+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Schiff head's investigation, in my humble opinion, is going to blow up in his face because when you lie, as he consistently does, it eventually boomerangs. (See 1 below.)
And:
Kamala Harris the pre-imminent campaigner . (See 1a below.)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Lynn bought me two books recently. One is "Triggered." Have not begun to read. (See 2 below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Israel continues under attack from Hamas. (See 3, 3a and 3b below.)
And:
If you believe America has self serving politicians Israel tops us hands down. (See c below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Trump should call the Democrat's hand/hypocrisy/insanity with this strategy. (See 4 below.)
And:
Moyer concerned about republic's survival. (See 4a below.)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dick
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1)Ambassador Sonderland Testifies He was Unaware of Any “Quid Pro Quo”
Last week’s testimony from E.U. Ambassador Gordon Sondland backed up what President Trump has said from day one: there was no “quid pro quo” between POTUS and Ukraine President Zelensky.
However, Democrats are trying to twist the testimony to say the opposite.
Transcripts of Sonderland’s testimony reveal he never had any firsthand knowledge of any “quid pro quo” involving U.S. military aid traded for Ukraine investigations.
Fortunately, a small Republican counsel was able to enter Schiff’s secret basement hearings and ask Sonderland questions like this: “To the best of your knowledge, do you know about any preconditions on the aid?”
Sonderland replied, “No.”
Sonderland revealed in his testimony a phone call on September 9, 2019, when he called the President and asked him what he wanted from Ukraine.
Trump replied, “I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do the right thing.”
Sonderland said he replied, “What does that mean?”
POTUS responded, “I want him (Zelensky) to do what he ran on.”
Two days after this phone call, the foreign aid was unfrozen, and Ukraine didn’t have to do anything to get it.
Of course, the Democrats are trying to twist the testimony to fit their narrative by focusing on a small portion of Sonderland’s testimony where he told an aide to
Ukrainian President Zelensky that resumption of U.S. aid “would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public an anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks.”
North Carolina Republican Rep. Mark Meadows attended Sondland’s testimony and took to Twitter to point out the Democrat’s lies on what Sondland testified.
1a)
1a)
Did Anyone Notice What Kamala Harris Just Said About Democrats?
I haven’t been able to shake this comment from my mind since she made it a couple weeks ago. Maybe it’s because Kamala Harris was my confident early prediction for the Democratic presidential nomination, maybe it’s because I still struggle to understand how someone can be so bad at running a national campaign as she […]
The post Did Anyone Notice What Kamala Harris Just Said About Democrats? appeared first on The Resurgent.
Read in browser +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2)Trump Jr. Goes On The Offensive, Democrats EXPOSED
Speaking on Fox News’ “Life, Liberty & Levin” to promote his new book, “Triggered,” Donald Trump Jr. spoke directly to the American people, asserting that they realized in 30 seconds that when the Democrats chose Special Counsel Robert Mueller it was “one big joke,” that it was part of a “witch hunt” designed to target his father, President Donald Trump.
Trump Jr, stated, “They’re trying to, you know, reverse the results of an election that they didn’t agree with, though the American people obviously agreed.” He said of Mueller, “Obviously, they only brought him in because he was the former head of the FBI and he was a decorated Marine. So he’s above reproach. Trump cannot possibly attack him … Then, they were going to get him, finally — they were going to get Trump. We’re gonna put him on the stand. And, within about 30 seconds, the American public realized that this thing was one big joke, that they used Robert Mueller simply because of the credentials and … the fact that he was beyond reproach because of his resume. They realized this guy had no idea what he’s even talking about.”
Trump Jr. noted Mueller’s remarks from the July Congressional hearing in which he stated that allegations against ex-MI6 agent Christopher Steele were a subject “beyond my purview,” followed by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) retorting, “No, that’s directly in your purview, Mr. Mueller and here’s why. Either Steele made this whole thing up and there were never any Russians telling him of this vast criminal conspiracy that you didn’t find, or, Russians lied to Steele.”
Trump Jr. commented, “It was a joke. And I do believe that despite the media attacks, the American people get it … They see the nonsense. They see the witch hunt.”
Trump Jr. posited that that the president has served as an example of how Republicans should counter Democrats, saying, “And I think it’s been a great thing in the sense that it’s shown conservatives that you can actually fight back. You don’t just have to turn the other cheek We’ve done that for 50 years and all we’ve done to cede ground to the lunatic fringe of the left and their policies.”
Last Thursday, as The Daily Wire reported, Trump Jr. told radio show host Rush Limbaugh:
We’re at war, and we’re at war for our freedoms. We’re at war for our culture. You know, this is the largest divide between the two political parties in the history of the country. You know, I write a lot in the book about socialism and communism, ’cause my mother escaped from it. You know, I grew up with grandparents that lived through that stuff. You know, I spent summers in what was then communist Czechoslovakia. I can tell you those bread lines that Bernie talks about are not nearly so wonderful.”
Trump bashed the media recently, telling The Daily Wire, “The hypocrisy of the Left, the hypocrisy of the mainstream media, and their sort of unabashed willingness to just disregard the notion of fairness — the notion that they are there to report the news and just be a cheerleader for one side and that’s obviously what they are. They are the marketing wing of the DNC.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3) HONEST REPORTING
3) HONEST REPORTING
| |
When one tries to “reason” with a Democrat,
remember you are dealing with a person who believes that a man can be a woman and a woman can be a
man and that such a delusion should be encouraged, not discouraged. Discouragement of the delusion is considered immoral and bigoted. Thus, our society
has unnecessary dilemmas concerning bathrooms, athletic competition at all levels, and “pronoun” controversies subjecting ourselves to all manner of laws, rules, regulation and more needless
government control.
Here is a suggestion to break the left’s ridiculous
gender ideology and denial of biological reality.
President Trump should make a declaration that he
is identifying as a woman. The left will have to admit
the absurdity of their gender ideology or accept and celebrate “Donna Trump” as the first woman
President, thus beating Hillary, Liz Warren, Amy Klobuchar, Kamala Harris and Kirsten Gillibrand to
the glorious goal of one of their “female firsts”.
Furthermore, if he remains married to Melania, he will also be the first gay president and the first lesbian president. He will also be the first lesbian
president married to an immigrant! What a most glorious event for the democrats to celebrate.
4a)
The Looming ‘1984’ Election Like it or not,2020 is going to be a plebiscite on an American version of Orwell’s Nineteen-Eighty-Four.By Victor Davis Hanson
Posted By Ruth King
Posted By on November 11th, 2019
For a variety of reasons, the 2020 election is going to be a referendum beyond Donald Trump’s
record and his Democratic opposition.
The furor that Trump has incurred, and the radical antithesis to his agenda and first term, have redefined the looming election. It is becoming a stark choice between a revolutionary future
versus American traditionalism.
The choice in reductionist terms will be one between a growing, statist Panopticon, fueled by
social media, a media-progressive nexus, and an electronic posse. Online trolls and government bureaucrats seek to know everything about us, in Big Brother fashion to monitor our very
thoughts to ferret out incorrect ideas, and then to regiment and indoctrinate us to ensure elite
visions of mandated equality and correct behavior—or else!
In other words, the personality quirks of a Trump or an Elizabeth Warren or a Bernie Sanders
will become mostly irrelevant given the existential choice between two quite antithetical ideas
of future America. In 2020 we will witness the penultimate manifestation of what radical
progressivism has in store for us all—and the furious, often desperate, and unfettered pushback
against it.
Targeting Traditional America
We are also well beyond even the stark choices of 1972 and 1984 that remained within the
parameters of the two parties. In contrast, the Democratic Party as we have known it, is extinct
for now. It has been replaced since 2016 by a radical progressive revolutionary movement that
serves as a touchstone for a variety of auxiliary extremist causes, agendas, and cliques—almost
all of them radically left-wing and nihilistic, and largely without majority popular support.
When Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and a number of Democratic
presidential candidates sympathize with the New York subway jumpers who openly threaten the
police, then what or who exactly is the alternative to such chaos?
When the media proves 90 percent partisan according to its own liberal watchdog institutions,
or reports things as true that cannot be true but “should” be true, what are the forces behind that?
When the violence of Antifa is quietly—or sometimes loudly—condoned, who are those who
empower it and excuse it?
If a late-term abortion results in a live baby exiting the birth canal only to be liquidated, who
exactly would say that is amoral?
If the leading Democratic presidential candidates openly embrace the Green New Deal,
reparations, abolishing the Electoral College, welfare for illegal aliens, open borders, amnesties,
wealth taxes, a 70-90 percent income tax code, Medicare for all, and legal infanticide—what is
the alternative vision and who stands between all that and a targeted traditional America?
Californication Ahead!
In California, the nation’s largest utility preemptively shuts off power to multibillion-dollar
and two-million customers, given its ossified grid and over-regulated operations, and the
deliberate policy of the state not to clean up drought-stricken dead forests and underbrush that
are ignited by
wind and antiquated transmission cables. So, who or what then in 2020 would oppose all that?
In a state where half the nation’s homeless use the streets as open sewers and receptacles for
refuse, incubating medieval diseases and public hazards, who exactly says that is unacceptable?
The California attorney general openly boasts that he believes the state is the home for 10
million illegal aliens; is there any pushback to that agenda? If not, would 20 or 30 million illegal aliens be acceptable for Californians? Why not 50 to 60 million additional illegally residing foreign
nationals?
Can even a leftwing Facebook, Google, or Apple operate within a landscape that cannot ensure
reliable power to run its businesses? Do the progressive masters of the Silicon Valley want to
hand over millions per year in wealth taxes on money that has already been taxed—but which is considered by the Warrenites and Sandersites as veritable public property given their own past
use of state roads and infrastructure to build their businesses? Do these billionaires really think conservative state policies encouraged tens of thousands of homeless people to sleep in cars and
streets near their businesses?
On the social front, we are bombarded with celebrities dreaming of various methods of
assassinating the current president. Who speaks out against such incendiary smears? Did
Hollywood stars do the same to then-President Barack Obama?
In professional sports, Colin Kaepernick’s circus of not standing up during the national anthem
has transmogrified into something far more serious—the National Basketball Association’s
wholesale appeasement of the dictatorial communist Chinese government, and the leveraging of
U.S. free speech in return for access to the lucrative Chinese market. Who is more likely to speak
out against that?
Will Campus Culture Replace Our National Character?
Our universities effectively have eroded the First Amendment and the due process protections
of the Fifth in matters of sexual assault allegations. Higher education is now controlled by a
revolutionary clique. It institutionalizes racially segregated dorms and safe spaces, matter of
factly promotes censorship, and either cannot or will not prevent students from disrupting
lecturers with whom they disagree. What or who exactly say not to all that? Who would dare
say that America in its third century is not going to change its use of English pronouns or decide
that there are not three and more biological genders?
When a progressive mom takes her kids to walk and play in a California municipal park and,
instead of relaxing comfortably with her fellow mom friends, finds blood-tainted needles sticking
up out of the grass, what sort of policies does she imagine allowed that? When a small business
owner in San Francisco finds vagrants defecating near his breezeway or mobs of shoplifters
swarming his store, what sort of politics and ideologies will he consider led to that?
Who Is Sovereign Here?
On the national level, what or who created a landscape in which the highest echelons of the FBI,
, and Justice Department sought to surveil American citizens, undermine a presidential campaign,
and abort a presidential transition and then a presidency? If Hillary Clinton had won in 2016,
would anyone have objected? Do any object today that she hired a foreign national to work with foreign sources to discredit and smear her political opponent?
Who or what is behind the constant remonstrations that the American people are racist, sexist, homophobic, nativist, xenophobic, and oppressing the transgendered? Who lodges such charges?
Who believes them to be true?
Why is gasoline reaching $5 a gallon in coastal cities, when states like California have huge
untapped sources of oil and natural gas? Why is lumber sky-high in stores while the state
mandates that millions of harvestable drought-stricken dead trees instead slowly rot to serve as
kindle for deadly wildfires?
What is wrong with 3.5 percent unemployment? Is there a Democratic plan to lower it to 2.5
percent?
Who exactly wishes to pack the court, to repeal the Electoral College, to nix the difference
between residency and citizenship, to promote identity-politics tribalism over collective affinities,
to nullify federal immigration law, to hunt down and disrupt political opponents as they eat and
sleep—and who not?
Whose ideologies logically lead to promoting iconoclasm and statue-toppling, the Orwellian
renaming of streets and buildings, the defacing of public murals?
The Orwellian Jacobins or America First
The new progressive party is Jacobin. It sees politics in all-inclusive French revolutionary terms—encompassing every aspect of American life from entertainment, sports, academia, religion, and
family matters to politics, foreign policy, and individual rights.
In his own way, Trump also fights back in 360-degree fashion, from the existential to the trivial,
railing against Colin Kaepernick, tit for tatting Hollywood stars, weighing in on radical abortion,
open borders, power outages, the homeless and subway jumping. The result is not just that there
looms a choice between two different agendas, but two quite different American lifestyles and experiences—and histories.
Like it or not, 2020 is going to be a plebiscite on an American version of Orwell’s Nineteen-
Eighty-Four. One side advocates a complete transformation not just of the American present but
of the past as well. The Left is quite eager to change our very vocabulary and monitor our
private behavior to ensure we are not just guilty of incorrect behavior but thought as well.
The other side believes America is far better than the alternative, that it never had to be perfect
to be good, and that, all and all, its flawed past is a story of a moral nation’s constant struggle
for moral improvement.
One side will say, “Just give us more power and we will create heaven on earth.” The other says
“Why would anyone wish to take their road to an Orwellian nightmare?” The 2020 election is
that simple.
4b)
Legendary Journalist Bill Moyers Says He Fears For The Nation For The FirstTime In His Life
“Society, a democracy, can die of too many lies — and we’re getting close to
that terminal moment,” he warns.
Veteran journalist Bill Moyers said Sunday that for the first time “in my long life”— including the Depression and World War II — he fears for the nation’s survival.
A “society, a democracy, can die of too many lies — and we’re getting close to that terminal moment unless we reverse the obsession with lies that are being fed
around the country,” Moyers told Brian Stelter on CNN.
Hope rests in citizens paying careful attention to the televised impeachment hearings beginning this week on Wednesday and Friday in the House, noted Moyers, who
served for two years as President Lyndon Johnson’s press secretary. He has
be seen by working people.
“Do facts matter anymore?” Moyers asked, referring to the impeachment
investigation. “I think they do. I think they mattered in the Watergate hearings, in the Clinton hearings, and I think they’ll matter this time, too.”
He referred to Trump’s “astonishing” response from the crowd at a campaign rally
last month in Louisiana.
“They believed everything he said,” Moyers noted. “I’m hoping only 10% of those
people watch the hearings ... They will see it is not a witch hunt, and they will begin
to doubt their master. And they will begin to break off and maybe become a citizen
again.”
Moyers believes Trump still has a “pretty good” chance of winning the 2020 election,
but that only a “slight shift” in people who “begin to doubt” could make a significant difference.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
No comments:
Post a Comment