Margaret Thatcher: The Woman Who Saved Great Britain | PragerU
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I see nothing wrong in resolving currently what appeasers failed to do in a previous time. There is no statute of limitations for murder last time I looked.
The reaction to the killing of Qud's leader borders on pathetic, but then I am a hawk who believes you do not wait to be hit if there is valid evidence you are going to be attacked.
Democrats have always been confused about the use of power except they seem to rise to the occasion when impeachment is the issue when their own loss of power is threatened.
As for Trump, he showed restraint and offered to negotiate but the Iranian leaders mistakenly interpreted restraint as appeasement and concluded they were dealing with Jimmy Carter and Obama all over again.
I seriously doubt Iran has the guts to take us on and if they do they will receive a crippling pasting .
And:
Tucker Carlson turns Hollywoodish and what is John Bolton up to? (See 1 below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ More from Ordman. (See 2 edited below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From the friend of a very dear friend and fellow memo reader. (See 3 below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I did not watch:
Ricky Gervais Proves Pompous Hollywood Can No Longer Take a Joke - Read More
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
How's Australia's doing? (See 4 below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Another Rant. (See 5 below.)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dick
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Another Rant. (See 5 below.)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dick
1)
Trump Has Come Out as a Neocon on Iran – and Tucker Carlson Can't Stand It
Carlson has lost his self-declared role as the Trump whisperer on Iran, signaling how far the GOP's isolationist wing is losing control of Trump’s foreign policy.
The killing of Qassem Soleimani, the commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, by a U.S. drone strike led left-wing critics of President Donald Trump to take to the streets in more than dozens of American cities to protest what they denounced as a drift toward war.
But while those demonstrators despise Trump, and denounced the killing as an attempted distraction from Democrats’ efforts to impeach him, their opposition to conflict with Iran was also supported by one of the president's loudest and most influential cheerleaders.
While both the Republican Party and conservative media pundits largely united in celebrating Trump for ordering Soleimani’s death, there was one prominent and crucial exception. Fox News host Tucker Carlson delivered a stinging rebuke to the administration over the attack.
Carlson is one of Trump’s most devoted supporters and perhaps the single most articulate advocate for Trump’s "America First" foreign policy philosophy. But Carlson was appalled not just by Trump's decision, but also by what he framed as a victory for "neocons [whose] objective all along" has been regime change in Tehran. He ended his TV attack by declared, "Washington has wanted war with Iran for decades. They have been working toward it. They may have finally gotten it."
Carlson, whose audience exceeds that of his competition on the two rival CNN and MSNBC news networks combined - prides himself on his access to Trump. Only last June, he boasted on air that he'd persuaded the president to reject military retaliation against Iran, after it shot down a U.S. drone.
At that time, Carlson roasted then National Security Advisor John Bolton as a "bureaucratic tapeworm" and said that had Trump gone ahead and struck Iran, it would have "ended his political career in a minute" and definitively ended his chances of re-election.
Less than three months later, Bolton resigned. Trump’s hostility to Iran and his desire to destroy the nuclear pact concluded with Tehran by his predecessor Barack Obama was undiminished. But so long as Carlson had his ear, it appeared as if he would always pull back from military confrontation with Iran.
Indeed, Tehran seemed to indicate that it believed it had little to lose by continued provocations up to and including last week’s attack that led to the death of a U.S. contractor, and the subsequent orchestrated assault on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad. Trump’s pullout from the nuclear deal and re-imposition of sanctions had crippled their economy and imposed hardships on the IRGC’s ability to fund its terrorist auxiliaries.
But with Trump’s pullout of American troops from northeastern Syria, and Carlson’s ability to talk Trump out of military action against them in mind, they may have not unreasonably concluded that "America First" was as isolationist in nature as its historic namesake that tried to keep the U.S. out of the war with Nazi Germany.
So the strike that killed Soleimani and the head of Iran’s Iraqi terrorist units was not just a body blow to the theocracy’s leadership structure, it also indicated that the neo-isolationist wing of the GOP, for which Carlson is a spokesperson, is losing the struggle for control of Trump’s foreign policy.
This series of events tells us a great deal not just about the future of policy towards Iran, but also the nature of the Trump presidency.
It turns out that the president’s foreign policy instincts may be in sync with that of Carlson and other isolationists when it comes to Europe or the notion of "nation building." But when it comes to Iran, Trump needs no prodding from the likes of Bolton to act like a neo-conservative. Just as important, the entire notion of anyone - be it Carlson, former White House senior advisor Steve Bannon, or any cabinet official like Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, being able to control Trump is a myth.
Trump’s stands may be inconsistent: his willingness to confront Iran has always been at odds with both his desire for a rapprochement with Vladimir Putin’s Russia, and his belief that the U.S. should avoid foreign entanglements.
But Trump is charting his own course and regardless of its wisdom, he will take the GOP, the conservative movement as well as the minority of American Jews who are more devoted to his re-election than ever, down any path he wants on any issue, including the ongoing struggle with Iran.
While Carlson attempted to make the case that killing Soleimani was a mistake, he did so in a manner that avoided any criticism of the man who made the decision: he still understands who has the affection of his audience. Trump’s name never came up during his monologue that attempted to argue that Iran was no threat to the United States so long as it stayed at home and minded its own business. Instead, Carlson impotently directed his abuse at a Republican critic of Trump like Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse and Bolton, neither of whom have any influence in the White House.
Should this lead to more American casualties, or unknowable complications, public opinion may turn on the president. But what Carlson seems to have misunderstood about the president is that while the president shares his antipathy for Middle East wars, Trump understands that the problem with Obama’s nuclear deal was not just its weak terms, but that it empowered and enriched a regime that is bent on attacking and undermining the United States and its allies.
Part of his hostility to Tehran may lie in Trump’s innate sympathy for Israel and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu - a sentiment that is as puzzling to figures on the right like Carlson, who have little liking for the Jewish state, as it is to left wing critics of the Likud-led government or to Zionism.
Though his basic knowledge of foreign policy may be limited, Trump’s instinctual distrust of and hostility for the foreign policy establishment has also led him to this conclusion. He seems to understand that breaking the wheel of conventional wisdom about the threat from Iran that had allowed the Islamist regime to bluff the West into concessions as it successfully pursued a quest for regional hegemony was a fundamental error that must be reversed.
While Carlson claimed the death of Soleimani would start a war that "Washington" has wanted "for decades," and that Iran is no more a threat to America than Mexico, it seems Trump has caught on to the fact that it the IRGC that has already been waging a war on the West over that time – and that war wasn’t ended by Obama’s deal.
Moreover, Trump also seems to understand that the false choice put forward by both Obama’s old media "echo chamber" and Carlson alike - that the only choices on Iran are appeasement or all-out war - are wrong.
There is no telling whether Iran’s retaliation will lead to a wider conflict that Americans don’t want to fight. But for now, the neoconservative conviction that a generational war with a rogue regime in Tehran shouldn’t be lost by default seems to have, to the utter frustration of both right-wing isolationists and left-wing opponents of the projection of American power, a convert in Donald Trump.
Jonathan S. Tobin is editor in chief of JNS (the Jewish News Syndicate) and a contributing writer for National Review. Twitter: @jonathans_tobin
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please recommend www.verygoodnewsisrael.
Please visit www.IsraelActive.com and use the SEARCH box to retrieve archived articles on subjects that are of interest to you.
Best regards
Michael
- An Israeli study shows that the vaccine against TB also protects against Alzheimer’s.
- An Israeli, non-profit cares for dementia patients individually, according to their needs.
- Disposable plastics are being removed from Israeli schools and key cities.
- Israel’s largest natural gas field has begun production.
- Eilat is a major center for music and cultural festivals.
- Aliya (immigration to Israel) numbers are the highest in a decad
- If someone wishes to be added to the free email subscription list, they should either click here or send a request (with their name) to michael.goodnewsisrael@gmail.
com
ISRAEL’S MEDICAL ACHIEVEMENTS
TB vaccine can prevent Alzheimer’s. Israeli scientists have studied 1,371 bladder cancer patients receiving treatment at Hebrew University’s Hadassah Medical Center. They found that those who had received the BCG vaccination against tuberculosis were half as likely to develop Alzheimer’s as those who hadn’t.
https://www.afhu.org/tag/
Countering the side-effects of cancer treatment. The Israel Cancer Research Fund (ICRF) has given $72 million for Israeli cancer research. Much of this is used by scientists to develop treatments that alleviate the damage from chemotherapy, radiation and immunotherapy. Several examples are given in this link.
https://www.jta.org/2019/11/
Half a billion shekels extra for subsidized medicines. Israel’s Ministries of Health and Finance have increased the budget for the health basket by NIS 500 million. There is now NIS 54.2 billion available in 2020 for subsidized medicines and medical devices required by Israeli citizens and permanent residents.
https://www.jpost.com/
Theranica is a 2020 game-changer. The Nerivio migraine-zapping wearable device from Israel’s Theranica has already been reported (see here) as one of Time Magazine’s 100 Best Inventions for 2019. Now it has been selected by US research company CB Insights as one of 36 game-changing companies in 2020.
http://nocamels.com/2019/12/
https://www.cbinsights.com/
Funding for “ghost” cell cancer therapy. Israel’s aMoon fund, has invested $5 million in the new NanoGhost anti-cancer therapy of Technion Professor Marcelle Machluf. (reported here previously). In lab tests NanoGhost reduced small lung carcinoma, prostate, and pancreatic cancer tumors, by as much as 85%.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/
US approval for AR surgical headset. As reported previously (see here) Israel-based Augmedics has developed xvision - an augmented reality X-ray-like headset for surgeons to use in spinal and pelvic operations. Xvision has just received US FDA clearance.
https://www.calcalistech.com/
US approval for robotic orthopedic brace. (TY Jacques) As reported previously (Sep 2018) Israel’s Orthospin is a smart, robotic, self-adjusting, external fixation system for helping heal bones after complex orthopedic operations. Orthospin has now received US FDA approval.
http://israelbetweenthelines.
https://www.prnewswire.com/
How retina implants integrate. Researchers from Israel’s Bar-Ilan and US Stanford Universities report the discovery that the brain can integrate artificial vision from retina implants together with natural vision from healthy retina. It implies that AMD patients with advanced prosthetic devices can restore their sight.
https://www.jewishpress.com/
A better diet for diabetics. Israeli research published in Diabetes Care suggests that the current recommended diet for diabetics, of small frequent meals, worsens their condition. They should eat a big breakfast of bread, fruit and sweets in the early hours of the morning, a substantial lunch and a small dinner.
https://www.israel21c.org/the-
https://care.diabetesjournals.
ISRAEL IS INCLUSIVE AND GLOBAL
Warm coats for poor children. Israeli charity Yad Ezra V’Shulamit is distributing free winter coats, boots and blankets to thousands of Israel’s poorest children. The distribution includes only brand-new items, in line with the organization’s philosophy to bring not only warmth, but also self-esteem and dignity to recipients
https://unitedwithisrael.org/
Empowering the disabled. Israeli non-profit Kelev Tov (Hebrew for “good dog”) gives jobs caring for dogs to people struggling with physical and mental disabilities.
http://www.israelnationalnews.
Dementia sufferers are not alone. Israeli non-profit Melabev works with people who have dementia and Alzheimer’s. Its centers are divided up by language (English, French, Russian and Hebrew) and by cognitive level. Malabev’s ethos is that the person has not changed, but the way to connect and interact with them has.
http://www.israelnationalnews.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Empowering Arab women. Israeli NGO Seeds (Zarayim) operates a bilingual and multi-cultural (Arab-Jewish) seminar. Its inclusive environment allows Arab and Jewish women to learn together, exchange ideas, build friendships and bridge the cultures. As a result, many of the Arab women become pre-school teachers.
https://zraim.antro-tlv.org/ https://www.jgive.com/new/
An Arab-Israeli alliance is taking shape. Ed Husain, writing in the UK Spectator magazine, claims that new maps of the Muslim mind are being drawn and old hatreds are on the run. He cites recent events in Oman, Abu Dhabi, the UAE, Dubai, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia to suggest that this may yet be the decade of peace.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/
Partnerships with Portugal. Whilst Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was in Portugal to meet US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, he also met with Portugal’s PM António Costa and Foreign minister Augusto Santos Silva. They agreed new joint ventures in defense, cyberterrorism, entrepreneurship, and agri-tech.
https://www.israelhayom.com/
Israel helped find crashed Chilean plane. IDF Intelligence, Israel’s ImageSat International and an Israeli satellite helped locate the crash site of Chile’s C-130 Hercules plane that vanished in Antarctica with 38 on board. The Israelis significantly reduced the search area. Unfortunately, there were no survivors of the crash.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/
SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Electronics to improve energy production. Professor Lior Kornblum, working in the Grand Energy Program (GTEP) at Israel’s Technion, is pioneering new ways to generate and store energy to meet rapidly expanding demand. He is developing smart electronic devices to improve energy efficiency.
https://gtep.technion.ac.il/
Study archaeology in Israel. For anyone wanting to study archaeology in English, Israel is probably the most significant region in the world to do it. Nowhere offers such a concentration of archaeological sites - from Neolithic to Crusader periods, underground and underwater. Summer courses are offered at Israeli universities.
https://israelarchaeology.org/
Getting rid of disposable plastic. Israel’s 2017 plastic bag law saves 7,091 tons of non-recyclable plastic from landfills every year. Now, Tel Aviv and Jerusalem are removing disposable plastics from schools. Herzliya has launched its “City without Plastics” project. IKEA, Sodastream and many Israeli companies are following suit.
https://www.israel21c.org/fed-
https://www.facebook.com/
“The Start-up Nation for Medical Innovation”. Dr Rob Norman’s new book explores the world of Israeli medical and scientific innovations. It highlights the achievements of some of the 1,000+ Israeli companies in healthcare or life-science products and provides compelling reasons why Israel is a world leader in innovation.
https://blogs.timesofisrael.
Clean, renewable energy. Israel’s Ellomay is a developer of renewable energy and power projects in Europe and Israel. It has just sold 12 of its power plants in Italy to JP Morgan’s Sonnedix Group for 38.7 million Euros. Ellomay has another four photovoltaic plants in Spain.
https://www.calcalistech.com/
System to counter Gaza fire balloons. (TY Hazel) There is a new solution to stop the thousands of incendiary balloons, kites and drones that Gaza terrorists have launched to burn large areas of Israeli farmland. Light Blade’s laser system has a 2km range and tests were conducted during the past week.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/
ECONOMY & BUSINESS
A grand end to the decade. Ambassador Ettinger’s final report of 2019 highlights 2019 hi-tech exits totaling $9.9 billion (double that in 2018). The past decade featured 587 exits, totaling $71 billion. If follow-on deals are included, the total surges to $108 billion. The report also includes some excellent economic indicators.
http://theettingerreport.com/
Now we’re really pumping. Israel is commencing production from Leviathan’s 22 trillion cubic feet of natural gas field, formally turning the Jewish state into an energy powerhouse. The milestone for the country will pave its way to “energy independence” and, via exports, to stronger ties with its neighbors.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/
Another multi-million fund for Israeli startups. Israel’s Aleph Venture Capital has raised a $200 million fund, for investing in Israeli startups. It previously raised a $180 million fund in 2016 and $150 million in 2013. It aims to support ambitious Israeli entrepreneurs who want to build global brands from Israel.
https://www.calcalistech.com/
Third intake for TAU and Shin Bet accelerator. Tel Aviv University and Israel’s Shin Bet Security Agency have announced the 3rd cohort (intake) of its accelerator program Xcelerator. Its six new startups work in fields including speech recognition, real-time video analysis, and cybersecurity.
https://www.calcalistech.com/
New IAI accelerator. Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) has opened an innovation center in Tel Aviv, in partnership with US-based accelerator Starburst Ventures. The Israeli teams chosen for the first class of the accelerator develop radar, robotics, and autonomous driving technologies.
https://www.calcalistech.com/
Via to open second Israeli R&D center. Israeli-founded ride-sharing company Via (reported here previously) already has one Research & Development center in Tel Aviv, with 250 employees. It has just announced it will be opening a second R&D center in Jerusalem, employing another 50 staff.
https://www.calcalistech.com/
Defense gear for Dutch army. Israel’s Elbit has just won a $65 million order to supply the Armed Forces of the Netherlands with protection equipment for soldiers, radio gear and wearable computer units, as well as vehicle and command and control systems.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/
CULTURE, ENTERTAINMENT & SPORT
Caesarea is the top Middle East tourist spot for 2020. Caesarea Port and National Park ranked 12th among 50 most recommended tourism sites in the world for 2020 by Travel + Leisure magazine. It ranked highest and most recommended of all Middle East tourist destinations. Its new visitor center opened in June (see here)
https://www.israel21c.org/
Eilat festivals. Eilat is the warm winter venue for several music festivals. Isrotel Classi-Cameri (Jan 1 – 4); Electronic Music festival (Jan 9 – 11); the Eilat Chamber Music Festival (Jan 22 – 25); Red Sea Guitar Festival (Feb 13 – 15); and Red Sea Winter Jazz Festival (Feb 20 – 22). Eilat hosts 35 festivals from Jan to May 2020.
https://eilat.city/en/event/
https://www.google.com/search?
Jamie Oliver praises great Israeli breakfast. Famed UK chef Jamie Oliver visited Israel this summer, and one of his breakfasts, eaten at Jerusalem’s café Kalo, recently hit prime time on Israel’s Food Channel. “This blows most breakfasts around the world out of the water,” Jamie said.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/
Jesse Underhill performs in Israel. Jewish-American teen sensation Jesse Underhill is one of the biggest performers on the Tik Tok application with six million people following his uploads. On Dec 29th he made his first stage performances in Tel Aviv and Beersheba.
https://www.jpost.com/Israel-
Eurovision Israel was the best of the decade. In an official post, the European Broadcasting Union announced that the 2019 Eurovision song contest in Tel Aviv has been voted as the best song contest of the decade. Via social media, viewers were asked to judge the stage, songs, voting sequence and overall production value.
https://www.israel21c.org/
THE JEWISH STATE
Holydays in Jerusalem. (TY Sharon) Here are some of Sharon’s photos of this year’s biggest and best Chanukah happenings this year in Jerusalem. And her photos show that Jerusalem is for all religions.
http://rjstreets.com/2019/12/
http://rjstreets.com/2020/01/
The largest Aliya in a decade. 34,000 people immigrated to Israel during 2019 – the largest annual figure in the past 10 years. Over the decade Israel received 250,000 immigrants from 150 countries. More than three million people have immigrated to Israel since 1948, with around 44% of them arriving after 1990.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/
US Ambassador packs food for the needy. US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman joined volunteers at Israeli charity Colel Chabad's Pantry Packers center in Jerusalem to prepare packages for Israel's needy. They also re-packed rescued food for 200 elderly Israelis and gifts for 150 orphans.
http://www.israelnationalnews.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++3)No, Soleimani Wasn’t Assassinated.
As is typically true following any military strike, the armchair quarterbacks are out in force on television, and as is also typical, I get aggravated watching them. I’ve received a lot of questions about the potential repercussions of the act, but have also seen most of the discussion on the news revolve around the legality of the strike —specifically as it relates to Executive Order 12333—which prohibits “assassinations”. I wrote a blog about this in 2010 and thought it instructive to revisit it and post an updated version.
Soleimani’s killing was most definitely targeted. It wasn’t a random drone strike, but was it an assassination, contrary to the proscriptions in EO 12333? What does that term actually mean? Is this action that some talking heads are frothing at the mouth over truly illegal?
It’s not an easy question. In fact, it’s so difficult to quantify that there isn’t a recognized legal definition of the term. Sure, the dictionary has a definition. But there’s not a definition which is recognized by the international community – which means there’s no international legal prohibition against it – and no U.S. definition that’s codified in law. Although there is a prohibition.
In November of 1975, the U.S. Senate investigated alleged U.S. assassination plots. The committee, named the Church Committee, found U.S. involvement in five assassination attempts from 1960-1975. At the conclusion of the investigation, the committee recommended legislation banning assassination. Although there were three different proposals brought before Congress, the legislation was never passed.
Since Congress was unwilling to act, President Gerald Ford signed Executive Order 11905, which read in part “no person employed by or acting on behalf of the United States shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, political assassination.” This prohibition is now embodied in Executive Order 12333, signed by every president since President Carter. Unfortunately, the term assassination was not defined in the order (or anywhere else). Some say this was done intentionally to allow leeway for action. What has actually occurred is the opposite. Anything that could potentially be construed as an assassination results in the immediate termination of the operation or enormous hand wringing after the fact.
Since nobody else has defined it, I’ll give it a go. Assassination is murder up front, but what else distinguishes it from other homicides? The first thing that comes to mind when anyone hears the term is that the killer knew the person he or she was killing. It wasn’t random; you sought him or her out and killed them. That’s certainly an element, but can’t be the total definition. If it were, then almost every homicide that occurs is an assassination. The only ones that aren’t are random drive-by shootings and robberies gone wrong. The truth is we already have a word for that. It’s murder, plain and simple.
Assassination implies something more. The murder was done for a purpose, beyond greed or a lovers’ quarrel. So, at first blush, I’d say you need to specifically target an individual, but the targeting has to be for a purpose greater than your individual satisfaction.
But is that enough? Is the definition limited to that? Suppose I’m in a tank platoon leader in World War II and I tell my men to focus all of their efforts at the tank with three antennae, because I know it’s the company commander’s vehicle. I’ve singled out a man, knowing who he is, and it’s for a greater purpose, namely the loss of command and control, giving me leverage in the battle. Am I now an assassin? Or what if I see my neighbor, whom I know, beating his wife to death and step in to stop it. In the ensuing fight, I kill him. Am I an assassin? I think most everyone would say no. Neither example is murder. So something else is needed in the definition. A killing that is not initiated to defensively protect someone from harm or offensively win a battle. And that something is political.
The term assassination implies a targeted killing for political purposes. Which is why the Church Committee came about in the first place, namely because of US attempts at Castro and others. They were attempted political murders in the absence of overt hostilities, designed to engender a political solution, which was favorable to the United States. So where is the line drawn? When is it political and when is it a conflict falling under the Law of War? In the deliberations, the committee drew a line at self defense against a belligerent organization seeking to harm the United States. The draft legislation read that assassination would be prohibited against a foreign country with which the United States was not at war pursuant to a declaration of war, or engaged in hostilities pursuant to the War Powers resolution. Senator Church himself stated he was “not talking about Adolf Hitler or anything of that character.”
In short, the genesis of the EO 12333 was not designed to prevent self defense. It was designed to prevent political murder – which, in and of itself is a detestable act and worthy of the executive order. The term, and the prohibition, have a distinct definition that is not applicable to terrorists hell-bent on harming United States interests. And General Soleimani, along with his Quds Force, was most definitely a terrorist.
To the point, assassination means more than murder, and less than the weight the press gives it. In a legal piece that’s better than most that I’ve read, Tyler J. Harder postulates that an assassination has three components: 1. An intentional killing. 2. Of a targeted person. 3. For political purposes.
I think that’s just about right.
So, in the end, is killing a terrorist like Soleimani assassination? Hell no. It’s self defense plain and simple. There are no political ramifications in the act. It’s no different than killing a man in a recognized war-zone who’s hell bent on killing you, personally. The battlefield has changed, but the intent has not. That’s international law – which gives every sovereign state the right to self defense.
Yeah, I’m a knuckle dragger and that’s exactly what you would expect me to say, but respected jurists have been saying it since BEFORE 9-11. Since 12333 was so contentious, and could have repercussions on soldiers in wartime (If I tell my men to kill the company commander, have I breached 12333, etc.) the Department of Defense did a review in 1989. Yes, 1989. In a Memorandum of Law, a remarkably short legal essay, Hays Parks distinctly showed that targeting anyone who’s a combatant preparing to physically harm United States citizens or interests are fair game for targeting and does not break the proscriptions inherent in 12333. The meat of the essay:
‘That the clandestine, low visibility or overt use of military force against legitimate targets in time of war, or against similar targets in time of peace where such individuals or groups pose an immediate threat to United States citizens or the national security of the United States, as determined by competent authority, does not constitute assassination or conspiracy to engage in assassination, and would not be prohibited by the proscription in
As is typically true following any military strike, the armchair quarterbacks are out in force on television, and as is also typical, I get aggravated watching them. I’ve received a lot of questions about the potential repercussions of the act, but have also seen most of the discussion on the news revolve around the legality of the strike —specifically as it relates to Executive Order 12333—which prohibits “assassinations”. I wrote a blog about this in 2010 and thought it instructive to revisit it and post an updated version.
Soleimani’s killing was most definitely targeted. It wasn’t a random drone strike, but was it an assassination, contrary to the proscriptions in EO 12333? What does that term actually mean? Is this action that some talking heads are frothing at the mouth over truly illegal?
It’s not an easy question. In fact, it’s so difficult to quantify that there isn’t a recognized legal definition of the term. Sure, the dictionary has a definition. But there’s not a definition which is recognized by the international community – which means there’s no international legal prohibition against it – and no U.S. definition that’s codified in law. Although there is a prohibition.
In November of 1975, the U.S. Senate investigated alleged U.S. assassination plots. The committee, named the Church Committee, found U.S. involvement in five assassination attempts from 1960-1975. At the conclusion of the investigation, the committee recommended legislation banning assassination. Although there were three different proposals brought before Congress, the legislation was never passed.
Since Congress was unwilling to act, President Gerald Ford signed Executive Order 11905, which read in part “no person employed by or acting on behalf of the United States shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, political assassination.” This prohibition is now embodied in Executive Order 12333, signed by every president since President Carter. Unfortunately, the term assassination was not defined in the order (or anywhere else). Some say this was done intentionally to allow leeway for action. What has actually occurred is the opposite. Anything that could potentially be construed as an assassination results in the immediate termination of the operation or enormous hand wringing after the fact.
Since nobody else has defined it, I’ll give it a go. Assassination is murder up front, but what else distinguishes it from other homicides? The first thing that comes to mind when anyone hears the term is that the killer knew the person he or she was killing. It wasn’t random; you sought him or her out and killed them. That’s certainly an element, but can’t be the total definition. If it were, then almost every homicide that occurs is an assassination. The only ones that aren’t are random drive-by shootings and robberies gone wrong. The truth is we already have a word for that. It’s murder, plain and simple.
Assassination implies something more. The murder was done for a purpose, beyond greed or a lovers’ quarrel. So, at first blush, I’d say you need to specifically target an individual, but the targeting has to be for a purpose greater than your individual satisfaction.
But is that enough? Is the definition limited to that? Suppose I’m in a tank platoon leader in World War II and I tell my men to focus all of their efforts at the tank with three antennae, because I know it’s the company commander’s vehicle. I’ve singled out a man, knowing who he is, and it’s for a greater purpose, namely the loss of command and control, giving me leverage in the battle. Am I now an assassin? Or what if I see my neighbor, whom I know, beating his wife to death and step in to stop it. In the ensuing fight, I kill him. Am I an assassin? I think most everyone would say no. Neither example is murder. So something else is needed in the definition. A killing that is not initiated to defensively protect someone from harm or offensively win a battle. And that something is political.
The term assassination implies a targeted killing for political purposes. Which is why the Church Committee came about in the first place, namely because of US attempts at Castro and others. They were attempted political murders in the absence of overt hostilities, designed to engender a political solution, which was favorable to the United States. So where is the line drawn? When is it political and when is it a conflict falling under the Law of War? In the deliberations, the committee drew a line at self defense against a belligerent organization seeking to harm the United States. The draft legislation read that assassination would be prohibited against a foreign country with which the United States was not at war pursuant to a declaration of war, or engaged in hostilities pursuant to the War Powers resolution. Senator Church himself stated he was “not talking about Adolf Hitler or anything of that character.”
In short, the genesis of the EO 12333 was not designed to prevent self defense. It was designed to prevent political murder – which, in and of itself is a detestable act and worthy of the executive order. The term, and the prohibition, have a distinct definition that is not applicable to terrorists hell-bent on harming United States interests. And General Soleimani, along with his Quds Force, was most definitely a terrorist.
To the point, assassination means more than murder, and less than the weight the press gives it. In a legal piece that’s better than most that I’ve read, Tyler J. Harder postulates that an assassination has three components: 1. An intentional killing. 2. Of a targeted person. 3. For political purposes.
I think that’s just about right.
So, in the end, is killing a terrorist like Soleimani assassination? Hell no. It’s self defense plain and simple. There are no political ramifications in the act. It’s no different than killing a man in a recognized war-zone who’s hell bent on killing you, personally. The battlefield has changed, but the intent has not. That’s international law – which gives every sovereign state the right to self defense.
Yeah, I’m a knuckle dragger and that’s exactly what you would expect me to say, but respected jurists have been saying it since BEFORE 9-11. Since 12333 was so contentious, and could have repercussions on soldiers in wartime (If I tell my men to kill the company commander, have I breached 12333, etc.) the Department of Defense did a review in 1989. Yes, 1989. In a Memorandum of Law, a remarkably short legal essay, Hays Parks distinctly showed that targeting anyone who’s a combatant preparing to physically harm United States citizens or interests are fair game for targeting and does not break the proscriptions inherent in 12333. The meat of the essay:
‘That the clandestine, low visibility or overt use of military force against legitimate targets in time of war, or against similar targets in time of peace where such individuals or groups pose an immediate threat to United States citizens or the national security of the United States, as determined by competent authority, does not constitute assassination or conspiracy to engage in assassination, and would not be prohibited by the proscription in
After the killing of Soleimani, other legal scholars have echoed that opinion; namely, that self-defense isn’t assassination, and thus not illegal.
Think about that the next time you see the term “assassination” on the news. As soon as that word is used in a news story, you have a pejorative sense that something’s wrong. “Assassination” has a ring to it that “killing” does not, but using the term, as so often is the case in the press, doesn’t make it true. Killing someone who is out to harm the United States isn’t assassination by any application of domestic or international law, especially in an active war zone.
In the end, discussing the judgement of the action vis-Ã -vis a potential war with Iran is justified and logical, but spinning our wheels accusing Trump of breaking international or domestic law is simply a waste of breath.
Notes on the Church Committee came from the book “Regulating Covert Action” by Michael Reisman and James Baker, Yale Univ. Press, 1992.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4)
4): Australian gun law update
While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady
decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since the
Take note Americans, before it's too late!
TenYear Ten year rates are down 100 BP from where they were in 2018, and from where economists
4): Australian gun law update
From Douglas Barthelmes
Australian Gun Law Update;
Here's a thought to warm some of your hearts....
From: Ed Chenel, A police officer in Australia
Hi Yanks, I thought you all would like to see the real figures from Down Under. It has now been 12 months since
Australian Gun Law Update;
Here's a thought to warm some of your hearts....
From: Ed Chenel, A police officer in Australia
Hi Yanks, I thought you all would like to see the real figures from Down Under. It has now been 12 months since
gun owners in Australia were forced by a new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by
our own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars.
The first year results are now in:
Australia-wide, homicides are up 6.2 percent,
Australia-wide, assaults are up 9.6 percent;
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!
In the state of Victoria.....alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent.(Note that while the
The first year results are now in:
Australia-wide, homicides are up 6.2 percent,
Australia-wide, assaults are up 9.6 percent;
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!
In the state of Victoria.....alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent.(Note that while the
law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not and criminals still possess their guns!)
While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady
decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since the
criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins
and assaults of the elderly, while the resident is at home.
Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and
Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and
expense was expended in 'successfully ridding Australian society of guns....'
You won't see this on the American evening news or hear your governor or members of the State Assembly
You won't see this on the American evening news or hear your governor or members of the State Assembly
disseminating this information.
The Australian experience speaks for itself. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and,
The Australian experience speaks for itself. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and,
yes, gun-control laws affect only the law-abiding citizens.
Take note Americans, before it's too late!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5) This is long, but packed at the latter part with lots of good data, and should provide a good
basis for your decisions going forward. I tried to provide actual hard data from various credible
sources, and not any numbers produced by political parties or the press.
sources, and not any numbers produced by political parties or the press.
The big black swan has landed. What the assassination of Soleimani did was change the
geopolitics of the world forever. Here is the perfect analogy. In 1938 Chamberlain made his
famous peace in our time deal with Hitler. Appeasement and genocide. We know what
happened. Obama made his deal with the mullahs in 2025, and what happened was similar,
on a smaller scale. Appeasement and death. Obama financed their massive terror campaign
which took off as soon as the money was delivered. Iran was treated by Obama Biden as a
potentially cooperative nation who deserved to get paid 100% up front, (stupid beyond
comprehension) that would suddenly act right, when they were really using the money for
murdering hundreds or thousands with terror attacks throughout the Mideast. Were Obama
Biden naïve, or just idiots. Both I think. Obama Biden claimed the nuke deal was going to
bring a peaceful and cooperative Iran. (peace in our time). What Trump did was the equivalent
to assassinating Hitler in 1938. Soleimani was the modern day Hitler. Instead of the
Wehrmacht, he was running proxy armies across the world killing thousands. He was far more
dangerous than Bin Laden. What is hard to understand is the Dems and the press not
understanding what he represented as a clear and present danger to the US. Pompeo and
Trump said he had plans for a series of deadly attacks on US personnel and facilities across
the Mideast which were imminent. They had already attacked 11 bases and then the embassy.
That alone is an act of war in some cases. Iran initiated all of that, and Trump did nothing but
warn Iran there would be dire consequences, and Congress said nothing. What do the Dems
and press think Soleimani was doing in Baghdad -buying a birthday gift for his wife??? They
seem to think it better not to have done anything and let the attacks happen. The chairman of
the House Armed Services Committee when asked what he would have done if he had the
intelligence that Trump had about imminent attacks. He responded that he would have done
nothing. Ignorance of that level is incomprehensible, and the Dems complain Trump should
have gotten permission from Congress!!! That he should have asked Adam Schiff???? If he
had not acted, and then when there were the attacks and Americans died, they would have
condemned Trump for having the intel and doing nothing. A lot of Americans possibly would
have died. Are they just stupid, or so partisan and hateful of Trump they cannot understand
what is happening. I think it is both. If it is partisan, then it is it also immensely stupid, as it
undermines the US threat to Iran,and just emboldens them. The idiots say this will mean
retaliation and possibly some dead Americans. Yes, but they forget a whole series of attacks
was imminent, and there would have possibly been many more dead Americans had Trump
not acted.
have gotten permission from Congress!!! That he should have asked Adam Schiff???? If he
had not acted, and then when there were the attacks and Americans died, they would have
condemned Trump for having the intel and doing nothing. A lot of Americans possibly would
have died. Are they just stupid, or so partisan and hateful of Trump they cannot understand
what is happening. I think it is both. If it is partisan, then it is it also immensely stupid, as it
undermines the US threat to Iran,and just emboldens them. The idiots say this will mean
retaliation and possibly some dead Americans. Yes, but they forget a whole series of attacks
was imminent, and there would have possibly been many more dead Americans had Trump
not acted.
Now Iran needs to think -if I do this, Trump is going to destroy my refineries, and much of my
military. Maybe he is even going to blow me up. He is willing to act decisively and violently . A
total change from Obama Biden appeasement and fear. The US is now in position to take out
their navy bases, cyberattack headquarters, and revolutionary guard bases in a very short
amount of time. If we do that, then the Iranian people will possibly be empowered to rise up
again if the RCG bases are wiped out inside Iran. The Iranians now know, Trump offered to
talk, but he is fully prepared to kill any of them if needed, and destroy their ability to pose a
threat. The Iranian economy is in free fall, and riots have been in all the cities. The Iranians
are out of money to support and pay the proxies. The Dems and press ignore all of that. The
Dems and press think we should cower in fear of an attack and reassert the nuke deal. That is
exactly what has brought us to Iran being in the position they are in-Obama gave them license
and money to kill. Trump said, I have warned you, and if you do anything I will wipe you out,
and has proven he can and will do it. It is Iran that is in fear of what might happen. The Dems
are a real danger to American security.
Dems rage about Chinese human rights issues, and Saudis killing one journalist, but Iran is
free to kill 1,000 citizens, and arrest thousands and torture more, but did we hear any
resolution in Congress about human rights in Iran. Crickets. They could not even pass a
resolution condemning anti-Semitism, and now we have numerous anti-Semitic attacks in
NYC. Do we hear anything from the Dems in Congress. Crickets. The Dems clearly do not
understand the uses of raw power in geopolitics. Instead we had years under Obama Biden of
a deteriorating military, and restraints on fracking, making us weak, and no real threat, plus
$150 billion of cash funding to the Iranians. That just encouraged Iran to spread its terror. Now
we have a powerful military, energy independence, and the will to use power in audacious
ways. Kim are you paying attention!. Putin are you listening. Trump totally changed the
calculus for the whole world, and the mullahs do not know what to do next. Now they have a
lot more to worry about. The rest of the world has to be saying -Oh Sh-- he could really do
anything. If pushed too far he will unleash fire and fury. He is not the isolationist we thought
when American lives and facilities are at risk. Few people understand that Trump grew up in
the NY construction industry with the mob in control. He had to deal with them all the time on
his projects. I had several direct dealings with the mob, and once they threatened to kill me
because they felt I had screwed them in a deal I sold to them. I did in fact. For some reason
they never did try to kill me. They are nice guys so long as you do not screw with them. Once
on another occasion, I was meeting with some mob guys who were very pleasant to deal with.
At one point, as we were inspecting an abandoned factory, they told me how they had just
been planning to kill some guy by dumping him the river with cement boots, but they decided
to let him live because his wife and kid needed him. They told me this like they were
discussing the weather. It was just business. This was the real world Trump lived in much of
his early life. I get it, having experienced it firsthand several times. My view of him is he is like
the mob. A nice guy face to face, and willing to let you live if you behave, but once he warns
you, then you better not screw with him, or you die. The world has misread Trump completely.
They thought he would never take action even though he had warned them clearly not to kill
an American. Now they know. Heed the warning. This is not Obama trying to appease
everyone, and afraid to do anything.
With the price of oil up, fracking production will rise, and there is always the strategic reserve
to keep oil and gas prices down inside the US. None of this could have happened if fracking
had been shut off by the Dems. Geopolitics changed entirely with fracking, but neither the
Dems, the press, nor the campus left wingers have any understanding of any of this.
The Dem comments are beyond stupid and disgraceful. Here we have killed the world’s top
terrorist, and they are claiming it was a bad idea because there will be retaliation. They are like
a bunch of scared kids- oh he might hit me. When Obama ordered the killing of Bin Laden he
was a hero for the exact same action, and he never told Congress, but they never objected.
They claim Trump has no strategy. What do they think is happening, that Trump just is sitting
around, and says let’s kill this guy on a whim. Rand Paul says now diplomacy is dead. It was
never alive. And what is next from the Dems. Impeachment in the midst of all of this.
Demands by Dems to stop Trump from acting against Iran. Iran is our sworn enemy, and the
Dems want to prevent Trump from acting to defend US troops and facilities. That is insane and
just encourages the Iranians. The Iranians and others likely now will do anything to help defeat
Trump. Their lives depend on it. The Dems are disgraceful. Attacking Trump, and impeachment,
just when we need to be united and strong. It is a replay of the thirties when Congress thought
we could stay out of the war. Do they ever read a history book. Do they never learn anything.
It is the Dems and press who are posing a true risk to our security. Can you imagine if one of
the Dem candidates was president and nothing had been done to stop the pending attacks
Trump acted to stop. It used to be that the partisan fights stopped in times of peril. Not now.
Trump. Their lives depend on it. The Dems are disgraceful. Attacking Trump, and impeachment,
just when we need to be united and strong. It is a replay of the thirties when Congress thought
we could stay out of the war. Do they ever read a history book. Do they never learn anything.
It is the Dems and press who are posing a true risk to our security. Can you imagine if one of
the Dem candidates was president and nothing had been done to stop the pending attacks
Trump acted to stop. It used to be that the partisan fights stopped in times of peril. Not now.
Here are some current economic stats that tell you where we really are: It is likely the ten year
remains around 2% all year, and into the next year. Inflation is likely to remain under or around
2%. Unemployment around 3.5% is likely to continue and with the four trade deals and Boeing
going back into production by spring, that will possibly decline further. 2018 economic
forecasts were almost universally wrong, by a lot. Thus my caution about paying a lot of
attention to the talking heads and fancy forecast models. Models have loads of assumptions,
and one or two bad assumptions throws off the whole thing. Tariffs have created uncertainty
which caused CEO’s to be too cautious, and they still think a recession is a risk, so they are
not investing in capex the way they need to. Capex and hiring essentially has flat lined.
Farmers, manufacturing, and thus transport all suffered downturns. This is likely to all change
with the 4 trade deals. (China, USMCA, Japan and S Korea). The good news due to Iran, is oil
prices are now at a place where fracking again makes economic sense, so cap ex in the oil
patch might rise, but so will gas prices. Some models suggest tariffs took .5% off GDP. And
added .3% to unemployment. I do not have a model, so I do not know. But if that is true, then GDP should grow nicely in 2020,
remains around 2% all year, and into the next year. Inflation is likely to remain under or around
2%. Unemployment around 3.5% is likely to continue and with the four trade deals and Boeing
going back into production by spring, that will possibly decline further. 2018 economic
forecasts were almost universally wrong, by a lot. Thus my caution about paying a lot of
attention to the talking heads and fancy forecast models. Models have loads of assumptions,
and one or two bad assumptions throws off the whole thing. Tariffs have created uncertainty
which caused CEO’s to be too cautious, and they still think a recession is a risk, so they are
not investing in capex the way they need to. Capex and hiring essentially has flat lined.
Farmers, manufacturing, and thus transport all suffered downturns. This is likely to all change
with the 4 trade deals. (China, USMCA, Japan and S Korea). The good news due to Iran, is oil
prices are now at a place where fracking again makes economic sense, so cap ex in the oil
patch might rise, but so will gas prices. Some models suggest tariffs took .5% off GDP. And
added .3% to unemployment. I do not have a model, so I do not know. But if that is true, then GDP should grow nicely in 2020,
especially when Boeing returns.
and the Fed forecast they would be at the end of 2019. The reduction in rates is key to
housing, with mortgage rates below 4%, that is the trigger point that accelerates housing
demand. We are below 4%. So the housing market should be strong in 2020, and that is very
good for the economy. The housing vacancy rate is at a 35 year low including multi and single
family, and going lower. There is already a shortage of 1.6 million units, and the demand is
now annually running1.7 mill, but only building 1.4 mill, so the built up demand situation is
getting worse. All of the shortage is in low and moderate income units, but costs to build
including land is too high. 2.5 cents more of average aggregate increased household net worth
is generating an added .5% of GDP due to the wealth effect. The stock market matters.
Savings are now around 8%, near a new high, and boomers are higher than that. That is good
for covering retirement along with the higher home values and stock values which will generate
much more for retirement than most forecasters expected. When the Dems claim only the rich
are benefiting, it is nonsense. The high dollar will continue to be a drag on export demand, but
it keeps inflation low. The dollar is not at risk for now of being replaced by anything. China will
be better off with the trade deal, but they will go back to their program of pushing to reduce the
massive excess leverage in their economy, and that will be a further damper on Chines growth
. That then dampens growth in emerging markets dependent on selling commodities. The EU
will remain in major problems.
The risk in residential is in Fannie, Freddie and FHA. The major banks are out of this market
now. It is almost all small nonbank lenders who are dependent on credit lines. If there is a
financial downturn, they could lose their lines and then the agency market could crash. Or the
big banks could step in and acquire the portfolios and save the day.
Household debt service to income is the lowest in two generations, and debt total to income
the lowest in one generation. So when you hear talking heads say rising consumer debt is a
problem, ignore that. Consumers are in financially the best shape in 50-60 years. A massive
refi of mortgages to low rates has made a huge difference, so now consumers are able to
spend and save more. Record stock prices and home values have made consumer balance
sheets the best ever, and have a wealth effect. Households hold $30 trillion of stocks, double
the prior high, and another $30 trillion of home value, 20% above the prior high, so when the
claim only rich guys hold stocks, it is a blatant lie. 50% of all workers own some stock in a
401K or otherwise. Those numbers are double the prior high. Good for more consumer
spending. Boomers are now able to save much more for retirement than they had been able to
do, so the crisis in that retirement age group may not be so bad as first thought. 25-30 year
old’s never saved money, so ignore the warnings that they are not saving now.
Commercial Real Estate has increased 8% per annum since the crash. This is likely to flatten
out as rates will not likely drop from here. CRE is very vulnerable to rate rises now. The best
types are warehouse, industrial and apartments, but high end residential is now getting over
built so is more risky, depending on the market. In NYC it is already badly down.
The federal debt outstanding is now 80% of GDP and headed to 100% by 2030. A real risk
long term. All stock measured by the Wilshire 5000 is now at a 15 PE vs long term 9. Worst
was 18X in the tech bubble. Earnings need to start growing more to justify these levels, and
interest rates need to remain low. Margins are getting pressed by labor costs but the lowering
of tariffs will help a little. AI should help mitigate rising labor costs and raise productivity, but it
is unclear when and by how much. We need to continue to have high stock prices to have the
wealth effect to push consumers to spend.
The biggest risks are geopolitical and the US election. There are protests and violence around
the world now as populism takes hold. It is especially bad in S America, the Mideast and
France, with other parts of the EU at risk. This is escalating now in many countries that had
been stable, like Chile. The US is somewhat insulated, but not totally. It is highly likely Trump
is reelected, but in case he is not, the markets and the economy will tank given the candidates,
other than Bloomberg. Bloomberg is the only viable candidate, but it is 11 months away.
Impeachment is a non-issue for almost everyone.
2020 will be a wild ride for sure.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
No comments:
Post a Comment