Saturday, March 30, 2019

My Friend Is In Love With AOC. Will Republicans Rip Up A Winning Hand Over Health Legislation? The Time To Act Is Now!


I was engaged in some back and forth with a liberal friend and fellow memo reader about AOC and this was his response. I hope it was tongue in cheek but you never know: "I think she is beautiful with incredible eyes and a really nice body I would love to meet her."
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
If logic determined elections, Trump should win hands down in 2020.

a) Democrats have moved so far left they would be better running in Venezuela.

b)  After two years, an extensive staff that was politically aligned with Hillary and expenditures of over $25 million, Democrats still reject Mueller's conclusion that no American was engaged in Russian collusion. As I have written before, Democrats are nymphomaniacal when it comes to Trump's guilt and nothing can satisfy their warped minds that he colluded.

Trump will be the most examined president ever when the 2020 election rolls around.


c) The economy is recovering from the miserable level during the Obama years and in defiance of his comment that 1% GDP was the new norm.

d) Accompanying the improving economy is low unemployment and increasing wages for all Americans regardless of their ethnicity etc.

e) On virtually every issue Democrat resistance goes against the grain of most Americans. Certainly the border issue and support for sanctuary cities  are at the top of the list.

f) Other serious issues are being addressed but remain unresolved and health legislation is the Achilles heel that could allow Republicans to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory as they have so often.

Trump wants to resolve the health issue and he is meeting resistance from within his own party.  Apparently, Sen,. Collins would rather see Democrats run with the ball than align herself with Trump.

To allow Pelosi and Schumer to shift attention from AOC's stupid Green initiative, and the Democrat's internal war over anti-Semitism borders on political suicide but ,you can bet, Republicans are more than capable of falling on their sword.

All it ever takes are a few renegades like McCain, Collins and their ilk and Republicans can rip up any winning hand.  Stay tuned.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
War is the final step after diplomacy fails.  Being an unabashed  hawk I would not hesitate.

America faces the same situation in N Korea. (See 1 and 1a below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dick
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1) Hamas: Should Israel Go to War?

.

Perhaps the title of this article is incorrect. Israel has been at war with Hamas since the terrorist organization was initially formed in 1988, but only one side recognizes it -- Hamas.  By Charter and deed Hamas is sworn to the annihilation of Israel and every Jew within it.  Having grown accustomed to fighting the nation-states they’re surrounded by, Israel at the outset never truly viewed the inexorable threat Hamas would turn out to be.  Similar to an untreated cut finger initially scoffed at, if allowed to fester soon turns into a major infection.  
This is the exact position Israel has found herself in since September 12, 2005 when the late prime minister of Israel, Ariel Sharon, at the behest of his son Gilad and his deputy leader, Ehud Olmert, unilaterally withdrew from the Gaza Strip.  What was the rationale for what has turned out to be such a disastrous, pollyanna move?

In a speech given on Monday, August 25, 2005 justifying the pullout Sharon stated in part:  
  • “We cannot hold on to Gaza forever. More than a million Palestinians live there and double their number with each generation.”
  • “This plan will be good for Israel in any future scenario. We are reducing daily friction and its victims on both sides.”
  • “The Israeli army will redeploy along defensive lines behind the security fence.”
  • “Those who continue to fight us will meet the full force of the Israeli army and security forces.”
Here we are 14 years later, has any of this come to fruition?  This is what Mark Steyn wrote in the Irish Times, August 22, 2005: 
"This then is the audacious gamble of the Gaza withdrawal: the best way to demonstrate that the Palestinians are undeserving of a state is to force one upon them. It's a dangerous move.  I'm not sure I buy it. I still think the Gaza pull-out will increase violence and terror.” 
He could not have been more prophetic.  

As a multitude both within and out of Israel predicted from the get-go, the Gaza pullout led to the setting up of a terrorist state, with lawless Islamist gangs fighting each other for control. Instead of setting up a parliamentary democracy with respect for the law and human rights, it devolved into a savage civil war between the corrupt ‘good guys’ Fatah and murderous Hamas, the eventual winners. Regarding the violence, Melanie Phillips had this to say on June 13, 2007:
“As terror gangs shoot each other in hospitals, lynch each other in the street, kill each other's families, and throw each other off rooftops, The fact is that what is happening in Gaza is the savage retort to all those who believe that a Palestinian state is the answer. When handed the reins of self-government, this is how the Palestinians behave. Hundreds of rockets fired upon Israel, and their own people thrown off the top of tall buildings and murdered in hospital.”
In fact, 12 years on, the violence against Israel has intensified exponentially, both in occurrence and lethality.  Since her withdrawal from Gaza in 2005, along with every inconceivable act of terrorism committed against Israeli and foreign citizens, Israel has fought three major wars with Hamas in 2008-09, 2012, 2014.

Make no mistake, Hamas and its assorted terrorist allies such as Islamic Jihad are endemic foes of the Jewish state, relentless in their goals, truculent in their actions.

From the May 18, 2001 shopping mall bombing that killed five and injured one hundred people, to the Park Hotel bombing the following year, up to this past week when 300 missiles were fired into Israel, one of which destroyed a home sending six people to the hospital, Hamas has been inexorable and true to its charter. 

“Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it... Our struggle against the Jews is very great and very serious.  It needs all sincere efforts.”  The Hamas charter, replete with such proclamations, spells it out plainly for all to see.  There is no compromise, no wiggle room for negotiation, not a possibility of settlement with a messianic cabal of fanatics hell bent on genocide.

Since its disengagement from Gaza in 2005, Israel has responded to suicide bombings, missile attacks, stabbings, vehicular homicides, tunnel infiltrations, kidnappings, ordinance-filled balloons, and whatever else this implacable foe has thrown at her, with pinprick, measured responses.  Unfortunately, such calibrated warfare has meant nothing to these recalcitrant terrorists.  They have no qualms using hospitals, schools, private residences, and human shields to conduct aggression.  Paradoxically, despite warning Gazan civilians to vacate areas of military activity during successive conflicts, Israel has drawn nothing but condemnation from the U.N. and pro-Islamist nations throughout the world. The reason? Supposed lack of proportionality in her responses; as if any of these self-righteous countries would ever tolerate such incessant aggression for so long a period of time.

Israel is at a crossroads today, a great deal of which is of her own making.  This is analogous to the early 1930s when the allies passed up the opportunity of eliminating Hitler only to do it years later at a much greater, catastrophic cost.  Although it’s not 1940 all over again, it’s late in the game.  With Iranian sponsorship, Hamas and its affiliates are no longer isolated and are growing in power daily.  Palliation is no longer the answer.  To save the body further infection, now is the time for the cure.


1a)Weekly Commentary: Finally a real election issue - demilitarizing Gaza by
force despite human shields
By Dr. Aaron Lerner 

After weeks of a campaign focused on various aspects of the party heads, New
Right leader Naftali Bennett has pitched a tangible actionable proposal for
dealing with a pressing critical national security issue which challenges
the current "quiet for quiet" policy - the kick-the-can-down-the-road policy
which the leaders of Blue White also embrace.

Under the quiet for quiet policy, Hamas and other military forces in the
Gaza Strip can prepare for war against the Jewish State without interference
as long as they don't get too "noisy". And even in those instances that
they are "noisy" and fire rockets at Israel, Israel's choice of targets in
the target bank does not seek to wipe out the enemy's weapons producing
capabilities or armories but instead only provide an Israeli "tat" for the
enemy "tit" to complete the round of "noise" and return to quiet.

Speaking this week at Maariv's National Security Conference, Bennett
described a plan to destroy the weapons factories and armories in the Gaza
Strip and then follow up with a policy of destroying any new factories or
armories the moment that they are discovered.

Frankly speaking, if that's all Bennett said I would not have been
impressed.

That plan would be empty words if the issue of human shields is ignored.
But Bennett addressed the issue head on.

"Launch first step crushing from the air and clearing the rocket capability
of Gaza.

And that means seeking and destroying every missile warehouse and factory.
I don't care if its under a residential building, it's a military base
A house that's a source of fire towards the State of Israel loses its right
to be a house. It's not a residential home. It's a military base."

We have a window of opportunity to implement the plan.

On the one hand, our exposure to Security Council action is limited today
thanks to the support of President Trump.

At the same time, it is claimed that Hezbollah has yet to upgrade its over
hundred thousand missiles with guidance kits. Without the guidance kits
the over hundred thousand missiles would only cause statistical damage -
whatever they randomly slammed into - should they join the fray.
There is no telling how long this window of opportunity to essentially
demilitarize the Gaza Strip will remain open.

I fervently hope that this idea gets traction in the remaining days of the
campaign.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Friday, March 29, 2019

Trump, The Female President! Attacking Mueller and Barr! A Smollettism? Radical Option? Black And Female Is In.

;
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A thought for a "puckish"  Donna Trump:

President Trump should make a declaration he is identifying as a woman. Then, the left will have to admit the absurdity of their gender ideology or accept and celebrate “Donna Trump” as the first woman President, thus beating Hillary, Liz Warren, Amy Klobuchar, Kamala Harris and Kirsten Gillibrand to the glorious goal of one of their “female firsts.”  

Furthermore, if Donna remains married to Melania she will also be the first gay and lesbian president. She will also be the first lesbian president married to an immigrant! What a most glorious event for the Democrats to celebrate.     

Meanwhile:

Booker got up enough courage to ask a young lady for her telephone number according to a news report.  That certainly qualifies him to be president and take on N Korea and China's leaders. Perhaps he needs a little more maturation time before taking on Putin. But at least he is black. 

Biden is now accused of kissing a woman's neck after stalking her from behind. The prospect of an old white man running for president as a Democrat is ludicrous enough but now he has been" Kavanaughed" his future is questionable.

That leaves the  only qualified Democrat candidates for president are black females.  Warren is white and part Indian so that disqualifies her. The former governor of Colorado is white so that eliminates him.  Bernie is white, old and Jewish, though he really denies being Jewish, so that disqualifies Bernie. Booker is black and male in a sea of females so that becomes an issue. Certainly, Trump, who already is president could not run under the Democrat banner because he is white, has blond hair and, to make matters worse, not too young. However, if he announces he is a female, as I suggest above, that would give him some leverage.  Pence is white but because he believes there is a God and probably owns a bible that disqualifies him should he ever want to run. Stacey Abrams is black, owes money to the IRS and is a bit overweight but she probably would qualify because she is angry and lost her election because of voting irregularities.

Note, I have not discussed anyone's qualifications because ability is no longer a criteria worth a bead of sweat.  Obama proved if you are "cool," can smile and read a teleprompter you can be president. 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
They loved and praised Mueller but when he concluded there was no Russian collusion they now hate him because his report did not fit their pre-conceived desires and Shifty Schiff's acclamation's.

So now they have turned their dirt throwing in Barr's direction because he is taking his time and  acting within the law in deciding what can legally be revealed.  Once again, Democrats and assorted Trump Haters fear Barr will exclude evidence proving Trump obstructed a collusion charge that never was factual and they are believing their own false narrative.

I suspect Barr will abide by the law and will do what is appropriate in  releasing over 400 pages of Mueller's investigative report.

Trump is also back to "counter punching" and is calling Schiff  "Pencil Neck."  The mass media do not understand Trump does not initiate attacks and when he chooses to attack it is based on factual evidence, therefore he is acting in accord with "Don't Tread On Me," an expression that once defined what characterized what it meant to be called an American.(See 1 below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sent to me by a friend and fellow memo reader. Just another instance where black citizens believe they are above the law because they are black.  It is based on reverse discrimination affirmative action or worse, maybe a  Smollettism! (See 2 below.)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A radical option but one that needs to be considered because, when Trump is no longer president, N Korea will be free to do whatever they want.  I recently posted an article about Iran's leaders seriously planning out waiting Trump. (See 3 below.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Soros' is continuing to fund district attorney campaigns knowing that fs radicals get elected America's Rule of Law is finished. (See 4 below.)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Dick
++++++++++++++++++
1)

The Mueller Bitter Enders

By Kimberley Strassel

The special counsel wraps up his work and opens up another Democratic split.


Democrats are struggling over the direction of their party, and this week things got more complicated. In addition to the splits over the Green Leap Forward, Medicare for All and constitutional rewrites, Robert Mueller’s report has opened a new divide. It’s Team Reality vs. Team Bitter Enders.


Granted, the end of the special counsel’s probe is a shattering blow to Trump haters. So long as Mr. Mueller continued his investigation, the left and its media mates were free to spin collusion claims and nurse hopes of a toppled Trump presidency. Anyone who pushed back was told to sit down, shut up and wait until Mr. Mueller ruled. He now has. The party is over.
Realists understand the risks of continuing to dwell on collusion and obstruction of justice. Americans are weary of Mueller headlines. In a CNN poll this month, respondents listed the economy, immigration and health care as their most important issues for 2020. No one listed the special-counsel probe. The Democrats who are actually charged with electing more Democrats understand this. In a leadership meeting Monday night, Illinois Rep. Cheri Bustos, head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, laid out the alarming reality: Voters have little idea what the Democratic policy agenda is; the party urgently needs to move beyond 2016.
The realists also understand the Mueller probe has gained the party little up to now, beyond gratifying its base. While the resistance wallowed in collusion hysteria, Donald Trump presided over tax reform, massive deregulation and a remake of significant parts of the judiciary. He’s an incumbent presiding over a growing economy, with a campaign awash in money. A Politico story recently warned the left not to put much stock in approval ratings: “If the election were held today,” the reporters wrote, Mr. Trump would “likely ride to a second term in a huge landslide, according to multiple economic models with strong track records of picking presidential winners and losses.”
This is why Speaker Nancy Pelosi derided impeachment as “not worth it.” And it’s why she held another closed-door caucus meeting Tuesday, lecturing members on the need to stay focused on issues that helped Democrats in 2018. Her deputies, at least, got the message. House Democratic Caucus Chairman Hakeem Jeffries didn’t even mention Mr. Mueller in his opening statement in an ensuing press conference. Majority Whip James Clyburn declared the Mueller chapter “closed.”
But the Bitter Enders are having none of it. Liberal pundits and TV hosts now accuse Attorney General Bill Barr of a “coverup,” and meditate on the cosmic meaning of “exoneration.” Former FBI Director James Comey claimed on NBC that the Mueller report was deficient. Liberal legal analysts explained that Mr. Trump is still guilty of all kinds of counterintelligence sins outside Mr. Mueller’s jurisdiction.
Mrs. Pelosi’s bigger problem is her members. Michigan’s Rashida Tlaib responded to the Mueller report by introducing a resolution for impeachment. California’s Eric Swalwell went on air to insist—no kidding—that the debunked Steele dossier was “factual.” Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff—in response to a call by every committee Republican for his resignation—doubled down on his irresponsible claims, arguing that there is clear “evidence” of collusion.
It would be one thing if the Bitter Enders were few or marginalized. But they make up a significant portion of the Democratic House majority. Hailing primarily from liberal districts, they need to worry not as much about re-election as about furious progressive activists, who for two years were promised conspiracy, obstruction and impeachment, and still demand it. The presidential candidates have a similar interest in whipping up those crowds with Trump-collusion talk.
Mr. Schiff, meanwhile, holds a powerful post, drives headlines, and has a reputational interest in carrying on. Chairmen Elijah Cummings and Jerry Nadler, of the Oversight and Judiciary committees respectively, are attempting to pursue broader investigations—of Trump finances or supposed corruption. But one interesting legacy of the Mueller probe is that any investigation into Mr. Trump—no matter what the topic—may come across as more of the same. And Mrs. Pelosi has little ability to rein in these senior members.
Finally, there’s the media, which—after a humiliating week—has a self-interest in giving airtime to those who would diminish its atrocious performance. Mrs. Pelosi tried to change the subject this week to health care. A few reporters bit, but most of the headlines are still about Mr. Mueller. And think of all the forthcoming news hooks—the release of the report itself, the inspector general findings, the Senate Judiciary Committee investigation.
The question for reality-minded Democrats is how they put the Russia genie back in the bottle. It was supposed to spell the end of Mr. Trump. If they play their cards wrong, it could help him to re-election.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2) Segregation is back. But now this is supposed to be the "good kind" of progressive segregation.
With signs stating “Black press only” on the doors of the church where the meeting was held, white reporters were barred from entry, while black reporters for at least two television stations were permitted inside.
The event was coordinated by the Rev. Clarence Teddy Williams, owner of the consulting firm, The Trigon Group, who declined to discuss the entry policy.
Former Savannah Mayor Edna Jackson declined to comment before going inside, as did Chatham County Commissioner Chester Ellis.
Savannah Alderman Estella Shabazz, who also attended, said that she had once owned a newspaper and she was a member of the black press, but she declined to comment - when repeatedly pressed - on the policy barring white reporters from going inside.
While notes were allowed, photos, video and audio recordings were prohibited during the event, according to Stephen Moody, an African-American reporter with WJCL who was allowed entry. Another reporter from WSAV who attended the meeting was told she could stay because she was black, Moody said.
Shirley James, the African-American publisher of the black-owned Savannah Tribune, was also seen going into the meeting.
Savannah Alderman Van Johnson, who is one of three African-Americans who have stated their intention to run for mayor, said afterwards that during the meeting he had talked about his vision for an inclusive and progressive Savannah. With regards to the discriminatory policy at the door, Johnson said that he believed people have the right to assemble and determine the rules of their assembly.
I'm pretty sure the civil rights movement disagreed.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3)Military options for denuclearizing
 North Korea
By Dr. Peter Vincent Pry 

After North Korea’s H-Bomb test in September 2017, some analysts, myself included, urged the White House to consider possible military options, using conventional surgical strikes to denuclearize North Korea quickly, while minimizing escalatory risks.

 Decades of failed talks, and the failed Hanoi nuclear summit proves again, North Korea will not denuclearize peacefully.

 Dictator Kim Jong-un’s game is to buy time through pretend negotiations to build enough ICBMs so nuclear-armed North Korea, with a Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) relationship with the United States, becomes irreversible.

 Economic sanctions designed to pressure North Korea’s denuclearization peacefully never worked, and are not working now. According to a recent United Nations report obtained by the Associated Press, leaked in the UK Guardian (March 11, 2019):

“United Nations experts are investigating possible violations of UN sanctions on North Korea in about 20 countries, from alleged clandestine nuclear procurement in China to arms brokering in Syria and military cooperation with Iran, Libya and Sudan. The expert panel’s 66-page report to the security council also detailed the appearance in North Korea of a Rolls-Royce Phantom, Mercedes-Benz limousines and Lexus LX 570 all-wheel-drives in violation of a ban on luxury goods. And it noted a trend in North Korea’s evasion of financial sanctions by using cyberattacks to ‘illegally force the transfer of funds from financial institutions and cryptocurrency exchanges.’”

 Moreover, according to the UN report: “North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs remained intact and its leaders were dispersing missile assembly and testing facilities to prevent ‘decapitation’ strikes.” 

 The White House should be alarmed North Korea is now reneging on dismantlement of their Sohae satellite launch facility, rebuilding Sohae to orbit satellites, possibly nuclear-armed for EMP attack.

 The Congressional EMP Commission warns two North Korean satellites presently orbit over the United States that, if nuclear-armed, could blackout North America — posing potentially the single greatest nuclear threat from North Korea.

 The EMP Commission recommends shooting-down these satellites over uninhabited regions. The United States has intercepted satellites before, in the 1980s, and is significantly more capable of anti-satellite operations today.

Destruction of North Korea’s two satellites would be the least escalatory military option, as it would not entail striking North Korea’s homeland, yet would eliminate the greatest potential nuclear threat to the United States.

Downing North Korea’s satellites alone, one of the smallest and most easily executed military operations, might be enough to bring about a diplomatic solution. For the first time the United States will be striking against the North Korean nuclear threat — proving to Pyongyang, China, and Russia the United States is determined to denuclearize North Korea, forcefully if necessary.

 Another military option, more ambitious and riskier, would destroy North Korea‘s: 2 satellites, 12-20 ICBMs, 30-50 IRBMs, 60 mostly non-nuclear bombers, 1 Sinpo missile submarine, 12 retired Golf missile submarines (purchased from Russia), the Sohae satellite launcher and Yongbyon Nuclear Complex, including a nearby clandestine uranium enrichment facility.

Tunnels can become graveyards for North Korean missiles by bombing entrances. North Korean air defenses are antiquated, ineffective, and can be suppressed non-lethally with electronic countermeasures. Aegis cruisers and other anti-missile defenses can be surged to intercept any launched missiles.

 All of this, fewer than 150 targets, could probably be destroyed by three aircraft carriers and Global Strike forces using conventional weapons in a few hours. Any surviving or future new ICBMs or IRBMs should be destroyed on sight.

 This campaign would eliminate the North Korean nuclear missile threat to North America and U.S. territories and severely cripple their nuclear program.

 Another military option, even more ambitious and even riskier, would do all the above and destroy North Korea’s almost entirely non-nuclear 300-450 MRBMs and 600-800 SRBMs. This would eliminate Pyongyang’s nuclear threat to Japan and South Korea, but would probably require days to execute and entail much higher escalatory risks.

 Striking quickly, surgically, against the smallest number of targets, is least likely to be misconstrued as attempting to destroy the North Korean regime in an all-out war — and therefore least likely to result in North Korean escalation using nuclear or other weapons of mass destruction.

 Psychopaths like Kim Jong-un have been attacked, and defeated, without their using weapons of mass destruction (WMDs):

• Adolf Hitler during World War II refrained from using Tabun and Sarin nerve gas, fearing Allied retaliation.
• Iraq’s Saddam Hussein did not retaliate for Israel’s destruction of his Osirik nuclear reactor in 1981, or launch chemical and biological missiles during wars with the United States in 1991 and 2003.
• Syria’s Bashar Assad did not retaliate for Israel’s destruction of his clandestine Al Kibir nuclear reactor in 2007, or for U.S. destruction of his Barzah chemical-biological weapons complex in 2018.

 Denuclearizing North Korea forcibly is very risky. The United States should be prepared to respond to North Korean use of WMDs — including with nuclear strikes to destroy the regime, if necessary.

 But “living” with nuclear-armed North Korea, surrendering to Mutual Assured Destruction with Kim Jong-un, is reckless and will surely kill millions.

 If North Korea defies denuclearization successfully, nuclear-armed Iran is next. Tehran on March 18 announced Russia will build them two more nuclear reactors.

• Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, former chief of staff of the congressional Electromagnetic Pulse Commission, served on the House Armed Services Committee and the CIA. Dr. Pry is author of “Blackout Wars”

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4) Dirty Chicago Prosecutor’s Ties to Soros




Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx, whose office is under fire after dropping all charges against Empire actor Jussie Smollett, recently attended at a fundraiser hosted by Alex Soros, the son of progressive billionaire George Soros, who donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to a super PAC that supported her.
Foxx spoke at a fundraiser for the Justice and Public Safety PAC hosted at the New York apartment of Alex Soros on March 5th, roughly three weeks prior to Smollett being let off the hook for allegedly staging a racist and homophobic attack on himself, according to photos shared to social media.
As Breitbart News reported Tuesday, state campaign records show that George Soros personally donated $333,000 to a PAC supporting Foxx, who was running against incumbent top prosecutor Anita Alvarez, prior to the March 15h, 2016 primary. The far-left hedge fund manager also contributed another $75,000 after Foxx won, bringing the total to $408,000.
Foxx will most likely be investigated by the FBI and DOJ and could be charged for corruption.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++