked it must either be stopped over there or they will have to be stopped here.

We have a president who is fundamentally either out to destroy America or is so naive that he cannot bring himself to be a whackamole president. Either way, he is a threat and a danger.  His failures , both domestic and foreign, mount and are there for all , but the most partisan, to see.

I want you to watch this marvelous video and ask yourself do you really believe this president would ever respond to an attack on our nation with the firepower he has at his command?

I believe he would dither, respond in half measures complain the choices are too hard and he does not want to sacrifice American blood and then go play a round of golf and attend a fund raiser.  This is his consistent pattern of behaviour and here again, only the most partisan, would tell you otherwise.

I no longer believe Obama is incompetent.  No one could be that incompetent and be able to dress them self. Yes, I know he has a White House man servant

I am increasingly of the view Obama is intent on believing the world can be made  a peaceful one where everyone and outcomes are equal and that the U.N. is the method through which this will be accomplished.. This is why he is dangerous in addition to his past background and associations and that he is a consummate liar..

Wendell Wilkie believed in a "One World" concept and he was also a dreamer. Fortunately he was never elected, whereas Obama has.

http://www.chonday.com/Videos/pen1usnav1

===
Dick
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1)  Email Shows IRS Official Was Pretty Happy About Obama Publicly Singling Out Conservative "Secret Donor" Groups
By Katie Pavlich

An email recently released by the House Oversight Committee shows IRS official Sarah Ingram was pretty excited about President Obama publicly speaking out against conservative groups with "secret donors." The email was sent from Ingram to Lois Lerner and others inside the tax agency after a glowing piece was published in the New York Times about the IRS and the trouble it was having with new tax exempt applicants and groups in light of the 2010 Citizen's United ruling.

"The 'secret donor' theme will continue -- see Obama salvo and today's Diane Reeham (sp). At least SS started the idea that we don't have the law to do something," the email reads.

For reference, the word salvo is defined as "a simultaneous or successive discharge of artillery, bombs, etc.," and was clearly used by Ingram in reference to Obama's repeated public slamming of conservative tea party groups.

President Obama August 9, 2010 at a DNC fundraiser in Austin, Texas:

 Right now all around this country there are groups with harmless-sounding names like Americans for Prosperity, who are running millions of dollars of ads against Democratic candidates all across the country. And they don't have to say who exactly the Americans for Prosperity are. You don't know if it’s a foreign-controlled corporation. You don't know if it’s a big oil company, or a big bank. You don't know if it’s a insurance company that wants to see some of the provisions in health reform repealed because it’s good for their bottom line, even if it’s not good for the American people.

A Supreme Court decision allowed this to happen. And we tried to fix it, just by saying disclose what’s going on, and making sure that foreign companies can’t influence our elections. Seemed pretty straightforward. The other side said no.

They don't want you to know who the Americans for Prosperity are, because they're thinking about the next election. But we’ve got to think about future generations. We’ve got to make sure that we’re fighting for reform. We’ve got to make sure that we don't have a corporate takeover of our democracy.

President Obama during an MTV interview October 14, 2010:

 During a town hall-style event with young voters hosted by MTV, the president was asked about the tea party’s validity. “They have every right and obligation as citizens to be involved in this process,” the president said. However, he noted that “there is an awful lot of corporate money being poured into these elections right now,” being spent on negative campaign ads

“If you’re in a battleground state right now, you are being bombarded with negative ads every single day and nobody knows who’s paying for these ads. They’ve got these names like ‘Americans for Prosperity,’ or ‘Moms for Motherhood.’ Actually, that last one I made up,” he laughed. “They’ve got these innocuous-sounding names and we don’t know where this money’s coming from. I think that is a problem for democracy,” he concluded, suggesting that the groups might be Big Oil or Big Insurance companies unhappy with federal regulations on their industries.

These are just two examples from 2010, there are many many more. Americans for Prosperity was specifically targeted by the IRS.

Fast forward to 2012 when President Obama was on the campaign trail where he openly berated "dark money" groups like Americans for Prosperity and Crossroads GPS. In the same year, the Senate voted on the DISCLOSE Act in, which was sponsored by Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer. Although the DISCLOSE Act didn't make it to cloture, it would have required 501c4 groups to disclose their donors. Even after the IRS targeting scandal broke, Schumer gave a speech to the far left Center for American Progress about how conservative groups needed more extensive scrutiny. Further, Democrats were heavily criticizing Citizens United and "political speech" by conservative groups at the time. These actions back up statements former head of tax exempt groups Lois Lerner made in 2010 about being under tremendous political pressure. More from Breitbart:

 Back in October 2010 Lerner did speak to a group of at Duke's Sanford School of Public Policy and came as close as she ever has to admitting a possible motive for the IRS targeting of conservative 501(c)(4) groups.

During a Q&A, Lerner answered a question about the impact of the Citizens United case on the flow of money in politics. Lerner said that "everyone" was "screaming at" the IRS, adding that they "want the IRS to fix the problem."

Over to you, Kim Strassel:

 Was the White House involved in the IRS's targeting of conservatives? No investigation needed to answer that one. Of course it was.

Mr. Obama didn't need to pick up the phone. All he needed to do was exactly what he did do, in full view, for three years: Publicly suggest that conservative political groups were engaged in nefarious deeds; publicly call out by name political opponents whom he'd like to see harassed; and publicly have his party pressure the IRS to take action.

The IRS not only took action against inconvenient groups, but they also tried to cover their tracks by "losing" thousands of emails between 2009 and 2011.

IRS Commissioner John Koskinen will testify tonight in front of the House Oversight Committee.

UPDATE: I should add that Sarah Ingram is now in charge of the IRS division responsible for implementing Obamacare. 

1a)  Bombshell: IRS cancelled email backup contract just weeks after Lois Lerner's computer 'crashed'

By Thomas Lifson

Nothing suspicious here, at least to Democrats and mainstream media types. But it would be interesting to see the paperwork leading to this contract termination, since the IRS is required by law to backup its communications. (via Patrick Howley of the Daily Caller):

 The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) cancelled its longtime relationship with an email-storage contractor just weeks after ex-IRS official Lois Lerner’s computer crashed and shortly before other IRS officials’ computers allegedly crashed. (snip)

Sonasoft’s six-year business relationship with the IRS came to an abrupt end at the close of fiscal year 2011, as congressional investigators began looking into the IRS conservative targeting scandal and IRS employees’ computers started crashing left and right.

Sonasoft’s fiscal year 2011 contract with the IRS ended on August 31, 2011. Eight days later, the IRS officially closed out its relationship with Sonasoft in accordance with the federal government’s contract close-out guidelines, which require agencies to fully audit their contracts and to get back any money that wasn’t used by the contractor. Curiously, the IRS de-allocated 36 cents when it closed out its contract with Sonasoft on September 8, 2011.

Lois Lerner’s computer allegedly crashed in June 2011, just ten days after House Ways and Means Committee chairman Rep. Dave Camp first wrote a letter asking if the IRS was engaging in targeting of nonprofit groups. Two months later, Sonasoft’s contract ended and the IRS gave its email-archiving contractor the boot.

IRS official and frequent White House visitor Nikole Flax allegedly suffered her own computer crash in December 2011, three months after the IRS ended its relationship with Sonasoft.

Was Sonasoft required to purge its records? If so, why? What did the IRS do with the backup records?

Hat tip: Clarice Feldman

Nothing suspicious here, at least to Democrats and mainstream media types. But it would be interesting to see the paperwork leading to this contract termination, since the IRS is required by law to backup its communications. (via Patrick Howley of the Daily Caller):

 The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) cancelled its longtime relationship with an email-storage contractor just weeks after ex-IRS official Lois Lerner’s computer crashed and shortly before other IRS officials’ computers allegedly crashed. (snip)

Sonasoft’s six-year business relationship with the IRS came to an abrupt end at the close of fiscal year 2011, as congressional investigators began looking into the IRS conservative targeting scandal and IRS employees’ computers started crashing left and right.

Sonasoft’s fiscal year 2011 contract with the IRS ended on August 31, 2011. Eight days later, the IRS officially closed out its relationship with Sonasoft in accordance with the federal government’s contract close-out guidelines, which require agencies to fully audit their contracts and to get back any money that wasn’t used by the contractor. Curiously, the IRS de-allocated 36 cents when it closed out its contract with Sonasoft on September 8, 2011.

Lois Lerner’s computer allegedly crashed in June 2011, just ten days after House Ways and Means Committee chairman Rep. Dave Camp first wrote a letter asking if the IRS was engaging in targeting of nonprofit groups. Two months later, Sonasoft’s contract ended and the IRS gave its email-archiving contractor the boot.

IRS official and frequent White House visitor Nikole Flax allegedly suffered her own computer crash in December 2011, three months after the IRS ended its relationship with Sonasoft.

Was Sonasoft required to purge its records? If so, why? What did the IRS do with the backup records?

Hat tip: Clarice Feldman

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------