%20(1)%20(4)%20(1).jpg)
One Solution For Gun Control
In 1865, a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America.
In 1881, a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States - who later died from the wound.
In 1963, a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States .
In 1975, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States .
In 1983, a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States .
In 1984, James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonald's restaurant.
In 1986, Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.
In 1990, James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.
In 1991, George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria in Killeen , TX .
In 1995, James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
In 1999, Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.
In 2001, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.
In 2003, Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.
In 2007, a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.
In 2010, a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Gifford and killed 6 others.
In 2011, a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.
In 2012, Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis .
In 2013, a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school in Newtown , CT.
In Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.
As recently as 2016, an angry Democrat attacked and shot up a Republican Congressional baseball practice in D.C., wounding US Congressman Steve Scalise.
Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.
Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was involved in any of these shootings and murders.
SOLUTION:
It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns!
We don't need gun control, we need Democrat control!
Guns don't kill people, Democrats do!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
FACTS:
+++
Facebook Twitter YouTube Web Email
(Part 2) Rep. Rashida Tlaib/et al Antisemitic “Nakba” and “Palestinian Refugees” Resolution
Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) National President Morton A. Klein and ZOA Director of Special Projects Elizabeth Berney, Esq. released the following statemen
In Part 1 of this Article (available here), ZOA set the record straight about aspects of a defamatory, anti-Semitic propaganda resolution entitled, “Recognizing the Nakba and Palestinian Refugees’ Rights” (H. Res. 1123), introduced by Jew-haters Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and six other Democratic “Squad” members. Part 1 of this Article described that: (i) the “Nakba” that Tlaib seeks to commemorate is the sick, hateful genocidal belief that it’s a “catastrophe” when Jews survive Arab attacks; (ii) Tlaib’s resolution grossly inflates Palestinian Arab “refugee” numbers and ignores the “refugees” origins outside Israel; and (iii) under the U.S. and international definitions of refugees, Palestinian Arabs never qualified as “refugees.”
This Part 2 of this article documents that Arab governments and leaders (not Israel) created the Palestinian Arab refugees; and that millions of alleged descendants of fraudulent “Palestinian refugees” have no “right” to overrun and annihilate the Jewish state.
Tlaib’s Resolution Falsely Blames Israel for Arab Refugees, Who Were Actually Created By Arab Leaders and Governments: First, Tlaib’s resolution falsely blames Israel for Arabs who left the area in 1948. In fact, Jewish authorities urged local Arabs to remain and live together in peace; while invading Arab armies, Arab governments and local Arab authorities, including Nazi-collaborator Grand Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini, demanded that local Arabs leave, to clear a path for the Arab armies to annihilate the Jewish population. Arab authorities also invented stories of Jewish atrocities to encourage Arabs to leave; while the Arabs committed actual atrocities against Jews – including murdering over 70 Jewish doctors and nurses on the way to Hadassah hospital. This Arab responsibility for Arab “refugees” is extremely well documented in British police reports, Arab authorities’ reports, Christian authorities’ reports, and Arab, local and international press. For instance:
Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Said, a Jew-hater also responsible for expelling Iraq’s ancient Jewish community from Iraq, declared: “We will smash the country [Israel] with our guns and obliterate every place the Jews seek shelter in. The Arabs should conduct their wives and children to safe areas until the fighting has died down.”
The Near East Arabic Broadcasting Station confirmed on April 3, 1949: “It must not be forgotten that the Arab Higher Committee encouraged the refugees’ flight from their homes in Jaffa, Haifa, and Jerusalem.”
Egyptian daily Akhbar el Yom recounted on October 12, 1963: “The 15th of May, 1948, arrived.... On that day the mufti of Jerusalem appealed to the Arabs of Palestine to leave the country, because the Arab armies were about to enter and fight in their stead.”
The Melkite Greek Catholic bishop of Galilee, George Hakim acknowledged in August 1948: “The refugees were confident that their absence would not last long, and that they would return within a week or two. Their leaders had promised them that the Arab Armies would crush the ‘Zionist gangs’ very quickly and that there was no need for panic or fear of a long exile.” Bishop Hakim also reported that the Arabs of Haifa “fled in spite of the fact that the Jewish authorities guaranteed their safety and rights as citizens of Israel.”
| Read More +++++++++++++++++++++++ |
It's Hunter again:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
How FBI HQ hamstrung the Alfa Bank investigation
The latest from the Michael Sussmann Trial
https://technofog.substack.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Can Durham get a fair hearing from a liberal D.C Jury? Stay tuned. The evidence is solid.
+++
John Durham Makes “Rare” Appearance During Trial
(RoyalPatriot.com )- Jury selection for Democratic cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann’s high-profile criminal prosecution began Monday, with special counsel John Durham, who filed the case in his long-running investigation’s first trial, making a rare public appearance.
According to news reports, Sussman presented debunked allegations suggesting a secret backchannel between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa-Bank during a September 2016 meeting with FBI general counsel James Baker. Sussmann was later charged with concealing his clients, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, and former Neustar executive Rodney Joffe from general counsel Baker.
Durham sat at the prosecution table, close to the gallery, which was half-filled with reporters and other audience members who had come to the federal courtroom in Washington, D.C.
The court, the prosecution, and the defense questioned scores of possible jurors before a full jury was selected Monday evening. The jury is made up of 12 regular jurors and four alternates. Eleven women and five males make up the whole jury panel.
Many members of the jury pool, and those chosen for the jury, indicated a strong dislike for former President Donald Trump and supported Hillary Clinton. The majority stated they were unaware of the Sussmann case until the judge informed them last week, according to reports.
One juror said she very much disliked Donald Trump and didn’t think she could be impartial if the case were about someone on his team. Another said he had donated money to the Democratic side during the 2016 primaries but believed he could be fair. According to a media report, another juror, an attorney, said she had heard of Perkins Coie, the law firm that represented the Clinton campaign in 2016, but didn’t remember any details.
Judge Christopher Cooper reminded the jury that they were not there to relitigate the 2016 election. He added that the case has political connotations, but Donald Trump is not on trial, and Hillary Clinton is not being investigated.
Investigative reports show the Alfa-Bank accusations made by the Clinton campaign in the last days of the 2016 election were placed into doubt or rejected by Mueller, the FBI, the CIA, and a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee probe.
Special counsel John Durham believes that members of the Clinton campaign, Fusion, and Perkins worked together to advance the collusion allegations.
Washington D.C. is Democratic, as are many of the jury pools. Reports show In the 2016 presidential election, Clinton earned 90.9 percent of the vote to Trump’s 4.1 percent. President Joe Biden garnered 92.1 percent of the vote in 2020, while Trump received 5.4 percent.
Can Durham pop the DC bubble?
++++++++++++++++++++
Biden has a longlist of blaming others for what he should be responsible for so I listened to a Zoom meeting today (Wednesday, May 25) about where the Iranian mess now stands. It too, comes down to another instance not only of Biden inaction and dereliction but something even worse.
Biden actually appointed Russia to become a negotiator for America with Iran hoping to extract concessions.
We have now discovered 4 new unreported sites where Iran is engaged in developing a nuclear weapon.
Iran is now developing 20% enriched uranium up from 5% levels.
Iran now has enough enriched uranium for one bomb.
During this entire time Iran has also financially enriched themselves to the tune of $100 billion dollars as a result of money we have allowed them to acquire as a result of reduced and/or failure to enforce sanctions as well as increased profits from heightened oil prices and sales to China.
All of the above has occurred during the suspension of meetings in violation of prior agreements.
Finally, Israel is totally opposed to what Biden has allowed to occur.
During this period, Iran has continued to engage in terrorist activities and we have not censured them.
In recent weeks the Ayatollah unleashed 50,000 Iranian forces on civilians protesting the inflated cost of food.
Biden appears ready to bolster relations with The Saudis but has not rejected the idea of going back to the negotiation table.
Thee events has increased pressure on Israel regarding the existential threat Iran poses and Israel is now upgrading and expanding their retaliatory options as I recently reported. A few days ago Israel apparently assassinated a Qud's military official on Iranian soil and now that Russia is vacating Syria, because of the poor results in The Ukraine, Israel is in a better position to attack Iranian activity in Syria.
I continue to regard Iran as the greatest threat to world peace.
+++
‘Republicans For Biden’ Owe The Nation — Heck, The World — An Apology.
In the run-up to the 2020 election, the Biden campaign was gleeful about the flood of prominent Republicans who’d crossed the aisle to support Joe’s candidacy. These Never-Trumpers weren’t just expressing their disdain for President Donald Trump, they were heartily, lovingly, making the case for Joe Biden.
Back then, they were lauded as heroes by the establishment. Today, everyone knows the truth.
These Biden-supporting Republicans were utterly, embarrassingly, dangerously wrong about the man they were touting for president. And we are all now paying an enormous and rapidly increasing price for their arrogant stupidity.
Nothing better encapsulates the “Republicans for Biden” mindset than the statement issued by nearly 500 former national security officials in the fall of 2020 backing Biden.
Forget about the fact that they trafficked in anti-Trump lies such as the “Russian bounty” story and sided against Trump on China, climate change, and other issues of importance to conservatives.
What stands out today is when they claimed that Biden “is the leader our nation needs.”
“It is unthinkable,” these “experts” said in their statement, “that [Biden] would ever utter the phrase ‘I don’t take responsibility at all.’”
Would anyone make such a claim today?
Do a Google search of “Biden blames” and you’ll be flooded with examples of his refusing to take responsibility for anything. Not for the 40-year high inflation gripping the nation and stealing Americans’ savings. Nor for shortages that plague the country. Not for the 600,000-some Americans that the Centers for Disease Control says have died since he took office. Not for the disaster in Afghanistan. Not even for his dismal poll numbers.
Here’s a small sampling of the articles that turn up:
Biden blames Republicans for classroom ‘culture wars’
Biden Blames His Low Polling on ‘Psychological Scars’ Americans Have
Biden Blames ‘Technical Factors’ For Economic Contraction
Biden blames delta variant, unvaccinated people for weaker-than-expected jobs report
Biden Blames Four Large Meat Processors for Rising Prices
Biden blames others for swift collapse in Afghanistan, defends his decision to withdraw troops
Biden blames Putin, ‘ultra-MAGA’ for inflation, vows to give voters ‘simple’ explanations
At one press conference, a reporter asked “Do you take any responsibility for the inflation in this country? Do you take any responsibility, your policies?
Biden’s response: “I think our policies helped, not hurt.”
At another event, which took place when the COVID death toll had reached 800,000 (it now tops 1 million), a reporter asked Biden “do you have a statement on your responsibility? And why haven’t you asked China to do more, to be transparent on the origins?”
Biden’s answer was … to smile and walk away.
So, let’s take a moment and look at what other Republicans-for-Biden were telling the public about the Democrat before the election, and see how well their judgment holds up. (And, keep in mind, these are people who held themselves up as moral superiors to those awful Tump supporters.)
++++++++++++++++++
| War, Peace, And Politics With Victor Davis Hanson |
| interview with Victor Davis Hanson via GoodFellows: Conversations From The Hoover Institution As the fighting in Ukraine continues, what’s the wisest strategy for the United States—keep sending weapons, help the Ukrainians broaden their operations, or advocate for a peaceful settlement? Victor Davis Hanson, the Hoover Institution’s Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow, joins senior fellows John Cochrane, Niall Ferguson, and H. R. McMaster for a spirited debate regarding the breadth of American involvement overseas, Donald Trump’s sway over election outcomes, plus California’s drought and its impact on Victor’s farm in the San Joaquin Valley. +++++++++++++++++++++++++ More on Iran: +++ Iran Used Secret U.N. Records to Evade Nuclear Probes WSJ Internal IAEA documents, obtained by Iranian intelligence, were sent to top officials amid an investigation into a suspected past nuclear-weapons program |
See attached PDF.
+++
Window of opportunity for attacking Iran now narrower'
Defense Minister Benny Gantz's revelation Tuesday regarding Iran's nuclear program was "the last call to the world to stop burying its head in the sand and stop Iran before it's no longer possible," says Eli Bar-On, an expert on missiles and advanced weapons systems.
By Tamir Morag Israel Hayom
Defense Minister Benny Gantz on Tuesday said Iran was installing 1,000 additional advanced IR6 uranium enrichment centrifuges at underground sites being built near its Natanz nuclear plant, and that the Islamic republic was now just weeks away from obtaining enough fissile material for a first bomb.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
No comments:
Post a Comment