The funds will bring comfort to a besieged people who simply want to live in peace and raise their children to be good world citizens.
That said, they are also prepared and willing to defend themselves against terrorism and those who, in the name of humanitarianism, want to prevent them from doing so however, Israelis resist because "never again!" dictates their actions!
Here is Daniel's link should you wish to donate:
https://www.crowdrise.com/ PGHMISSION2ISRAEL/fundraiser/ danielberkowitz
Do so to his link not mine. Thanks in advance for your generosity and caring.
===
Is Putin Set to Destroy Obama's Presidency?
I suspect Obama is capable of doing that all by himself!
Does Vlad have something nasty up his sleeve for our nation's president.?
Do so to his link not mine. Thanks in advance for your generosity and caring.
===
Is Putin Set to Destroy Obama's Presidency?
Does Vlad have something nasty up his sleeve for our nation's president.?
Time will tell
I also alerted you to this several weeks ago.
Kennedy must be turning over in his grave.
Is Obama about to allow what Kennedy prevented? (See 1 below.)
I also alerted you to this several weeks ago.
Kennedy must be turning over in his grave.
Is Obama about to allow what Kennedy prevented? (See 1 below.)
===
As I have suspected and suggested.
Nevertheless, many of my more liberal friends have disagreed and urged me to stop bashing and/or mistrusting Obama's intentions regarding Israel.
I find no evidence to force me to change course. (See 2, 2a and 2b below.)
http://www.cbn.com/tv/
===
I would like to thank all my friends who supported and contributed to the campaigns of Jolene Byrne, Bob Johnson and Jack Kingston.
I have e mailed the three candidates expressing my own thanks for their hard fought campaigns.
===
Dick
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) Putin Restores a Cuban Beachhead
Cuban spy Ana Belen Montes was the highest-ranking Pentagon intelligence analyst ever to be busted for working for the Castros. What's also notable, in light of Vladimir Putin's visit to Havana earlier this month, is that she was nabbed in 2001, long after the Cold War ended.
1) Putin Restores a Cuban Beachhead
The Kremlin and the Castros are chummy again, and Moscow is offering military aid.
Cuban spy Ana Belen Montes was the highest-ranking Pentagon intelligence analyst ever to be busted for working for the Castros. What's also notable, in light of Vladimir Putin's visit to Havana earlier this month, is that she was nabbed in 2001, long after the Cold War ended.
Besides leaking classified material and blowing the cover of covert U.S. intelligence agents, Montes seems to have been charged by her handlers with convincing top brass in Washington that Fidel Castro —who had wanted the Soviets to drop the bomb on this country during the 1962 missile crisis—no longer presents a threat to the U.S. Montes, who rose to become the U.S. military's resident intelligence expert on Cuba, partly accomplished that mission. The Pentagon's 1998 Cuba threat assessment played down its military and intelligence capabilities.
The best Cuba watchers were less sanguine. The Castros remain as paranoid, power-hungry and pathological as ever. They may be economic fools, but they run a good business making the island available to criminal governments, like Iran and North Korea.
Mr. Putin's Cuba trip reinforces the point. The old Cold War villains are up to no good one more time.
Russia's president is trying to rebuild the Soviet empire. Eastern Europe won't cooperate and in Asia the best he will ever be is China's junior partner. But in Latin America Mr. Putin's KGB résumé and willingness to stick his thumb in the eye of the U.S. gives him traction. Colonizing Cuba again is an obvious move.
Cuban President Raúl Castro greets Vladimir Putin in Havana, July 11. Kommersant via Getty Images
After the Soviet Union fell in 1991 and the gravy train to Havana was cut off, Fidel was furious with the Kremlin. It hasn't been easy to get back in his good graces. In 2008 the Moscow news outlet Kommersant reported that Putin friend and Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin got the cold shoulder when he visited the island to work on "restoring full-scale cooperation." Kommersant reported that the Castros were "displeased" that Russia had been talking up a military deployment to Cuba without Havana's approval.
But it seems that the world's most notorious moochers are willing to forgive—for the right price. With sugar-daddy Venezuela running into economic problems in recent years and Mr. Putin itching for a place in the Caribbean sun, Cuba has decided to deal.
In February 2013 Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev traveled to Cuba, where he signed agreements to lease eight Russian jets worth $650 million to Havana and proposed some $30 billion in debt forgiveness. Two months later, Russian Chief of Staff Gen. Valery Gerasimov visited key military and intelligence sites on the island. In August a spokesman for the Black Sea Fleet announced that the Russian guided-missile warship Moskva, the fleet's flagship, had set off for Cuba and other ports in Central and South America.
Fast forward to February of this year. Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu announced that Russia had engaged in talks to establish military bases in Venezuela, Nicaragua and Cuba. The next day a Russian intelligence-gathering ship docked in Havana.
In May, Russia's Security Council and Cuba's Commission for National Security and Defense agreed in Moscow to form a joint working group. "The situation in the world is changing fast and it is dynamic. That's why we need the ability to react promptly," Nikolai Patrushev, secretary of the Russian Security Council, told the press. Cuban Col. Alejandro Castro Espin, son of Raúl Castro, led the Cuban delegation. In June Russia signed a space cooperation agreement with Cuba to allow it to use the island to base its Glonass (Russia's alternative to GPS) navigation stations.
When he called in Havana this month Mr. Putin flaunted his intentions to restore a Russian beachhead in Cuba. The shootdown of the Malaysia Airlines 3786.KU -2.22%flight on the same day that he ended his Latin American tour raised the visibility of a trip that was made for both psychological and strategic reasons. Mr. Putin wants to assure the Free World that he can be a menace in the U.S. backyard—and he wants a local foothold to make the threat real.
Mr. Putin officially wrote off $32 billion of bad Cuban debt on his trip, leaving just $3.2 billion due over the next 10 years. Russia is looking for oil in Cuban waters, and Mr. Putin signed new agreements in energy, industry and trade with Castro. Days after the visit he denied rumors that the Kremlin intends to reopen its old electronic-eavesdropping facility on the island.
That's cold comfort, even if you believe him. Satellite technology has made land-based listening posts obsolete in many ways. Far more troubling is the emergence of Mr. Putin as a Latin American presence. Tyrants all over the region, starting with the Castros, admire his ruthlessness and skill in consolidating economic and political power. They want to emulate him. It's a role model the region could do without.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2)
ISRAEL’S MOST DANGEROUS ENEMY | ||
BY ROGER L. SIMON | ||
Barack Obama is apparently very angry with Bibi Netanyahu. |
We have known for some time, via hot mike and other methods, that neither he nor his secretary of State much care for the Israeli prime minister. But — perhaps exacerbated by a multiplicity of foreign and domestic policy failures, plus atrocious poll numbers, one this weekend showing Romney beating him handily were the election held today — Obama seemed more irked than usual.
He needed someone to beat up since the world was beating himup. And the Israelis had just hugely embarrassed his secretary of State (and by extension him) by pointing out their absurd bias in favor of Hamas in ceasefire negotiations, so absurd in fact that they outraged even Israel’s most famous liberal/left politician, Tzipi Livni, who would normally do almost anything for a chance for peace. (Ironically, the details of the pro-Hamas negotiations in which Israeli security concerns — the tunnels, demilitarization, etc. — were ignored were exposed by Barak Ravid in Israel’s most liberal newspaper, Haaretz.)
He needed someone to beat up since the world was beating himup. And the Israelis had just hugely embarrassed his secretary of State (and by extension him) by pointing out their absurd bias in favor of Hamas in ceasefire negotiations, so absurd in fact that they outraged even Israel’s most famous liberal/left politician, Tzipi Livni, who would normally do almost anything for a chance for peace. (Ironically, the details of the pro-Hamas negotiations in which Israeli security concerns — the tunnels, demilitarization, etc. — were ignored were exposed by Barak Ravid in Israel’s most liberal newspaper, Haaretz.)
Further, they had outraged the Egyptians, who were dumped from the negotiations by Obama and Kerry in favor of Turkey and Qatar. Our administration seems to have a preference for the more extreme Islamist/Muslim Brotherhood societies, although you would think, given their professed loyalty to women’s and gay rights, these cultures would be anathema to them. Never mind. Obama is an equal opportunity narcissist and everything’s fine, unless you cross him.
Which, according to sources in Israel, is where Netanyahu found himself when the American president called Sunday to admonish him about Gaza. Obama reportedly used or implied the threat of withholding the resupply of weapons — don’t know if this includes the Iron Dome itself — if Israel didn’t fall into line and stop attacking Gaza immediately.
What Obama is doing, in effect, is saving Hamas. It’s almost mind boggling to think, but it’s true.
2a)
1y U.S. Push for Gaza Truce Yields a Few Hours of Calm
Israel and the Palestinian territory's Hamas rulers observed a 12-hour humanitarian cease-fire on Saturday. But they couldn't agree to extend the truce on Sunday and the cycle of attacks resumed.
Mr. Kerry, lacking a deal, returned to Cairo. By Friday night, matters with Israel came to a head. Mr. Kerry, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and Egypt's Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry convened a news conference at a Cairo hotel in the hope of announcing the one-week temporary cease-fire. But after a full day of negotiations, Mr. Netanyahu's cabinet ultimately rejected the U.S.-brokered proposal.Mr. Netanyahu moved to protest the U.S. decisions by driving to Ben Gurion and greeting former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg after he flew into Tel Aviv on an El Al jet in a sign of solidarity with Israel. Israel's leader noticeably didn't offer Mr. Kerry such a gesture when he flew into the same airport on the same day.
By Yaakov Levi
2a)
1y U.S. Push for Gaza Truce Yields a Few Hours of Calm
Diplomacy Stymied by Divisions Between Washington and its Mideast Allies
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, center, meets with foreign officials. Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
After six days of exhaustive meetings and stops in Cairo, Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Ramallah and Paris, Secretary of State John Kerry came home Sunday with only a few fitful hours of peace in Gaza that proved fleeting.
Israel and the Palestinian territory's Hamas rulers observed a 12-hour humanitarian cease-fire on Saturday. But they couldn't agree to extend the truce on Sunday and the cycle of attacks resumed.
The inability of the U.S. and others to achieve more from a week of diplomatic effort has exposed the changes sweeping the region, and the divisions that have developed between the U.S. and its Mideast allies, including Israel, Egypt, the Palestinian Authority and many leading Arab states.Late Sunday night, Israel said it was easing up on its air, sea and land attacks on Gaza, providing a lull as Muslims headed into Eid al-Fitr, the holiday that marks the end of the holy fasting month of Ramadan. But the military said it would still strike back if militants from Gaza attacked.
In a sign of growing U.S. exasperation, President Barack Obama spoke by phone with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday, calling for what the White House described as "an immediate, unconditional humanitarian cease-fire" to halt the hostilities while negotiators work on details of a long-term deal.
Late Sunday night, the United Nations Security Council also agreed to call for an immediate cease-fire.
The developments capped a week of U.S. diplomacy that bore little fruit.
As fighting raged in nearby Gaza, Mr. Netanyahu met Mr. Kerry late Wednesday night at the headquarters of the Israeli Defense Forces in downtown Tel Aviv. Some U.S. officials expected the meeting to last five or six hours while the two tried to forge a cease-fire.
But after just two hours, the meeting broke with no agreement. Mr. Netanyahu left fuming over the U.S. government's decision to ban American air carriers from flying to Ben Gurion International Airport here for at least 24 hours after a Hamas rocket from Gaza landed nearby. Flights have since resumed.
The tense session, described by officials involved in the deliberations, was among the flash points in a week of high stakes Obama administration diplomacy that brought the full weight of American prestige to the mission of halting the bombardment of Israel and Gaza.
A core impediment to Mr. Kerry's mission, according to officials involved in the negotiations, were sharply contrasting views between Israel and the U.S. on the nature of Hamas's threat and the best path to neutralizing it. Members of Mr. Netanyahu's government are pushing the U.S. for the diplomatic space to launch broader military operations to dismantle Hamas's missile arsenal and network of tunnels from Gaza into Israel to ensure another conflict—a fourth in a decade—won't erupt when the current hostilities end.
U.S. officials, however, have argued to Mr. Netanyahu that his military offensive has already made significant strides in degrading Hamas's war machine and Israel risked sparking a broader Palestinian uprising, including in the West Bank, if a cease-fire isn't agreed to soon.
"Palestinians are seeing their people killed. So there's a lot of tension there," said a senior official who traveled with Mr. Kerry. "So, yes, there's a risk there."
More than 200 Palestinians under age 18 have been killed during three weeks of fighting in Gaza. WSJ's Nicholas Casey reports from Gaza City, where Israel's latest military invasion is taking a heavy toll on children.
The shifting balance of power in the Mideast in recent years, and political divisions among Washington's regional allies, added an extra dimension of difficulty to the U.S. efforts over the past week, according to U.S. and Arab officials.
Mr. Kerry devoted much of his time to discussing the terms of a cease-fire with the Egyptian government and with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, traditionally key players in the region's peace processes.
But U.S. officials acknowledged that Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al Sisi and Mr. Abbas have little to no influence over Hamas's political leadership, raising questions about why Mr. Kerry devoted so much time seeking their counsel.
Searching for a more direct channel to Hamas, Mr. Kerry changed course and opened a broad dialogue with the organization's chief financial and diplomatic backers: Qatar and Turkey. The Qatari capital Doha currently hosts the political leader of Hamas, Khaled Meshaal, and Mr. Kerry began relying on Qatari officials to pass messages to him.
Engaging these countries posed its own risks, according to U.S. and Arab officials.
Israel, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia cautioned Mr. Kerry against relying on Qatar and Turkey, citing their strong financial and diplomatic support for Hamas and its parent organization, the Muslim Brotherhood.
Mr. Kerry invested heavily in a broader peace deal that collapsed three months ago, fueling recriminations on all sides. He plunged into his latest diplomacy July 21 by initially seeking to build on a cease-fire proposal put forward by Egypt two weeks ago and that was immediately accepted by Israel.
Hamas rejected it, saying it wasn't consulted and its demands had not been met. After that, Mr. Kerry and his team tried to draw in the group by working with Arab and European states and the United Nations to provide greater assurances that Gaza's mounting economic woes would be addressed if rocket fire into Israel stopped.
Mr. Kerry and his diplomatic partners also concluded a permanent cease-fire might be too ambitious at that stage, due to the intensity of the fighting. Instead, they devised to put in place a one-week "pause" to coincide with the end of Ramadan.
Israel, however, grew increasingly lukewarm as the diplomacy progressed. Mr. Netanyahu and other Israeli officials believed the emerging terms of the proposal being discussed provided substantial economic perks to Hamas without providing any guarantees that the militia's rocket arsenal and tunnel networks would be destroyed.
A draft document outlining some of the terms of a cease-fire only vaguely mentioned that an agreement would "address all security issues," according to U.S. and Israeli officials.
Moderate Justice Minister Tzipi Livni said there were ideas "that were totally unacceptable" to Israel in the proposal. "The bottom line was a boost to extremist forces in the area,'' she said in an interview with Israel Radio. "`It was bringing Qatar and Turkey into the issue, when they are part of the broader world view of the Muslim Brotherhood."
Relations between Mr. Netanyahu's government and the Obama administration were tested further by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration announcement last Tuesday of a 24-hour ban on U.S. aviation traffic. Mr. Netanyahu and his ministers viewed the move as a White House attempt to use economic pressure to force Mr. Netanyahu into a cease-fire—a charge U.S. officials denied.
Mr. Kerry, lacking a deal, returned to Cairo. By Friday night, matters with Israel came to a head. Mr. Kerry, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and Egypt's Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry convened a news conference at a Cairo hotel in the hope of announcing the one-week temporary cease-fire. But after a full day of negotiations, Mr. Netanyahu's cabinet ultimately rejected the U.S.-brokered proposal.Mr. Netanyahu moved to protest the U.S. decisions by driving to Ben Gurion and greeting former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg after he flew into Tel Aviv on an El Al jet in a sign of solidarity with Israel. Israel's leader noticeably didn't offer Mr. Kerry such a gesture when he flew into the same airport on the same day.
The best Israel and Hamas agreed to was a 12-hour humanitarian pause.
Undeterred by Israel's decision, the U.S. team decided to broaden the negotiations by staging a mini-summit in Paris on Saturday. It included the foreign ministers of France, Germany, Italy, the U.K., representatives of the European Union and the top diplomats of Qatar and Turkey. Europeans have been very vocal in calling for an immediate cease-fire.
Mr. Kerry ultimately left France Saturday night without a long-term cease-fire, but with continued hopes that the diplomatic negotiations he oversaw would eventually end the fighting. Israeli and Hamas officials continue to alternate between fighting and talking truce.
A rupture between the U.S. and Israel appeared real.
"Give us diplomatic cover in the U.N. The best thing that Kerry can do is stay out,'' said Michael Oren, who served as Israel's ambassador to the U.S. until last year. "We need time to do the job, we need to inflict a painful and unequivocal blow on Hamas. Anything less would be a Hamas victory."
—Asa Fitch in Ramallah and Nicholas Casey in Gaza City contributed to this article.
2b) Danny Dayan: Obama, Kerry Caused 'Long-Term Damage'
Danny Dayan of the Council of Judea and Samaria said that the Obama administration suffered from a 'perversion of morality'
Danny Dayan Photo by Yoni Kempinski
Danny Dayan, head of the Council of Judea and Samaria, said Monday that asking Israel to stop its attacks on Hamas at this time was “a perversion of morality and diplomacy.” Israelis understand quite well, he said, that “they are fighting for their homes. No matter what we do the enemy will never be satisfied” without Israel's destruction. “We must continue fighting until our goals are reached.”
Dayan was speaking in light of the heavy pressure being placed on Israel by US President Barack H Obama for an immediate and unconditional cease-fire. In his proposal, Obama said that the issue of Hamas' disarming was a matter for later discussions, a stance that Dayan said he was shocked by. “There is no other way to describe it other than as a perversion of morality and diplomacy.
“When they leave office soon, we will all breathe a sigh of relief, quiet but quite audible,” he said. “It will take a long time to repair the damage caused by Obama and his Secretary of State, John Kerry.”
US President Barack Obama exerted “heavy pressure” on Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu in a phone call Sunday to end Operation Protective Edge in Gaza immediately, according to Channel 2 television. Obama reportedly agreed to the idea of an unconditional ceasefire, to be followed by discussion of Hamas's demands for easing of sanctions on Gaza. This is the formula that the Egyptians had offered, and which Israel favored, whereas Hamas wanted easing of sanctions to be agreed from the outset. However, Obama would not close the door on involvement by Qatar and Turkey in the negotiations, despite Israel's opposition.
The cabinet discussed Obama's phone call later Sunday night. Hawkish ministers said that Israel should have hit harder during the three weeks of “credit” it had received from the US to operate in Gaza. "Militarily, I feel that there is a missed opportunity here,” said Agriculture Minister Yair Shamir. “We had a chance to be victorious and go all the way, to defeat the body that fought us.” Shamir said that the fault was not the military's, which “did what it was told to do thoroughly and with professionalism,” but in the instructions it was given. I think we should have given more aggressive and clearer objectives and shortened the time frame,” he added. “We followed the other side, instead of being creative. We always responded to Hamas, never threw the enemy off balance with some surprising move.”
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
No comments:
Post a Comment