Wednesday, April 28, 2021

What Being Woke Means In Music. McWhorter Speaks. Free Lunch Economics. How 'Bout You? Brennan A Constant Disaster.

This is what being "Woke" means:


The Singing Anesthesiologists - This one is just too funny! Listen carefully to the words!

These singers are all Anesthesiologists in Minnesota and they can really sing.

Here they sing "Waking up is hard to do"

click on:

http://nottotallyrad.blogspot.com/2009/11/waking-up-is-hard-to-do.html
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Do Black People Enjoy Being Told They Are Weak and Dumb? The Elect Hope So.


Tracing, facing and erasing what psychology titles the Victimhood Mentality will be key to, among other things, saving America's educational system.
by John McWhorter

FAIR Board of Advisors member John McWhorter penned an insightful piece this week exposing a disturbing paper published in Critical Criminology last month by Riverdale Country School upper school head Tom Taylor. Taylor's 10-page manifesto, titled “Independent School Rhetoric and its Role in the Neoliberal Construction of Whiteness,” uses the terms “white,” “whiteness” or “white supremacy” upwards of eighty times.

McWhorter writes:

“Again, the school is channeling Jesus and will not be questioned. Thou shalt not question Tom Taylor. Given the buzzwords, the period of composition, and current practice at such schools nationwide, we are reasonable to assume that the program Taylor is espousing will include excusing black students from real standards, teaching students to distrust one another across racial boundaries, narrowing scholastic coverage to 'center' issues of oppression and inequity, 'decentering,' well, just plain school as 'too white,' assigning KenDiAngelonian texts as scripture, and creating an atmosphere where students and teachers are afraid to take issue with any of this because they don’t want to be rhetorically roasted alive and socially excommunicated.

And Taylor’s position is 'If parents don’t like what we’re doing they can go fuck themselves. We’re right and they’re wrong.'

This man, despite his sport coats and probably pacific demeanor, is a zealot.”

Read the full article here. Taylor's Public Academic Profile:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Worthy of re-posting. 

Far better than Biden's lifeless laundry list of free giveaways. 

Obviously Biden believes in lunches are free economics.

Biden claims we are back. If so it is only so he can stab us with his laundry list of absolute banal nonsense. His speech to the nation was delivered in a depressing manner and does not instill confidence that America is anything but a sinking boat propped up by a sea of wasteful spending meant to grow government, whose citizenry pray on an altar of dependency.

Like all Democrats, Biden offers nothing but a Christmas "Treat" of baubles the antithesis of the American character and independent spirit that made us a once great, compassionate, generous and justifiably proud people. 

This lolly pop president believes we are suckers and perhaps that is what we have become.  He left me aghast and sad. Biden obviously wants to outdo FDR in the Socialism category.

How 'bout you?

Every time John Brennan opens his mouth he is a threat to world order. The man has proven to be one of the worst American civil servants ever placed in a high position of authority.  He is an unmitigated liar.

He fits the role model for the type of hire Obama consistently made.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Cartoons Over Words Knives Over Guns. Now, Biden Wants To Twist The One Obama Left. Is The FBI Out Of Control? Oscar 2.





























Cartoons can be far more effective than many, many words.

Meanwhile, stabbings are also effective.  
Liberals, progressives and now radical Democrats and even some Republicans  have been stabbing America in the back for decades. 28 plus trillion in debt is  a testimonial to that fact. Now Biden wants to twist the knife left by Obama.

Why We Should Be Talking About Stabbings


We Should Talk About Stabbings, Not Just Shootings

Read Here
And:

Stirring The Melting Pot
interview with John H. CochraneNiall FergusonH. R. McMaster, Reihan Salam via GoodFellows: Conversations From The Hoover Institution

For decades, America has struggled to make sense of whom to allow legally into the nation, whether to create pathways to citizenship for those who have slipped across the border illegally, and how to maintain the ideal of a welcoming society. Reihan Salam, president of the Manhattan Institute and author of 2018’s Melting Pot or Civil War? A Son of Immigrants Makes the Case Against Open Borders, joins Hoover senior fellows Niall Ferguson, H. R. McMaster and John Cochrane to discuss the present crisis at the southern border and what a 21st-century version of immigration reform should resemble.

 
 
Better Footing In East Asia
by H. R. McMaster via Defining Ideas

How the United States can set aside illusions and grapple with Chinese ambitions—military, economic, and ideological.



++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Was this necessary to use this sensational manner.? The FBI is out of control is seems.

++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
I watched Biden's speech and Scott's response.  Here are my thoughts:

a) One can look at Biden's speech in two ways. 

Cynically, I believe Biden should have appeared in a Santa Suit because he offered a lot of goodies that "have no cost." Free everything all paraded as infrastructure .

b) I have no doubt Biden's speech will be well received because there are far more people who do not pay anything and receive the most from government and now have the prospect they will get more and it will come from the wealthy who do not pay their "fair share" according to Biden.

c) Like all these "giveaway" speeches they never add up  and are chock full of platitudes and Biden is good at giving a maudlin type folksy speech.

d) This is the president, who, as Sen. Scott noted, was going to heal/unify our nation yet, has done everything to divide us even further. Biden talks a good game but his actions belie his words but then he has always been a two faced politician who flops like a fish out of The Potomac.

e) I was struck by the fact the attendees were pathetic old dodo birds and it caused me to think that if these " old f----" are in charge maybe our nation is past it's period of glory. It was depressing to see Waters, Bernie, Pocahontas, Pelosi and an array of other octogenarians from both sides of the aisle walking around bent over wearing their masks in a, depressingly, empty hall. God help America.

At least it was uplifting to see a youthful Sen.Scott make an uplifting, marvelous, "from cotton to Congress," speech.

f) Biden touched all the bases when it came to infrastructure.  If one looks behind the curtain, everything Biden wants to do has now become infrastructure, even money for child care, free college just as radical Democrats have weaponized everything as racial.

g) I did not watch The Oscar's but everything I read seemed unfavorable except Perry's speech, which I posted in a previous memo.  I suggest Biden's speech was akin to watching Oscar 2.

h) Finally, Biden talked about great "future jobs" that must have felt like knife stabs for those oil and pipeline workers he helped fire now.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++


















Did Americans Trade Freedoms For Their Health? If So Who Won? My Take On Biden, The Middle East and Israel.




















++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

If you are radical, insanely liberal and/or if you are a progressive Democrat, you probably will find it difficult to agree the COVID pandemic was a subtle way for those who hate this nation and wish to destroy it to take advantage of determining to what degree Americans would trade freedom for safety.

Obviously, there were also many conservatives, who might be patriotic and love America, but also were willing to trade freedoms out of exorbitant fear.

Rest assured, radicals won round one and will not forget what they observed/learned

So what were the results? We are still wearing masks and probably will for years.  We were willing to allow restrictions on church attendance while other less "necessitous" institutions were allowed to remain open, ie bars etc. We closed schools and one governor literally panicked and killed thousands in nursing homes and will probably not pay for his vicious incompetence.

Knee jerk reactions resulted in millions of proprietors, of various businesses, to go bankrupt because of zealous imposition of questionable rules and regulations. Some politicians took advantage and disobeyed policies they imposed on others whose safety they were responsible for in order, in one instance, to get their hair done, ie. Madam Pelosi. Others took trips while demanding their own "charges" remain restricted etc.  

While we remained in this heightened emotional state incidences occurred which afforded opportunities for radicals to riot, to destroy, to engage in theft, to outlaw books, and to engage in other obscene activities that curtailed freedoms and American's succumbed meekly and, in many instances,  stood absolutely silent and submissive. As the pandemic persisted and negative statistics mounted, radicals successfully pressed for other constitutional violations involving reverse discrimination and racial allocations as well as alterations in school curricula which, if they are allowed to stand, will inculcate an entire generation of hateful and devisive/derisive messaging. 

If this becomes the new moral our Republic will have been crippled.

https://babylonbee.com/news/new-law-will-require-cops-to-call-lebron-for-permission-before-making-an-arrest

++++

Three interesting articles from The HOOVER Monthly:

The Hoover Institution Monthly Briefing on National Security

Welcome to the Hoover Institution’s monthly briefing on national security. This month we look at the options available to the United States in its policy toward Taiwan; delve into the emerging discussion of China and digital currencies; consider the US stance toward Russia; and herald the accessibility of a private collection of rare, multilanguage twentieth-century newspapers and journals from Afghanistan as the US prepares for withdrawal from the region.

What Are the Options for US Policy toward Taiwan?

Many Hoover fellows are focused on the recent suppression of democratic values in Hong Kong by China and heightened concerns around Taiwan’s security. With Beijing undeterred in its “One-China” principle and its aggressive posture both in military readiness and political rhetoric, the future of the America’s “deliberate ambiguity” toward Taiwan is now in question.

How US policy should respond to this increasing threat is examined in “The United States, China, and Taiwan—a Strategy to Prevent War.” The discussion, moderated by Senior Fellow Larry Diamond, focuses on a paper by Distinguished Visiting Fellow Philip Zelikow and Robert Blackwell. In it, they support a policy that would challenge a potential Chinese quarantine strategy by working with allies to deliver arms and supplies to Taiwan. Distinguished Fellow James Mattis advocates that the United States take steps to reduce miscalculations, engage in a sustained dialogue with Beijing’s leaders, and strengthen alliances, in particular the Quad, to counter China’s ambitions. Distinguished Visiting Fellow James O. Ellis Jr. explains that the US has not developed a force structure in the region strong enough to deter Beijing’s aggression. To the authors, he challenged the judgment of a publicly revealed deterrence strategy.

In a Bloomberg article, Senior Fellow Niall Ferguson argues that “this ambiguity—whereby the US does not recognize Taiwan as an independent state but at the same time underwrites its security and de facto autonomy—remains an intolerable state of affairs” for China. Unlike Zelikow and Blackwell, who liken the Taiwan situation to the Cuban Missile Crisis (in reverse), Ferguson sees the United States playing a role similar to that of the United Kingdom in the 1956 Suez Crisis. Fellow Lanhee J. Chen, in an op-ed for CNN, discusses the considerations for US policy makers from both major parties if China were to take Taiwan by force and trigger a crisis in the Indo-Pacific.
+++

Newest Arena for Global Power Competition Is Digital Currencies

Lawmakers, economists, and national security strategists are giving increasing attention to the threats of digital payments to global power competition, financial systems, and data security. Senior Fellow Raghuram Rajan describes in “All Eyes on Digital Payments” the evolution of payment systems and the possible information gains for providers who “control all means of payment,” across not just banking but also e-commerce and social media. He highlights the introduction of data responsibility and risk concerns for public policy and argues that these will not be mitigated even if central banks enter the digital payment system. In an earlier piece for CNBC, Rajan discusses the role of private currencies and data responsibilities in global banking.

In “Don’t Let China Mint the Money of the Future,” Senior Fellow Niall Ferguson explains how China is “pioneering a combination of digital currency and electronic payments.” China’s digital foresight could challenge America’s financial hegemony, a threat he feels the American monetary authorities are underestimating. “This new Chinese system not only defends the CCP [Chinese Communist Party] against the twin threats of crypto and big tech, while ensuring that all Chinese citizens’ transactions are under surveillance; it also includes an offensive capability to challenge the US dollar’s dominance in cross-border payments.”

National Security Visiting Fellow Nadia Schadlow warns that “China’s dominance in fintech also promises to boost the CCP’s expansionist ambitions in another way, hardwiring other countries to China’s economy.” In the her piece for Foreign Affairs, she prompts the United States to get serious about alternatives to Chinese fintech.

In a complementary article, Distinguished Visiting Fellow Kevin Warsh points out that China’s confidence in its “macroeconomic outperformance . . . [and] growing belief in the superiority of China’s economic governance model” opens a new front in the great power competition between the United States and China. Find more information on Hoover’s work on Global Implications of China’s Central Bank Digital Currency here.
+++
Sizing Up the Russian Threat and the US Response

The recent expansion of US sanctions on Russia indicate that times have changed, explains Senior Fellow Michael McFaul in an interview with NPR. “[Biden was] trying to signal, I'm willing to engage with you in mutual interest, as long as you knock off this belligerent, aggressive behavior against the United States. . . . [The Biden administration is] trying to contain and engage at the same time.” In a January article, “How to Contain Putin’s Russia,” McFaul advocates a new policy of containment and describes how the United States needs to think of Russia not as a declining power but instead as a country “with significantly more military, cyber, economic, and ideological might than most Americans appreciate.” Senior Fellow Victor Davis Hanson warns in “How to Start a War” that the Biden administration is sending confusing signals to global authoritarians: it is hard to back up a rhetoric of force when the US is also considering a decreased military budget.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
In my view, when it comes to America and the Middle East, America has chosen to shift it's focus, from a strategic standpoint, to China from The Middle East. Though this is strategically understandable, since America basically lost two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, consequently, Israel has gained  a small amount of freedom but Israel still has not been given America's blessing to finish the job regarding Iran, though they can and are prepared to do so.. 

Meanwhile, because Biden has less regard for a relationship with Israel, this administration will mistakenly persist, in all probability, allowing Iran to pursue its goal while concurrently harassing our ships etc.

By focusing on China, Biden seems not to comprehend if you don't use force you lose and Biden using American force, against China, is out of the question.

Furthermore, if our foreign policy is driven by human rights then why the criticism of Saudi Arabia and allow/give Iran and Palestinians a pass while removing the terrorist designation on the Huti's?

Finally, if America is perceived tying Israel's hands, regarding, Iran the UAE and the Saudis will, out of necessity, fear and self survival, move closer to Iran.

Biden has told Israel they have a right to defend themselves but what is that worth considering Biden's actions towards pacifying Iran?

Lamentably, Biden's withdrawal from The Middle East, which was begun by Obama, and both continue sending a message they are willing to allow Iran it's goal, this places pressure on Israel to convince the UAE, Saudis etc. they are prepared to defend the region in America's absence/withdrawal.

I hope I am wrong but this is the direction I believe events are heading and Biden is totally ignoring as are his advisors. Before Biden is out of The Oval Office I believe he will cause tragic diplomatic events.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++






 







Tuesday, April 27, 2021

Accumulated Postings During 5 Day Absence.










Highlight this and post then click. Hope was British, became an American citizen and was beloved.

He was a true hero, entertained the troops tirelessly, kept up their moral and it would be nice if we had comedians like him today but he would now be attacked as a sexist and of course, being white, he would be tagged as a racist. http://biggeekdad.com/2011/02/bob-

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Interesting articles:

Black Rage: It’s All About the Humiliation By Christopher ChantrillThe humiliating thing about being black is that everything has been done for you, by virtue-signaling whites. More++ By